×
Go back to Martindale-Avvo ➔

Law Offices of John S. MalikPrincipal
John S. Malik
Pro

John S. Malik

4.5
20 reviews

100 East 14th Street, Wilmington, DE 19801

Criminal Trial Practice - Federal & State Courts, Appellate Practice, Felonies and 6 more

About John S. Malik

John S. Malik Attorney At Law is a privately held company in Wilmington, DE and is a Single Location business. He practices Criminal Trial and Appellate work in all State and Federal Courts. In addition, his practice also includes Felonies, Misdemeanors, DUI, White Collar Crime, Drug Crimes, Juvenile Offenses, Traffic Violations.
John S. Malik (Wilmington, Delaware) View website

Awards

Gold Client Champion
This award is granted to attorneys who have received at least 6 client reviews, and have an average review score of 4.2 or higher.
Champion Badge Gold
AV Preeminent Peer Rated
This elite award is granted to attorneys who have been recognized by their peers for their very high ethical standards, with an average peer review score of 4.5 or higher.
Martindale-Hubbell Peer AV

Client Champion Awards

Client Champion awards recognize those attorneys who excel at service as affirmed by their clients. The awards, based on the quantity and quality of an attorney’s Martindale-Hubbell client reviews, demonstrate an ongoing commitment to delivering excellent client service. Award recipients stand out from their peers with a platinum, gold or silver icon.

Champion Badge Silver

At least three reviews and a score of 4.0 or higher.

Champion Badge Gold

At least six reviews and a score of 4.2 or higher.

John S. Malik got this award in 2021

Champion Badge Platinum

At least ten reviews and a score of 4.5 or higher.

Martindale Peer Awards

A lawyer who receives a minimum threshold of qualifying responses from fellow attorneys can qualify for one of three prestigious Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings:

Martindale-Hubbell Peer AV Preeminent Rating

AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

John S. Malik got this award in 2021

Martindale-Hubbell Peer Distinguished Rating

Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

Martindale-Hubbell Peer Notable Rating

Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Avvo Awards

Avvo Top Contributor

Avvo Top Contributor: The Avvo Top Contributor Award is granted to attorneys who have earned significant contribution points in a given year on our sister site, Avvo.com. Contribution points are earned by answering questions in Q&A, publishing Legal Guides, and other useful contributions to the Avvo community.

Avvo Client Choice

Avvo Client’s Choice: The Avvo Client's Choice Award Badge is granted to attorneys with a significant number of 4+ star reviews in a given year.

Reviews for John

Have you consulted or hired this lawyer?

Leave a review about your experience with this lawyer.

Write a Review

Overall Rating
4.5
See All Reviews
20
4.0
Lawyers.com
12
4.8
Martindale
5
4.7
Avvo
3
Showing 1-10 of 12 client reviews from Lawyers.com
Lawyers.com Rating Snapshot
5 stars
67%
4 stars
8%
3 stars
0%
2 stars
0%
1 star
25%
What do people say on Lawyers.com?
Communication
4.0
Quality of Service
4.0
Responsiveness
4.0
Value for Money
3.9
Criminal Law
Posted by Renee
October 01, 2024
Hired Attorney

I was so hopeful when I was recommended to this attorney. I called on a Tuesday and left a message. The secretary called back, took a few details and then said I'd get a call back that afternoon. I called back that afternoon after not receiving a call. Then I called again the next day twice, still no one to talk to. I was told the paralegal, Tabitha, would contact me that afternoon. Again, nothing! I called again and left a voicemail stating my disappointment. I got another call from the the secretary, Mary stating that the attorney was at a funeral and would call me before Monday. Now, day 4 of only speaking to Mary, and no one else that can guide me in a serious legal matter. I FINALLY got a call Monday afternoon by Tabitha. No apologies just yes, I'm returning your call. So a week later, no apology no explanation. That tells me I won't be a priority as a paying customer. Why would anyone hire an attorney that I can NOT get on the phone. RIDICULOUS!!!

 
Criminal Law
Posted by anonymous
March 14, 2022
Hired Attorney

Lazy lawyer and lazy staff. John will lead you to believe he's right for the case, even though he has a conflict of interest, all just to get your $200 consultation fee! I wouldn't recommend Malik if he was the last attorney on Earth!

