Duane Morris LLPSpecial Counsel

Suzanne Ryder Fogarty

About Suzanne Ryder Fogarty

Suzanne Ryder Fogarty is a lawyer practicing trial practice, insurance, insurance coverage and 4 other areas of law. Suzanne received a B.A. degree from University of California, Davis in 1988, and has been licensed for 35 years. Suzanne practices at Duane Morris LLP in San Francisco, CA.

Reviews for Suzanne

This lawyer does not have any client reviews on Lawyers.com yet

Write a Review

Services

Areas of Law

  • Insurance 1
    • Reinsurance
  • Other 5
    • Trial Practice
    • Insurance Coverage
    • Risk Management
    • Technology Law
    • Business

Practice Details

  • Firm Information
    Position
    Special Counsel
    Firm Name
    Duane Morris LLP
  • Representative Cases & Transactions
    Cases
    Representative Matters: JRI, Inc. v. City
    County of San Francisco - Commercial Litigation - (Alameda Superior Court) Represented Aircraft Firefighting Rescue Vehicle manufacturer in contract dispute regarding vehicle purchase. Matter settled on favorable terms.
    FlightCar, Inc. v. City of Millbrae - Commercial Litigation/L
    Use - (San Mateo Superior Court) Represented start-up car share company in l
    use dispute with local government entity. Matter settled on favorable terms
    In re Zynga Privacy Litigation - Class Action Litigation - (Northern District of California, Ninth Circuit) Obtained judgment dismissing consolidated federal class actions alleging claims under Electronic Communications Privacy Act, Stored Communications Act, Computer Fraud
    Abuse Act, as well as state common-law
    statutory claims. Plaintiffs alleged that Zynga shared personally identifiable information with advertisers through the transmission of referrer headers that linked to Facebook user pages ? allegations that were based on an October 18, 2010, front-page Wall Street Journal article. Zynga argued that any leakage did not involve the contents of any communications under the federal privacy statutes, that any transmissions resulted from st
    ard web-browser operations
    that plaintiffs had not alleged any actual harm. In May 2014, the Ninth Circuit affirmed the dismissal of all claims against Zynga
    the dismissal of most claims against Facebook in the parallel Facebook Privacy case. In re: Zynga Privacy Litigation, No. 11-18044, ___ F.3d ___, 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 8662, 2014 WL 1814029 (9th Cir. May 8, 2014)
    dw-link Incorporated v. Giant Bicycle, Inc.
    Giant Manufacturing Co., Ltd. - Patent Litigation/Commercial Litigation - (Central District of California) Represented defendants in patent infringement lawsuit relating to vehicle suspension systems. Matter settled on favorable terms.
    Ackerman v. Zynga, Inc. - Class Action Litigation - (San Francisco Superior Court) Defended Zynga in Nationwide class action. Plaintiffs alleged claims under the UCL
    CRLA for false advertising in connection with Zynga's Words With Friends games. Matter settled on favorable terms.
    Telswitch, Inc. v. Billing Solutions Incorporated, et al., - Intellectual Property Litigation - (Northern District of California) Representing defendants
    counter-claimants in trade secrets
    Computer Fraud
    Abuse Act case.
    Tuition Options, LLC v. ATI Enterprises, Inc. - Commercial Litigation - (Philadelphia Arbitration ) Lead counsel in arbitration for prevailing defendant
    counter-claimant company in the career education sector regarding complicated accounting
    contractual issues pertaining to a servicing agreement.
    Swift v. Zynga, Inc. - Class Action Litigation - obtained a dismissal with prejudice of a class action brought against Zynga Inc. under the California Unfair Competition Law
    the Consumer Legal Remedies Act, following a successful motion to compel arbitration based on the U.S. Supreme Court's 2011 AT&T Mobility v. Concepcion decision. In the first application of that decision to an online terms of service agreement, the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California found that the Zynga's modified click-wrap agreement was effective to bind the plaintiff to arbitrate the claims as an individual -
    , not as a representative of the putative class.
    The Kindred Limited Partnership v. Screen Actors Guild (Central District of California) - Copyright infringement
    wrongful foreclosure action brought on behalf of Feldman/Meeker Co. to obtain return of copyright for the motion picture, The Kindred. Obtained partial summary judgment that SAG's foreclosure on the motion picture copyright was unlawful
    ineffective. Damages claim settled shortly before trial set for June 2010.
    Ivanhoe Capital v. Janna Hospitality Holdings, LLC (San Francisco Superior Court) - Represented defendant potential real estate investor in complex commercial real estate dispute arising from an alleged breach of contract regarding the potential development of a property in Idaho
    obtained dismissal of the complaint without leave to amend. Obtained a unanimous decision from the California Court of Appeal affirming the trial court's decision.
    Topa Insurance Group v. RCM Technologies, Inc. (Los Angeles Superior Court) - Represented plaintiff insurance company in a major software defect case against a company it had hired to design, install
    implement custom-built software
    obtained pre-trial rulings
    trial resolution that the client found favorable.
    PeopleData v. Yahoo! (Santa Clara Superior Court) - Represented Yahoo! in defense of breach of pay-per-click advertising contract
    various related tort claims
    prosecution of cross-complaint for successor liability
    fraudulent conveyance of business assets. Matter was settled, with Yahoo! as a defendant obtaining an affirmative recovery.
    Premises Liability Litigation (Eastern District of California) - Represented defendant restaurant owner in a premises liability action alleging that plaintiff's decedent died as result of being run over outside of restaurant
    obtained settlement
    Environmental Coverage Litigation - Represented insurance companies in complex coverage claims
    litigation arising out of environmental contamination
    /or product injuries.
    Advised
    represented highly visible internet social gaming company on multiple litigation
    corporate matters relating to content policies, virtual currency issues, internal risk management
    terms of service.

