×
Go back to Martindale-Avvo ➔
Thomas H. Fain
Pro

Thomas H. Fain

4.6
3 reviews

701 Fifth Ave., Ste. 4750, Seattle, WA 98104

Professional Liability, Professional Discipline, Products Liability and 2 more

About Thomas H. Fain

Order of the Coif; Phi Delta Phi.

Thomas H. Fain (Seattle, Washington) View website

Awards

Client Reviewed
This badge is granted to attorneys who have been reviewed by a past client.
Champion Badge Reviewed
AV Preeminent Peer Rated
This elite award is granted to attorneys who have been recognized by their peers for their very high ethical standards, with an average peer review score of 4.5 or higher.
Martindale-Hubbell Peer AV

Client Champion Awards

Client Champion awards recognize those attorneys who excel at service as affirmed by their clients. The awards, based on the quantity and quality of an attorney’s Martindale-Hubbell client reviews, demonstrate an ongoing commitment to delivering excellent client service. Award recipients stand out from their peers with a platinum, gold or silver icon.

Champion Badge Silver

At least three reviews and a score of 4.0 or higher.

Champion Badge Gold

At least six reviews and a score of 4.2 or higher.

Champion Badge Platinum

At least ten reviews and a score of 4.5 or higher.

Martindale Peer Awards

A lawyer who receives a minimum threshold of qualifying responses from fellow attorneys can qualify for one of three prestigious Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings:

Martindale-Hubbell Peer AV Preeminent Rating

AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

Thomas H. Fain got this award in 2021

Martindale-Hubbell Peer Distinguished Rating

Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

Martindale-Hubbell Peer Notable Rating

Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Avvo Awards

Avvo Top Contributor

Avvo Top Contributor: The Avvo Top Contributor Award is granted to attorneys who have earned significant contribution points in a given year on our sister site, Avvo.com. Contribution points are earned by answering questions in Q&A, publishing Legal Guides, and other useful contributions to the Avvo community.

Avvo Client Choice

Avvo Client’s Choice: The Avvo Client's Choice Award Badge is granted to attorneys with a significant number of 4+ star reviews in a given year.

Reviews for Thomas H.

Have you consulted or hired this lawyer?

Leave a review about your experience with this lawyer.

Write a Review

Overall Rating
4.6
See All Reviews
3
Showing 1-3 of 3 client reviews from Lawyers.com
Lawyers.com Rating Snapshot
5 stars
67%
4 stars
0%
3 stars
0%
2 stars
0%
1 star
33%
What do people say on Lawyers.com?
Communication
3.7
Quality of Service
3.7
Responsiveness
3.7
Value for Money
3.7
Medical Malpractice
Posted by anonymous
November 16, 2011
Hired Attorney

Knowledgeable. Thorough. Very client centered. Terrific experience in this field (defense work) and helpful at all levels. Should be anyone's first choice.

Medical Malpractice
Posted by anonymous
September 16, 2010
Hired Attorney

In the midst of an action which Fain is investigating

Medical Malpractice
Posted by anonymous
June 29, 2015
Hired Attorney

This lawyer did not advocate on my behalf, and has poor communication. His judgmental attitude negatively affected the defense of the action on my medical license by the medical board.

Services

Areas of Law

  • Professional Liability
  • Products Liability
  • Commercial Litigation
  • Other 2
    • Professional Discipline
    • Business Torts

Practice Details

  • Firm Information
    Position
    Founding Member
    Firm Name
    Fain Anderson VanDerhoef Rosendahl O'Halloran Spillane PLLC
  • Representative Cases & Transactions
    Cases
    Roth v. Bell, 24 Wn. App. 22
    Ohler v. Tacoma General Hospital, 92 Wn.2d 507
    Gustav v. Gottesman, 954 P.2d 319
    Jeffries v. Clark's Restaurant Enterprises, 20 Wn. App. 428
    Silves v. King, 970 P.2d 790.
  • Additional Links
    http://www.favfirm.com

