×
Go back to Martindale-Avvo ➔

The McMillan Law Firm, APCPresident
Scott Anthony McMillan
Pro

Scott Anthony McMillan

4.7
99 reviews

4670 Nebo Drive, Suite 200, La Mesa, CA 91941-5230

Employment Law, Real Estate, Business Litigation and 14 more

About Scott Anthony McMillan

Scott McMillan has been a licensed California attorney since February of 2001. He was raised in San Diego, California. He became an attorney after recognizing the limited availability of attorneys who provide litigation services to small businesses and individuals.

Prior to becoming an attorney Scott McMillan operated a computer distribution business which he founded at the age of nineteen. While operating the computer business, Scott McMillan attended the University of California at San Diego, and obtained a B.A. in Mathematics. Scott McMillan was later joined in the business by his father James I. McMillan, and brother Shawn McMillan. Together, they operated the computer business for sixteen years. At the height of that company's success, the distribution business employed 29 employees and had a gross revenue of $9,000,000 per year. While operating the distribution business, Scott McMillan attended law school at night. After graduating he took and passed the California bar exam on his first attempt.

Scott McMillan has litigated fifteen civil jury trials in California and United States District Courts, the shortest being three days and the lengthiest being seven weeks. The trials involved a variety of different matters including business disputes involving oral contracts, contracts for employment, leases on real property, violations of California's wage and hour law, competitor claims of antitrust and false advertising violations, and individuals' claims of police misconduct. Most recently, Scott McMillan obtained a $962,000 verdict after an eight day jury trial, which included an award of punitive damages.

Scott McMillan is familiar with appellate practice, and entitled to practice in all California Court of Appeal as well as the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. He has successfully brought or responded to a number of appeals and petitions for extraordinary relief.

Scott McMillan has repeatedly demonstrated a willingness and ability to accept engagements involving complex litigation, with rapidly evolving facts, scheduled for expedited resolution.

Scott McMillan presently resides in El Cajon, California, with his wife Rebeca and three children.

Customhouse Broker, Department of the Treasury.

 

Scott Anthony McMillan (La Mesa, California) View website

Awards

Platinum Client Champion
This award is granted to attorneys who have received at least 10 client reviews, and have an average review score of 4.5 or higher.
Champion Badge Platinum
AV Preeminent Peer Rated
This elite award is granted to attorneys who have been recognized by their peers for their very high ethical standards, with an average peer review score of 4.5 or higher.
Martindale-Hubbell Peer AV

Client Champion Awards

Client Champion awards recognize those attorneys who excel at service as affirmed by their clients. The awards, based on the quantity and quality of an attorney’s Martindale-Hubbell client reviews, demonstrate an ongoing commitment to delivering excellent client service. Award recipients stand out from their peers with a platinum, gold or silver icon.

Champion Badge Silver

At least three reviews and a score of 4.0 or higher.

Champion Badge Gold

At least six reviews and a score of 4.2 or higher.

Champion Badge Platinum

At least ten reviews and a score of 4.5 or higher.

Scott Anthony McMillan got this award in 2021

Martindale Peer Awards

A lawyer who receives a minimum threshold of qualifying responses from fellow attorneys can qualify for one of three prestigious Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings:

Martindale-Hubbell Peer AV Preeminent Rating

AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

Scott Anthony McMillan got this award in 2021

Martindale-Hubbell Peer Distinguished Rating

Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

Martindale-Hubbell Peer Notable Rating

Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Avvo Awards

Avvo Top Contributor

Avvo Top Contributor: The Avvo Top Contributor Award is granted to attorneys who have earned significant contribution points in a given year on our sister site, Avvo.com. Contribution points are earned by answering questions in Q&A, publishing Legal Guides, and other useful contributions to the Avvo community.

Avvo Client Choice

Avvo Client’s Choice: The Avvo Client's Choice Award Badge is granted to attorneys with a significant number of 4+ star reviews in a given year.

