×
Go back to Martindale-Avvo ➔

Moomjian Law Firm PLLCPartner
no photo

Edward Moomjian II

Not yet reviewed

31 N. 6th Ave., Ste. 105-151, Tucson, AZ 85701

Business Law, Civil Rights, Class Action Litigation and 10 more

About Edward Moomjian II

Edward Moomjian II is a lawyer practicing business law, civil rights, class action litigation and 10 other areas of law. Edward received a B.S.M.E. degree from Arizona State University in 1992, and has been licensed for 31 years. Edward practices at Moomjian Law Firm PLLC in Tucson, AZ.

Awards

AV Preeminent Peer Rated
This elite award is granted to attorneys who have been recognized by their peers for their very high ethical standards, with an average peer review score of 4.5 or higher.
Martindale-Hubbell Peer AV

Client Champion Awards

Client Champion awards recognize those attorneys who excel at service as affirmed by their clients. The awards, based on the quantity and quality of an attorney’s Martindale-Hubbell client reviews, demonstrate an ongoing commitment to delivering excellent client service. Award recipients stand out from their peers with a platinum, gold or silver icon.

Champion Badge Silver

At least three reviews and a score of 4.0 or higher.

Champion Badge Gold

At least six reviews and a score of 4.2 or higher.

Champion Badge Platinum

At least ten reviews and a score of 4.5 or higher.

Martindale Peer Awards

A lawyer who receives a minimum threshold of qualifying responses from fellow attorneys can qualify for one of three prestigious Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings:

Martindale-Hubbell Peer AV Preeminent Rating

AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

Edward Moomjian II got this award in 2021

Martindale-Hubbell Peer Distinguished Rating

Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

Martindale-Hubbell Peer Notable Rating

Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Avvo Awards

Avvo Top Contributor

Avvo Top Contributor: The Avvo Top Contributor Award is granted to attorneys who have earned significant contribution points in a given year on our sister site, Avvo.com. Contribution points are earned by answering questions in Q&A, publishing Legal Guides, and other useful contributions to the Avvo community.

Avvo Client Choice

Avvo Client’s Choice: The Avvo Client's Choice Award Badge is granted to attorneys with a significant number of 4+ star reviews in a given year.

Reviews for Edward

This lawyer does not have any client reviews on Lawyers.com yet

Write a Review

Services

Areas of Law

  • Business Law
  • Civil Rights
  • Commercial Law
  • Commercial Litigation
  • Contracts
  • Corporate Law
  • Health Care
  • Labor and Employment
  • Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility 1
    • Legal Malpractice
  • Litigation
  • Other 3
    • Class Action Litigation
    • Commercial
    • Ethics & Professional Responsibility

Practice Details

  • Firm Information
    Position
    Partner
    Firm Name
    Moomjian Law Firm PLLC
  • Representative Cases & Transactions
    Cases
    United Artists Theatre Co., 406 B.R. 643 (Bankr. D. Del. 2009)
    United Artists Theatre Co., 410 B.R. 385 (Bankr. D. Del. 2009)
    Barber v. Nelson, 2009 WL 449250 (Ariz. App. 2009)
    Biggerstaff v. F.C.C., 511 F.3d 178 (D.C. Cir. 2007)
    National Union Fire Ins. Co. of Pittsburgh, PA v. ESI Ergonomic Solutions, LLC, 342 F.Supp.2d 853 (D.Ariz. 2004)
    Ergonomic Solutions, LLC v. United Artists Theatre Circuit, Inc., 203 Ariz. 94, 50 P.3d 844 (App. 2002)
    United Artists Theatre Circuit, Inc. v. F.C.C., 147 F.Supp.2d 965 (D. Ariz. 2000)
    State Compensation Fund v. Superior Court (Energcor, Inc.), 190 Ariz. 371, 948 P.2d 499 (App. Div. 1997).

