Sheppard MullinOf Counsel

Robert J. Uram

About Robert J. Uram

Robert J. Uram is a lawyer practicing environmental, tribal and indian law, real estate, energy, land use & environmental and 5 other areas of law. Robert received a B.A. degree from University of Pennsylvania in 1969, and has been licensed for 53 years. Robert practices at Sheppard Mullin in San Francisco, CA.

Awards

Reviews for Robert

This lawyer does not have any client reviews on Lawyers.com yet

Write a Review

Services

Areas of Law

  • Energy
  • Transportation
  • Construction Law
  • Other 5
    • Environmental
    • Tribal and Indian Law
    • Real Estate, Energy, Land Use & Environmental
    • Wetlands and Endangered Species
    • Food and Beverage

Practice Details

  • Firm Information
    Position
    Of Counsel
    Firm Name
    Sheppard Mullin
  • Representative Cases & Transactions
    Cases
    Experience: Throughout his career, Robert has combined detailed knowledge of laws
    regulations, high st
    ards
    a willingness to work long hours to find solutions to intrinsically challenging problems.
    Advancing Federal/State/Tribal Relations: Robert has been instrumental in finding solutions to difficult issues on how the Federal government, States
    Indian Tribes work together on coal mining reclamation.
    Robert drafted
    negotiated cooperative agreements with six states that resolved a dispute that arose over the extent of state authority to regulate surface coal mining reclamation on federal l
    s. The Congress adopted the cooperative agreement model in Section 525 of the Surface Mining Control
    Reclamation Act of 1977.
    Robert resolved disputes between the Office of Surface Mining Reclamation
    Enforcement
    states seeking to obtain approval for primacy under the Surface Mining Control
    Reclamation Act.
    As Director of the Office of Surface Mining Reclamation
    Enforcement, Robert used a vision of Shared Commitment to improve contentious relations between his agency
    the states
    signed an agreement of Shared Commitment with the National Association of Ab
    oned Mine L
    Programs.
    Robert settled a lawsuit filed by the Navajo
    Hopi Tribes who objected to a 1989 regulation that said the Department of the Interior had the sole authority to regulate coal mining on Indian L
    s
    recognized their inherent Tribal sovereignty.
    Addressing Difficult Legal Issues: Robert has enjoyed working on resolving high stakes legal issues.
    Robert researched
    drafted regulations to define the proper st
    ards for the Bureau of L
    Management to review 183 applications for preference right coal leases on 496,000 acres of l
    that contained more than 12 billion tons of coal. The regulations were upheld in NRDC v. Berklund, 609 F.2d 553 (D.C. Cir. 1979).
    Robert provided the legal guidance for preparing a Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement under the National Environmental Policy Act to evaluate the effects of adopting a new federal coal-leasing program. He was also a primary author
    reviewer of the document.
    Robert defended the Surface Mining Control
    Reclamation Act against existential challenges to its implementation. The courts rejected cases alleging that the Surface Mining Control
    Reclamation Act violated the Fifth
    Tenth Amendments of the United States Constitution, Hodel v Virginia, 452 U.S. 264 (1981)
    Hodel v. Indiana, 452 U.S. 314 (1981)
    rejected a bet the agency challenge to the agency's authority to set st
    ards for state programs beyond the bare minimums specified in the SMCRA. In Re Permanent Surface Mining Regulation Litigation, Appeal of Peabody Coal, 653 F.2d 514 (D.C. Cir. 1981)(En Banc), denied, 454 U.S. 822 (1981).
    Robert worked closely with the Army Corps of Engineers on the Special Area Management Plan for the San Diego Creek Watershed, the first watershed-wide comprehensive permitting plan in California for issuance of Section 404 permits.
    Robert developed an innovative, comprehensive approach to complying with the Environmental Protection Agency's Section 404(b)(1) Guidelines. The approach was approved in Friends of the Santa Clara River v. Army Corps of Engineers, 887 F.3d 906 (9th Cir. 2018), a case involving a Section 404 permit for the Newhall Ranch, a 20,000 home master planned net zero carbon emissions community.
    Robert drafted the Organic Trade Association's comments on the Department of Agriculture's proposed National Organic Program regulations. The comments lead to the Department's decision to reverse its proposal to allow use of sewage sludge
    genetically modified organisms in production
    use of irradiation in processing of organic food.
    Promoting Habitat Conservation As Part of Development: Robert has helped conserve habitat for endangered species
    worked on many key habitat conservation activities in both Northern
    Southern California.
    Robert advice on the proposed listing of the California Gnatcatcher under the state
    federal endangered species acts started the development community on the path that led to the passage of the State of California's Natural Community Conservation Program
    the development of multiple multi-species habitat conservation plans in Central
    Southern Orange County, San Diego
    Riverside
    other jurisdictions.
    Robert led the team that prepared a Habitat Conservation Plan the El Sobrante L
    fill in Riverside County covering two federally listed species
    29 other species of concern. The El Sobrante HCP was one of the first Habitat Conservation Plans in the country to comply with the Fish
    Wildlife Service's five-point policy, which required increased rigor.
    Robert negotiated a C
    idate Conservation Agreement for the Newhall Ranch with the Fish
    Wildlife Service to support the conservation of the San Fern
    o Valley spineflower, a tiny plant once believed to be extinct in southern California.
    Robert led a team that developed a plan for a six-mile long wildlife corridor through the Great Park to link the Clevel
    National Forest to the Laguna Coast. The plan fulfilled a decades long effort by a coalition of conservation groups led by the Laguna Greenbelt.
    In Northern California, Robert advised companies on the development
    approval of mitigation banks
    helped his clients place conservation easements on l
    to protect wetl
    s,
    endangered species like the California red-legged frog, the California Tiger Salam
    er, vernal pool fairy shrimp, vernal pool tadpole shrimp, the Alameda whipsnake, the Mission Blue butterfly, the Bay Checkerspot butterfly, burrowing owl
    western pond turtle.
    Improving Government Programs: Robert provided leadership
    direction for the Office of Surface Mining Reclamation
    Enforcement.
    Robert started the Acid Mine Drainage Technology Initiative to develop technical st
    ards to stop new mines from becoming a source of acid mine drainage. His work on the Appalachian Clean Streams Initiative served as a catalyst for the funding of hundreds of projects that have restored thous
    s of miles streams polluted by acid mine drainage.
    Robert successfully defended the agency's right to provide a federal backstop when state agencies failed to enforce the law under state primacy programs, defeating two bills, S. 1401
    H.R. 2372, which sought to remove this enforcement authority.
    Robert issued policy guidance that made it easier for private companies to voluntarily reclaim ab
    oned coal refuse piles.
    Robert issued a new mission
    vision statement, streamlined agency processes
    enhanced employee productivity by eliminating layers of unnecessary reviews
    carrying out reviews under the Government Results
    Performance Act to improve financial performance.
    Helping Clients Seeking Government Approvals: Robert has helped evaluate
    comply with the complex requirements of the National Environmental Policy Act, the Clean Water Act, the Endangered Species Act, the California Fish
    Game Code, among other laws.
    Robert has worked on hundreds of housing, commercial, recreational, master planned, solar, l
    fill, s