Reviews for Scott

Have you consulted or hired this lawyer?

Leave a review about your experience with this lawyer.

Write a Review

Overall Rating
4.7
See All Reviews
99
5.0
Lawyers.com
11
4.5
Martindale
42
4.9
Avvo
46
Showing 1-10 of 11 client reviews from Lawyers.com
Lawyers.com Rating Snapshot
5 stars
100%
4 stars
0%
3 stars
0%
2 stars
0%
1 star
0%
What do people say on Lawyers.com?
Communication
5.0
Quality of Service
5.0
Responsiveness
5.0
Value for Money
5.0
Libel, Slander and Defamation
Posted by anonymous
October 20, 2025
Hired Attorney

I consulted with Scott McMillan on possible litigation. I was very impressed with his knowledge, and the time he took to explain matters to me. He presented to me as a caring individual who tries to help others. I would definitely use him, and refer him to others.

Libel, Slander and Defamation
Posted by Jon
September 25, 2025
Hired Attorney

I needed a second opinion on my case and spoke with Mr. McMillan in a free consult. He immediately grasped the issues and explained the risks and shared relevant case histories if I pursued it further. He candidly advised against doing so, and I'm taking his advice.

Litigation
Posted by anonymous
July 29, 2017
Hired Attorney

Scott McMillan has helped me every step of the way on multiple cases! I highly recommend McMillan Law Firm for anyone who needs a professional, knowledgeable, and hard working attorney. Scott is upfront and gets things done! The McMillan Law Firm gives their undivided attention to your case. I am so thankful for working with the McMillan Law Firm and all that they have done for me!! Thank you Scott!!!

 
Civil Litigation
Posted by anonymous
July 28, 2017
Hired Attorney

I was having so much trouble finding a lawyer that was willing to take on my case. I had gone through two lawyers and they took my money but did nothing for me. I got in contact with Scott through a friend's recommendation and he took me under his wing. He took on my case and gave me confidence that we could beat my case. I was being sued by a company and Scott (being the amazing lawyer that he is) found out that they were actually committing fruad!! The company had been out of business for year

 
Real Estate
Posted by anonymous
March 03, 2014
Hired Attorney

I was involved in a property dispute that quickly turned into nightmare and left me stressed and in despair. I was in need of legal help when I went to meet Scott and asked him to represent me. From the first meeting with Scott and his team I knew I was in good hands. Scott is incredibly smart, experienced, professional attorney who cares for his clients. During the case he was honest with me and kept me well informed. Scott is competent, diligent and very effective. I recommend Scott.

 
Labor and Employment
Posted by anonymous
December 28, 2012
Hired Attorney

I met Scott while serving on a jury. Based on this, when I needed legal advice on an employment law issue I turned to Scott. He worked with me to understand the case, what my rights are and what actions where available for me to take. I retained Scott to represent me and he worked my case to a successful conclusion. I highly recommend Scott and The McMillan Law Firm to be your legal advocate.

 
Litigation
Posted by anonymous
May 28, 2012
Hired Attorney

Mr. McMillan always responds immediately to my inquiries, he's honest and straight-forward, and extremely tenacious in dealing with the games of other lawyers. The two other attorneys in his office, Evan Kalooky and Michael Healy, are also very diligent and reliable. Together they create a very competent and effective law firm. Mr. McMillan has successfully represented me in two cases so far, and I highly recommend The McMillan Law Firm.

 
Labor and Employment
Posted by anonymous
March 23, 2012
Hired Attorney

I found Scott McMillan online. The McMillan Law Firm expressed familiarity with my questions and in the area that I needed help in. Scott McMillan was as portrayed on the website, so I hired him to help me. Over the course of three years, I worked quite a bit with Scott McMillan, Evan Kalooky, and the associates and staff. I always felt that the McMillan Law Firm was completely invested in my case and doing their very best to achieve a good result for me. I would again hire Scott McMillan.