Experience

  • Bar Admission & Memberships
    Admissions
    1976, Washington
    2004, Idaho
    2004, Oregon
    U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington and Western District of Texas
    U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth, Ninth and Tenth Circuits
    Memberships
    Seattle-King County, Washington State and American (Member, Torts and Insurance Practice Sections
    Former Chair, Product, Consumer and General Liability Committee) Bar Associations
    National Trial Academy (Former Director)
    American Board of Trial Advocates
    American College of Trial Lawyers
    Washington Defense Trial Lawyers Association
    Defense Research Institute.
  • Education & Certifications
    Law School
    University of Texas
    Class of 1976
    J.D.
    with honors
    Other Education
    Southern Methodist University
    Class of 1969
    B.B.A.
  • Personal Details & History
    Age
    Born in 1947
    Mexia, Texas, June 27, 1947

Email Thomas H. Fain

Case type is required.
A valid zip code is required.
A valid city is required.
State is required.
Country is required.
Outside the US or Canada?
Message is required.
0/1000 characters

Contact Information

First name is required.
Last name is required.
A valid email address is required.
A valid phone number is required.

By clicking the Submit button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls, from Lawyers.com and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.

Thank you! Your message has been successfully sent.

For your records, a copy of this email has been sent to

Summary of Your Message
Case Type:
Zip Code or Postal Code:
City:
State:
Country:
Case Description:
Contact Information
First Name:
Last Name:
Email:
Phone Number:
Return to Profile

Attorneys FAQs

  • What year was this attorney first admitted to the bar?
    Thomas H. Fain was admitted in 1976 to the State of Washington.
  • Is this attorney Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review rated?
    Yes, Thomas H. Fain has a 5.0 Peer Rating from Martindale-Hubbell.
  • How many attorneys are in this law firm?
    Fain Anderson VanDerhoef Rosendahl O'Halloran Spillane PLLC has 19 attorneys at this location.
  • What law school did this attorney attend?
    Thomas H. Fain attended University of Texas.
  • What year was this attorney's law firm established?
    Fain Anderson VanDerhoef Rosendahl O'Halloran Spillane PLLC was established in 1997.

Attorney information displayed in this FAQ section is based upon information the lawyer has included on their profile, in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals.

These FAQs include information about a lawyer's background, but do not evaluate their knowledge of the law, past performance on individual cases, personality, or communication skills.

It is solely the responsibility of lawyers and law firms to ensure that any information they provide complies with all applicable laws and rules of professional conduct.

You should be aware that the information we rely upon may not be comprehensive, or frequently updated.

Always research the lawyer further to get a better understanding of their license credentials, disciplinary status, background, and experience.

Lawyers.com Client Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review Ratings™ display reviews submitted by individuals who have either hired or consulted the lawyers or law firms.

The Client Review Rating score is determined through the aggregation of validated responses. People who submit reviews are either individuals who consulted with the lawyer/law firm or who hired the lawyer/law firm and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be anyone who consults or hires a lawyer including in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners, and private individuals.

Martindale-Hubbell validates that a reviewer is a person with a valid email address. As part of the review process, respondents must affirm that they have had an initial consultation, are currently a client or have been a client of the lawyer or law firm identified, although Martindale-Hubbell cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship as it is often confidential. The content of the responses is entirely from reviewers.

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review. For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Client Review Ratings, please visit our Client Review Page

Martindale Peer Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Peer Review Ratings™ are the gold standard in attorney ratings, and have been for more than a century. These ratings indicate attorneys who are widely respected by their peers for their ethical standards and legal expertise in a specific area of practice.

The Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings process is the gold standard due to its objectivity and comprehensiveness. Lawyers solicited for peer reviews include both those selected by the attorney being reviewed and lawyers independently selected by Martindale-Hubbell. All reviewers are verified as attorneys through Martindale-Hubbell’s extensive attorney database. Only attorneys practicing at least three years and receiving a sufficient number of reviews from non-affiliated attorneys are eligible to receive a Rating.

What are the different Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings?*

• AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies that a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

• Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

• Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Lawyers who have received peer reviews after 2009 will display more detailed information, including practice areas, summary ratings, detailed numeric ratings and written feedback (if available). Details for individual reviews received before 2009 are not displayed.

Attorneys that receive reviews from their peers, but not a sufficient number to establish a Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Rating, will have those reviews display on our websites.

For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings™, please visit our Ratings Page on Martindale.com and our Frequently Asked Questions