×
Go back to Martindale-Avvo ➔
Office | Wellesley, MA

Wilchins Cosentino Novins LLP

1.0
4 reviews

20 William Street, Suite 130, Wellesley, MA 02481, U.S.A.

MEET OUR TEAM

Partner Stephen Niles
Wilchins
Meet all 4 Lawyers

About Wilchins Cosentino Novins LLP

Wilchins Cosentino Novins LLP is a law firm with an office in Wellesley, MA. At this office location, there are 4 lawyers.

Awards

Client Reviewed
This badge is granted to attorneys who have been reviewed by a past client.
Champion Badge Reviewed
AV Preeminent Peer Rated
This elite award is granted to attorneys who have been recognized by their peers for their very high ethical standards, with an average peer review score of 4.5 or higher.
Martindale-Hubbell Peer AV

Client Champion Awards

Client Champion awards recognize those attorneys who excel at service as affirmed by their clients. The awards, based on the quantity and quality of an attorney’s Martindale-Hubbell client reviews, demonstrate an ongoing commitment to delivering excellent client service. Award recipients stand out from their peers with a platinum, gold or silver icon.

Champion Badge Silver

At least three reviews and a score of 4.0 or higher.

Champion Badge Gold

At least six reviews and a score of 4.2 or higher.

Champion Badge Platinum

At least ten reviews and a score of 4.5 or higher.

Martindale Peer Awards

A lawyer who receives a minimum threshold of qualifying responses from fellow attorneys can qualify for one of three prestigious Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings:

Martindale-Hubbell Peer AV Preeminent Rating

AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

Wilchins Cosentino Novins LLP got this award in 2021

Martindale-Hubbell Peer Distinguished Rating

Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

Martindale-Hubbell Peer Notable Rating

Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Avvo Awards

Avvo Top Contributor

Avvo Top Contributor: The Avvo Top Contributor Award is granted to attorneys who have earned significant contribution points in a given year on our sister site, Avvo.com. Contribution points are earned by answering questions in Q&A, publishing Legal Guides, and other useful contributions to the Avvo community.

Avvo Client Choice

Avvo Client’s Choice: The Avvo Client's Choice Award Badge is granted to attorneys with a significant number of 4+ star reviews in a given year.

Reviews for Wilchins Cosentino Novins LLP

Have you consulted or hired this firm?

Leave a review about your experience with this firm.

Write a Review

Overall Rating
1.0
See All Reviews
4
1.0
Lawyers.com
4
4.6
Martindale
4
Avvo
Not yet reviewed
Showing 1-4 of 4 client reviews from Lawyers.com
Lawyers.com Rating Snapshot
5 stars
0%
4 stars
0%
3 stars
0%
2 stars
0%
1 star
100%
What do people say on Lawyers.com?
Communication
1.0
Quality of Service
1.0
Responsiveness
1.0
Value for Money
1.0
Litigation
Posted by Andrew
February 23, 2025
Hired Law Firm

Attorney Michael B. Cosentino: A Liability to His Firm and the Public Michael B. Cosentino has a history of unethical conduct, including a public reprimand by the Massachusetts Board of Bar Overseers (PR2024-1): https://www.massbbo.org/Files?fileName=PR2024-1.pdf. His violations include disrupting a tribunal (Rule 3.5), prejudicial conduct (Rule 8.4), and past misconduct in 2019. Cosentino is helping Kate & Jamie O’Leary defraud Breiter Planet Properties, keeping a fully installed $30,138.31 solar system for free while demanding a refund. His actions are an abuse of the legal system. His troubling client reviews and disciplinary record make him a liability to Wilchins Cosentino Novins LLP—they should reconsider his place in the firm before more damage is done. CA #: 2382CV0004 (Norfolk) CA #: 2357CV000275 (Wrentham) CA #: 2457SP000013 (Wrentham)

 
Litigation
Posted by Andrew
February 23, 2025
Hired Attorney Michael Cosentino

Attorney Michael B. Cosentino: A Liability to His Firm and the Public Michael B. Cosentino has a history of unethical conduct, including a public reprimand by the Massachusetts Board of Bar Overseers (PR2024-1): https://www.massbbo.org/Files?fileName=PR2024-1.pdf. His violations include disrupting a tribunal (Rule 3.5), prejudicial conduct (Rule 8.4), and past misconduct in 2019. Cosentino is helping Kate & Jamie O’Leary defraud Breiter Planet Properties, keeping a fully installed $30,138.31 solar system for free while demanding a refund. His actions are an abuse of the legal system. His troubling client reviews and disciplinary record make him a liability to Wilchins Cosentino Novins LLP—they should reconsider his place in the firm before more damage is done. CA #: 2382CV0004 (Norfolk) CA #: 2357CV000275 (Wrentham) CA #: 2457SP000013 (Wrentham)

 
Securities
Posted by Jonathan
January 31, 2025
Hired Attorney Michael Cosentino

Broke multiple multiple rules in the rules of professional conduct. He promised to work our case and created a case against us and told us he couldn’t win anything for us. Michael’s performance as an attorney has been criminal. I’m Pro Se now.

Business Litigation
Posted by anonymous
June 12, 2023
Hired Law Firm

Abuse of power and extremely unethical on many levels. Very costly as well. They are more interested in lining their own pockets than doing what is right for you and your case.

From the Martindale-Avvo Legal Network

Services

Wilchins Cosentino Novins LLP

1.0
4 reviews

20 William Street, Suite 130Wellesley, MA 02481U.S.A.

Show on map
Lawyers.com Client Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review Ratings™ display reviews submitted by individuals who have either hired or consulted the lawyers or law firms.

The Client Review Rating score is determined through the aggregation of validated responses. People who submit reviews are either individuals who consulted with the lawyer/law firm or who hired the lawyer/law firm and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be anyone who consults or hires a lawyer including in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners, and private individuals.

Martindale-Hubbell validates that a reviewer is a person with a valid email address. As part of the review process, respondents must affirm that they have had an initial consultation, are currently a client or have been a client of the lawyer or law firm identified, although Martindale-Hubbell cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship as it is often confidential. The content of the responses is entirely from reviewers.

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review. For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Client Review Ratings, please visit our Client Review Page

Martindale Peer Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Peer Review Ratings™ are the gold standard in attorney ratings, and have been for more than a century. These ratings indicate attorneys who are widely respected by their peers for their ethical standards and legal expertise in a specific area of practice.

The Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings process is the gold standard due to its objectivity and comprehensiveness. Lawyers solicited for peer reviews include both those selected by the attorney being reviewed and lawyers independently selected by Martindale-Hubbell. All reviewers are verified as attorneys through Martindale-Hubbell’s extensive attorney database. Only attorneys practicing at least three years and receiving a sufficient number of reviews from non-affiliated attorneys are eligible to receive a Rating.

What are the different Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings?*

• AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies that a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

• Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

• Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Lawyers who have received peer reviews after 2009 will display more detailed information, including practice areas, summary ratings, detailed numeric ratings and written feedback (if available). Details for individual reviews received before 2009 are not displayed.

Attorneys that receive reviews from their peers, but not a sufficient number to establish a Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Rating, will have those reviews display on our websites.

For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings™, please visit our Ratings Page on Martindale.com and our Frequently Asked Questions