 
Business Law
Posted by anonymous
January 30, 2012
Hired Attorney

Scott and his staff are professional, courteous, knowledgeable, well versed in the law, and at home in the courtroom. They give 100 percent of their efforts to helping their clients. I recommend them to any who are in need of an ethical and honest law firm with commitment and dedication to their clients.

Bankruptcy
Posted by anonymous
August 08, 2011
Hired Attorney

We hired Scott McMillan (and his associates) to represent our bond positions in various complex corporate bankruptcies. In the proceedings Scott was extremely persistent in making sure our voice was heard. Scott's filings were thorough and aggressive. All of his colleagues gave us the attention that we required. I wouldn't't hesitate to recommend the McMillan Law Firm to any buy-side firm looking for cost-efficient representation.

 
From the Martindale-Avvo Legal Network

Services

Areas of Law

  • Real Estate
  • Business Law 1
    • Business Litigation
  • Contracts
  • Construction Law
  • Restraining Orders
  • Antitrust and Trade Regulation 1
    • Unfair Competition
  • Litigation 1
    • Civil Litigation
  • Insurance 1
    • Insurance Bad Faith
  • Communications and Media 1
    • Libel, Slander and Defamation
  • Other 8
    • Employment Law
    • Probate Litigation
    • Federal Civil Litigation
    • Trial Practice
    • Insurance Coverage
    • Civil Rights Section 1983
    • Creditors Rights in Bankruptcy
    • Real Estate Title Insurance

Practice Details

  • Languages
    Spanish
  • Payment Information
    Payment & Cost Features
    Free initial consultation
    Fixed hourly rates: $120 - $450/hr
    Fixed fees available
    Contingency Fee: 15% - 50%
  • Firm Information
    Position
    President
    Firm Name
    The McMillan Law Firm, APC
  • Representative Cases & Transactions
    Cases
    • Mendoza - Caballero, et al. v. Lee, et al., California Superior Court for the County of San Diego, UC301839, February through March 2003 (Jury trial)
    • Mancinelli v. Rustie's Unique Designs, Inc., California Superior Court for the County of San Diego, (Jury
    Court trial) April 16, 2004 - April 29, 2004
    • Richard Lytwyn, Plaintiff
    Appellant v. Fry's Electronics, Inc., et al., Defendants
    Respondents, Case No. D042401 Court of Appeal of California, Fourth Appellate District, Divison One, Lexis Cite: 2005 Cal. App. LEXIS 267, February 22, 2005

    • Kanj v. Viejas B
    of Kumeyaay Indians, ARB No. 06-074, ALJ No. 2006-WPC-1, August 18, 2008 to August 21, 2008
    • Courtois v. Steensgaard, California Superior Court for the County of San Diego, (Jury
    Court trial)
    November 2, 2007 - October 3, 2008
    • Ryan v. Verizon Directories Sales West, Inc., California Superior Court for the County of San Diego, (Jury
    Court trial)
    October 9, 2007 - October 31, 2007
    • Rocha v. Vu, California Superior Court for the County of San Diego, GIC 869645, August 5. 2008 to August 29, 2008 (Jury trial)
    • Morton v. Spotts, California Superior Court for the County of San Diego, 37-2008-00099933 -CU-OR-EC, June 28, 2010 to August 17, 2010 (Jury trial)

