×
Go back to Martindale-Avvo ➔

Heidell, Pittoni, Murphy & Bach, LLPPartner
Andrew M. Neubardt
Pro

Andrew M. Neubardt

5.0
1 review

81 Main Street, White Plains, NY 10601

Commercial Litigation & General Liability, Medical Liability Defense and Products Liability & Mass Tort

About Andrew M. Neubardt

Andrew M. Neubardt joined Heidell, Pittoni, Murphy & Bach, LLP as a partner in the White Plains office in 2011.

Mr. Neubardt’s practice focuses on medical and other professional malpractice as well as general liability litigation. He has more than 30 years of federal and state civil litigation experience focusing on litigation at the trial and appellate stages.

Mr. Neubardt has litigated matters dealing with most medical specialties and has concentrated on catastrophic injury cases secondary to cardiac and neurosurgical care, cancer misdiagnosis and obstetrical injuries with claims of neonatal injury. He has also defended OPMC, employment and sexual discrimination claims.

Mr. Neubardt is a member of the Executive Committee and Secretary of the New York State Medical Defense Bar Association.

Voted 2024 Lawyer of the Year for Medical Malpractice Law in Defendants

 

Andrew M. Neubardt (White Plains, New York) View website

Awards

Peer Reviewed Rated
This badge is granted to attorneys who have been reviewed by another attorney.
Martindale-Hubbell Peer PR

Client Champion Awards

Client Champion awards recognize those attorneys who excel at service as affirmed by their clients. The awards, based on the quantity and quality of an attorney’s Martindale-Hubbell client reviews, demonstrate an ongoing commitment to delivering excellent client service. Award recipients stand out from their peers with a platinum, gold or silver icon.

Champion Badge Silver

At least three reviews and a score of 4.0 or higher.

Champion Badge Gold

At least six reviews and a score of 4.2 or higher.

Champion Badge Platinum

At least ten reviews and a score of 4.5 or higher.

Martindale Peer Awards

A lawyer who receives a minimum threshold of qualifying responses from fellow attorneys can qualify for one of three prestigious Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings:

Martindale-Hubbell Peer AV Preeminent Rating

AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

Martindale-Hubbell Peer Distinguished Rating

Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

Martindale-Hubbell Peer Notable Rating

Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Avvo Awards

Avvo Top Contributor

Avvo Top Contributor: The Avvo Top Contributor Award is granted to attorneys who have earned significant contribution points in a given year on our sister site, Avvo.com. Contribution points are earned by answering questions in Q&A, publishing Legal Guides, and other useful contributions to the Avvo community.

Avvo Client Choice

Avvo Client’s Choice: The Avvo Client's Choice Award Badge is granted to attorneys with a significant number of 4+ star reviews in a given year.

Reviews for Andrew M.

Have you consulted or hired this lawyer?

Leave a review about your experience with this lawyer.

Write a Review

Overall Rating
5.0
See All Reviews
1
Lawyers.com
Not yet reviewed
5.0
Martindale
1
Avvo
Not yet reviewed

Services

Areas of Law

  • Other 3
    • Commercial Litigation & General Liability
    • Medical Liability Defense
    • Products Liability & Mass Tort

Practice Details

  • Firm Information
    Position
    Partner
    Firm Name
    Heidell, Pittoni, Murphy & Bach, LLP
  • Representative Cases & Transactions
    Cases
    Verdicts & Cases:New York State Judicial Institute's 2025 Medicine for Judges Seminar
    HPM&B is proud to be listed in the 2025 Edition of the Best Lawyers in America!
    Best Lawyers...
    Unanimous Defense Verdict
    HPM&B recently obtained a unanimous defense verdict in Supreme Court, Westchester County, on behalf of a hospitalist who was affiliated with a major Hospital network. Plaintiff alleged that the hospitalist was negligent in her care
    treatment...
    Discontinuance During Summary Judgment...
    2024 Best Lawyers: Lawyer of the Year
    2024 Best Laywers & 2024 Best Laywers: Ones to Watch
    2024 Best Lawyers
    Summary Judgment Dismissal
    HPM&B recently obtained summary...
    Summary Judgment Dismissal
    HPM&B successfully obtained summary judgment dismissal of all...
    Summary Judgment Dismissal
    HPM&B recently obtained summary judgment dismissal of all claims against...
    HPM&B Secures Summary Judgment Dismissal
    Congratulations to Andrew M. Neubardt...
    Jury Verdict Set Aside
    The Appellate Division, Second Department recently set aside a $1.1 million jury verdict on the issue of liability
    dismissed the complaint in favor of HPM&B's clients, an otolaryngologist
    her private medical group. This medical...Defense Verdict In Westchester
    On June 13, 2013, Andrew M. Neubardt received a defense verdict in Westchester County Supreme Court on behalf of an ophthalmologist
    a multi-specialty medical group.The plaintiff claimed that the defendant...

