×
Go back to Martindale-Avvo ➔

iCommLawFounder
Anita Taff-Rice
Pro

Anita Taff-Rice

Not yet reviewed

1547 Palos Verdes, Suite 298, Walnut Creek, CA 94597

Telecommunications Law, Transactional, Litigation and 21 more

About Anita Taff-Rice

Georgetown Law Center: Order of the Coif; Recipient, American Jurisprudence Award (Constitutional Law) University of Texas: Kappa Tau Alpha. Dean' List. Speaker: Presentation on DSL issues for Women in Telecommunications, 2001-2003; Presentation on Telecommunications infrastructure issues at day-long continuing legal education seminar. Witness, Testified on California Environmental Quality Act issues in complaint proceeding before California Public Utilities Commission. Moderator, Infrastructure and ISDN panels, SuperComm '92. Moderator and Co-organizer, Communications Managers Association day-long session at annual conference. Guest Speaker, Telephone Network outages for Monitor Today, cable news program of Christian Science Monitor. Member: Women in Telecommunications; Wireless Communications Alliance; California Wireless Association. Senior Articles Editor and Staff Member, Georgetown International Environment Law Review, 1993-1994.

 

Anita Taff-Rice (Walnut Creek, California) View website

Reviews for Anita

This lawyer does not have any client reviews on Lawyers.com yet

Write a Review

Services

Areas of Law

  • Communications and Media 1
    • Telecommunications Law
  • Litigation
  • Other 22
    • Transactional
    • Regulatory
    • Compliance
    • Internet
    • Land Use
    • Cellular Communications
    • Cellular Telephone
    • Communications Common Carrier
    • Communications Law
    • Digital Communications
    • FCC Licensing
    • FCC Regulation
    • International Telecommunications Law
    • Mass Media Law
    • Telecommunications Contracts
    • Telecommunications Competition
    • Telecommunications Finance
    • Telecommunications Licensing
    • Telecommunications Regulation
    • Wireless Communications
    • Technology Licensing
    • Technology Contracts

Practice Details

  • Payment Information
    Payment & Cost Features
    Free initial consultation
    Fixed hourly rates
    Fixed fees available
  • Firm Information
    Position
    Founder
    Firm Name
    iCommLaw
    Firm Onwership
    Minority Owned
  • Representative Cases & Transactions
    Cases
    North County Communications v. Vaya Telecom, Inc. Case No. 37-2011-000083845
    IntelePeer v. MilliCorp, Inc. Case No. 16-cv-00303-MEJ
    InteelPeer v. Explore Travels, Inc. Case No. 16-cv-01255-DMR
    O1 Communications v. AT&T Corp. Case No. 16-cv-01452-VC
    Verizon California v. O1 Communications, Case No. 13-07-cv-07869 PSG (VBKx)
    Qwest v. Anovian, et al. Case No. 08-CV-01715 MAT (W.D. Wash)
    Pacific Bell d/b/a AT & T California v. California Public Utilities Commission, Case No. 3:07-CV-01797-SI (N.D. Calif)
    Metromedia Fiber Network Services v. City of Berkeley, Case No. C-01-0722-SI (N.D. Calif)
    Application of Pacific Fiber Link, L.L.C. (U-6028-C) for Modification of its CPCN to Review Proponent's Environmental Assessment for Compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA"), Case No. 99-08-021
    Pasadena Neighborhood Coalition v. Altrio Communications, Case No. C.02-11-053
    Federal Communications, Inc. for Provision of In-Region Services in Texas, CC Docket No. 00-4
    Illinois Commerce Commission Docket 00-0393 (Line Sharing)
    California Public Utilities Commission Docket R.93-04-003/I.93-04-002 (Line Sharing)
    California Public Utilities Commission Docket R.95-04-043 (Collocation
    Triennial Review phases)
    California Public Utilities Commission, Docket R. 93-04-003/I.93-04-002/ R.95-04-043/I.95-04-044 (Section 271 Compliance)
    Public Utility Commission of Texas Docket 29175/28745 (Triennial Review Batch Hot Cuts/Loops Impairment Analysis)
    Minnesota Public Utilities Commission Docket P-42/CI-02-293/OAH Docket No. 12-2500-14765-2 (Line Sharing Over DLC)
    Michigan Public Service Commission Case No. U-13891 (Triennial Review)
    Public Utility Commission of Texas Docket No. 20226/20272.