    • Tri-City Healthcare District v. Sterling, California Superior Court, County of San Diego, April 2011 (Court trial), March 25,2011 - March 29, 2011
    • Cervantes v. Molina, California Superior Court, County of San Diego, (Jury
    Court trial) April 22,2011 - August 18, 2011
    • Menifee Lakes Master Association v. [Redacted], California Superior Court, County of Riverside, Case No. RIC 458659, (Jury
    Court Trial), July 14, 2011 - August 26, 2011
    • Debra Roth v. Talmadge East, California Superior Court for the County of San Diego, (Defense / Jury Trial)
    April 27, 2012 - May 25, 2012
    • Johnson v. Copenbarger, California Superior Court for the County of Riverside, (Plaintiff / Jury Trial)
    September 13, 2013 to October 17, 2012
    • DiGrigoli v. Bolton, California Superior Court for the County of San Diego, (Plaintiff / Court Trial)
    July 23 - 25, 2013
    • Mancinelli v. Maubach, Circuit Court of Laclede County, Missouri, Case No. 09LA-C00032, January 21, 2014 to January 23, 2014 (Plaintiff / Court Trial)
    • Plikaytis v. Roth, California Superior Court for the County of San Diego, March 2014
    37-2010-00083847-CU-BC-CTL, May 14, 2012 to May 25, 2012 (Plaintiff / Court Trial)
    • Cox v. San Diego Air Service, California Superior Court for the County of San Diego, (Plaintiff / Jury Trial)
    April 24, 2015 - May 6, 2015
    • Balaz v. First American Title Insurance Company, California Superior Court for the County of San Diego, October through November 2016 (Plaintiff / Jury Trial)
    October 17, 2016 - November 9, 2016
    • Kindt v. Trango Systems, Inc., California Superior Court for the County of San Diego, December 2011 & Summer 2017 (Plaintiff / Jury Trial) - December 2, 2011 - December 20, 2011
    • In re Roth
    Roth Management Corporation, United States Bankruptcy Court Southern District of California, August 2011 (Chapter 11 / Court Trial) (10-07663-MM11) (10-07659 –
    MM11) Confirmation Trial - August 29, 2011 - August 31, 2011

    Appeals:
    • Tri-City Healthcare District v. Sterling, Court of Appeal of the State of California Fourth Appellate District, Division One, November 2012 & February 2013(Court of Appeal No. D060431 & D061265)
    • Kindt v. Trango Systems, Inc, Court of the State of California, Fourth Appellate District, Division One, September 9, 2011 - Junes 22, 2012 (Court of Appeal No. D062404)
    •Chaker v. Mateo, Court of Appeal of the State of California, Fourth Appellate District, Division One, Opinion Filed October 2012 (Court of Appeal No. D058753)

  • Additional Links
    http://www.mcmillanlaw.us/are/scott.htm https://www.lamesaattorney.us

Experience

  • Bar Admission & Memberships
    Admissions
    2001, California
    U.S. District Court, Central District of California
    U.S. District Court, Southern District of California
    U.S. District Court, Eastern District of California
    U.S. District Court, Middle District of Florida
    U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
    Memberships
    San Diego County Bar Association, Los Angeles County, American and International Bar Associations
    San Diego East County Chamber of Commerce
    Better Business Bureau.
  • Education & Certifications
    Law School
    Western Sierra School of Law
    Class of 1999
    J.D.
    Other Education
    University of California at San Diego
    Class of 1988
    B.A.
    Mathematics
    Legal Certifications
    Certified Appellate Specialist, Office of Legal Specialization, State Bar of California
  • Military Service
    Private, U.S. Army, Honorably Discharged, 1983.
  • Personal Details & History
    Age
    Born in 1963
    Los Angeles, California, December 8, 1963
    Hobbies & Interests
    Aircraft, Agriculture, Firearms law,

Contact Scott Anthony McMillan

President at The McMillan Law Firm, APC
4.7
99 reviews

The McMillan Building4670 Nebo Drive, Suite 200La Mesa, CA 91941-5230U.S.A.

Show on map
Fax: (619) 828-7399

Activity

Email Scott Anthony McMillan

Case type is required.
I am is required.
First name is required.
Last name is required.
A valid zip code is required.
Country is required.
State is required.
A valid city is required.
A valid email address is required.
A valid phone number is required.
Message is required.
0/1000 characters

By clicking the Submit button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls, from Lawyers.com and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.

