×
Go back to Martindale-Avvo ➔

Kosakoski L.C.Member
no photo

Graham Thomas Kosakoski

5.0
2 reviews

130 Cooper’s Mews, Vancouver, BC V6Z 3A2

Criminal Law, Class Actions, Constitutional Law and 11 more

About Graham Thomas Kosakoski

Graham Thomas Kosakoski is a lawyer practicing criminal law, class actions, constitutional law and 11 other areas of law. Graham received a B.A. degree from Queen's University in 2004, and has been licensed for 16 years. Graham practices at Kosakoski L.C. in Vancouver, BC.

Awards

Client Reviewed
This badge is granted to attorneys who have been reviewed by a past client.
Champion Badge Reviewed

Client Champion Awards

Client Champion awards recognize those attorneys who excel at service as affirmed by their clients. The awards, based on the quantity and quality of an attorney’s Martindale-Hubbell client reviews, demonstrate an ongoing commitment to delivering excellent client service. Award recipients stand out from their peers with a platinum, gold or silver icon.

Champion Badge Silver

At least three reviews and a score of 4.0 or higher.

Champion Badge Gold

At least six reviews and a score of 4.2 or higher.

Champion Badge Platinum

At least ten reviews and a score of 4.5 or higher.

Martindale Peer Awards

A lawyer who receives a minimum threshold of qualifying responses from fellow attorneys can qualify for one of three prestigious Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings:

Martindale-Hubbell Peer AV Preeminent Rating

AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

Martindale-Hubbell Peer Distinguished Rating

Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

Martindale-Hubbell Peer Notable Rating

Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Avvo Awards

Avvo Top Contributor

Avvo Top Contributor: The Avvo Top Contributor Award is granted to attorneys who have earned significant contribution points in a given year on our sister site, Avvo.com. Contribution points are earned by answering questions in Q&A, publishing Legal Guides, and other useful contributions to the Avvo community.

Avvo Client Choice

Avvo Client’s Choice: The Avvo Client's Choice Award Badge is granted to attorneys with a significant number of 4+ star reviews in a given year.

Reviews for Graham

Have you consulted or hired this lawyer?

Leave a review about your experience with this lawyer.

Write a Review

Overall Rating
5.0
See All Reviews
2
Showing 1-2 of 2 client reviews from Lawyers.com
Lawyers.com Rating Snapshot
5 stars
100%
4 stars
0%
3 stars
0%
2 stars
0%
1 star
0%
What do people say on Lawyers.com?
Communication
5.0
Quality of Service
5.0
Responsiveness
5.0
Value for Money
5.0
Criminal Law
Posted by anonymous
September 17, 2017
Hired Attorney
Litigation
Posted by anonymous
June 11, 2017
Hired Attorney

Made us feel like we had sombody standing up for us in a very stressful time, Graham has a heart !

Services

Areas of Law

  • Criminal Law
  • Class Actions
  • Constitutional Law
  • Personal Injury
  • Products Liability
  • Commercial Litigation
  • Medical Malpractice
  • Entertainment Law
  • Other 6
    • Civil Appeals
    • Criminal Appeals
    • Aboriginal Title Litigation
    • Human Rights
    • Privacy Litigation
    • Internet Crimes

