Kellogg, Hansen, Todd, Figel & Frederick, P.L.L.C.Partner

Mr. David Charles Frederick

About Mr. David Charles Frederick

Mr. David Charles Frederick is a lawyer practicing u.s. supreme court litigation, appellate litigation, litigation and 2 other areas of law. David received a D.Phil. degree from Oxford University, University College in 1987, and has been licensed for 37 years. David practices at Kellogg, Hansen, Todd, Figel & Frederick, P.L.L.C. in Washington, DC.

Awards

Reviews for David

This lawyer does not have any client reviews on Lawyers.com yet

Write a Review

Services

Areas of Law

  • Litigation
  • Administrative Law
  • Other 3
    • U.S. Supreme Court Litigation
    • Appellate Litigation
    • Admiralty / Maritime

Practice Details

  • Firm Information
    Position
    Partner
    Firm Name
    Kellogg, Hansen, Todd, Figel & Frederick, P.L.L.C.
  • Representative Cases & Transactions
    Cases
    Noteworthy Representations: Lead Counsel for National Credit Union Administration, as liquidating agent, in lawsuits against Bank of America, Barclays, Bear Sterns, Countrywide, Credit Suisse, Goldman Sachs, JP Morgan, Merrill Lynch, Morgan Stanley, Nomura, Royal Bank of Scotl
    , UBS, Wachovia
    Washington Mutual
    Apple Inc. v. Pepper, et al., successfully argued that iPhone owners may sue Apple as direct purchasers under 4 of the Clayton Act
    Illinois Brick Co. v. Illinois, 431 U.S. 720 (1977), for monopolizing the market for iPhone apps
    Tyson Foods v. Bouaphakeo, 135 S. Ct. 2806 (2015) - successfully represented workers in meat processing plant in upholding class certification in case for overtime pay under Fair Labor St
    ards Act
    Tibble v. Edison Int'l, 135 S. Ct. 1823 (2015) - successfully represented members of ERISA plan asserting breach of fiduciary duty against statute of limitations defense
    Mississippi v. Tennessee, No. 143 Original - represent Tennessee in boundary dispute over Memphis S
    s Aquifer
    Amgen Inc., et al. v. Connecticut Retirement Plans
    Trust Funds, 133 S. Ct. 1184 (2013) - successfully represented investors in securities class action on principle that materiality need not be proved at class certification stage
    Pacific Operators Offshore, LLP, et al. v. Luisa L. Valladolid, et al., 132 S. Ct. 680 (2012) - successfully represented widow of Mexican-American roustabout on oil drilling platform to obtain spousal death benefits under OCSLA
    CSX Transportation Inc. v. McBride, 131 S. Ct. 2630 (2011) - successfully represented rail worker in rejecting railroad's assertion that proximate cause needs to be proved under FELA
    Matrixx Initiatives, Inc. v. Siracusano, 131 S. Ct. 1309 (2011) - successfully represented investors in establishing that materiality in securities fraud case is not established solely by statistical significance of drug adverse event reports
    Merck v. Reynolds, 130 S. Ct. 1784 (2010) - successfully represented investors in case defining when statute of limitations arises in securities cases
    Jones v. Harris Associates, 130 S. Ct. 1418 (2010) - successfully represented mutual fund investors in case defining when fund advisor breaches fiduciary duty to investors
    South Carolina v. North Carolina, 130 S. Ct. 854 (2010) - successfully represented South Carolina in obtaining settlement for additional water in boundary dispute with North Carolina
    14 Penn Plaza v. Pyett, 556 U.S. 247 (2009) - represented union members in age discrimination case involving arbitrability of claims under collective bargaining agreement
    Wyeth v. Levine, 555 U.S. 555 (2009) - successfully represented woman whose arm was amputated in failure-to-warn case against preemption defense for prescription drugs
    Altria v. Good, 555 U.S. 70 (2008) - successfully represented consumers against cigarette company asserting preemption defense to claims of fraudulent representations of light cigarettes
    Plains Commerce Bank v. Long Family L
    & Cattle Co., 554 U.S. 316 (2008) - represented Native American family in case concerning scope of tribal court jurisdiction over claims of fraud by off-reservation bank
    New Jersey v. Delaware, 552 U.S. 597 (2008) - successfully represented Delaware in boundary dispute with New Jersey over licensing of liquefied natural gas facility that was to encroach across Delaware's boundary
    Watson v. Philip Morris Cos., 551 U.S. 142 (2007) - successfully represented consumers in preventing tobacco company from deploying federal officer removal statute as basis for removing state-court action to federal court
    Bates v. Dow AgroSciences LLC, 544 U.S. 431 (2005) - successfully represented peanut farmers whose crops had been killed by pesticides
    Represented Mid-Atlantic Sports Network in matters pertaining to carriage
    Washington Nationals television rights fees
    Represented 35 states in common proceeding against tobacco companies arising out of Master Settlement Agreement

Experience

  • Bar Admission & Memberships
    Admissions
    1989, Pennsylvania
    1992, District of Columbia
    1996, U.S. Supreme Court
    Illinois
    Memberships
    American Bar Association (Member, Sections on: Administrative Law
    Antitrust)
    District of Columbia Bar.
    Bar Fellowship
    American Bar Foundation.
  • Education & Certifications
    Law School
    University of Texas School of Law, Austin
    Class of 1989
    J.D.
    with honors; Articles Editor, Texas Law Review, 1988-1989
    Other Education
    Oxford University, University College
    Class of 1987
    D.Phil.
    Rhodes Scholar

    University of Pittsburgh
    Class of 1983
    B.A.
    summa cum laude; Phi Beta Kappa; Truman Scholar
  • Personal Details & History
    Age
    Born in 1961
    Shields, Illinois, April 9, 1961

Mr. David Charles Frederick

Partner at Kellogg, Hansen, Todd, Figel & Frederick, P.L.L.C.
Not yet reviewed

Sumner Square, 1615 M Street, NW, Suite 400Washington, DC 20036-3209U.S.A.

Show on map

Lawyers Nearby

Edgar N. James
Pro
Edgar N. James
5.0
Litigation lawyer
Jonathan C. Puth
Pro
Jonathan C. Puth
5.0
Litigation lawyer
Jordan D. Howlette
Pro
Jordan D. Howlette
5.0
Litigation lawyer
John P. Williams
Pro
John P. Williams
5.0
Litigation lawyer

Free Consultation

Robert L. Ferguson, Jr.
Pro
Robert L. Ferguson, Jr.
5.0
Litigation lawyer
Case type is required.
I am is required.
First name is required.
Last name is required.
A valid zip code is required.
Country is required.
State is required.
A valid city is required.
A valid email address is required.
A valid phone number is required.
Message is required.
0/1000 characters

By clicking the Submit button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls, from Lawyers.com and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.

You should not send any sensitive or confidential information through this site. Emails sent through this site do not create an attorney-client relationship and may not be treated as privileged or confidential. The lawyer or law firm you are contacting is not required to, and may choose not to, accept you as a client. The internet is not necessarily secure and emails sent though this site could be intercepted or read by third parties.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA. See Google’s Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.

Thank you! Your message has been successfully sent.

For your records, a copy of this email has been sent to test@test.com.

Summary of Your Message
Case Type:
I am a/an:
First Name:
Last Name:
City:
Zip Code or Postal Code:
State:
Country:
Phone Number:
Message: