×
Go back to Martindale-Avvo ➔

Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLPAttorney
no photo

Mr. Kenneth Edward Natale

Not yet reviewed

1333 New Hampshire Ave. N.W., Washington, DC 20036-1564

Project Finance, Construction & Development, Global Projects and 2 more

About Mr. Kenneth Edward Natale

Mr. Kenneth Edward Natale is a lawyer practicing project finance, construction & development, global projects and 2 other areas of law. Kenneth received a B.A. degree from University of Notre Dame in 1974, and has been licensed for 49 years. Kenneth practices at Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP in Washington, DC.

Mr. Kenneth Edward Natale (Washington, District of Columbia)

Reviews for Kenneth

This lawyer does not have any client reviews on Lawyers.com yet

Write a Review

Services

Areas of Law

  • Finance 1
    • Project Finance
  • Other 4
    • Construction & Development
    • Global Projects
    • Energy: Government Relations
    • Government Relations & Legislative Advocacy

Practice Details

  • Firm Information
    Position
    Attorney
    Firm Name
    Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP
  • Representative Cases & Transactions
    Cases
    Representative Matters: Previously, Mr. Natale's other representations have included: an investment fund, with responsibility for the negotiation
    drafting of design services agreements, a technology license agreement
    a construction agreement in connection with an acquired company's acquisition of technology
    design
    construction of used oil refineries in the U.S.
    a Chinese mineral development company in connection with the negotiation of an option agreement for acquisition of mining licenses in Tanzania
    the owner of an oil refinery in Morocco in connection with a $1 billion upgrade, with primary responsibility for the drafting
    negotiation of EPC agreements
    related documentation with a consortium of Turkish
    Italian contractors
    the owner of a oil refinery in Russia in connection with the negotiation of a construction agreement for a major upgrade
    the owner of a used oil refinery in the Midwest United States in connection with the drafting
    negotiation of the EPC contract
    related project agreements
    the developer of a 415 MW cogeneration power project in the Netherl
    s with respect to negotiation
    drafting of the joint development agreement
    agreements with offtakers
    the developer of a 135 MW tolling facility for a steel mill in Michigan, with responsibility for negotiation
    drafting of the steam
    electric energy sales agreement
    a Lithuanian state-owned energy company, with responsibility for the negotiation of transmission construction, power sale
    related project agreements
    a Norwegian oil
    gas exploration
    development company with respect to joint ventures for the development of oil fields in Albania, the Republic of Adygea
    Ukraine
    a U.S. mining company in connection with a joint venture related to mining rights in Pol



    Native American tribes in Arizona, New York, Massachusetts, Nevada,
    California with respect to the negotiation of design/build agreements
    management agreements for the construction
    management of hotels, golf courses, casinos
    related facilities,
    transactions related to the transfer
    use of tribal l
    s.

Experience

  • Bar Admission & Memberships
    Admissions
    1977, Virginia
    1978, District of Columbia
    1986, New York
    Memberships

    Memberships

    •District of Columbia Bar
    •New York State Bar Association
    •Virginia State Bar

  • Education & Certifications
    Law School
    The George Washington University Law School
    Class of 1977
    J.D.
    Other Education
    University of Notre Dame
    Class of 1974
    B.A.
    with high honors

Email Mr. Kenneth Edward Natale

Case type is required.
I am is required.
First name is required.
Last name is required.
A valid zip code is required.
Country is required.
State is required.
A valid city is required.
A valid email address is required.
A valid phone number is required.
Message is required.
0/1000 characters

By clicking the Submit button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls, from Lawyers.com and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.

You should not send any sensitive or confidential information through this site. Emails sent through this site do not create an attorney-client relationship and may not be treated as privileged or confidential. The lawyer or law firm you are contacting is not required to, and may choose not to, accept you as a client. The internet is not necessarily secure and emails sent though this site could be intercepted or read by third parties.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA. See Google’s Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.

Thank you! Your message has been successfully sent.

For your records, a copy of this email has been sent to test@test.com.

Summary of Your Message
Case Type:
I am a/an:
First Name:
Last Name:
City:
Zip Code or Postal Code:
State:
Country:
Phone Number:
Message:
Return to Profile Reset Form
Lawyers.com Client Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review Ratings™ display reviews submitted by individuals who have either hired or consulted the lawyers or law firms.

The Client Review Rating score is determined through the aggregation of validated responses. People who submit reviews are either individuals who consulted with the lawyer/law firm or who hired the lawyer/law firm and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be anyone who consults or hires a lawyer including in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners, and private individuals.

Martindale-Hubbell validates that a reviewer is a person with a valid email address. As part of the review process, respondents must affirm that they have had an initial consultation, are currently a client or have been a client of the lawyer or law firm identified, although Martindale-Hubbell cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship as it is often confidential. The content of the responses is entirely from reviewers.

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review. For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Client Review Ratings, please visit our Client Review Page

Martindale Peer Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Peer Review Ratings™ are the gold standard in attorney ratings, and have been for more than a century. These ratings indicate attorneys who are widely respected by their peers for their ethical standards and legal expertise in a specific area of practice.

The Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings process is the gold standard due to its objectivity and comprehensiveness. Lawyers solicited for peer reviews include both those selected by the attorney being reviewed and lawyers independently selected by Martindale-Hubbell. All reviewers are verified as attorneys through Martindale-Hubbell’s extensive attorney database. Only attorneys practicing at least three years and receiving a sufficient number of reviews from non-affiliated attorneys are eligible to receive a Rating.

What are the different Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings?*

• AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies that a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

• Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

• Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Lawyers who have received peer reviews after 2009 will display more detailed information, including practice areas, summary ratings, detailed numeric ratings and written feedback (if available). Details for individual reviews received before 2009 are not displayed.

Attorneys that receive reviews from their peers, but not a sufficient number to establish a Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Rating, will have those reviews display on our websites.

For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings™, please visit our Ratings Page on Martindale.com and our Frequently Asked Questions