Duane Morris LLPOf Counsel

Daniel Cullen Minteer

About Daniel Cullen Minteer

Daniel Cullen Minteer is a lawyer practicing intellectual property, intellectual property litigation, patents and 6 other areas of law. Daniel received a B.A. degree from San Diego State University in 1971, and has been licensed for 52 years. Daniel practices at Duane Morris LLP in San Diego, CA.

Awards

Reviews for Daniel

This lawyer does not have any client reviews on Lawyers.com yet

Write a Review

Services

Areas of Law

  • Intellectual Property 4
    • Patents
    • Trademarks
    • Copyrights
    • Trade Secrets
  • Antitrust and Trade Regulation 1
    • Unfair Competition
  • Other 3
    • Intellectual Property Litigation
    • Manufacturing
    • Financial Services

Practice Details

  • Firm Information
    Position
    Of Counsel
    Firm Name
    Duane Morris LLP
  • Representative Cases & Transactions
    Cases
    Representative Matters: Intellectual Property
    Represented Quest Diagnostics in the sale of a stream of royalty revenue from commercialization of the drug c
    idate Ibrutinib to Royalty Pharma for $485 million in cash.
    Represented a large telecommunications company in defending patent infringement
    trade dress claims involving 11 utility patents dealing primarily with the electrical circuitry of the accused phone
    design patents covering the design of the accused mobile radio telephone. The case included TRO
    Preliminary Injunction hearings, a motion to consolidate,
    11 Markman proceedings. The plaintiff submitted a satisfactory settlement proposal during the summary judgment phase, which was accepted.
    Represented a plaintiff software designer in a breach of license arbitration under the rules of the American Arbitration Association. The claims asserted also included copyright infringement. The matter ended in an arbitration award in favor of our client.
    Represented an automotive supplier in the defense of a patent infringement claim based on a patent allegedly covering a particular process for injection molding of plastic. This matter involved complex indemnity
    co-defendant issues in addition to the more traditional infringement
    invalidity issues.
    Represented an equipment manufacturer in connection with a series of patent infringement claims. Each claim was resolved without litigation
    without payment of any license fees.
    Represented a large European chemical company in connection with a trial de novo following a favorable interference ruling from the Patent & Trademark Office. The case involved a priority of invention
    reduction to practice issues.
    Worked with several companies in connection with a patent infringement claim against companies practicing a particular st
    ard. These cases presented numerous issues beyond issues of infringement
    validity, including the alleged duty of parties participating in st
    ards committees to disclose their respective IP positions.
    Represented a computer component manufacturer in federal court
    before the International Trade Commission regarding patent infringement claims. This case related to the technology involved in how computers upscale data sent for one screen size to a computer with a larger screen. The matter involved proceedings before the ITC where the action was resolved
    Represented numerous companies in the recordation of patent, trademark,
    copyright assignments, normally in connection with securitized financings.
    Represented an educational institution in a trademark infringement case. The case resulted in a permanent injunction being issued against the defendant
    the defendant paid our client's fees
    costs.
    Represented a major automobile retailer in a trademark infringement case we filed on its behalf. The defendant ceased using our client's trademark to resolve the matter.
    Represented an educational institution in connection with the misappropriation of the school's trademark. We assisted the client in obtaining a registered trademark
    pursuing those who misappropriated our client's trademark.
    Represented a healthcare company in an action to protect its trademark from an infringing name. The defendant paid a substantial sum
    changed its name to resolve the matter.
    Represented venture banks
    other companies in a wide variety of intellectual property based financial restructurings, investment enforcement proceedings
    bankruptcy proceedings. Incorporated h
    ling a substantial number of intellectual property sales
    licensing transactions. Deep experience with the rights of intellectual property licensees
    licensors under 11 U.S.C. 365(n).
    Represented clients in a wide range of intellectual property issues, including ownership of inventions
    copyrighted works, rights under a wide range of licensing arrangements, programs to strengthen trademark rights
    the establishment of corporate procedures to reduce risk on unintentional copyright or trademark infringement.
    General Litigation
    Represented the owner of a business in defending a claim that the plaintiff was a 50% owner. The case went to trial
    judgment was entered in favor of our client, the owner.
    Represented an insurer in defending a property damage claim under the insurance policy. The case went to trial
    judgment was entered in favor of our client, the insurer.
    Represented the official sanctioning organizations for professional racquetball in an antitrust action involving its policy for designating its official ball. The case was vigorously contested, even after the plaintiff filed a bankruptcy petition. We were successful in getting our client dismissed without having to pay anything in settlement.
    Represented the lender in a lender liability lawsuit arising from a bankruptcy precipitated by the lender's refusal to renew the company's secured lines of credit. We won the case on a motion for summary judgment. The ruling on appeal established that a plaintiff could not recover non-economic losses in California lender liability cases. We h
