×
Go back to Martindale-Avvo ➔

Morgan & MorganAttorney
Michael N. Hanna
Pro

Michael N. Hanna

4.7
6 reviews

2000 Town Center, Suite 1900, Southfield, MI 48075

Personal Injury Lawyer Claims & Lawsuits, Class Action Lawsuit Lawyers, Minimum Wage Claim & Unpaid Wages Lawyers and 2 more

About Michael N. Hanna

Michael Hanna is a trial lawyer at Morgan & Morgan and Managing Partner of the firm’s Michigan office. He is a personal injury and class action employment attorney who has represented thousands of clients across the nation. His law practice focuses on the prosecution of personal injury, wrongful death, truck accident litigation, wage and hour collective actions, and wrongful termination claims in state and federal court.

Mr. Hanna has served as lead counsel on many high profile cases that have been featured on The New Yorker, The New York Times, The Washington Post, CNN, MSNBC, ABC Action News, Fox News, Bloomberg Law, Law 360, CBS News, AOL News, The Huffington Post, The Washington Times, The Detroit Free Press, The Detroit News, The Miami New Times, The Orlando Sentinel, The Associated Press, and various other national and local news syndicates. Mr. Hanna’s prior representations include serving as lead counsel for world-renowned trial lawyer, Geoffrey Fieger.

Mr. Hanna was the recipient of the 2025 ALM National Law Journal’s Elite Trial Lawyer Award. Mr. Hanna was also selected for inclusion in the 2021, 2022 and 2023 edition of The Best Lawyers in America. Mr. Hanna has also been selected by his peers as a Florida Super Lawyers Rising Star from 2017 to 2018, Michigan Super Lawyers Rising Star from 2019 to 2024, and Michigan Super Lawyers for the year 2025, an honor bestowed on less than 2.5% of lawyers in the state. Mr. Hanna was also the recipient of the 2015 ADC Pro Bono Attorney of the Year award.

Published Decisions: Zarza v. Bd. of Regents of U. of Michigan, 2023 WL 3270899 (6th Cir. May 5, 2023); Guy v. Absopure Water Co., LLC, 2024 WL 1342626 (E.D. Mich. Mar. 29, 2024); Khan v. U.S., 2024 WL 4248875, at *1 (S.D. Fla. Sept. 20, 2024); Alzid v. BCBS, 671 F. Supp. 3d 786 (E.D. Mich. 2023); Dozier v. DBI Servs., LLC, 2021 WL 6061742 (M.D. Fla. Dec. 22, 2021); Gales v. California California Dep't of Corr. & Rehab. Ventura Youth Corr. Facility, 2021 WL 342571 (C.D. Cal. Jan. 28, 2021); Walter v. Oakland Community College, 2020 WL 6499833 (E.D. Mich. Nov. 5, 2020); Bruce v. Sana Health, Inc., 504 F. Supp. 3d 653 (E.D. Mich. 2020); Mingo v. Fed Cmty., 2020 WL 5258481 (E.D. Mich. Sept. 3, 2020); Daoust v. Maru Rest., LLC, 2019 WL 2866490 (E.D. Mich. July 3, 2019) Leverett v. Primestar Painting, Inc. et. al., 2018 WL 3013660 (E.D. Mich. June 14, 2018); Kutzback v. LMS Intellibound, LLC, 301 F. Supp. 3d 807 (W.D. Tenn. 2018); Adams v. Gilead Group, LLC, 280 F. Supp. 3d 1358 (M.D. Fla. 2017); Simmons v. Mathis Tire & Auto Service, Inc., 2015 WL 5008220 (W.D. Tenn. Aug. 20, 2015); Burdette v. Panola County, 83 F.Supp.3d 705 (N.D. Miss. 2015); Shadeh v. Glenn Buick-GMC Trucks, LLC, 2014 WL 6909049 (E.D. Ken. Dec. 9, 2014); Kidd v. Mathis Tire & Auto Service, Inc., 2014 WL 4923004 (W.D. Tenn. Sept. 18, 2014); Benhassine v. Star Taxi, Inc., 2013 WL 3070871 (M.D. Fla. 2013).