From the Martindale-Avvo Legal Network

Services

Areas of Law

  • Appellate Practice
  • Criminal Law 4
    • Felonies
    • Misdemeanors
    • Drug Crimes
    • Traffic Violations
  • White Collar Crime
  • Other 3
    • Criminal Trial Practice - Federal & State Courts
    • DUI
    • Juvenile Offenses

Practice Details

  • Firm Information
    Position
    Principal
    Firm Name
    Law Offices of John S. Malik

Experience

  • Bar Admission & Memberships
    Admissions
    1983, Pennsylvania
    1983, Delaware
    1985, New Jersey
    1985, U.S. District Court, District of Delaware
    1989, U.S. Supreme Court
    1990, U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
    Memberships
    Delaware Bar Association (Member, Criminal Law Section)
    National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers
    Association of Trial Lawyers of America
    Delaware Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers.
  • Education & Certifications
    Law School
    Delaware Law School of Widener University
    Class of 1983
    J.D.
    Other Education
    St. Joseph's University
    Class of 1980
    B.A.
    Politics
  • Personal Details & History
    Age
    Born in 1958
    Bryn Mawr, Pennsylvania, September 15, 1958

Email John S. Malik

Case type is required.
A valid zip code is required.
A valid city is required.
State is required.
Country is required.
Outside the US or Canada?
Message is required.
0/1000 characters

Contact Information

First name is required.
Last name is required.
A valid email address is required.
A valid phone number is required.

By clicking the Submit button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls, from Lawyers.com and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.

Thank you! Your message has been successfully sent.

For your records, a copy of this email has been sent to

Summary of Your Message
Case Type:
Zip Code or Postal Code:
City:
State:
Country:
Case Description:
Contact Information
First Name:
Last Name:
Email:
Phone Number:
Return to Profile

Attorneys FAQs

  • Is this attorney admitted to practice in any U.S. Federal Courts?
    John S. Malik is admitted to practice before the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, United States District Court for the District of Delaware and United States Supreme Court.
  • Is this attorney Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review rated?
    Yes, John S. Malik has a 4.8 Peer Rating from Martindale-Hubbell.
  • What law school did this attorney attend?
    John S. Malik attended Delaware Law School of Widener University.
  • What year was this attorney's law firm established?
    Law Offices of John S. Malik was established in 1984.

Attorney information displayed in this FAQ section is based upon information the lawyer has included on their profile, in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals.

These FAQs include information about a lawyer's background, but do not evaluate their knowledge of the law, past performance on individual cases, personality, or communication skills.

It is solely the responsibility of lawyers and law firms to ensure that any information they provide complies with all applicable laws and rules of professional conduct.

You should be aware that the information we rely upon may not be comprehensive, or frequently updated.

Always research the lawyer further to get a better understanding of their license credentials, disciplinary status, background, and experience.

Lawyers.com Client Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review Ratings™ display reviews submitted by individuals who have either hired or consulted the lawyers or law firms.

The Client Review Rating score is determined through the aggregation of validated responses. People who submit reviews are either individuals who consulted with the lawyer/law firm or who hired the lawyer/law firm and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be anyone who consults or hires a lawyer including in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners, and private individuals.

Martindale-Hubbell validates that a reviewer is a person with a valid email address. As part of the review process, respondents must affirm that they have had an initial consultation, are currently a client or have been a client of the lawyer or law firm identified, although Martindale-Hubbell cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship as it is often confidential. The content of the responses is entirely from reviewers.

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review. For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Client Review Ratings, please visit our Client Review Page

Martindale Peer Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Peer Review Ratings™ are the gold standard in attorney ratings, and have been for more than a century. These ratings indicate attorneys who are widely respected by their peers for their ethical standards and legal expertise in a specific area of practice.

The Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings process is the gold standard due to its objectivity and comprehensiveness. Lawyers solicited for peer reviews include both those selected by the attorney being reviewed and lawyers independently selected by Martindale-Hubbell. All reviewers are verified as attorneys through Martindale-Hubbell’s extensive attorney database. Only attorneys practicing at least three years and receiving a sufficient number of reviews from non-affiliated attorneys are eligible to receive a Rating.

What are the different Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings?*

• AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies that a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

• Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

• Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Lawyers who have received peer reviews after 2009 will display more detailed information, including practice areas, summary ratings, detailed numeric ratings and written feedback (if available). Details for individual reviews received before 2009 are not displayed.

Attorneys that receive reviews from their peers, but not a sufficient number to establish a Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Rating, will have those reviews display on our websites.

For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings™, please visit our Ratings Page on Martindale.com and our Frequently Asked Questions

Avvo Client Reviews

Ratings and reviews are feedback from people who have either consulted an attorney about an issue (but may not have hired the attorney) or people who hired an attorney as a current or former client and provided their feedback to our sister site, Avvo.com.