    gravel mines
    l
    exchanges projects primarily located in California, but he also worked on projects in Guam, Nevada, New Mexico, Colorado
    Mississippi.
    Robert secured permits for housing developments
    master planned communities in dozens of California jurisdictions. Projects include the Windemere Ranch, the Gale Ranch, Alamo Creek, the Newhall Ranch, the Great Park, Spectrum 5, Spectrum 6, Quail Hill, Orchard Grove, Shady Canyon, Turtle Ridge
    Portola Springs.
    Robert also secured permits for the San Juan Capistrano High School, Coast Rock Products S

    Gravel Mine
    several l
    fills.
    Two of his projects were among the first new solar generation projects in Imperial County.

Experience

  • Bar Admission & Memberships
    Admissions
    1973, Pennsylvania
    1980, New Mexico
    1986, California
    Memberships

    Memberships

    •Member, American College of Environmental Lawyers
    •Member, Organic Trade Association

    Bar Fellowship
    2009

    • Northern California Super Lawyers, San Francisco Magazine, 2007, 2008, 2010-2013

    Memberships

    • Member, American College of Environmental Lawyers

    • Member, Organic Trade Association

    Articles

    • An Update on Wind, Solar Energy on Public Lands, Law360, July 10, 2009

    • Ninth Circuit Raises the Level of Protection Afforded to Critical Habitat, September 29, 2004

    • Statewide Listing of California Tiger Salamander As A Federal Endangered Species Took Effect on September 3, 2004, Critical Habitat Proposed, September 29, 2004

    • Major New ESA Decision Limits Mitigation the Services May Require, August 5, 2004