    led the underlying bankruptcy by proposing
    implementing a plan of reorganization.
    Represented the defendant in a RICO claim asserted against the defendant
    developer of a large multi-use real estate development in San Diego. The case presented unusual issues regarding the st
    ing of the plaintiff
    the scope of the RICO statute. We prevailed in getting our client dismissed without any contribution from our client.
    Represented a defendant in connection with multiple fraud claims arising from a series of limited partnership investments in properties acquired from a bank REO department. Our client was served shortly before one of the cases was scheduled for trial. This case involved the alleged responsibility of a lender to the investors of its alleged joint venture partner. The plaintiffs also alleged the lender made direct representations to individual investors. The legal issues revolved around the applicability of the D'Oench Duhme doctrine
    the scope of civil RICO. We successfully moved to continue the trial. We were able to jump into the case
    get our client dismissed from the case without any contribution by our client.
    Represented a group of Norwegian companies that were defrauded in connection with a complex loan scheme whereby certain Hong Kong
    Canadian companies offered to lend the Norwegian companies funds at a favorable rate provided the funds were secured by a letter of credit. The Hong Kong company called the letters of credit
    the Norwegian companies lost in excess of $15,000,000. After settlement negotiations failed we brought an action in California for fraud
    constructive trust. The case involved bankruptcy proceedings in Hong Kong, jurisdictional issues, choice of law issues
    complex factual issues regarding the letters of credit. We achieved a recovery satisfactory to our client.
    Represented the owner of a large professional sports facility in connection with a dispute over a joint venture/purchase agreement that our client wanted to close. We were successful in getting the defendants to complete the purchase of the facility from our client.
    Represented a stockbroker in a series of lawsuits
    arbitrations brought by a number of his former clients against him
    a major brokerage firm. Plaintiffs alleged a particular leveraged bond fund investment was not suitable for these plaintiffs
    that the risks were not adequately explained. We tried a number of NASD arbitrations before we were able to convince the plaintiffs to settle the remaining matters on terms acceptable to the defendants.
    Represented a number of defendants in a class action brought by a well-known class action lawyer who asserted that the packaging of wine contained lead
    it lacked the required warning label. We prevailed on a demurrer to the complaint without leave to amend.
    Represented the largest secured creditor in connection with the foreclosure
    subsequent bankruptcy of a multi-building office/restaurant complex. The loan amount exceeded $140,000,000. The developer resisted the appointment of a receiver
    when the receiver became inevitable, the developer filed under Chapter 11
    attempted a cram down with very low values. We promptly sought
    received relief from the stay to proceed with our foreclosure action,
    the property was sold at a bankruptcy sale. At the time, that sale was the second largest real estate transaction in San Diego County history. This matter raised a whole host of state law collection, bankruptcy,
    real estate transaction issues, particularly since the real estate collateral consisted of most, but not all, of the mixed-use development.
    Represented the largest unsecured creditor
    later the creditor's committee in Chapter 11 proceeding. This case established a number of precedents, including the availability of jury trials in adversary proceedings, procedures for interim distribution to creditors
    procedures for resolving potential toxic waste claims through principles of equitable subordination.
    Represented the lender with over $50,000,000 in loans to a real estate syndicator
    a number of its partnerships. Issues dealt with during this representation included loan workouts of individual partnerships all over the United States with many debt
    equity tiers, analysis of potential fraud claims, dealing with large investor groups, protecting holder in due course status
    dealing with a multi-committee bankruptcy pending in New York.
    Represented the secured lender in connection with the foreclosure of preferred ship mortgages on three modern purse seining tuna boats. The sums involved exceeded $36,000,000. We filed collection actions in the District Court of Guam. The borrower filed counter-claims against the lender
    also filed bankruptcy petitions on the isl
    of Saipan. Two of the boats were seized by the U.S. Marshal in Guam. The third was eventually found
    seized by New Zeal
    authorities. The debtor attempted to convince the bankruptcy court that it should be permitted to fish the boats during the bankruptcy proceedings. We convinced the court that the boats should be sold
    obtained relief from the automatic stay for that purpose. Thereafter, we assisted in the foreclosure process
    liquidated the lender's collateral.
    Represented a lender involved in a tax shelter program who secured a $7,000,000 loan with four purse seine tuna boats that were still in the shipyard waiting commissioning. The total construction cost for the four boats exceeded $50,000,000. We caused the arrest of the boats in San Diego, Canada,
    American Samoa. The Mexican government claimed it had advanced over $50,000,000 towards the construction of the boats
    claimed a senior lien under Mexican law. The claim of the Mexican government went to trial in San Diego
    the court ruled in our client's favor. We also won relief from the automatic stay so we could proceed with our foreclosure actions.