Experience

  • Bar Admission & Memberships
    Admissions
    1987, Connecticut
    1988, New York
    United States District Court, Eastern District of New York
    United States District Court, Northern District of New York
    United States District Court, Southern District of New York
    United States District Court, Western District of New York
  • Education & Certifications
    Law School
    Pace University School of Law
    Class of 1987
    J.D.
    Other Education
    State University of New York, Purchase College
    B.A.

Email Andrew M. Neubardt

Case type is required.
A valid zip code is required.
A valid city is required.
State is required.
Country is required.
Outside the US or Canada?
Message is required.
0/1000 characters

Contact Information

First name is required.
Last name is required.
A valid email address is required.
A valid phone number is required.

By clicking the Submit button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls, from Lawyers.com and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.

Thank you! Your message has been successfully sent.

For your records, a copy of this email has been sent to

Summary of Your Message
Case Type:
Zip Code or Postal Code:
City:
State:
Country:
Case Description:
Contact Information
First Name:
Last Name:
Email:
Phone Number:
Return to Profile

Attorneys FAQs

  • What year was this attorney first admitted to the bar?
    Andrew M. Neubardt was admitted in 1987 to the State of Connecticut.
  • Is this attorney admitted to the bar in more than one state?
    Yes, Andrew M. Neubardt is admitted to practice in Connecticut and New York.
  • Is this attorney admitted to practice in any U.S. Federal Courts?
    Andrew M. Neubardt is admitted to practice before the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York, United States District Court for the Northern District of New York, United States District Court for the Southern District of New York and United States District Court for the Western District of New York.
  • How many attorneys are in this law firm?
    Heidell, Pittoni, Murphy & Bach, LLP has 83 attorneys at this location.
  • What law school did this attorney attend?
    Andrew M. Neubardt attended Pace University School of Law.

Attorney information displayed in this FAQ section is based upon information the lawyer has included on their profile, in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals.

These FAQs include information about a lawyer's background, but do not evaluate their knowledge of the law, past performance on individual cases, personality, or communication skills.

It is solely the responsibility of lawyers and law firms to ensure that any information they provide complies with all applicable laws and rules of professional conduct.

You should be aware that the information we rely upon may not be comprehensive, or frequently updated.

Always research the lawyer further to get a better understanding of their license credentials, disciplinary status, background, and experience.

Lawyers.com Client Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review Ratings™ display reviews submitted by individuals who have either hired or consulted the lawyers or law firms.

The Client Review Rating score is determined through the aggregation of validated responses. People who submit reviews are either individuals who consulted with the lawyer/law firm or who hired the lawyer/law firm and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be anyone who consults or hires a lawyer including in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners, and private individuals.

Martindale-Hubbell validates that a reviewer is a person with a valid email address. As part of the review process, respondents must affirm that they have had an initial consultation, are currently a client or have been a client of the lawyer or law firm identified, although Martindale-Hubbell cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship as it is often confidential. The content of the responses is entirely from reviewers.

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review. For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Client Review Ratings, please visit our Client Review Page

Martindale Peer Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Peer Review Ratings™ are the gold standard in attorney ratings, and have been for more than a century. These ratings indicate attorneys who are widely respected by their peers for their ethical standards and legal expertise in a specific area of practice.

The Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings process is the gold standard due to its objectivity and comprehensiveness. Lawyers solicited for peer reviews include both those selected by the attorney being reviewed and lawyers independently selected by Martindale-Hubbell. All reviewers are verified as attorneys through Martindale-Hubbell’s extensive attorney database. Only attorneys practicing at least three years and receiving a sufficient number of reviews from non-affiliated attorneys are eligible to receive a Rating.

What are the different Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings?*

• AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies that a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

• Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

• Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Lawyers who have received peer reviews after 2009 will display more detailed information, including practice areas, summary ratings, detailed numeric ratings and written feedback (if available). Details for individual reviews received before 2009 are not displayed.

Attorneys that receive reviews from their peers, but not a sufficient number to establish a Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Rating, will have those reviews display on our websites.

For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings™, please visit our Ratings Page on Martindale.com and our Frequently Asked Questions