×
Go back to Martindale-Avvo ➔

Rumberger, Kirk & Caldwell Professional AssociationAssociate
no photo
Pro

Madison Miller

Not yet reviewed

100 North Tampa Street, Suite 2000, Tampa, FL 33602

Casualty Litigation and Trucking

About Madison Miller

Madison Miller focuses her practice in the areas of casualty and trucking litigation. She defends claims arising from a variety of trucking accidents including vehicle/ pedestrian and multiple vehicle collisions, and represents businesses against premises liability, auto negligence and various tort claims.

While in law school, Madison worked as a intern for the Honorable Christine Marlewski for the Thirteenth Judicial Circuit.

Awards & Honors

•Florida Super Lawyers Rising Star, Personal Injury General: Defense, 2025

Madison's News and Insights

06.26.2025
Firm News

Five RumbergerKirk Attorneys Selected for the 2025 Florida Super Lawyers List

Orlando, FL- June 26, 2025 - Five RumbergerKirk attorneys have...

02.01.2024
Firm News

Coke Florida Secures Third Defense Verdict in the Last Year

After a hotly disputed liability and damage trial, a Hillsborough...

 

Madison Miller (Tampa, Florida) View website

Reviews for Madison

This lawyer does not have any client reviews on Lawyers.com yet

Write a Review

Services

Areas of Law

  • Other 2
    • Casualty Litigation
    • Trucking

Practice Details

  • Firm Information
    Position
    Associate
    Firm Name
    Rumberger, Kirk & Caldwell Professional Association
  • Representative Cases & Transactions
    Cases
    Notable Cases: Vance Campbell v. Coke Florida, et al.: After a hotly disputed liability
    damage trial, a Hillsborough County jury entered a defense verdict for Coca-Cola Beverages Florida, LLC ('Coke Florida')
    its driver. Plaintiff claimed the Coke Florida tractor-trailer violated his right of way proceeding to an intersection, causing an accident resulting in a lumbar discectomy
    the need for future lumbar
    cervical fusions
    asked the jury to award just under a million dollars in damages. The RumbergerKirk trial team argued that Plaintiff caused the accident by failing to pay proper attention while driving with a clear
    unobstructed view of the tractor-trailer as it properly entered the left turning lane,
    that Plaintiff's injuries were not caused by the accident. The jury found there was no negligence on the part of the Coke Florida driver that caused Plaintiff's damages. Defendants will move for their attorneys' fees based on Plaintiff's rejection of their Proposal for Settlement.
  • Additional Links
    https://www.rumberger.com/people/mmiller/

Experience

  • Bar Admission & Memberships
    Admissions
    2020, Florida
  • Education & Certifications
    Law School
    Stetson University College of Law
    Class of 2020
    J.D.
    cum laude; Dean’s List (Fall 2019); Honor Roll (Fall 2018; Spring 2019); Highest Grade Designation in Sports Law (Fall 2019); Phi Delta Phi International Legal Honors Society; Stetson Ambassadors; Florida Association for Woman Lawyers at Stetson; Entertainment and Sports Law Society; Real Property Probate and Trust Law
    Other Education
    University of South Florida
    Class of 2016
    B.A.
    Criminology, cum laude

Email Madison Miller

Case type is required.
A valid zip code is required.
A valid city is required.
State is required.
Country is required.
Outside the US or Canada?
Message is required.
0/1000 characters

Contact Information

First name is required.
Last name is required.
A valid email address is required.
A valid phone number is required.

By clicking the Submit button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls, from Lawyers.com and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.

Thank you! Your message has been successfully sent.

For your records, a copy of this email has been sent to

Summary of Your Message
Case Type:
Zip Code or Postal Code:
City:
State:
Country:
Case Description:
Contact Information
First Name:
Last Name:
Email:
Phone Number:
Return to Profile

Attorneys FAQs

  • How many attorneys are in this law firm?
    Rumberger, Kirk & Caldwell Professional Association has 87 attorneys at this location.
  • What year was this attorney's law firm established?
    Rumberger, Kirk & Caldwell Professional Association was established in 1978.

Attorney information displayed in this FAQ section is based upon information the lawyer has included on their profile, in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals.

These FAQs include information about a lawyer's background, but do not evaluate their knowledge of the law, past performance on individual cases, personality, or communication skills.

It is solely the responsibility of lawyers and law firms to ensure that any information they provide complies with all applicable laws and rules of professional conduct.

You should be aware that the information we rely upon may not be comprehensive, or frequently updated.

Always research the lawyer further to get a better understanding of their license credentials, disciplinary status, background, and experience.

Lawyers.com Client Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review Ratings™ display reviews submitted by individuals who have either hired or consulted the lawyers or law firms.

The Client Review Rating score is determined through the aggregation of validated responses. People who submit reviews are either individuals who consulted with the lawyer/law firm or who hired the lawyer/law firm and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be anyone who consults or hires a lawyer including in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners, and private individuals.

Martindale-Hubbell validates that a reviewer is a person with a valid email address. As part of the review process, respondents must affirm that they have had an initial consultation, are currently a client or have been a client of the lawyer or law firm identified, although Martindale-Hubbell cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship as it is often confidential. The content of the responses is entirely from reviewers.

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review. For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Client Review Ratings, please visit our Client Review Page

Martindale Peer Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Peer Review Ratings™ are the gold standard in attorney ratings, and have been for more than a century. These ratings indicate attorneys who are widely respected by their peers for their ethical standards and legal expertise in a specific area of practice.

The Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings process is the gold standard due to its objectivity and comprehensiveness. Lawyers solicited for peer reviews include both those selected by the attorney being reviewed and lawyers independently selected by Martindale-Hubbell. All reviewers are verified as attorneys through Martindale-Hubbell’s extensive attorney database. Only attorneys practicing at least three years and receiving a sufficient number of reviews from non-affiliated attorneys are eligible to receive a Rating.

What are the different Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings?*

• AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies that a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

• Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

• Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Lawyers who have received peer reviews after 2009 will display more detailed information, including practice areas, summary ratings, detailed numeric ratings and written feedback (if available). Details for individual reviews received before 2009 are not displayed.

Attorneys that receive reviews from their peers, but not a sufficient number to establish a Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Rating, will have those reviews display on our websites.

For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings™, please visit our Ratings Page on Martindale.com and our Frequently Asked Questions