×
Go back to Martindale-Avvo ➔

Parker Daniels Kibort LLCPartner
Jesse Hersch Kibort
Pro

Jesse Hersch Kibort

4.9
28 reviews

123 Third Street North, Minneapolis, MN 55401

Banking Litigation, Bank Foreclosures, Bank Fraud and 32 more

About Jesse Hersch Kibort

A highly regarded civil trial attorney, Jesse Kibort is a co-founder of Parker Daniels Kibort LLC. Based in Minneapolis, Jesse has vigorously represented his clients in state and federal courts throughout the United States. His clients range from individuals, to large national companies. In particular, he has extensive experience representing financial services firms involving multi-million dollar claims of negligence, breach of contract, breach of fiduciary duty, and violations of state and federal statutes. In addition to the financial services arena, Jesse has substantial experience in the areas of commercial contracts disputes, business disputes, shareholder and partnership disputes, business torts, real estate litigation, breaches of contract, defending broker dealers, financial investment advisers and financial planners.

Jesse is admitted to practice before all Minnesota and Wisconsin state courts, Jesse is also admitted to practice before the U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota, the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin, and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 8th Circuit.

Majoring in political science, Jesse attended the University of Kansas, and he participated in numerous student organizations before receiving a Bachelor of Arts in 2000. He then went on to pursue his legal education at Mitchell Hamline School of Law in Saint Paul, Minnesota, and while he was there, he was an editor of the Mitchell Hamline Law Journal of Public Policy and Practice and served as a judicial clerk for a judge on the Minnesota Court of Appeals. Jesse's successful track record has earned him multiple selections as a Rising Star and Super Lawyer by his peers, as well as an "Excellent" peer review rating through Avvo, and an AV Preeminent Rating by Martindale-Hubbell. The AV Preeminent Rating is the highest award given by Martindale-Hubbell, awarded to less than 5% of all lawyers,

Awards & Honors

• Selected as a Minnesota Super Lawyer, 2020-present

• AV Preeminent Rating, by Martindale-Hubbell, 2020-present

• Selected by Super Lawyers as a Minnesota Rising Stars, 2013-2018

• Volunteer for The Twin Cities Cardozo Society Steering Committee, 2012-present

• Volunteer For The United States District Court’s Pro Se Project, 2008-present

• Volunteer For Minnesota Legal Aid Clinic, 2003-present

• Volunteer For VANTAGE for Minnetonka High School Advanced Professional Studies, 2019-present

 

Jesse Hersch Kibort (Minneapolis, Minnesota) View website

Awards

Platinum Client Champion
This award is granted to attorneys who have received at least 10 client reviews, and have an average review score of 4.5 or higher.
Champion Badge Platinum
AV Preeminent Peer Rated
This elite award is granted to attorneys who have been recognized by their peers for their very high ethical standards, with an average peer review score of 4.5 or higher.
Martindale-Hubbell Peer AV

Client Champion Awards

Client Champion awards recognize those attorneys who excel at service as affirmed by their clients. The awards, based on the quantity and quality of an attorney’s Martindale-Hubbell client reviews, demonstrate an ongoing commitment to delivering excellent client service. Award recipients stand out from their peers with a platinum, gold or silver icon.

Champion Badge Silver

At least three reviews and a score of 4.0 or higher.

Champion Badge Gold

At least six reviews and a score of 4.2 or higher.

Champion Badge Platinum

At least ten reviews and a score of 4.5 or higher.

Jesse Hersch Kibort got this award in 2021

Martindale Peer Awards

A lawyer who receives a minimum threshold of qualifying responses from fellow attorneys can qualify for one of three prestigious Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings:

Martindale-Hubbell Peer AV Preeminent Rating

AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

Jesse Hersch Kibort got this award in 2021

Martindale-Hubbell Peer Distinguished Rating

Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

Martindale-Hubbell Peer Notable Rating

Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Avvo Awards

Avvo Top Contributor

Avvo Top Contributor: The Avvo Top Contributor Award is granted to attorneys who have earned significant contribution points in a given year on our sister site, Avvo.com. Contribution points are earned by answering questions in Q&A, publishing Legal Guides, and other useful contributions to the Avvo community.

