AV Preeminent Peer Rated Attorneys
Kit Carson Residents, consider several factors when selecting a lawyer including their experience, expertise, and reputation. AV Rated Attorneys represent a distinguished group of lawyers who have received top ratings from their peers for their exceptional ethical standards and an A grade (4.5 or higher).
AV Preeminent Peer Rated Attorneys
Kit Carson Residents, consider several factors when selecting a lawyer ... Learn More
AV Preeminent Peer Rated Attorneys
Kit Carson Residents, consider several factors when selecting a lawyer including their experience, expertise, and reputation. AV Rated Attorneys represent a distinguished group of lawyers who have received top ratings from their peers for their exceptional ethical standards and an A grade (4.5 or higher).
  • 217 South Main St., Lamar, CO 81052

  • 201 S. 4th St., Ste. 1, Lamar, CO 81052-0030

  • 208 Main St., Ordway, CO 81063

Your legal solution starts here.

Get professional advice by contacting an attorney today.

ADVERTISEMENT
  • 401 S. 4th St., Lamar, CO 81052-3216

  • Limon, CO 80828

Ask a Lawyer

Additional Resources

Looking for Criminal Law Lawyers in Kit Carson?

Criminal defense lawyers represent individuals accused of committing crimes, ranging from minor offenses to serious felonies. They investigate the case, challenge evidence presented by the prosecution, negotiate plea bargains, and defend the client in court. Their primary duty is to protect the accused's constitutional rights and ensure a fair legal process.

About our Criminal Defense Lawyers Ratings

The average lawyer rating is created by peers based on legal expertise, ethical standards, quality of service, and relationship skills. Recommendations are made by real clients.

CLIENT RECOMMENDED
100 %

2 Client Reviews

PEER REVIEWS
4.1

 

Commonly Asked Criminal Law Questions From Users Near You

This information is not legal advice and is not guaranteed to be correct, complete or up-to-date. It is provided for general informational purposes only. If you need legal advice you should consult a licensed attorney in your area.

Any ideas of what I am facing for stealing?

Answered by attorney Laurie A. Schmidt
Criminal Law lawyer at 5280 Law Group
In most states, burglary or breaking and entering do not require you to actual "break-in." The law allows a burglary charge if you walk in to a home with the intent to commit a felony or theft. Here, you walked-in and took something that was not yours (theft). Typically, it is not a defense that you did not think anyone lived in the home and/or if all of the doors and windows were gone. As for the theft charges- in Colorado, felony theft is dependent on the amount of the items taken. If the amount is over $1,000; then it would be a felony. If the other person cannot determine their property and/or value of the property taken could be a way to get the charges reduced for the theft case, assuming that you do not have any prior convictions.
In most states, burglary or breaking and entering do not require you to actual "break-in." The law allows a burglary charge if you walk in to a home with the intent to commit a felony or theft. Here, you walked-in and took something that was not yours (theft). Typically, it is not a defense that you did not think anyone lived in the home and/or if all of the doors and windows were gone. As for the theft charges- in Colorado, felony theft is dependent on the amount of the items taken. If the amount is over $1,000; then it would be a felony. If the other person cannot determine their property and/or value of the property taken could be a way to get the charges reduced for the theft case, assuming that you do not have any prior convictions.
Read More Read Less

Is there anything I can do to keep my school and employer from finding out about my theft?

default-avatar
Answered by attorney Stephen Lewis Freeborn (Unclaimed Profile)
Criminal Law lawyer at Freeborn Law Offices P.S.
I suggest that you contact and retain an attorney. The most important thing is to try and prevent a conviction. If you get convicted, then if asked on an employment application if you have ever been convicted, you will have to say "yes". Also, if you are still in school and getting any scholarship, grants, student loans or government grants or loans, you could be disqualified from all of these. Being charged (and possibly convicted) of theft does not bode well with future employers, especially in your field, as an employed could be concerned about future theft of monies from work, or worse, theft of medications. With the economy being what it is and so few jobs out there, a theft could be enough to disqualify you from future jobs. Hire an attorney who may be able to help you get some amicable resolution short of a conviction.
I suggest that you contact and retain an attorney. The most important thing is to try and prevent a conviction. If you get convicted, then if asked on an employment application if you have ever been convicted, you will have to say "yes". Also, if you are still in school and getting any scholarship, grants, student loans or government grants or loans, you could be disqualified from all of these. Being charged (and possibly convicted) of theft does not bode well with future employers, especially in your field, as an employed could be concerned about future theft of monies from work, or worse, theft of medications. With the economy being what it is and so few jobs out there, a theft could be enough to disqualify you from future jobs. Hire an attorney who may be able to help you get some amicable resolution short of a conviction.
Read More Read Less

How is habitual law legal? Isn't it basically the same as double jeopardy?

Answered by attorney Jonathan S. Willett
Criminal Law lawyer at Jonathan S. Willett Attorney at Law
Your question is a very good one. However, the courts have consistently upheld habitual criminal laws against challenges based upon one's constitutional right to be placed in jeopardy twice for the same offense ("double jeopardy"). The courts' reasoning is that the prior offenses alter the status, the nature and circumstances of the offender who comes before the court again. after re-offending. The punishment can be enhanced for the person's new offense, because he committed it while having the "status" of a two time or three time prior convicted felon. Many types of infringements on liberties occur once a person has suffered a felony conviction: such as loss of gun rights, loss of the ability to have certain licenses and jobs, and hold office, If a person commits another offense while still being supervised for the first one, the sentence for the second offense is aggravated. If a person commits a crime after having a prior felony at any time, the court can look at the prior felony conviction to give that person more time. The courts have circumvented the double jeopardy problems of enhancing sentences for prior offenders by saying he's being[ punished for the instant offense only, but his status as a prior offender changes what punishment he may receive.
Your question is a very good one. However, the courts have consistently upheld habitual criminal laws against challenges based upon one's constitutional right to be placed in jeopardy twice for the same offense ("double jeopardy"). The courts' reasoning is that the prior offenses alter the status, the nature and circumstances of the offender who comes before the court again. after re-offending. The punishment can be enhanced for the person's new offense, because he committed it while having the "status" of a two time or three time prior convicted felon. Many types of infringements on liberties occur once a person has suffered a felony conviction: such as loss of gun rights, loss of the ability to have certain licenses and jobs, and hold office, If a person commits another offense while still being supervised for the first one, the sentence for the second offense is aggravated. If a person commits a crime after having a prior felony at any time, the court can look at the prior felony conviction to give that person more time. The courts have circumvented the double jeopardy problems of enhancing sentences for prior offenders by saying he's being[ punished for the instant offense only, but his status as a prior offender changes what punishment he may receive.
Read More Read Less