×
Go back to Martindale-Avvo ➔

Del Toro & SantanaSenior Partner
Roberto Santana Aparicio

Roberto Santana Aparicio

Not yet reviewed

273 Ponce de Leon Avenue, San Juan, PR 00917-1902

Commercial Litigation, Construction Law, Employment Law and 4 more

About Roberto Santana Aparicio

Roberto Santana Aparicio is a lawyer practicing commercial litigation, construction law, employment law and 4 other areas of law. Roberto received a degree from Babson College, and has been licensed for 49 years. Roberto practices at Del Toro & Santana in San Juan, PR.

Roberto Santana Aparicio (San Juan, Puerto Rico)

Reviews for Roberto

This lawyer does not have any client reviews on Lawyers.com yet

Write a Review

Services

Areas of Law

  • Commercial Litigation
  • Construction Law
  • Other 5
    • Employment Law
    • Real Estate Litigation
    • Federal Practice
    • Insurance Coverage Defense
    • Civil RICO

Practice Details

  • Languages
    English
    Spanish
  • Firm Information
    Position
    Senior Partner
    Firm Name
    Del Toro & Santana
    Firm Onwership
    Minority Owned
  • Representative Cases & Transactions
    Cases
    Feliciano Rosado v. Matos, Jr., 81 JTS 1, 110 D.P.R. 550, (P.R., Jan 07, 1981)
    Alvarez Figueredo v. Gonzalez Lamela, 93 JTS 132, 134 D.P.R. 374, (P.R., Oct 28, 1993)
    95 JTS 107, 138 D.P.R. 958, (P.R., Jul 14, 1995)
    Morales v. Gregg Shirt Makers, Inc., 682 F. Supp. 142, (D. Puerto Rico, Mar 11, 1988)
    Miramar Const. Co. v. Home Depot, Inc., 167 F.Supp.2d 182, (D. Puerto Rico, Aug 21, 2001)
    Melendez-Arroyo v. Cutler-Hammer de P.R. Co., Inc., 273 F.3d 30, 87, (1st Cir., Puerto Rico, Dec 05, 2001)
    Chicago Title Ins. Co. v. Sotomayor, 394 F.Supp.2d 452, (D. Puerto Rico, Jul 12, 2005)
    Garcia v. Carrion, 2010 WL 3662593, (D. Puerto Rico August 11, 2010), Fabrica de Muebles J.J. Alvarez, Inc. v. WesternBank de Puerto Rico, 2011 WL 10604624 (D.Puerto Rico) (D.Puerto Rico,2011), Rishell v. Medical Card System, Inc., 2013 WL 6019212 (D.Puerto Rico) (D.Puerto Rico,2013).

Experience

  • Bar Admission & Memberships
    Admissions
    1977, Commonwealth of Puerto Rico
    1978, U.S. District Court, District of Puerto Rico and U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit
    2011, U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit
    2012, U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
    Memberships
    Bar Association of Puerto Rico (Member, Civil Rights Committee, 1979-1982)
    Federal Bar Association, Puerto Rico Chapter (Officer and Director, 1987-1992
    President, 1990-1991
    National Delegate, 1991-1992)
    Federal Bar Association, Washington, D.C. (National Vice President for the First Circuit, 1988-1992
    Member, National Council, 1988-2001
    Member, Select Committee on Admission Standards to Practice before Federal Courts, 1985
    Member, Judicial Selection Committee, 1993-1996, Chair, 2001-2003
    Audit Committee Chair, 1998-1999). Fellow: Lifetime Charter
    Bar Fellowship
    The Foundation of the Federal Bar Association.
  • Education & Certifications
    Law School
    University of Puerto Rico
    Class of 1977
    J.D.
    Law Review
    Other Education
    Babson College

    University of Puerto Rico
    Class of 1974
    B.B.A.
    magna cum laude

Email Roberto Santana Aparicio

Case type is required.
I am is required.
First name is required.
Last name is required.
A valid zip code is required.
Country is required.
State is required.
A valid city is required.
A valid email address is required.
A valid phone number is required.
Message is required.
0/1000 characters

By clicking the Submit button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls, from Lawyers.com and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.

You should not send any sensitive or confidential information through this site. Emails sent through this site do not create an attorney-client relationship and may not be treated as privileged or confidential. The lawyer or law firm you are contacting is not required to, and may choose not to, accept you as a client. The internet is not necessarily secure and emails sent though this site could be intercepted or read by third parties.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA. See Google’s Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.

Thank you! Your message has been successfully sent.

For your records, a copy of this email has been sent to test@test.com.

Summary of Your Message
Case Type:
I am a/an:
First Name:
Last Name:
City:
Zip Code or Postal Code:
State:
Country:
Phone Number:
Message:
Return to Profile Reset Form
Lawyers.com Client Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review Ratings™ display reviews submitted by individuals who have either hired or consulted the lawyers or law firms.

The Client Review Rating score is determined through the aggregation of validated responses. People who submit reviews are either individuals who consulted with the lawyer/law firm or who hired the lawyer/law firm and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be anyone who consults or hires a lawyer including in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners, and private individuals.

Martindale-Hubbell validates that a reviewer is a person with a valid email address. As part of the review process, respondents must affirm that they have had an initial consultation, are currently a client or have been a client of the lawyer or law firm identified, although Martindale-Hubbell cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship as it is often confidential. The content of the responses is entirely from reviewers.

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review. For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Client Review Ratings, please visit our Client Review Page

Martindale Peer Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Peer Review Ratings™ are the gold standard in attorney ratings, and have been for more than a century. These ratings indicate attorneys who are widely respected by their peers for their ethical standards and legal expertise in a specific area of practice.

The Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings process is the gold standard due to its objectivity and comprehensiveness. Lawyers solicited for peer reviews include both those selected by the attorney being reviewed and lawyers independently selected by Martindale-Hubbell. All reviewers are verified as attorneys through Martindale-Hubbell’s extensive attorney database. Only attorneys practicing at least three years and receiving a sufficient number of reviews from non-affiliated attorneys are eligible to receive a Rating.

What are the different Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings?*

• AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies that a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

• Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

• Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Lawyers who have received peer reviews after 2009 will display more detailed information, including practice areas, summary ratings, detailed numeric ratings and written feedback (if available). Details for individual reviews received before 2009 are not displayed.

Attorneys that receive reviews from their peers, but not a sufficient number to establish a Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Rating, will have those reviews display on our websites.

For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings™, please visit our Ratings Page on Martindale.com and our Frequently Asked Questions