Avvo Client Choice

Avvo Client’s Choice: The Avvo Client's Choice Award Badge is granted to attorneys with a significant number of 4+ star reviews in a given year.

Reviews for Jesse

Have you consulted or hired this lawyer?

Leave a review about your experience with this lawyer.

Write a Review

Overall Rating
4.9
See All Reviews
28
5.0
Lawyers.com
11
4.8
Martindale
17
Avvo
Not yet reviewed
Showing 1-10 of 11 client reviews from Lawyers.com
Lawyers.com Rating Snapshot
5 stars
91%
4 stars
9%
3 stars
0%
2 stars
0%
1 star
0%
What do people say on Lawyers.com?
Communication
5.0
Quality of Service
5.0
Responsiveness
5.0
Value for Money
4.9
Securities
Posted by Jason
June 06, 2024
Hired Attorney

They say you get what you pay for. My experience has been, not always when it comes to attorneys. All too many of them word really hard to get you as a client, and then not hard enough to provide the value you deserve or better yet, would get from Jesse. Thank you, Jesse.

From the Martindale-Avvo Legal Network

Services

Areas of Law

  • Civil Practice
  • Construction Law 2
    • Construction Defects
    • Construction Litigation
  • Litigation 2
    • Civil Litigation
    • Complex Litigation
  • Appellate Practice
  • Business Law 1
    • Business Litigation
  • Commercial Litigation
  • Corporate Law 1
    • Corporate Litigation
  • Trusts and Estates 1
    • Estate Litigation
  • Other 24
    • Banking Litigation
    • Bank Foreclosures
    • Bank Fraud
    • Civil Appeals
    • Commercial Real Estate Litigation
    • Construction Arbitration
    • Construction Mediation
    • Defense Litigation
    • Federal Civil Litigation
    • Federal Litigation
    • Trial Practice
    • Real Estate Litigation
    • Financial Institutions Litigation
    • Complex Commercial Litigation
    • Contract Litigation
    • Copyright Litigation
    • Intellectual Property Litigation
    • Employment Litigation
    • Noncompete Litigation
    • Patent Litigation
    • Securities Litigation
    • Trademark Litigation
    • Fiduciary Litigation
    • Trust Litigation

