In 1946, William M. Fulcher and his brother, Edwin D. Fulcher, founded a partnership committed to the highest quality of legal representation for their diverse clients. Since then, the Fulcher Hagler LLP firm has expanded to represent businesses and individuals, offering a wide range of legal services with emphasis in the areas of litigation and taxation. The firm serves the interests of national and international clients in state and federal courts in east central and south Georgia and Western South Carolina. Members of the firm have served with distinction on State Bar disciplinary tribunals, bar examination boards, in courts of general jurisdiction and worthwhile local civic and religious activities. Our attorneys and numerous support staff remain committed to the goals established by the firm over 60 years ago.
This badge is granted to attorneys who have been reviewed by a past client.
AV Preeminent Peer Rated
This elite award is granted to attorneys who have been recognized by their peers for their very high ethical standards, with an average peer review score of 4.5 or higher.
About Awards
Client Champion Awards
Client Champion awards recognize those attorneys who excel at service as affirmed by their clients. The awards, based on the quantity
and quality of an attorney’s Martindale-Hubbell client reviews, demonstrate an ongoing commitment to delivering excellent client service.
Award recipients stand out from their peers with a platinum, gold or silver icon.
At least three reviews and a score of 4.0 or higher.
At least six reviews and a score of 4.2 or higher.
At least ten reviews and a score of 4.5 or higher.
Martindale Peer Awards
A lawyer who receives a minimum threshold of qualifying responses from fellow attorneys can qualify for one of three prestigious
Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings:
AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him
or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.
Fulcher Hagler LLP got this award in 2021
Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely
respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.
Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.
Avvo Awards
Avvo Top Contributor: The Avvo Top Contributor Award is granted to attorneys who have earned significant contribution points in a given year on our sister site, Avvo.com. Contribution points are earned by answering questions in Q&A,
publishing Legal Guides, and other useful contributions to the Avvo community.
Avvo Client’s Choice: The Avvo Client's Choice Award Badge is granted to attorneys with a significant number of 4+ star reviews in a given year.
I met Attorney Michael N. Loebl as he was representing a dear friend of mine. Her case was complicated and the question was to what could Attorney Loebl or any attorney help. Attorney Loebl showed that he cared about her case and wanted to help. He was compassionate and kind and always listened to what she had to say. He answered all her questions and kept her up to date on everything that was going on throughout the entire process. He was hardworking and committed and did everything he could to get the best possible outcome of her case. The outcome was far beyond what was expected. Attorney Loebl’s hard work paid off. I was absolutely ecstatic with the way the case ended. I don’t think there was a better choice than Attorney Loebl. He was simply wonderful.
I have worked with this firm and Jim Purcell for decades. Jim is one of the most qualified defense counsel in the southeast, exhibiting professionalism, and expertise along with always doing the right thing in a timely fashion. He demonstrates the highest level of integrity and legal knowledge, achieving the best possible results at all times. His knowledge of the law, his experience in the medical-legal community is invaluable to successfully managing litigation.
Beth has always proven that her purpose and goal is to take care of the client. She is always available for a call and provides answers quickly. She is able to jump in feet first and handle all my needs. She is very knowledgeable in the area of workers compensation and employment law, and I would highly recommend her to all of my colleagues. In addition to her work ethic, she has a fabulous personality, speaks confidently and is forthright with advice.
If you don't pick Russell to be your attorney, you are making a mistake. He is very confidential and professional. If you want your work to get done with both efficiency and quality, choose Russell Mobley
Excellent attorney. I have enjoyed many years in working with Beth.
Family Law
Posted by anonymous
January 01, 2016
Hired Law Firm
Horrible. Had a mountain of evidence to support parental kidnapping, assault, battery, domestic violence, car theft and they refused to defend. Left me carrying an additional burden, already having my child's whole life kidnapped from me. Refused to enter certified legal documents and bring it to the courts attention that the other party entered false documents and committed perjury.
Do not hire this firm for any family law related issues. this firm conspired to cover up crimes committed against me and my family.and I was their client. They were more concerned with the other party in the action being a lawyer and their career. They absolutely refused to present issues of kidnapping, theft, domestic violence, fraud on the court and outright terrorism committed against me and my family by someone who is an active attorney, assistant to Latisha James, in NY. Having tons of support evidence to refute wildly unsupported allegations, they chose to ignore it and make deals that benefited their firm and opponents. They literally allowed a NY xlut who works for latish James to accuse me of rape and torture, to deflect from the crimes committed against us, after years of hiding. Regardless of letters, cards, pictures sent after fleeing or even naming a child my identical name after committing these crimes and disappearance they seen a path that benefited their profits..