Experience

  • Bar Admission & Memberships
    Admissions
    1974, California
    U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado
    U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
    Memberships

    Professional Activities

    •American Bar Association
    •San Diego County Bar Association
    •American Arbitration Association
    •San Diego Chapter of the Association of Trial Lawyers
    - Member, Board of Governors
    •State Bar of California
    - Conference of Delegates
    -- Former Delegate
    - Judicial Nominees Commission
    -- Former Member
    - Financial Disputes Committee
    -- Former Chair

  • Education & Certifications
    Law School
    University of California, Los Angeles School of Law
    J.D.
    1974 Associate Editor

    University of California, Los Angeles School of Law
    J.D.
    U.C.L.A. Law Review

    University of California, Los Angeles School of Law
    J.D.
    Order of the Coif
    Other Education
    San Diego State University
    Class of 1971
    B.A.
    high honors

    University of California, Los Angeles School of Law
    1974 Associate Editor

    University of California, Los Angeles School of Law
    U.C.L.A. Law Review

    University of California, Los Angeles School of Law
    Order of the Coif
  • Personal Details & History
    Age
    Born in 1949
    Pasadena, California, September 20, 1949

Daniel Cullen Minteer

Of Counsel at Duane Morris LLP
Not yet reviewed

750 B Street, Suite 2900San Diego, CA 92101U.S.A.

Show on map

Lawyers Nearby

Shaun M. Murphy
Pro
Shaun M. Murphy
4.4
Intellectual Property lawyer

Free Consultation

Su Lynn Barry
Pro
Su Lynn Barry
5.0
Intellectual Property lawyer
Mark C. Mazzarella
Pro
Mark C. Mazzarella
5.0
Intellectual Property lawyer
Craig R. McClellan
Pro
Craig R. McClellan
5.0
Intellectual Property lawyer

Free Consultation

Lisa J. Damiani
Pro
Lisa J. Damiani
4.8
Intellectual Property lawyer
Case type is required.
I am is required.
First name is required.
Last name is required.
A valid zip code is required.
Country is required.
State is required.
A valid city is required.
A valid email address is required.
A valid phone number is required.
Message is required.
0/1000 characters

By clicking the Submit button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls, from Lawyers.com and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.

You should not send any sensitive or confidential information through this site. Emails sent through this site do not create an attorney-client relationship and may not be treated as privileged or confidential. The lawyer or law firm you are contacting is not required to, and may choose not to, accept you as a client. The internet is not necessarily secure and emails sent though this site could be intercepted or read by third parties.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA. See Google’s Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.

Thank you! Your message has been successfully sent.

For your records, a copy of this email has been sent to test@test.com.

Summary of Your Message
Case Type:
I am a/an:
First Name:
Last Name:
City:
Zip Code or Postal Code:
State:
Country:
Phone Number:
Message: