×
Go back to Martindale-Avvo ➔

Miller Starr Regalia A Professional Law CorporationShare Holder
Matthew Cable Henderson

Matthew Cable Henderson

Not yet reviewed

1331 North California Boulevard, Fifth Floor, P.O. Box 8177, Walnut Creek, CA 94596

Appellate Advocacy, Entitlement, Land Use & CEQA and 2 more

About Matthew Cable Henderson

Matthew Cable Henderson is a lawyer practicing appellate advocacy, entitlement, land use & ceqa and 2 other areas of law. Matthew received a M.A. degree from University of Chicago, Humanities in 2000, and has been licensed for 23 years. Matthew practices at Miller Starr Regalia A Professional Law Corporation in Walnut Creek, CA.

Matthew Cable Henderson (Walnut Creek, California)

Reviews for Matthew

This lawyer does not have any client reviews on Lawyers.com yet

Write a Review

Services

Areas of Law

  • Real Estate
  • Litigation
  • Other 3
    • Appellate Advocacy
    • Entitlement
    • Land Use & CEQA

Practice Details

  • Firm Information
    Position
    Shareholder
    Firm Name
    Miller Starr Regalia A Professional Law Corporation
  • Representative Cases & Transactions
    Cases
    Representative Matters: Aptos Village Project: Matt represented a developer of a mixed-use project in Santa Cruz County subject to a variety of legal challenges under the Subdivision Map Act
    CEQA. Matt obtained a complete victory for his client,
    the project is currently under development.
    Shadel
    s Project: Twenty-five acre, mixed-use development in Walnut Creek, California involving multiple entitlement
    l
    use approvals including, adoption of specific plan, general plan amendment, rezoning, tentative map approval,
    CEQA review.
    California Building Industry Association v. Bay Area Air Quality Management District (2015) 62 Cal.4th 369 (co-authored amici curiae brief on behalf of League of California Cities
    three counties)
    Appel v. Superior Court. Matt served as counsel for amicus curiae California L
    Title Association in a proceeding for a petition for a writ of m
    amus before the Second District Court of Appeal involving the appropriate measurement of recovery under a mechanic's lien.
    Lee v. Fidelity National Title Insurance Company. Complete judgment in favor of client following three-week trial in Solano County Superior Court
    affirmation on appeal to the First District Court of Appeal.

Experience

  • Bar Admission & Memberships
    Admissions
    2003, California
    2004, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California
    Memberships

    Associations

    Bay Area Council

    California Land Use Law & Policy Reporter - Contributing Editor (2012-2017)

    California Lawyers Association - Member, Board of Representatives (2018-present)

    Contra Costa County Bar Association, Real Estate and Appellate Sections

    State Bar of California, Real Property Law Section

    •Executive Committee (2014-2017)
    •Litigation Subsection Co-Chair, (October 2009-August 2014)

  • Education & Certifications
    Law School
    University of California, Los Angeles School of Law
    Class of 2003
    J.D.
    Other Education
    University of Chicago, Humanities
    Class of 2000
    M.A.

    Pomona College
    Class of 1995
    B.A.
    English

Email Matthew Cable Henderson

Case type is required.
I am is required.
First name is required.
Last name is required.
A valid zip code is required.
Country is required.
State is required.
A valid city is required.
A valid email address is required.
A valid phone number is required.
Message is required.
0/1000 characters

By clicking the Submit button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls, from Lawyers.com and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.

You should not send any sensitive or confidential information through this site. Emails sent through this site do not create an attorney-client relationship and may not be treated as privileged or confidential. The lawyer or law firm you are contacting is not required to, and may choose not to, accept you as a client. The internet is not necessarily secure and emails sent though this site could be intercepted or read by third parties.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA. See Google’s Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.

Thank you! Your message has been successfully sent.

For your records, a copy of this email has been sent to test@test.com.

Summary of Your Message
Case Type:
I am a/an:
First Name:
Last Name:
City:
Zip Code or Postal Code:
State:
Country:
Phone Number:
Message:
Return to Profile Reset Form
Lawyers.com Client Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review Ratings™ display reviews submitted by individuals who have either hired or consulted the lawyers or law firms.

The Client Review Rating score is determined through the aggregation of validated responses. People who submit reviews are either individuals who consulted with the lawyer/law firm or who hired the lawyer/law firm and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be anyone who consults or hires a lawyer including in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners, and private individuals.

Martindale-Hubbell validates that a reviewer is a person with a valid email address. As part of the review process, respondents must affirm that they have had an initial consultation, are currently a client or have been a client of the lawyer or law firm identified, although Martindale-Hubbell cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship as it is often confidential. The content of the responses is entirely from reviewers.

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review. For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Client Review Ratings, please visit our Client Review Page

Martindale Peer Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Peer Review Ratings™ are the gold standard in attorney ratings, and have been for more than a century. These ratings indicate attorneys who are widely respected by their peers for their ethical standards and legal expertise in a specific area of practice.

The Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings process is the gold standard due to its objectivity and comprehensiveness. Lawyers solicited for peer reviews include both those selected by the attorney being reviewed and lawyers independently selected by Martindale-Hubbell. All reviewers are verified as attorneys through Martindale-Hubbell’s extensive attorney database. Only attorneys practicing at least three years and receiving a sufficient number of reviews from non-affiliated attorneys are eligible to receive a Rating.

What are the different Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings?*

• AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies that a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

• Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

• Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Lawyers who have received peer reviews after 2009 will display more detailed information, including practice areas, summary ratings, detailed numeric ratings and written feedback (if available). Details for individual reviews received before 2009 are not displayed.

Attorneys that receive reviews from their peers, but not a sufficient number to establish a Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Rating, will have those reviews display on our websites.

For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings™, please visit our Ratings Page on Martindale.com and our Frequently Asked Questions