Experience

  • Bar Admission & Memberships
    Admissions
    1991, California
    U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
    U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California
    U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California
    U.S. District Court for the Central District of California
    Memberships

    Professional Activities

    •Bar Association of San Francisco
    •State Bar of California
    - Litigation Section
    •2012 Duane Morris Women's Initiative Award

  • Education & Certifications
    Law School
    University of California, Hastings College of the Law
    Class of 1991
    J.D.
    Other Education
    University of California, Davis
    Class of 1988
    B.A.
  • Personal Details & History
    Age
    Born in 1966
    1966

Suzanne Ryder Fogarty

Special Counsel at Duane Morris LLP
Not yet reviewed

One Market Plaza, Suite 2200San Francisco, CA 94105U.S.A.

Show on map

Lawyers Nearby

George W. Nowell
Pro
George W. Nowell
5.0
Litigation lawyer

Free Consultation

Michael David Early
Pro
Michael David Early
5.0
Litigation lawyer
Steven Skikos
Pro
Steven Skikos
5.0
Litigation lawyer
Louie H. Castoria
Pro
Louie H. Castoria
5.0
Litigation lawyer

Free Consultation

Charles R. Fenton
Pro
Charles R. Fenton
5.0
Litigation lawyer

Free Consultation

Case type is required.
I am is required.
First name is required.
Last name is required.
A valid zip code is required.
Country is required.
State is required.
A valid city is required.
A valid email address is required.
A valid phone number is required.
Message is required.
0/1000 characters

By clicking the Submit button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls, from Lawyers.com and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.

You should not send any sensitive or confidential information through this site. Emails sent through this site do not create an attorney-client relationship and may not be treated as privileged or confidential. The lawyer or law firm you are contacting is not required to, and may choose not to, accept you as a client. The internet is not necessarily secure and emails sent though this site could be intercepted or read by third parties.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA. See Google’s Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.

Thank you! Your message has been successfully sent.

For your records, a copy of this email has been sent to test@test.com.

Summary of Your Message
Case Type:
I am a/an:
First Name:
Last Name:
City:
Zip Code or Postal Code:
State:
Country:
Phone Number:
Message: