×
Go back to Martindale-Avvo ➔
Office | Baltimore, MD
Choose Office Branch
Arizona
Brazil
California
Colorado
District of Columbia
Delaware
Florida
Georgia
Illinois
Massachusetts
Maryland
Minnesota
Mexico
North Carolina
New Jersey
New York
Pennsylvania
Texas
Turkey
Virginia
Washington

DLA Piper

4.0
18 reviews

100 Light St., Ste. 1350, Baltimore, MD 21202-1153, U.S.A.

Antitrust and EU Competition, Antitrust and Trade Regulation, Commercial Contracts and 104 more

MEET OUR TEAM

Attorney Amor Neill
Thupari
Meet all 6 Lawyers

About DLA Piper

DLA Piper is a law firm established in 1999 with an office in Baltimore, MD. At this office location, there are 6 lawyers practicing antitrust and eu competition, antitrust and trade regulation, commercial contracts and 104 other areas of law.

Awards

Silver Client Champion
This award is granted to attorneys who have received at least 3 client reviews, and have an average review score of 4.0 or higher.
Champion Badge Silver
AV Preeminent Peer Rated
This elite award is granted to attorneys who have been recognized by their peers for their very high ethical standards, with an average peer review score of 4.5 or higher.
Martindale-Hubbell Peer AV

Client Champion Awards

Client Champion awards recognize those attorneys who excel at service as affirmed by their clients. The awards, based on the quantity and quality of an attorney’s Martindale-Hubbell client reviews, demonstrate an ongoing commitment to delivering excellent client service. Award recipients stand out from their peers with a platinum, gold or silver icon.

Champion Badge Silver

At least three reviews and a score of 4.0 or higher.

DLA Piper got this award in 2021

Champion Badge Gold

At least six reviews and a score of 4.2 or higher.

Champion Badge Platinum

At least ten reviews and a score of 4.5 or higher.

Martindale Peer Awards

A lawyer who receives a minimum threshold of qualifying responses from fellow attorneys can qualify for one of three prestigious Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings:

Martindale-Hubbell Peer AV Preeminent Rating

AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

DLA Piper got this award in 2021

Martindale-Hubbell Peer Distinguished Rating

Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

Martindale-Hubbell Peer Notable Rating

Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Avvo Awards

Avvo Top Contributor

Avvo Top Contributor: The Avvo Top Contributor Award is granted to attorneys who have earned significant contribution points in a given year on our sister site, Avvo.com. Contribution points are earned by answering questions in Q&A, publishing Legal Guides, and other useful contributions to the Avvo community.

Avvo Client Choice

Avvo Client’s Choice: The Avvo Client's Choice Award Badge is granted to attorneys with a significant number of 4+ star reviews in a given year.

Reviews for DLA Piper

Have you consulted or hired this firm?

Leave a review about your experience with this firm.

Write a Review

Overall Rating
4.0
See All Reviews
18
4.0
Lawyers.com
18
4.8
Martindale
501
Avvo
Not yet reviewed
Showing 1-10 of 18 client reviews from Lawyers.com
Lawyers.com Rating Snapshot
5 stars
28%
4 stars
39%
3 stars
22%
2 stars
6%
1 star
6%
What do people say on Lawyers.com?
Communication
4.1
Quality of Service
4.1
Responsiveness
4.0
Value for Money
3.9
Personal Injury
Posted by anonymous
October 22, 2010
Hired Law Firm
Business Law
Posted by anonymous
September 28, 2010
Hired Law Firm
Mergers, Acquisitions and Divestitures
Posted by anonymous
June 17, 2010
Hired Law Firm
Bankruptcy
Posted by anonymous
November 13, 2010
Hired Law Firm
Bankruptcy
Posted by anonymous
June 29, 2010
Hired Attorney Victoria Lee

I was treated with mediocre service; there are better lawyers.

Insurance
Posted by anonymous
February 08, 2010
Hired Law Firm
Investments
Posted by anonymous
June 16, 2025
Hired Attorney Mr. Matthew Gorra

Worst experience of my life. My firm agrees and we regret engaging with Matthew. Everything is an issue and always seems to make everything so much for complicated and convoluted. The entire team felt the same way with dealing with Matt. Things that Matt brings up as concerns are just not relevent and we felt he was dpoing this to sidetrack the deal progress