Experience

  • Bar Admission & Memberships
    Admissions
    1995, Arizona
    1995, U.S. District Court, District of Arizona
    U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
    U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
    Memberships
    State Bar of Arizona
    American Bar Association
  • Education & Certifications
    Law School
    University of Arizona
    Class of 1995
    J.D.
    Order of the Coif, Magna Cum Laude
    Other Education
    Arizona State University
    Class of 1992
    B.S.M.E.
    Cum Laude

Edward Moomjian II

Partner at Moomjian Law Firm PLLC
Not yet reviewed

31 N. 6th Ave., Ste. 105-151Tucson, AZ 85701U.S.A.

Show on map

Lawyers Nearby

John C Lacy
Pro
John C Lacy
5.0
1
Business Law lawyer
CallView Phone
View Profile
Jeffrey Blackman
Pro
Jeffrey Blackman
4.4
37
Business Law lawyer

Free Consultation

520-783-5816
View Profile
Nathan B Hannah
Pro
Nathan B Hannah
4.5
4
Business Law lawyer
CallView Phone
View Profile
Scott Simonson
Pro
Scott Simonson
5.0
1
Business Law lawyer
520-482-0576
View Profile
Peter Timoleon Limperis
Pro
Peter Timoleon Limperis
5.0
30
Business Law lawyer
520-812-6022
View Profile

Email Edward Moomjian II

Case type is required.
I am is required.
First name is required.
Last name is required.
A valid zip code is required.
Country is required.
State is required.
A valid city is required.
A valid email address is required.
A valid phone number is required.
Message is required.
0/1000 characters

By clicking the Submit button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls, from Lawyers.com and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.

You should not send any sensitive or confidential information through this site. Emails sent through this site do not create an attorney-client relationship and may not be treated as privileged or confidential. The lawyer or law firm you are contacting is not required to, and may choose not to, accept you as a client. The internet is not necessarily secure and emails sent though this site could be intercepted or read by third parties.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA. See Google’s Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.

Thank you! Your message has been successfully sent.

For your records, a copy of this email has been sent to test@test.com.

Summary of Your Message
Case Type:
I am a/an:
First Name:
Last Name:
City:
Zip Code or Postal Code:
State:
Country:
Phone Number:
Message:
Return to Profile Reset Form
Lawyers.com Client Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review Ratings™ display reviews submitted by individuals who have either hired or consulted the lawyers or law firms.

The Client Review Rating score is determined through the aggregation of validated responses. People who submit reviews are either individuals who consulted with the lawyer/law firm or who hired the lawyer/law firm and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be anyone who consults or hires a lawyer including in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners, and private individuals.

Martindale-Hubbell validates that a reviewer is a person with a valid email address. As part of the review process, respondents must affirm that they have had an initial consultation, are currently a client or have been a client of the lawyer or law firm identified, although Martindale-Hubbell cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship as it is often confidential. The content of the responses is entirely from reviewers.

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review. For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Client Review Ratings, please visit our Client Review Page

Martindale Peer Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Peer Review Ratings™ are the gold standard in attorney ratings, and have been for more than a century. These ratings indicate attorneys who are widely respected by their peers for their ethical standards and legal expertise in a specific area of practice.

The Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings process is the gold standard due to its objectivity and comprehensiveness. Lawyers solicited for peer reviews include both those selected by the attorney being reviewed and lawyers independently selected by Martindale-Hubbell. All reviewers are verified as attorneys through Martindale-Hubbell’s extensive attorney database. Only attorneys practicing at least three years and receiving a sufficient number of reviews from non-affiliated attorneys are eligible to receive a Rating.

What are the different Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings?*

• AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies that a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

• Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

• Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Lawyers who have received peer reviews after 2009 will display more detailed information, including practice areas, summary ratings, detailed numeric ratings and written feedback (if available). Details for individual reviews received before 2009 are not displayed.

Attorneys that receive reviews from their peers, but not a sufficient number to establish a Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Rating, will have those reviews display on our websites.

For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings™, please visit our Ratings Page on Martindale.com and our Frequently Asked Questions