Practice Details

  • Payment Information
    Payment & Cost Features
    Free initial consultation
    Fixed hourly rates: $300 - $325/hr
    Accepted Credit Cards
    American Express
    MasterCard
    Other
    Visa
  • Firm Information
    Position
    Partner
    Firm Name
    Parker Daniels Kibort LLC
  • Representative Cases & Transactions
    Cases
    Business Investor v. Business Owner (Client)--Successfully vacated a default judgment against a business owner
    his business by an investor,
    then proceeded to defend the revived lawsuit by the investor resulting in an early
    extremely favorable settlement, 2019Broker-Dealer v. Broker-Dealer (Client)--Successfully guided
    defended Broker-Dealer client from another Broker-Dealer's accusations
    threats of defamation, "poaching"
    "raiding" resulting in no action from the accusing Broker-Dealer, 2019FINRA v. Financial Advisor (Client)--Successfully guided
    defended Financial Advisor client through a FINRA investigation, resulting in FINRA dropping the investigation
    closing the file, 2019Self-Storage Tenant (Plaintiff) v. Self-Storage Company (Defendant/Client)--Obtained an extremely favorable decision on Plaintiff's claims of personal injury, 2019Commercial Tenant (Client) v. Commercial L
    lord--Obtained an extremely favorable result
    win for commercial tenant client against its commercial l
    lord who tried to wrongfully gouge client for damages
    additions to year-end operating expenses, 2019Self-Storage Tenants (Plaintiff) v. Self-Storage Company (Defendant/Client)--Obtained dismissal with prejudice on all Plaintiff's claims of breach of contract
    various torts, 2019Self-Storage Tenants (Plaintiffs) v. Self-Storage Company (Defendant/Client)--Obtained summary judgment
    dismissal with prejudice on all Plaintiffs' claims of breach of contract
    various torts, 2019Broker-Dealer v. Broker-Dealer (Client)--Successfully guided
    defended Broker-Dealer client from another Broker-Dealer's accusations
    threats of breach of non-compete
    corporate theft, resulting in no action from the accusing Broker-Dealer, 2018Financial Advisor (employee) v. Financial Services Firm (former employer)--Obtained an extremely favorable settlement for client (financial advisor) defending a claim by his former employer (a financial services firm) which claimed employer/client owed over $500,000 on a loan to employer. Client (financial advisor) walked away paying $0 to the employer, 2018Financial Advisor (employee) v. Financial Services Firm (former employer)--Obtained a very favorable settlement for client (financial advisor) defending a claim by her former employer (a large financial services firm) which claimed employer/client owed over $900,000 on a loan to employer. Client (financial advisor) walked away paying a fraction claimed due to the former employer, 2018, 2018Residential Mortgage Modification Agreements--Obtained extremely favorable mortgage modification agreements for numerous Clients from their large banks
    servicers by pursuing claims against the banks
    servicers for violation of Minnesota statutes, 2018Manufacturing Business v. Bank Huge settlement for client (business)--Successfully defended a claim brought by its large business bank a counterclaim for breach of contract
    collection of over $1MM outst
    ing loan amounts due. We pursued a counterclaim against the bank for lender liability
    wrongful freezing of assets. Client (business) walked away paying nothing on the outst
    ing loan amount
    the bank paid client substantial damages, 2018FINRA v. Financial Advisors (Clients)--Successfully guided
    defended Financial Advisors clients through a FINRA investigation, resulting in FINRA dropping the investigation
    closing the file, 2018FINRA v. Financial Advisors (Clients)--Successfully guided
    defended Financial Advisor clients through a FINRA investigation, resulting in FINRA dropping the investigation
    closing the file., 2017Residential Mortgage Modification Agreements--Obtained very favorable mortgage modification agreements for numerous Clients from their large banks
    servicers by pursuing claims against the banks
    servicers for violation of Minnesota statutes, 2017FINRA v. Financial Advisors (Clients)--Successfully guided
    defended Financial Advisors clients through a FINRA investigation, resulting in FINRA dropping the investigation
    closing the file, 2016FINRA v. Financial Advisors (Clients)--Successfully guided
    defended Financial Advisors clients through a FINRA investigation, resulting in FINRA dropping the investigation
    closing the file, 2015Commercial Tenant (Client) v. Commercial L
    lord--Obtained a complete arbitration win for commercial tenant client against its commercial l
    lord who tried to wrongfully add $100k+ onto Client’s year end operating expenses, 2015
  • Pro Bono Services
    Time Spent on Pro Bono Work: 4%
  • Additional Links
    http://www.parkerdk.com/team/jesse-h.-kibort

Experience

  • Bar Admission & Memberships
    Admissions
    2003, The Supreme Court of the State of Minnesota
    2012, The Supreme Court of the State of Wisconsin
    2004, United States District Court for the District of Minnesota
    2012, United States District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin
    2013, United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
    2021, United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
    2003, Minnesota
    2012, Wisconsin
    Memberships
    Federal Bar Association
  • Education & Certifications
    Law School
    Hamline University School of Law
    Class of 2003
    J.D.
    Other Education
    University of Kansas
    Class of 2000
    B.A.
  • Personal Details & History
    Hobbies & Interests
    Volunteer For VANTAGE for Minnetonka High School Advanced Professional Studies, 2019-present; Volunteer, United States District Court’s Pro Se Project, 2008-present; Member, Twin Cities Cardozo Society, Steering Committee, 2016-present; Volunteer Minnesota Legal Aid Clinic, 2005-present; Mini-Hops Gymnastics, Board Member, 2015-2016; Children's Hospitals and Clinics of Minnesota Children's Council, 2017-2019

Activity

Email Jesse Hersch Kibort

Case type is required.
I am is required.
First name is required.
Last name is required.
A valid zip code is required.
Country is required.
State is required.
A valid city is required.
A valid email address is required.
A valid phone number is required.
Message is required.
0/1000 characters

By clicking the Submit button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls, from Lawyers.com and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.