Practice Details

  • Firm Information
    Position
    Member
    Firm Name
    Kosakoski L.C.
  • Representative Cases & Transactions
    Cases
    Recent Cases: A selection of Graham Kosakoski's recent cases includes: Alex Boudreault v. Her Majesty the Queen, 2018 SCC No. 37427 (Judgment Under Reserve)
    R. v. Ball, 2018 BCCA No. 43606 (Judgment Under Reserve)
    Hwlitsum First Nation vs. Canada et al., 2018 BCCA 276
    Kirk v. British Columbia et al., 2018 BCCA No. 44478
    Hwlitsum First Nation v. Canada et al., 2017 BCSC 475
    Kirk v. Executive Flight Centre Fuel Services, 2017 BCSC 726
    Bartram v. GlaxoSmithKline Inc., 2016 BCSC 2516
    Hwlitsum First Nation v. Canada (Attorney General), 2016 SCC No. 37079
    R. v. Veinotte, 2016 BCCA 21
    Hwlitsum First Nation v. Canada (Attorney General), 2016 FCA 118
    Fontaine v. Canada (Attorney General), 2015 BCSC 717
    R. v. Edmond, 2014 BCSC 1375
    Raikou v. Spencer, 2014 BCSC 1
    R. v. Grey, 2013 BCCA 232
    Catalano v. Ogloff, 2013 BCSC 2257
    Bartram v. GlaxoSmithKline Inc., 2013 BCCA 462
    Logan v. Hong, 2013 BCCA 249
    Chemainus First Nation v. Bullock Baur Associates Ltd., 2012 BCSC 479
    Canada (National Revenue) v. Patry, 2012 FC 977
    Bartram v. GlaxoSmithKline Inc., 2011 BCCA 539
    Logan v. Dermatech, Intradermal Distribution Inc., 2011 BCSC 1097
    R. v. Asp, 2011 BCCA 433

Experience

  • Bar Admission & Memberships
    Admissions
    2010, Ontario
    2010, New York
    2011, British Columbia
  • Education & Certifications
    Law School
    University of British Columbia
    Class of 2009
    J.D.
    Other Education
    Queen's University
    Class of 2004
    B.A.
  • Personal Details & History
    Age
    Born in 1982
    February 14, 1982

Email Graham Thomas Kosakoski

Case type is required.
I am is required.
First name is required.
Last name is required.
A valid zip code is required.
Country is required.
State is required.
A valid city is required.
A valid email address is required.
A valid phone number is required.
Message is required.
0/1000 characters

By clicking the Submit button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls, from Lawyers.com and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.

You should not send any sensitive or confidential information through this site. Emails sent through this site do not create an attorney-client relationship and may not be treated as privileged or confidential. The lawyer or law firm you are contacting is not required to, and may choose not to, accept you as a client. The internet is not necessarily secure and emails sent though this site could be intercepted or read by third parties.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA. See Google’s Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.

Thank you! Your message has been successfully sent.

For your records, a copy of this email has been sent to test@test.com.

Summary of Your Message
Case Type:
I am a/an:
First Name:
Last Name:
City:
Zip Code or Postal Code:
State:
Country:
Phone Number:
Message:
Return to Profile Reset Form
Lawyers.com Client Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review Ratings™ display reviews submitted by individuals who have either hired or consulted the lawyers or law firms.

The Client Review Rating score is determined through the aggregation of validated responses. People who submit reviews are either individuals who consulted with the lawyer/law firm or who hired the lawyer/law firm and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be anyone who consults or hires a lawyer including in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners, and private individuals.

Martindale-Hubbell validates that a reviewer is a person with a valid email address. As part of the review process, respondents must affirm that they have had an initial consultation, are currently a client or have been a client of the lawyer or law firm identified, although Martindale-Hubbell cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship as it is often confidential. The content of the responses is entirely from reviewers.

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review. For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Client Review Ratings, please visit our Client Review Page

Martindale Peer Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Peer Review Ratings™ are the gold standard in attorney ratings, and have been for more than a century. These ratings indicate attorneys who are widely respected by their peers for their ethical standards and legal expertise in a specific area of practice.

The Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings process is the gold standard due to its objectivity and comprehensiveness. Lawyers solicited for peer reviews include both those selected by the attorney being reviewed and lawyers independently selected by Martindale-Hubbell. All reviewers are verified as attorneys through Martindale-Hubbell’s extensive attorney database. Only attorneys practicing at least three years and receiving a sufficient number of reviews from non-affiliated attorneys are eligible to receive a Rating.

What are the different Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings?*

• AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies that a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

• Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

• Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Lawyers who have received peer reviews after 2009 will display more detailed information, including practice areas, summary ratings, detailed numeric ratings and written feedback (if available). Details for individual reviews received before 2009 are not displayed.

Attorneys that receive reviews from their peers, but not a sufficient number to establish a Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Rating, will have those reviews display on our websites.

For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings™, please visit our Ratings Page on Martindale.com and our Frequently Asked Questions