This firm participated in a conspiracy to commit crimes against me through the courts in the same manner the individual in Brunswick Georgia tried sweeping the crimes under the rug when they killed a man. Collectively, they refused to present a unequivocal evidence showing crimes committed against me, vehicle theft, domestic violence, and kidnapping of my child. They refused to bring to courts attention that my constitutional rights to my child had been totally severed through horrific acts. They refused outright to present police reports of crimes committed against me to protect another attorney and government official from kidnapping, theft, domestic violence, and terrorist threats.refused to perform their duties and conspired with others to prevent me from filing s documents that showed my innocence, me being victimized and left me and my family to deal with more crimes committed against us under color of law after the criminal had been located. Criminal conspiracy/ ne
This dead beat atty and owner of Fulcher, tried to mislead me during a meeting, and then directed his firm lawyers to not perform their duties to their client. He is a go-conspirator who participated in the systematic coverup of kidnapping, motor vehicle theft, fraud on the court, falsifying documents and writing, domestic violence. As his client, this man and his firm fully allowed crimes to be committed against me and they did nothing. Their only motive was enrichment of their firm, making deals over my objections that benefited them. They knowingly allowed further crimes to be committed against me, having excessive and extreme amounts of evidence to refute. They then refused to file evidence and his law firm atty tried making a deal with opposition without my consent, and made false statements to the opposition without my permission or knowledge, that made me look like I was asking permission from someone who committed crimes against me. They committed crimes against the.
Representative Insurance Clients: MAG Mutual; Medical Protective Company; The Cincinnati Insurance Co.; Government Employees Insurance Co.; Safeco Insurance Cos.; AIG Insurance; ANPAC; Crawford & Company; Georgia Farm Bureau Insurance Cos.; South Carolina Farm Bureau Insurance Cos.; The Doctors Co.; Lawyers Protector Plan; Guard Insurance Co.; Association of County Commissioners of Georgia; Alternative Service Concepts, LLC; Chartis Insurance; Broadspire; Georgia Interlocal Risk Management Agency (GIRMA); Grange Mutual Casualty Company; Trident Insurance Company; Gallagher Bassett Services, Inc.; GuideOne Insurance; Sedgwick Claims Management Services, Inc.; T.H.E. Insurance Company; Underwriters Safety and Claims.
Counsel For: Bi-Lo, LLC; CSX Transportation, Inc.; Thermal Ceramics; MAU, Inc; Coca Cola Bottling Co. United LLC; General Growth Properties; Reeves Construction Co.; Lowe's Home Centers, Inc. F&W Transportation; Augusta Economic Development Authority to General Counsel; Sheet Metal Engineers; Sizemore, Inc.; Gastroenterology of Augusta, P.C.; Augusta Endoscopy Center, LLC
General Counsel For: GIW Industries, Inc.; Bell Fatigue, Inc.; Southern Beverage Packers, Inc.; Riverside Forest Products; Ireland Electric Corp.; Community Service Board of East Central Georgia; MCBS, LLC; Warren County, Georgia; Waterco USA; Augusta Cardiology Clinic, PC; Pediatric Partners of Augusta, LLC; Vascular Radiology Associates II; Cardiovascular Associates of Augusta, P.A.; Augusta Renal Physicians, PC; Stephen W. Brown and Radiology Associates of Augusta; Radiation Oncology Associates; Carolina Radiological Associates; F&W Transportation; Augusta Economic Development Authority to General Counsel; Sheet Metal Engineers; Sizemore, Inc.; Gastroenterology of Augusta, P.C.; Augusta Endoscopy Center, LLC
Approved ATTORNEYS FOR: First American Title Insurance Company.
Representative Insurance Clients: Travelers Property Casualty Corp.; American International Group; CNA Insurance Companies; The Cincinnati Insurance Co.; Georgia Farm Bureau Insurance Cos.; Government Employees Insurance Co.; Safeco Insurance Co.; CIGNA Group.
By clicking the Submit button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls,
from Lawyers.com and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.
You should not send any sensitive or confidential information through this site. Emails sent through this site do not create an attorney-client relationship
and may not be treated as privileged or confidential. The lawyer or law firm you are contacting is not required to, and may choose not to, accept you as a client.
The internet is not necessarily secure and emails sent though this site could be intercepted or read by third parties.
Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review Ratings™ display reviews submitted by individuals who have either hired or consulted the lawyers or law firms.
The Client Review Rating score is determined through the aggregation of validated responses. People who submit reviews are either individuals who consulted with the lawyer/law firm or who hired the lawyer/law firm and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be anyone who consults or hires a lawyer including in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners, and private individuals.
Martindale-Hubbell validates that a reviewer is a person with a valid email address. As part of the review process, respondents must affirm that they have had an initial consultation, are currently a client or have been a client of the lawyer or law firm identified, although Martindale-Hubbell cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship as it is often confidential. The content of the responses is entirely from reviewers.
Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review. For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Client Review Ratings, please visit our Client Review Page
Martindale Peer Reviews
Martindale-Hubbell® Peer Review Ratings™ are the gold standard in attorney ratings, and have been for more than a century. These ratings indicate attorneys who are widely respected by their peers for their ethical standards and legal expertise in a specific area of practice.
The Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings process is the gold standard due to its objectivity and comprehensiveness. Lawyers solicited for peer reviews include both those selected by the attorney being reviewed and lawyers independently selected by Martindale-Hubbell. All reviewers are verified as attorneys through Martindale-Hubbell’s extensive attorney database. Only attorneys practicing at least three years and receiving a sufficient number of reviews from non-affiliated attorneys are eligible to receive a Rating.
What are the different Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings?*
• AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies that a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.
• Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.
• Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.
Lawyers who have received peer reviews after 2009 will display more detailed information, including practice areas, summary ratings, detailed numeric ratings and written feedback (if available). Details for individual reviews received before 2009 are not displayed.
Attorneys that receive reviews from their peers, but not a sufficient number to establish a Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Rating, will have those reviews display on our websites.