×
Go back to Martindale-Avvo ➔
Stephen M. Ullmer
Pro

Stephen M. Ullmer

Not yet reviewed

101 Second Street, Suite 2200, San Francisco, CA 94105

Intellectual Property & Technology, Patent Litigation and Litigation

About Stephen M. Ullmer

Stephen M. Ullmer focuses his practice on intellectual property matters, particularly patent litigation. He has tried cases involving software, internet technology, cellular technology, and pharmaceuticals, and has litigated cases in federal district courts across the country, at the Patent Trials and Appeals Board, and at the Federal Circuit.

Concentrations
•Patent Litigation
•Patent/IP strategy and counseling

Recognition & Leadership

Awards & Accolades

•Listed, Intellectual Asset Management (IAM) magazine, 'IAM Patent 1000,' 2024-2025

 

Stephen M. Ullmer (San Francisco, California) View website

Reviews for Stephen

This lawyer does not have any client reviews on Lawyers.com yet

Write a Review

Services

Areas of Law

  • Litigation
  • Other 2
    • Intellectual Property & Technology
    • Patent Litigation

Practice Details

  • Firm Information
    Position
    Shareholder
    Firm Name
    Greenberg Traurig, LLP
  • Representative Cases & Transactions
    Cases
    Experience: Representative Matters: Uniloc USA, Inc., et al. v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc., et al. Represented the defendant in a consolidated patent infringement case alleging infringement of 5 patents concerning pedometer functionality.
    Uniloc USA, Inc., et al. v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc., et al. Represented the defendant in 4 patent infringement cases alleging infringement of 4 patents concerning Bluetooth, LTE
    other communication protocols.
    Mobile Telecommunications Technologies, LLC v. Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC . Represented the defendant in patent litigation regarding technology for two-way wireless communications, including methods
    devices for processing data messages between a mobile unit
    a network operations center.
    Limelight Networks, Inc. v. Akamai Technologies, Inc. Represented Limelight as petitioner
    patent owner with respect to 16 inter partes review petitions concerning patents related to content delivery networks.
    Becton, Dickinson
    Company v. B. Braun Melsungen AG . Represented the patent owner with respect to 8 inter partes review petitions concerning patents related to catheters.
    Gonzalez v . Tagged & Gonzalez v. New Life Ventures. Represented Tagged
    New Life Ventures, won judgement of invalidity after trial in E.D.Tex. in patent litigation relating to digital labels for websites.
    EEF v . Personal Audio. Represented EEF, on judgement invalidating Personal Audio's podcasting patent after a trial before the Patent Trials
    Appeal Board.
    Prolifiq v . Veeva. Represented Prolifiq in patent
    trade secret litigation related to software for managing regulated communications for pharmaceuticals
    medical devices.
    Walker Digital v. MySpace, et al. Represented LinkedIn, MySpace
    Tagged against patents asserted against social networks' use of friend relationships.
    Teva Women's Health v. Mylan, Teva Women's Health v. Lupin,
    related matters. Represented Teva at trial
    in subsequent appeal regarding patents covering Seasonique, as well as in a set of five other related ANDA cases involving patents covering Seasonique, LoSeasonique
    Cenestin .
    Global Ground Automation v. Orissa et. al. Represented Global Ground Automation, in case involving patent relating to software for ground transportation.
    Core Wireless v. LG. Represented LG in patent litigation involving technology related to st
    ards for cellular telephones.
    Fotomedia v. Tagged, et al. Represented social network Tagged against five patents asserted against social networks' use of technology for displaying, uploading
    managing photos.
  • Additional Links
    https://www.gtlaw.com/en/professionals/u/ullmer-stephen-m

Experience

  • Bar Admission & Memberships
    Admissions
    Colorado
    California
    Oregon
    U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas
    U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California
    U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California
    U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
    Memberships

    Professional & Community Involvement

    •Member, American Bar Association
    •Member, Bar Association of San Francisco

  • Education & Certifications
    Law School
    University of California at Berkeley School of Law (Boalt Hall)
    Class of 2010
    J.D.
    Other Education
    Oregon State University
    B.S.
    Electrical Engineering, summa cum laude

Email Stephen M. Ullmer

Case type is required.
A valid zip code is required.
A valid city is required.
State is required.
Country is required.
Outside the US or Canada?
Message is required.
0/1000 characters

Contact Information

First name is required.
Last name is required.
A valid email address is required.
A valid phone number is required.

By clicking the Submit button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls, from Lawyers.com and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.

Thank you! Your message has been successfully sent.

For your records, a copy of this email has been sent to

Summary of Your Message
Case Type:
Zip Code or Postal Code:
City:
State:
Country:
Case Description:
Contact Information
First Name:
Last Name:
Email:
Phone Number:
Return to Profile

Attorneys FAQs

  • Is this attorney admitted to practice in any U.S. Federal Courts?
    Stephen M. Ullmer is admitted to practice before the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, United States District Court for the Northern District of California and United States District Court for the Southern District of California.
  • How many attorneys are in this law firm?
    Greenberg Traurig, LLP has 2750 attorneys at this location.
  • What law school did this attorney attend?
    Stephen M. Ullmer attended University of California at Berkeley School of Law (Boalt Hall).
  • What year was this attorney's law firm established?
    Greenberg Traurig, LLP was established in 1967.

Attorney information displayed in this FAQ section is based upon information the lawyer has included on their profile, in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals.

These FAQs include information about a lawyer's background, but do not evaluate their knowledge of the law, past performance on individual cases, personality, or communication skills.

It is solely the responsibility of lawyers and law firms to ensure that any information they provide complies with all applicable laws and rules of professional conduct.

You should be aware that the information we rely upon may not be comprehensive, or frequently updated.

Always research the lawyer further to get a better understanding of their license credentials, disciplinary status, background, and experience.

Lawyers.com Client Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review Ratings™ display reviews submitted by individuals who have either hired or consulted the lawyers or law firms.

The Client Review Rating score is determined through the aggregation of validated responses. People who submit reviews are either individuals who consulted with the lawyer/law firm or who hired the lawyer/law firm and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be anyone who consults or hires a lawyer including in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners, and private individuals.

Martindale-Hubbell validates that a reviewer is a person with a valid email address. As part of the review process, respondents must affirm that they have had an initial consultation, are currently a client or have been a client of the lawyer or law firm identified, although Martindale-Hubbell cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship as it is often confidential. The content of the responses is entirely from reviewers.

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review. For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Client Review Ratings, please visit our Client Review Page

Martindale Peer Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Peer Review Ratings™ are the gold standard in attorney ratings, and have been for more than a century. These ratings indicate attorneys who are widely respected by their peers for their ethical standards and legal expertise in a specific area of practice.

The Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings process is the gold standard due to its objectivity and comprehensiveness. Lawyers solicited for peer reviews include both those selected by the attorney being reviewed and lawyers independently selected by Martindale-Hubbell. All reviewers are verified as attorneys through Martindale-Hubbell’s extensive attorney database. Only attorneys practicing at least three years and receiving a sufficient number of reviews from non-affiliated attorneys are eligible to receive a Rating.

What are the different Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings?*

• AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies that a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

• Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

• Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Lawyers who have received peer reviews after 2009 will display more detailed information, including practice areas, summary ratings, detailed numeric ratings and written feedback (if available). Details for individual reviews received before 2009 are not displayed.

Attorneys that receive reviews from their peers, but not a sufficient number to establish a Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Rating, will have those reviews display on our websites.

For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings™, please visit our Ratings Page on Martindale.com and our Frequently Asked Questions