News & Insights

Jury Awards $10 Million Verdict to Medical Resident Who Was Terminated While on Maternity Leave

Recent Wins

Private Settlement $13,000,000 2022

Nicole Walker v. Ascension Genesys Hospital $10,034,951 Wrongful Termination, Employment Law, Wage and Hour Violation 2026

Khan, Irfan vs United States of America $6,279,508 Personal Injury

Private Settlement $5,000,000 Car Accident 2025

Pan et. al. v. PPM Tree Service & Arbor Care, LLC et. al. $2,096,328 Car Accident 2025

Private Settlement $2,000,000 Car Accident 2025

Hamood, Sudoos vs. Arab Community Center for Economic and Social Services $1,800,000 Workplace Discrimination 2026

Private Settlement $1,600,000 Car Accident 2025

Private Settlement $1,500,000 2022

Private Settlement $1,500,000 2021

Private Settlement $1,450,000 2019

Private Settlement $1,450,000 2023

Private Settlement $1,450,000 Class Action, Employment Law 2018

Private Settlement $875,000 2021

Private Settlement $725,000 2023

Private Settlement $610,000 2022

Private Settlement $585,000 2019

Private Settlement $440,000 2015

Guy, Justin vs. Absopure Water Company, LLC $386,032 Unpaid Overtime, Wage and Hour Violation 2023

Private Settlement $380,000 2019

Private Settlement $375,000 2023

Private Settlement $375,000 2020

Private Settlement $360,000 2021

Private Settlement $337,500 2019

Private Settlement $295,000 2019

Private Settlement $275,000 2021

Private Settlement $253,250 2015

Private Settlement $250,000 Car Accident 2024

 

Michael N. Hanna (Southfield, Michigan) View website

Awards

Peer Reviewed Rated
This badge is granted to attorneys who have been reviewed by another attorney.
Martindale-Hubbell Peer PR

Client Champion Awards

Client Champion awards recognize those attorneys who excel at service as affirmed by their clients. The awards, based on the quantity and quality of an attorney’s Martindale-Hubbell client reviews, demonstrate an ongoing commitment to delivering excellent client service. Award recipients stand out from their peers with a platinum, gold or silver icon.

Champion Badge Silver

At least three reviews and a score of 4.0 or higher.

Champion Badge Gold

At least six reviews and a score of 4.2 or higher.

Champion Badge Platinum

At least ten reviews and a score of 4.5 or higher.

Martindale Peer Awards

A lawyer who receives a minimum threshold of qualifying responses from fellow attorneys can qualify for one of three prestigious Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings:

Martindale-Hubbell Peer AV Preeminent Rating

AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

Martindale-Hubbell Peer Distinguished Rating

Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

Martindale-Hubbell Peer Notable Rating

Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Avvo Awards

Avvo Top Contributor

Avvo Top Contributor: The Avvo Top Contributor Award is granted to attorneys who have earned significant contribution points in a given year on our sister site, Avvo.com. Contribution points are earned by answering questions in Q&A, publishing Legal Guides, and other useful contributions to the Avvo community.

Avvo Client Choice

Avvo Client’s Choice: The Avvo Client's Choice Award Badge is granted to attorneys with a significant number of 4+ star reviews in a given year.

Reviews for Michael N.

Have you consulted or hired this lawyer?

Leave a review about your experience with this lawyer.

Write a Review

Overall Rating
4.7
See All Reviews
6
Lawyers.com
Not yet reviewed
4.7
Martindale
6
Avvo
Not yet reviewed

Services

Areas of Law

  • Other 5
    • Personal Injury Lawyer Claims & Lawsuits
    • Class Action Lawsuit Lawyers
    • Minimum Wage Claim & Unpaid Wages Lawyers
    • Wrongful Termination Lawyers
    • Labor and Employment Attorneys

Practice Details

  • Payment Information
    Payment & Cost Features
    Free initial consultation
    Contingency Fee: 20% - 40%
    Open 24 Hours
  • Firm Information
    Position
    Attorney
    Firm Name
    Morgan & Morgan
  • Representative Cases & Transactions
    Cases
    Published Decisions: Dozier v. DBI Servs., LLC, 2021 WL 6061742 (M.D. Fla. Dec. 22, 2021)
    Guy v. Absopure Water Co., 2021 WL 735787 (E.D. Mich. Feb. 25, 2021)
    Gales v. California California Dep't of Corr. & Rehab. Ventura Youth Corr. Facility, 2021 WL 342571 (C.D. Cal. Jan. 28, 2021)
    Walter v. Oakl
    Community College, 2020 WL 6499833 (E.D. Mich. Nov. 5, 2020)
    Bruce v. Sana Health, Inc., 504 F. Supp. 3d 653 (E.D. Mich. 2020)
    Mingo v. Fed Cmty., 2020 WL 5258481 (E.D. Mich. Sept. 3, 2020)
    Daoust v. Maru Rest., LLC, 2019 WL 2866490 (E.D. Mich. July 3, 2019)
    Leverett v. Primestar Painting, Inc. et. al., 2018 WL 3013660 (E.D. Mich. June 14, 2018)
    Kutzback v. LMS Intellibound, LLC, 301 F. Supp. 3d 807 (W.D. Tenn. 2018)
    Adams v. Gilead Group, LLC, 280 F. Supp. 3d 1358 (M.D. Fla. 2017)
    Burdette v. Panola County, 2015 WL 1433462 (N.D. Miss. Mar. 31, 2015)
    Simmons v. Mathis Tire & Auto Service, Inc., 2015 WL 5008220 (W.D. Tenn. Aug. 20, 2015)
    Khan v. U.S., 2015 WL 3644628 (S.D. Fla. June 10, 2015)
    Burdette v. Panola County, 83 F.Supp.3d 705 (N.D. Miss. 2015)
    Shadeh v. Glenn Buick-GMC Trucks, LLC, 2014 WL 6909049 (E.D. Ken. Dec. 9, 2014)
    Kidd v. Mathis Tire & Auto Service, Inc., 2014 WL 4923004 (W.D. Tenn. Sept. 18, 2014)
    Benhassine v. Star Taxi, Inc., 2013 WL 3070871 (M.D. Fla. 2013)
  • Additional Links
    http://www.forthepeople.com https://www.forthepeople.com/fort-lauderdale/

Experience

  • Bar Admission & Memberships
    Admissions
    State of Michigan
    State of Florida
    U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
    U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
    U.S. District Court, Eastern Districts of Michigan
    U.S. District Court, Western Districts of Michigan
    U.S. District Court, Southern District of Florida
    U.S. District Court, Middle District of Florida
    U.S. District Court, Northern District of Illinois
    U.S. District Court, Central District of Illinois
    U.S. District Court, Southern District of Illinois
    U.S. District Court, Western District of Tennessee
    U.S. District Court, Western District of Texas
    U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Kentucky
    U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Wisconsin
    U.S. District Court, District of Colorado
    2017, Michigan
    Memberships

    Memberships

    •Federal Bar Association, Eastern District of Michigan Chapter
    •Michigan Bar Association
    •Michigan Association for Justice

  • Education & Certifications
    Law School
    University of Miami School of Law
    J.D.
    cum laude, Dean's Honor Scholarship recipient, Dean's List, CALI Excellence for the Future Award, University Of Miami School of Law Supreme Court Justice
    Other Education
    Wayne State University
    B.S.
    magna cum laude, Dean's List, Phi Beta Kappa Honor Society, Golden Key National Honor Society
  • Personal Details & History
    Age
    Cairo, Egypt

Contact Michael N. Hanna

Attorney at Morgan & Morgan
4.7
6 reviews

2000 Town Center, Suite 1900Southfield, MI 48075U.S.A.

Show on map
Fax: 954-333-3515
Open 24 Hours Every Day

Email Michael N. Hanna

Case type is required.
I am is required.
First name is required.
Last name is required.
A valid zip code is required.
Country is required.
State is required.
A valid city is required.
A valid email address is required.
A valid phone number is required.
Message is required.
0/1000 characters

By clicking the Submit button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls, from Lawyers.com and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.