You should not send any sensitive or confidential information through this site. Emails sent through this site do not create an attorney-client relationship and may not be treated as privileged or confidential. The lawyer or law firm you are contacting is not required to, and may choose not to, accept you as a client. The internet is not necessarily secure and emails sent though this site could be intercepted or read by third parties.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA. See Google’s Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.

Thank you! Your message has been successfully sent.

For your records, a copy of this email has been sent to test@test.com.

Summary of Your Message
Case Type:
I am a/an:
First Name:
Last Name:
City:
Zip Code or Postal Code:
State:
Country:
Phone Number:
Message:
Return to Profile Reset Form

Attorneys FAQs

  • What year was this attorney first admitted to the bar?
    Jesse Hersch Kibort was admitted in 2003 to the State of Minnesota.
  • Is this attorney admitted to practice in any U.S. Federal Courts?
    Jesse Hersch Kibort is admitted to practice before the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit, United States District Court for the District of Minnesota and United States District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin.
  • How many attorneys are in this law firm?
    Parker Daniels Kibort LLC has 10 attorneys at this location.
  • What law school did this attorney attend?
    Jesse Hersch Kibort attended Hamline University School of Law.

Attorney information displayed in this FAQ section is based upon information the lawyer has included on their profile, in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals.

These FAQs include information about a lawyer's background, but do not evaluate their knowledge of the law, past performance on individual cases, personality, or communication skills.

It is solely the responsibility of lawyers and law firms to ensure that any information they provide complies with all applicable laws and rules of professional conduct.

You should be aware that the information we rely upon may not be comprehensive, or frequently updated.

Always research the lawyer further to get a better understanding of their license credentials, disciplinary status, background, and experience.

Lawyers.com Client Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review Ratings™ display reviews submitted by individuals who have either hired or consulted the lawyers or law firms.

The Client Review Rating score is determined through the aggregation of validated responses. People who submit reviews are either individuals who consulted with the lawyer/law firm or who hired the lawyer/law firm and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be anyone who consults or hires a lawyer including in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners, and private individuals.

Martindale-Hubbell validates that a reviewer is a person with a valid email address. As part of the review process, respondents must affirm that they have had an initial consultation, are currently a client or have been a client of the lawyer or law firm identified, although Martindale-Hubbell cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship as it is often confidential. The content of the responses is entirely from reviewers.

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review. For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Client Review Ratings, please visit our Client Review Page

Martindale Peer Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Peer Review Ratings™ are the gold standard in attorney ratings, and have been for more than a century. These ratings indicate attorneys who are widely respected by their peers for their ethical standards and legal expertise in a specific area of practice.

The Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings process is the gold standard due to its objectivity and comprehensiveness. Lawyers solicited for peer reviews include both those selected by the attorney being reviewed and lawyers independently selected by Martindale-Hubbell. All reviewers are verified as attorneys through Martindale-Hubbell’s extensive attorney database. Only attorneys practicing at least three years and receiving a sufficient number of reviews from non-affiliated attorneys are eligible to receive a Rating.

What are the different Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings?*

• AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies that a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

• Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

• Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Lawyers who have received peer reviews after 2009 will display more detailed information, including practice areas, summary ratings, detailed numeric ratings and written feedback (if available). Details for individual reviews received before 2009 are not displayed.

Attorneys that receive reviews from their peers, but not a sufficient number to establish a Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Rating, will have those reviews display on our websites.

For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings™, please visit our Ratings Page on Martindale.com and our Frequently Asked Questions