 
From the Martindale-Avvo Legal Network

Services

Areas of Law

  • Antitrust and Trade Regulation 2
    • Antitrust and EU Competition
    • Criminal Antitrust
  • Commercial Law 2
    • Commercial Contracts
    • Technology, Sourcing and Commercial
  • Energy 2
    • Energy Sector
    • Energy Regulatory and Policy
  • Agency and Distributorships 2
    • Franchise and Distribution
    • International Franchise and Distribution
  • Business Law 2
    • Franchise and Technology
    • Franchise Litigation
  • Finance 5
    • Project Finance
    • Public Finance
    • Real Estate Finance
    • Securitization
    • Retail Development and Finance
  • Construction Law 1
    • Construction
  • Corporate Law 6
    • Corporate
    • Corporate and Securities
    • Public Company and Corporate Governance
    • Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA), Anti-Corruption and Corporate Compliance Practice
    • White Collar, Corporate Crime and Investigations
    • Corporate Real Estate
  • Aviation Law 1
    • Aviation
  • Investments 5
    • Capital Markets
    • Emerging Growth and Venture Capital
    • Private Equity
    • Derivatives
    • Real Estate Capital Markets
  • Environmental Law 2
    • Climate Change
    • Environmental
  • Education Law 1
    • Education Sector
  • International Law 3
    • International Tax
    • International Arbitration
    • Cross-border Investment
  • Technology and Science 2
    • Life Sciences
    • Technology and Media
  • Mergers, Acquisitions and Divestitures 1
    • Mergers and Acquisitions
  • Securities 1
    • Securities Enforcement
  • Banking Law 4
    • Subprime Mortgage
    • Banking and Financial Services
    • Real Estate Restructuring and Loan Workouts
    • Banking and Financial Services Regulation
  • Taxation 3
    • Tax
    • Tax Controversy
    • Tax Policy and Legislation
  • Trusts and Estates
  • Employee Benefits 3
    • Employment, Pensions and Benefits
    • Employee Benefits and Executive Compensation
    • ERISA Litigation
  • Labor and Employment 1
    • Labor and Employment Law
  • Insurance 1
    • Insurance and Reinsurance
  • Intellectual Property 5
    • Copyrights
    • Patent Litigation
    • Trademark Litigation
    • Trademarks
    • Intellectual Property and Technology
  • International Trade
  • Litigation 5
    • Litigation and Arbitration
    • Electronic Discovery Readiness and Response
    • Privacy Litigation
    • Real Estate Litigation
    • Securities Litigation
  • Class Actions 1
    • Class Action
  • Health Care 1
    • Health Care Enforcement and Compliance
  • Medical Malpractice 1
    • Medical Malpractice Defense
  • Torts 1
    • Product Liability and Mass Torts
  • Professional Liability
  • Qui Tam Litigation 1
    • Qui Tam/False Claims Act
  • Government 6
    • State Legislation and Public Policy
    • Government Real Estate
    • Land Use, Development and Government Relations
    • Regulatory and Government Affairs
    • Government Affairs
    • Government Controversies
  • Products Liability 1
    • Product Liability
  • Public Finance 1
    • Projects and Infrastructure
  • Real Estate 3
    • Condominium Development
    • Green Real Estate
    • Mixed Use Development
  • Housing Law 1
    • Affordable Housing and Community Development
  • Hospitality Law 1
    • Hospitality and Leisure
  • Leases and Leasing 3
    • Landlord Leasing
    • Retail Leasing
    • Tenant Leasing
  • Sports Law 1
    • Sports Facilities Development
  • Communications and Media 4
    • Communications
    • Electronic Commerce and Privacy
    • Media and New Media
    • Social Media
  • Contracts 1
    • Government Contracts
  • Advertising and Marketing 1
    • Advertising, Promotion and Trade Practices
  • Internet Law 1
    • Domain Name Practice
  • Other 9
    • Clean Tech
    • Fund Formation and Operations
    • Retail and Consumer Products Practice
    • Drug and Medical Device
    • Acquisition and Disposition
    • Homebuilding and Master Planned Communities
    • Defense
    • Federal Law and Policy
    • Restructuring

DLA Piper

4.0
18 reviews

100 Light St., Ste. 1350Baltimore, MD 21202-1153U.S.A.

Show on map

Email DLA Piper

Case type is required.
I am is required.
First name is required.
Last name is required.
A valid zip code is required.
Country is required.
State is required.
A valid city is required.
A valid email address is required.
A valid phone number is required.
Message is required.
0/1000 characters

By clicking the Submit button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls, from Lawyers.com and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.

You should not send any sensitive or confidential information through this site. Emails sent through this site do not create an attorney-client relationship and may not be treated as privileged or confidential. The lawyer or law firm you are contacting is not required to, and may choose not to, accept you as a client. The internet is not necessarily secure and emails sent though this site could be intercepted or read by third parties.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA. See Google’s Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.

Thank you! Your message has been successfully sent.

For your records, a copy of this email has been sent to test@test.com.

Summary of Your Message
Case Type:
I am a/an:
First Name:
Last Name:
City:
Zip Code or Postal Code:
State:
Country:
Phone Number:
Message:
Return to Profile Reset Form
Lawyers.com Client Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review Ratings™ display reviews submitted by individuals who have either hired or consulted the lawyers or law firms.

The Client Review Rating score is determined through the aggregation of validated responses. People who submit reviews are either individuals who consulted with the lawyer/law firm or who hired the lawyer/law firm and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be anyone who consults or hires a lawyer including in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners, and private individuals.

Martindale-Hubbell validates that a reviewer is a person with a valid email address. As part of the review process, respondents must affirm that they have had an initial consultation, are currently a client or have been a client of the lawyer or law firm identified, although Martindale-Hubbell cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship as it is often confidential. The content of the responses is entirely from reviewers.

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review. For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Client Review Ratings, please visit our Client Review Page

Martindale Peer Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Peer Review Ratings™ are the gold standard in attorney ratings, and have been for more than a century. These ratings indicate attorneys who are widely respected by their peers for their ethical standards and legal expertise in a specific area of practice.

The Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings process is the gold standard due to its objectivity and comprehensiveness. Lawyers solicited for peer reviews include both those selected by the attorney being reviewed and lawyers independently selected by Martindale-Hubbell. All reviewers are verified as attorneys through Martindale-Hubbell’s extensive attorney database. Only attorneys practicing at least three years and receiving a sufficient number of reviews from non-affiliated attorneys are eligible to receive a Rating.

What are the different Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings?*

• AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies that a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

• Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

• Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Lawyers who have received peer reviews after 2009 will display more detailed information, including practice areas, summary ratings, detailed numeric ratings and written feedback (if available). Details for individual reviews received before 2009 are not displayed.

Attorneys that receive reviews from their peers, but not a sufficient number to establish a Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Rating, will have those reviews display on our websites.

For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings™, please visit our Ratings Page on Martindale.com and our Frequently Asked Questions