Experience

  • Bar Admission & Memberships
    Admissions
    1996, California
    1997, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California and U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
    2016, United States Supreme Court
    2015, Eastern District Court of California
    2014, Central District Court of California
    Memberships
    Federal Communications Bar Association
    State Bar of California.
  • Education & Certifications
    Law School
    Georgetown University Law Center
    Class of 1996
    J.D.
    magna cum laude
    Other Education
    University of Texas
    Class of 1984
    B.J.
  • Special Agencies
    California Public Utilities Commission
    Texas Public Utilities Commission
    Illinois Public Utilities Commission
    Minnesota Public Utilities Commission
    Federal Communications Commission.

Contact Anita Taff-Rice

Founder at iCommLaw
Not yet reviewed

1547 Palos Verdes, Suite 298Walnut Creek, CA 94597U.S.A.

Show on map
Office Hours:
  • Monday 08:00 AM - 06:00 PM
  • Tuesday 08:00 AM - 06:00 PM
  • Wednesday 08:00 AM - 06:00 PM
  • Thursday 08:00 AM - 06:00 PM
  • Friday 08:00 AM - 06:00 PM
  • Saturday By appointment

Email Anita Taff-Rice

Case type is required.
A valid zip code is required.
A valid city is required.
State is required.
Country is required.
Outside the US or Canada?
Message is required.
0/1000 characters

Contact Information

First name is required.
Last name is required.
A valid email address is required.
A valid phone number is required.

By clicking the Submit button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls, from Lawyers.com and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.

Thank you! Your message has been successfully sent.

For your records, a copy of this email has been sent to

Summary of Your Message
Case Type:
Zip Code or Postal Code:
City:
State:
Country:
Case Description:
Contact Information
First Name:
Last Name:
Email:
Phone Number:
Return to Profile

Attorneys FAQs

  • What year was this attorney first admitted to the bar?
    Anita Taff-Rice was admitted in 1996 to the State of California.
  • Is this attorney admitted to practice in any U.S. Federal Courts?
    Anita Taff-Rice is admitted to practice before the United States Supreme Court.
  • Does this attorney offer any legal services for a flat fee?
    Yes, Anita Taff-Rice offers fixed fees for certain legal services.
  • What law school did this attorney attend?
    Anita Taff-Rice attended Georgetown University Law Center.
  • Is the law firm that this attorney is affiliated with minority owned?
    Yes, the firm Anita Taff-Rice is affiliated with is a minority owned business.

Attorney information displayed in this FAQ section is based upon information the lawyer has included on their profile, in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals.

These FAQs include information about a lawyer's background, but do not evaluate their knowledge of the law, past performance on individual cases, personality, or communication skills.

It is solely the responsibility of lawyers and law firms to ensure that any information they provide complies with all applicable laws and rules of professional conduct.

You should be aware that the information we rely upon may not be comprehensive, or frequently updated.

Always research the lawyer further to get a better understanding of their license credentials, disciplinary status, background, and experience.

Lawyers.com Client Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review Ratings™ display reviews submitted by individuals who have either hired or consulted the lawyers or law firms.

The Client Review Rating score is determined through the aggregation of validated responses. People who submit reviews are either individuals who consulted with the lawyer/law firm or who hired the lawyer/law firm and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be anyone who consults or hires a lawyer including in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners, and private individuals.

Martindale-Hubbell validates that a reviewer is a person with a valid email address. As part of the review process, respondents must affirm that they have had an initial consultation, are currently a client or have been a client of the lawyer or law firm identified, although Martindale-Hubbell cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship as it is often confidential. The content of the responses is entirely from reviewers.

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review. For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Client Review Ratings, please visit our Client Review Page

Martindale Peer Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Peer Review Ratings™ are the gold standard in attorney ratings, and have been for more than a century. These ratings indicate attorneys who are widely respected by their peers for their ethical standards and legal expertise in a specific area of practice.

The Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings process is the gold standard due to its objectivity and comprehensiveness. Lawyers solicited for peer reviews include both those selected by the attorney being reviewed and lawyers independently selected by Martindale-Hubbell. All reviewers are verified as attorneys through Martindale-Hubbell’s extensive attorney database. Only attorneys practicing at least three years and receiving a sufficient number of reviews from non-affiliated attorneys are eligible to receive a Rating.

What are the different Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings?*

• AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies that a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

• Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

• Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Lawyers who have received peer reviews after 2009 will display more detailed information, including practice areas, summary ratings, detailed numeric ratings and written feedback (if available). Details for individual reviews received before 2009 are not displayed.

Attorneys that receive reviews from their peers, but not a sufficient number to establish a Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Rating, will have those reviews display on our websites.

For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings™, please visit our Ratings Page on Martindale.com and our Frequently Asked Questions