Cases
Experience: Consumer Electronics (software, GPS, smartphones, television, etc.)
Medical Devices: Certain Robotic Vacuum Cleaning Devices
Components Thereof Such as Spare Parts, ITC Inv. No. 337-TA-1057: First chair trial attorney, delivered opening statement at trial.
Certain Modular Led Display Panels
Components Thereof, ITC Inv. No. 337-TA-1114: Lead counsel in on-going Section 337 Investigation.
Certain Strontium-Rubidium Radioisotope Infusion Systems,
Components thereof Including Generators, ITC Inv. No. 337-TA-1110: Representing client in on-going Section 337 Investigation.
Certain Digital Television Set-Top Boxes, Remote Control Devices
Components Thereof, ITC Inv. No. 337-TA-1041: Achieved favorable settlement during discovery.
Advanced Electrolyte Technologies, LLC & Ube Industries, Ltd. v. Samsung SDI Co., Ltd., et al. (W.D. Tex.): Representing client in on-going litigation.
Mobile Telecommunications Technologies, LLC v. Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC (E.D. Tex.): Part of litigation
trial team that secured client's first ever patent litigation winning jury trial verdict in the Eastern District of Texas.
Uniloc USA, Inc.
Uniloc Luxembourg, S.A. v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. (E.D. Tex.): Representing client in on-going litigation.
Prisua Engineering Corp. v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc., et al. (S.D. Fl.): Representing client in on-going litigation.
FalkonTreasures LLC v. Limited Stores, LLC (E.D. Tex.): Prevailed on motion to dismiss pleadings because patent was invalid under 35 U.S.C. 101.
eDekka LLC v. Mars, Inc. (E.D. Tex.): Prevailed on motion to dismiss pleadings because patent was invalid under 35 U.S.C. 101.
Mobile H
set Devices
Related Touch Keyboard Software, ITC Inv. No. 337-TA-864: Litigated on behalf of complainant
secured settlement before trial.
Global Communications, Inc. v. DirecTV, Inc., et al. (E.D. Tex.): Achieved settlement on behalf of client.
Certain Navigation Products, Including GPS Devices, Navigation
Display Systems, Radar Systems, Navigational Aids, Mapping Systems
Related Software, ITC Inv. No. 337-TA-900: Achieved settlement on behalf of client.
Digital Televisions
Components Thereof, ITC Inv. No. 337-TA-789: Achieved settlement for client which resulted in client being paid substantial sum, even though the client was not the party that instigated litigation originally.
PersonalWeb Technologies LLC, et al. v. Microsoft Corporation (E.D. Tex.): Litigated through much of discovery
achieved a settlement on behalf of client.
Set-Top Boxes,
Hardware
Software Components Thereof, ITC Inv. No. 337-TA-761: Achieved settlement on behalf of client after bench trial at the ITC.
Dynamic Hosting Co. v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. (E.D. Tex.): Achieved settlement on behalf of client early in the discovery process.
Bluebonnet Telecommunications, LLC v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc., et al. (E.D. Tex.): Achieved settlement on behalf of client early in the discovery process.
Tune Hunter Inc. v. Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC, et al. (E.D. Tex.): Achieved settlement on behalf of client early in the discovery process.
Systems for Detecting
Removing Viruses or Worms, Components Thereof,
Products Containing Same, ITC Inv. No. 337-TA-624: Achieved settlement on behalf of complainant on the eve of trial.
Mobile Telephones
Wireless Communication Devices Featuring Digital Cameras,
Components Thereof, ITC Inv. No. 337-TA-703: Avoided exclusion order after trial on behalf of respondent.
Cypaleo LLC v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., et al. (E.D. Tex. ): Achieved settlement on behalf of client.
Innovative Automation v. 3M (E.D. Tex.): Settled case on terms for client early in discovery.
Albert C. Jones v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc.
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. (E.D. Tex.): Achieved settlement on behalf of client.
CAO Group, Inc. v. Biolase Technology, Inc. (Ct. App. Fed. Cir.): Successfully second chair oral argument on appeal from IPR decision.
Consumer Products (materials
manufacturing): Certain Height-Adjustable Desk Platforms
Components Thereof, ITC Inv. No. 337-TA-1054: Lead counsel in Section 337 Investigation that settled during discovery.
Certain Carbon
Alloy Steel Products, ITC Inv. No. 337-TA-1002: Achieved full case dismissal on behalf of client.
Mouldtec, Inc. v. Pagter & Partners International B.V.
Pagter Innovations, Inc. (Ct. App. Fed. Cir.): Successfully argue summary judgment appeal before a three judge panel at the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.
Certain Height-Adjustable Desk Platforms
Components Thereof, ITC Inv. No. 337-TA-992: Achieved settlement for client after the close of fact discovery.
Certain Toy Figurines
Toy Sets Containing The Same, ITC Inv. No. 337-TA-948: Achieved settlement on behalf of client.
Certain Resealable Packages with Slider Devices, ITC Inv. No. 337-TA-962: Second chair trial at the International Trade Commission, argue motions,
put on witnesses at trial.
Semiconductors: Digital Televisions Containing Integrated Circuit Devices
Components Thereof, ITC Inv. No. 337-TA-806: Achieved settlement for client which resulted in client being paid substantial sum, even though the client was not the party that instigated litigation originally.
Tessera, Inc. v. Renesas Electronics Corporation (D. Del.): Litigated extensively on behalf of client until plaintiff dropped the litigation.
Invensas Corporation v. Renesas Electronics Corporation (D. Del.): Achieved settlement on behalf of client after expert discovery.
Voltage Regulators, Components Thereof
Products Containing Same, ITC Inv. No. 337-TA-564: Achieved winning Initial Determination on behalf of client.
Digital Corporation v. SK hynix, Inc., et al. (S.D. Cal.): Achieved settlement on behalf of client early in the discovery process.
National Semiconductor Corporation v. LSI Corporation, et al. (D. Del.): Achieved settlement on behalf of client.
Phillip M. Adams & Associates, L.L.C. v. Lenovo International, et al. (D. Utah): Achieved settlement on behalf of client.
Raytheon Company v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., et al. (E.D. Tex.): Representing client in on-going semiconductor device litigation, that includes a successful IPR.
DSS Technology Management v. SK Hynix (E.D. Tex.): Representing client in on-going semiconductor device litigation.
Automotive/Engines: Signal IP, Inc. v. Kia Motors America, Inc. (C.D. Cal.): Part of litigation team that invalidated numerous asserted patents
other asserted patent claims at the claim construction stage of the case based on indefiniteness grounds. Prevail on summary judgment motion
achieved settlement for client.
Voxathon LLC v. Hyundai Motor America (E.D. Tex.): Prevail on motion to dismiss the asserted claims.
Signal IP, Inc. v. Hyundai Motor America (C.D. Cal.): Achieved settlement for client.
EcoServices, LLC v. Certified Aviation Services, LLC (C.D. Cal.): Representing client in on-going litigation.
Pharmaceuticals/ANDA: Fresenius Kabi USA, LLC v. B. Braun Medical Inc. (D. Del.): Achieved settlement for client after filing motion to dismiss all claims.