You should not send any sensitive or confidential information through this site. Emails sent through this site do not create an attorney-client relationship and may not be treated as privileged or confidential. The lawyer or law firm you are contacting is not required to, and may choose not to, accept you as a client. The internet is not necessarily secure and emails sent though this site could be intercepted or read by third parties.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA. See Google’s Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.

Thank you! Your message has been successfully sent.

For your records, a copy of this email has been sent to test@test.com.

Summary of Your Message
Case Type:
I am a/an:
First Name:
Last Name:
City:
Zip Code or Postal Code:
State:
Country:
Phone Number:
Message:
Return to Profile Reset Form

Attorneys FAQs

  • What is this attorney's primary practice area?
    The practice area Scott Anthony McMillan spends the most time on is Trial Practice.
  • Is this attorney admitted to practice in any U.S. Federal Courts?
    Scott Anthony McMillan is admitted to practice before the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, United States District Court for the Central District of California, United States District Court for the Eastern District of California, United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida and United States District Court for the Southern District of California.
  • Does this attorney maintain a professional presence on any social networks?
    Yes, Scott Anthony McMillan has a professional profile on facebook and LinkedIn.
  • What law school did this attorney attend?
    Scott Anthony McMillan attended Western Sierra School of Law.
  • What year was this attorney's law firm established?
    The McMillan Law Firm, APC was established in 2001.

Attorney information displayed in this FAQ section is based upon information the lawyer has included on their profile, in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals.

These FAQs include information about a lawyer's background, but do not evaluate their knowledge of the law, past performance on individual cases, personality, or communication skills.

It is solely the responsibility of lawyers and law firms to ensure that any information they provide complies with all applicable laws and rules of professional conduct.

You should be aware that the information we rely upon may not be comprehensive, or frequently updated.

Always research the lawyer further to get a better understanding of their license credentials, disciplinary status, background, and experience.

Lawyers.com Client Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review Ratings™ display reviews submitted by individuals who have either hired or consulted the lawyers or law firms.

The Client Review Rating score is determined through the aggregation of validated responses. People who submit reviews are either individuals who consulted with the lawyer/law firm or who hired the lawyer/law firm and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be anyone who consults or hires a lawyer including in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners, and private individuals.

Martindale-Hubbell validates that a reviewer is a person with a valid email address. As part of the review process, respondents must affirm that they have had an initial consultation, are currently a client or have been a client of the lawyer or law firm identified, although Martindale-Hubbell cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship as it is often confidential. The content of the responses is entirely from reviewers.

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review. For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Client Review Ratings, please visit our Client Review Page

Martindale Peer Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Peer Review Ratings™ are the gold standard in attorney ratings, and have been for more than a century. These ratings indicate attorneys who are widely respected by their peers for their ethical standards and legal expertise in a specific area of practice.

The Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings process is the gold standard due to its objectivity and comprehensiveness. Lawyers solicited for peer reviews include both those selected by the attorney being reviewed and lawyers independently selected by Martindale-Hubbell. All reviewers are verified as attorneys through Martindale-Hubbell’s extensive attorney database. Only attorneys practicing at least three years and receiving a sufficient number of reviews from non-affiliated attorneys are eligible to receive a Rating.

What are the different Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings?*

• AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies that a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

• Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

• Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Lawyers who have received peer reviews after 2009 will display more detailed information, including practice areas, summary ratings, detailed numeric ratings and written feedback (if available). Details for individual reviews received before 2009 are not displayed.

Attorneys that receive reviews from their peers, but not a sufficient number to establish a Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Rating, will have those reviews display on our websites.

For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings™, please visit our Ratings Page on Martindale.com and our Frequently Asked Questions

Avvo Client Reviews

Ratings and reviews are feedback from people who have either consulted an attorney about an issue (but may not have hired the attorney) or people who hired an attorney as a current or former client and provided their feedback to our sister site, Avvo.com.