You should not send any sensitive or confidential information through this site. Emails sent through this site do not create an attorney-client relationship and may not be treated as privileged or confidential. The lawyer or law firm you are contacting is not required to, and may choose not to, accept you as a client. The internet is not necessarily secure and emails sent though this site could be intercepted or read by third parties.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA. See Google’s Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.

Thank you! Your message has been successfully sent.

For your records, a copy of this email has been sent to test@test.com.

Summary of Your Message
Case Type:
I am a/an:
First Name:
Last Name:
City:
Zip Code or Postal Code:
State:
Country:
Phone Number:
Message:
Return to Profile Reset Form

Attorneys FAQs

  • What year was this attorney first admitted to the bar?
    Michael N. Hanna was admitted in 2017 to the State of Michigan.
  • Is this attorney admitted to practice in any U.S. Federal Courts?
    Michael N. Hanna is admitted to practice before the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, United States District Court for the Central District of Illinois, United States District Court for the District of Colorado, United States District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky, United States District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin, United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida, United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida, United States District Court for the Southern District of Illinois, United States District Court for the Western District of Tennessee and United States District Court for the Western District of Texas.
  • How many attorneys are in this law firm?
    Morgan & Morgan has 800 attorneys at this location.
  • What law school did this attorney attend?
    Michael N. Hanna attended University of Miami School of Law.
  • What year was this attorney's law firm established?
    Morgan & Morgan was established in 1988.

Attorney information displayed in this FAQ section is based upon information the lawyer has included on their profile, in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals.

These FAQs include information about a lawyer's background, but do not evaluate their knowledge of the law, past performance on individual cases, personality, or communication skills.

It is solely the responsibility of lawyers and law firms to ensure that any information they provide complies with all applicable laws and rules of professional conduct.

You should be aware that the information we rely upon may not be comprehensive, or frequently updated.

Always research the lawyer further to get a better understanding of their license credentials, disciplinary status, background, and experience.

Lawyers.com Client Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review Ratings™ display reviews submitted by individuals who have either hired or consulted the lawyers or law firms.

The Client Review Rating score is determined through the aggregation of validated responses. People who submit reviews are either individuals who consulted with the lawyer/law firm or who hired the lawyer/law firm and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be anyone who consults or hires a lawyer including in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners, and private individuals.

Martindale-Hubbell validates that a reviewer is a person with a valid email address. As part of the review process, respondents must affirm that they have had an initial consultation, are currently a client or have been a client of the lawyer or law firm identified, although Martindale-Hubbell cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship as it is often confidential. The content of the responses is entirely from reviewers.

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review. For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Client Review Ratings, please visit our Client Review Page

Martindale Peer Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Peer Review Ratings™ are the gold standard in attorney ratings, and have been for more than a century. These ratings indicate attorneys who are widely respected by their peers for their ethical standards and legal expertise in a specific area of practice.

The Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings process is the gold standard due to its objectivity and comprehensiveness. Lawyers solicited for peer reviews include both those selected by the attorney being reviewed and lawyers independently selected by Martindale-Hubbell. All reviewers are verified as attorneys through Martindale-Hubbell’s extensive attorney database. Only attorneys practicing at least three years and receiving a sufficient number of reviews from non-affiliated attorneys are eligible to receive a Rating.

What are the different Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings?*

• AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies that a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

• Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

• Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Lawyers who have received peer reviews after 2009 will display more detailed information, including practice areas, summary ratings, detailed numeric ratings and written feedback (if available). Details for individual reviews received before 2009 are not displayed.

Attorneys that receive reviews from their peers, but not a sufficient number to establish a Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Rating, will have those reviews display on our websites.

For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings™, please visit our Ratings Page on Martindale.com and our Frequently Asked Questions