×
Go back to Martindale-Avvo ➔

Borden Ladner Gervais LLPPartner
Natasha Miklaucic

Natasha Miklaucic

Not yet reviewed

22 Adelaide Street West, Suite 3400, Toronto, ON M5H 4E3

Tax, Corporate Tax, Family Wealth Counsel and 6 more

About Natasha Miklaucic

Natasha Miklaucic is a lawyer practicing tax, corporate tax, family wealth counsel and 6 other areas of law. Natasha received a degree from Queen's University in 1990, and has been licensed for 28 years. Natasha practices at Borden Ladner Gervais LLP in Toronto, ON.

Natasha Miklaucic (Toronto, Ontario)

Reviews for Natasha

This lawyer does not have any client reviews on Lawyers.com yet

Write a Review

Services

Areas of Law

  • Labour and Employment
  • Other 8
    • Tax
    • Corporate Tax
    • Family Wealth Counsel
    • Estates and Trusts
    • Tax Litigation and Dispute Resolution
    • Business and Corporate Commercial
    • Education
    • Autonomous Vehicles

Practice Details

  • Firm Information
    Position
    Partner
    Firm Name
    Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
  • Representative Cases & Transactions
    Cases
    Representative Work: Advising corporate clients on income tax issues arising on acquisitions, mergers, reorganizations, financings, wind-ups
    amalgamations for domestic
    international corporations, partnerships
    trusts.
    Structuring
    implementing tax-effective plans for corporations, healthcare entities, partnerships, trusts
    individuals both domestically
    internationally.
    Providing advice to both resident
    non-resident, private equity
    other commercial funds, individuals
    corporations on the application of the non-resident trust (NRT)
    offshore investment fund rules.
    Advising corporations with respect to Canadian, cross-border
    international employee issues including taxation on termination.
    Structuring Canadian projects for non-residents in a tax-efficient manner.
    Providing tax advice to non-residents (both individuals
    corporations) establishing or investing in business activities
    properties in Canada.
    Providing offshore insurance
    trust planning for individuals
    corporations.
    Advising high net worth individual clients with respect to inter-generational wealth
    estate planning.
    Representing clients in tax disputes with the Canada Revenue Agency
    the Ministry of Revenue (Ontario), including filing Objections
    Appeals on behalf of clients
    appearing at the Tax Court of Canada, Ontario Superior Court of Justice
    the Federal Court of Appeal on income tax, GST, PST, l
    transfer tax, capital tax, CPP
    EI matters
    Representing corporate
    individual clients with respect to voluntary disclosures.
    Counsel to the taxpayer in the following cases: Par Golf Camps Inc. v. HMQ 2001-3812(GST)
    Simone v. R., 2005 D.T.C. 537 (TCC)
    1280659 Ontario Inc. V. M.N.R., 2004 TCC 138
    Santoro v. R., 2004 D.T.C. 3684 (TCC
    Tindall v. R., 2000 D.T.C. 2126 (TCC)
    Thornbrook Complete Home Care Inc. v. R. 2002 2132 (TCC)
    Thornbrook Complete Home Care Inc. v. R. 2005 FCA 22

Experience

  • Bar Admission & Memberships
    Admissions
    1998, Ontario
    Memberships

    Professional Involvement

    •Member, Ontario Bar Association
    •Member, American Bar Association
    •Member, Canadian Tax Foundation
    •Member, Canadian Bar Association
    •Member, International Fiscal Association
    •Member, Society of Trust and Estate Practitioners (STEP)

    Community Involvement

    •Convenor, Rep Team Manager and Trainer, Toronto Leaside Girls Hockey Association

  • Education & Certifications
    Law School
    Queen's University
    Class of 1996
    LL.B.
    Other Education
    Queen's University
    Class of 1990
    B.Comm.

    Queen's University
    Class of 1990
    Hons.

Email Natasha Miklaucic

Case type is required.
I am is required.
First name is required.
Last name is required.
A valid zip code is required.
Country is required.
State is required.
A valid city is required.
A valid email address is required.
A valid phone number is required.
Message is required.
0/1000 characters

By clicking the Submit button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls, from Lawyers.com and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.

You should not send any sensitive or confidential information through this site. Emails sent through this site do not create an attorney-client relationship and may not be treated as privileged or confidential. The lawyer or law firm you are contacting is not required to, and may choose not to, accept you as a client. The internet is not necessarily secure and emails sent though this site could be intercepted or read by third parties.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA. See Google’s Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.

Thank you! Your message has been successfully sent.

For your records, a copy of this email has been sent to test@test.com.

Summary of Your Message
Case Type:
I am a/an:
First Name:
Last Name:
City:
Zip Code or Postal Code:
State:
Country:
Phone Number:
Message:
Return to Profile Reset Form
Lawyers.com Client Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review Ratings™ display reviews submitted by individuals who have either hired or consulted the lawyers or law firms.

The Client Review Rating score is determined through the aggregation of validated responses. People who submit reviews are either individuals who consulted with the lawyer/law firm or who hired the lawyer/law firm and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be anyone who consults or hires a lawyer including in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners, and private individuals.

Martindale-Hubbell validates that a reviewer is a person with a valid email address. As part of the review process, respondents must affirm that they have had an initial consultation, are currently a client or have been a client of the lawyer or law firm identified, although Martindale-Hubbell cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship as it is often confidential. The content of the responses is entirely from reviewers.

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review. For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Client Review Ratings, please visit our Client Review Page

Martindale Peer Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Peer Review Ratings™ are the gold standard in attorney ratings, and have been for more than a century. These ratings indicate attorneys who are widely respected by their peers for their ethical standards and legal expertise in a specific area of practice.

The Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings process is the gold standard due to its objectivity and comprehensiveness. Lawyers solicited for peer reviews include both those selected by the attorney being reviewed and lawyers independently selected by Martindale-Hubbell. All reviewers are verified as attorneys through Martindale-Hubbell’s extensive attorney database. Only attorneys practicing at least three years and receiving a sufficient number of reviews from non-affiliated attorneys are eligible to receive a Rating.

What are the different Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings?*

• AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies that a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

• Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

• Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Lawyers who have received peer reviews after 2009 will display more detailed information, including practice areas, summary ratings, detailed numeric ratings and written feedback (if available). Details for individual reviews received before 2009 are not displayed.

Attorneys that receive reviews from their peers, but not a sufficient number to establish a Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Rating, will have those reviews display on our websites.

For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings™, please visit our Ratings Page on Martindale.com and our Frequently Asked Questions