×
Go back to Martindale-Avvo ➔

Kellogg, Hansen, Todd, Figel & Frederick, P.L.L.C.Partner
Scott Harris Angstreich

Scott Harris Angstreich

Not yet reviewed

1615 M Street, NW, Suite 400, Washington, DC 20036-3209

Administrative Law, Telecommunications, Appeals and 1 more

About Scott Harris Angstreich

Scott Harris Angstreich is a lawyer practicing administrative law, telecommunications, appeals and 1 other area of law. Scott received a M.Phil. degree from Oxford University, Balliol College in 1995, and has been licensed for 27 years. Scott practices at Kellogg, Hansen, Todd, Figel & Frederick, P.L.L.C. in Washington, DC.

Scott Harris Angstreich (Washington, District of Columbia)

Reviews for Scott

This lawyer does not have any client reviews on Lawyers.com yet

Write a Review

Services

Areas of Law

  • Administrative Law
  • Government
  • Other 2
    • Telecommunications
    • Appeals

Practice Details

  • Firm Information
    Position
    Partner
    Firm Name
    Kellogg, Hansen, Todd, Figel & Frederick, P.L.L.C.
  • Representative Cases & Transactions
    Cases
    Noteworthy Representations: Peerless Network, Inc. v. MCI Communications Services, Inc., No. 18-2747 (7th Cir. Jan. 14, 2019)
    SoundExchange, Inc. v. Copyright Royalty Board, 904 F.3d 41 (D.C. Cir. 2018)
    Cobb County v. BellSouth Telecomms., LLC, 802 S.E.2d 686 (Ga. Ct. Appeals 2017)
    Johnson v. American Towers, LLC, 781 F.3d 693 (4th Cir. 2015)
    U.S. Bank National Ass'n v. Verizon Communications Inc., 761 F.3d 409 (5th Cir. 2014)
    In re: FCC 11-161, 753 F.3d 1015 (10th Cir. 2014)
    In re Katrina Canal Breaches Litig., 673 F.3d 381 (5th Cir.), on reh'g, 696 F.3d 436 (5th Cir. 2012)
    Talk America Inc. v. Michigan Bell Tel. Co., 131 S. Ct. 2254 (2011)

Experience

  • Bar Admission & Memberships
    Admissions
    1999, New York
    2001, District of Columbia
    2004, U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas
    2004, U.S. District Court, Western District of Arkansas, U.S. Supreme Court and U.S. Court of Appeals, First, Second and Third Circuits
    2005, U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit
    2005, U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
    2006, U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
    2006, U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit
    2008, U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
    2008, U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit
    2010, U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
    2001, U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia
    Bar Fellowship
    in Law and Economics at the Harvard Law School. He is the author of Shoring Up Chevron: A Defense of Seminole Rock Deference to Agency Regulatory Interpretations, 34 U.C. Davis Law Review 49 (2000), and the co-author of Multilateral Merger Review, 68 Antitrust Law Journal 219 (2000).
  • Education & Certifications
    Law School
    Harvard Law School
    Class of 1998
    J.D.
    magna cum laude; Executive Editor, 1997-1998; and Editor, 1996-1997, Harvard Law Review
    Other Education
    Oxford University, Balliol College
    Class of 1995
    M.Phil.
    Politics

    Princeton University
    Class of 1993
    A.B.
    summa cum laude
  • Personal Details & History
    Age
    Born in 1971
    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, October 14, 1971

Scott Harris Angstreich

Partner at Kellogg, Hansen, Todd, Figel & Frederick, P.L.L.C.
Not yet reviewed

Sumner Square, 1615 M Street, NW, Suite 400Washington, DC 20036-3209U.S.A.

Show on map

Lawyers Nearby

Paul J. Seidman
Pro
Paul J. Seidman
5.0
1
Administrative Law lawyer
771-224-8454
View Profile
Craig F. Ballew
Pro
Craig F. Ballew
4.9
6
Administrative Law lawyer
443-909-4103
View Profile
David M. Kirstein
Pro
David M. Kirstein
5.0
1
Administrative Law lawyer
771-328-7561
View Profile
Linda M. Correia
Pro
Linda M. Correia
5.0
1
Administrative Law lawyer
771-224-8470
View Profile
Roopchand
Pro
Roopchand "Bobby" Devadoss
4.0
4
Administrative Law lawyer

Free Consultation

888-926-1905
View Profile

Email Scott Harris Angstreich

Case type is required.
A valid zip code is required.
A valid city is required.
State is required.
Country is required.
Outside the US or Canada?
Message is required.
0/1000 characters

Contact Information

First name is required.
Last name is required.
A valid email address is required.
A valid phone number is required.

By clicking the Submit button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls, from Lawyers.com and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.

Thank you! Your message has been successfully sent.

For your records, a copy of this email has been sent to

Summary of Your Message
Case Type:
Zip Code or Postal Code:
City:
State:
Country:
Case Description:
Contact Information
First Name:
Last Name:
Email:
Phone Number:
Return to Profile
Lawyers.com Client Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review Ratings™ display reviews submitted by individuals who have either hired or consulted the lawyers or law firms.

The Client Review Rating score is determined through the aggregation of validated responses. People who submit reviews are either individuals who consulted with the lawyer/law firm or who hired the lawyer/law firm and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be anyone who consults or hires a lawyer including in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners, and private individuals.

Martindale-Hubbell validates that a reviewer is a person with a valid email address. As part of the review process, respondents must affirm that they have had an initial consultation, are currently a client or have been a client of the lawyer or law firm identified, although Martindale-Hubbell cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship as it is often confidential. The content of the responses is entirely from reviewers.

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review. For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Client Review Ratings, please visit our Client Review Page

Martindale Peer Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Peer Review Ratings™ are the gold standard in attorney ratings, and have been for more than a century. These ratings indicate attorneys who are widely respected by their peers for their ethical standards and legal expertise in a specific area of practice.

The Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings process is the gold standard due to its objectivity and comprehensiveness. Lawyers solicited for peer reviews include both those selected by the attorney being reviewed and lawyers independently selected by Martindale-Hubbell. All reviewers are verified as attorneys through Martindale-Hubbell’s extensive attorney database. Only attorneys practicing at least three years and receiving a sufficient number of reviews from non-affiliated attorneys are eligible to receive a Rating.

What are the different Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings?*

• AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies that a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

• Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

• Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Lawyers who have received peer reviews after 2009 will display more detailed information, including practice areas, summary ratings, detailed numeric ratings and written feedback (if available). Details for individual reviews received before 2009 are not displayed.

Attorneys that receive reviews from their peers, but not a sufficient number to establish a Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Rating, will have those reviews display on our websites.

For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings™, please visit our Ratings Page on Martindale.com and our Frequently Asked Questions