×
Go back to Martindale-Avvo ➔

Stein Mitchell Beato & Missner LLPPartner
Kevin Lilja Attridge
Pro

Kevin Lilja Attridge

Not yet reviewed

2000 K Street NW, Suite 600, Washington, DC 20006

Antitrust and Trade Regulation and Commercial Litigation

About Kevin Lilja Attridge

Kevin Attridge is a litigation associate at Stein Mitchell Cipollone Beato & Missner LLP. Before joining the firm, Mr. Attridge practiced at Kellogg, Huber, Hansen, Todd, Evans & Figel PLLC as a contract attorney. He has represented clients in commercial litigation consisting of antitrust, telecommunications, securities, and class action matters.
During law school, Mr. Attridge was a student attorney in the Consumer Protection Clinic, where he represented victims of fraud in post-Hurricane Katrina rebuilding efforts. He served as a judicial intern for Magistrate Judges Alan Kay and John Facciola, and interned at Civil Justice, Inc., where he represented individuals subjected to mortgage fraud.

 

Kevin Lilja Attridge (Washington, District of Columbia) View website

Reviews for Kevin Lilja

This lawyer does not have any client reviews on Lawyers.com yet

Write a Review

Services

Areas of Law

  • Antitrust and Trade Regulation
  • Commercial Litigation

Experience

  • Bar Admission & Memberships
    Admissions
    2010, Maryland
    2011, Pennsylvania
    2013, District of Columbia
  • Education & Certifications
    Other Education
    Vanderbilt University
    Class of 2007

    Maryland, University of
    Class of 2010

Email Kevin Lilja Attridge

Case type is required.
I am is required.
First name is required.
Last name is required.
A valid zip code is required.
Country is required.
State is required.
A valid city is required.
A valid email address is required.
A valid phone number is required.
Message is required.
0/1000 characters

By clicking the Submit button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls, from Lawyers.com and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.

You should not send any sensitive or confidential information through this site. Emails sent through this site do not create an attorney-client relationship and may not be treated as privileged or confidential. The lawyer or law firm you are contacting is not required to, and may choose not to, accept you as a client. The internet is not necessarily secure and emails sent though this site could be intercepted or read by third parties.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA. See Google’s Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.

Thank you! Your message has been successfully sent.

For your records, a copy of this email has been sent to test@test.com.

Summary of Your Message
Case Type:
I am a/an:
First Name:
Last Name:
City:
Zip Code or Postal Code:
State:
Country:
Phone Number:
Message:
Return to Profile Reset Form

Attorneys FAQs

  • What year was this attorney first admitted to the bar?
    Kevin Lilja Attridge was admitted in 2010 to the State of Maryland.
  • Is this attorney admitted to the bar in more than one state?
    Yes, Kevin Lilja Attridge is admitted to practice in District of Columbia, Maryland and Pennsylvania.
  • How many attorneys are in this law firm?
    Stein Mitchell Beato & Missner LLP has 22 attorneys at this location.
  • What year was this attorney's law firm established?
    Stein Mitchell Beato & Missner LLP was established in 1965.
  • Is this attorney listed in the Bar Register of Preeminent Lawyers?
    Kevin Lilja Attridge is listed in the Construction Law section of the Bar Register of Preeminent Lawyers.

Attorney information displayed in this FAQ section is based upon information the lawyer has included on their profile, in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals.

These FAQs include information about a lawyer's background, but do not evaluate their knowledge of the law, past performance on individual cases, personality, or communication skills.

It is solely the responsibility of lawyers and law firms to ensure that any information they provide complies with all applicable laws and rules of professional conduct.

You should be aware that the information we rely upon may not be comprehensive, or frequently updated.

Always research the lawyer further to get a better understanding of their license credentials, disciplinary status, background, and experience.

Lawyers.com Client Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review Ratings™ display reviews submitted by individuals who have either hired or consulted the lawyers or law firms.

The Client Review Rating score is determined through the aggregation of validated responses. People who submit reviews are either individuals who consulted with the lawyer/law firm or who hired the lawyer/law firm and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be anyone who consults or hires a lawyer including in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners, and private individuals.

Martindale-Hubbell validates that a reviewer is a person with a valid email address. As part of the review process, respondents must affirm that they have had an initial consultation, are currently a client or have been a client of the lawyer or law firm identified, although Martindale-Hubbell cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship as it is often confidential. The content of the responses is entirely from reviewers.

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review. For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Client Review Ratings, please visit our Client Review Page

Martindale Peer Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Peer Review Ratings™ are the gold standard in attorney ratings, and have been for more than a century. These ratings indicate attorneys who are widely respected by their peers for their ethical standards and legal expertise in a specific area of practice.

The Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings process is the gold standard due to its objectivity and comprehensiveness. Lawyers solicited for peer reviews include both those selected by the attorney being reviewed and lawyers independently selected by Martindale-Hubbell. All reviewers are verified as attorneys through Martindale-Hubbell’s extensive attorney database. Only attorneys practicing at least three years and receiving a sufficient number of reviews from non-affiliated attorneys are eligible to receive a Rating.

What are the different Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings?*

• AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies that a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

• Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

• Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Lawyers who have received peer reviews after 2009 will display more detailed information, including practice areas, summary ratings, detailed numeric ratings and written feedback (if available). Details for individual reviews received before 2009 are not displayed.

Attorneys that receive reviews from their peers, but not a sufficient number to establish a Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Rating, will have those reviews display on our websites.

For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings™, please visit our Ratings Page on Martindale.com and our Frequently Asked Questions