Michael K Kellogg

Practice Details

• Languages
  French
• Firm Information
  Position

  Partner

  Firm Name

  Kellogg, Hansen, Todd, Figel & Frederick, P.L.L.C.
• Representative Cases & Transactions
  Cases

  Noteworthy Representations: American Express Co., et al. v. Italian Colors Restaurant, et al., No. 12-133 (U.S. S.Ct. 2013), argued successfully for the petitioners that the Federal Arbitration Act does not permit courts, invoking the federal substantive law of arbitrability, to invalidate arbitration agreements on the ground that they do not permit class arbitration of a federal-law claim.
  Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544 (2007), argued successfully for the petitioners, establishing that parallel conduct, absent plausible evidence of agreement, is insufficient to state a claim under 1 of the Sherman Act.
  Lexecon Inc. v. Milberg Weiss Bershad Hynes & Lerach, 523 U.S. 26 (1998), argued successfully for the petitioner, Lexecon, establishing that federal district courts conducting pretrial proceedings for multi-district litigation under 28 U.S.C. 1407(a) must rem
  the case for trial.
  In re Magnesium Corporation of America, 682 F. App'x 24 (2d Cir. 2017), argued successfully for the respondent, Lee E. Buchwald, as Trustee for the Renco bankruptcy estate, to affirm the approximately $213 million verdict against the Renco Group
  Ira Rennert.
  Anderson News, L.L.C. v. American Media, Inc., 680 F.3d 162 (2nd Cir. 2012), argued successfully that the district court judgment granting defendants' motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim under 1 of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. 1 be vacated
  rem
  ed.
  In re National Security Agency Telecommunications Records Litigation, 671 F.3d 881 (9th Cir. 2011), argued successfully, representing AT&T
  other telephone companies in conjunction with alleged assistance to NSA's alleged warrantless wiretapping sc
  al.
  In re Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001, 538 F.3d 71 (2d Cir. 2008), argued successfully on appeal from orders entered in the district court for dismissing claims against the seven Saudi Arabian defendants-appellees for lack of subject matter jurisdiction
  personal jurisdiction.