    • California Tiger Salamander Not Threatened With Extinction, November 17, 2003

    • New Court Decision On Section 7 Issues, December 21, 2001

    • U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Narrows the Impact of Recent Court Decisions That Attempt to Limit Clean Water Act Jurisdiction, March 15, 2001

    • Solid Waste Energy Of Northern Cook County v. United States Army Corps Of Engineers, January 10, 2001

    • Organic Certification Merits Careful Attention Under Impending Law, September 10, 1998

    • Substantive Requirements of the Endangered Species Act, July 10, 1998

    • Substantive Requirements of the Endangered Species Act,

    • Uram, R., "The Evolution of the Practicable Alternatives Test," Natural Resources & Environment, American Bar Association, Vol. 7, No. 1, Summer 1992.

    • Uram, R., Chapter VIII Federal And State Wetland Regulation and Chapter IX Endangered Species Act, Curtin, "California Land-Use and Planning Law."

    Class Action Defense Law Blog Articles

    • "Proposition 37 Permits "Natural" Labeling for Non-GMO Processed Food," October 8, 2012

    Climate Change & Clean Technology Law Blog Articles

    • "U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Seeks Public Comment on Proposed Strategic Climate Change Plan", November 16, 2009

    • "Coordinating Committee for California's Renewable Energy Transmission Initiative Issues Final Report for Phase 2A", September 22, 2009

    FDA Law Blog Articles

    • "FDA Issues Two Proposed Rules That Will Significantly Change Regulatory Requirements For Food Safety," January 24, 2013

    Real Estate, Land Use & Environmental Law Blog Articles

    • "Utility Pole Not A Point Source Under The Clean Water Act," April 16, 2013

    • "Comment Period to Close On Petition to FDA for Mandatory Labeling of All Foods Produced Using Genetic Engineering," March 26, 2012

    • "New And Revised Nationwide Permits For Dredge And Fill Activities," February 22, 2012

    • "9th Circuit Upholds Critical Habitat Designation for Mexican Spotted Owl," June 22, 2010

    • "9th Circuit Upholds Corps Permit and Biological Opinion," June 22, 2010

    • "Fish and Game Commission Seeks Comments Related to Proposed California Tiger Salamander Rulemaking", April 16, 2010

    • "State Listing of California Tiger Salamander Warranted", March 8, 2010

    • "New Construction General Permit Imposes Significant New Requirements for Storm Water Discharges", September 10, 2009

    • "Bureau of Land Management and Department of Energy Announce Availability of Solar Study Areas", July 20, 2009

    • "EPA's New Source Performance Standard Does Not Apply to Discharges of Mining Slurry Regulated Under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act", July 8, 2009

    • "EPA May Use Cost-Benefit Analysis In Setting "Best Technology Available" Standards Under Clean Water Act", April 6, 2009

    • "Army Corps Properly Limited Scope of NEPA Review of Section 404 Permits to Impacts of Filling Jurisdictional Waters", March 10, 2009

    • "California Fish and Game Commission to Consider Candidacy Status of California Tiger Salamander under CESA at February 5 Meeting", January 23, 2009

    • "Fish and Game Commission Must Accept Petition to List the CTS under California Endangered Species Act", September 17, 2008

    • "Corps and EPA Issue Important New Mitigation Rule", April 16, 2008

    • "Man-Made Pond That is Within a Larger Wetland Area Adjacent to Traditionally Navigable Water is Within Corps Jurisdiction Under Clean Water Act", August 29, 2007

    • "Army Corps of Engineers, US EPA Publish Long-Awaited Guidance on Determining Clean Water Act Regulatory Jurisdiction Subject to the Supreme Court's Rapanos and Carabell Decisions", June 6, 2007

    • "Ninth Circuit Holds Recovery Standard Applies to Jeopardy Analysis", April 10, 2007

    • "Clean Water Act Update: Adjacent Wetlands Rule for Establishing Clean Water Act Regulatory Authority Does Not Apply to a Non-Weland Diked Pond", March 21, 2007

    • "Clean Water Act Update: District Courts on the East, West Coasts Explain and Apply the Rapanos Decision to Adjacent Wetlands and Intermittent and Ephemeral Streams", March 13, 2007

    • "U.S. District Court Throws Out 'Tulloch II' Rule Defining Incidental Fallback", February 1, 2007

    • "Court Orders the CTS be Considered for Listing Under the California Endangered Species Act", December 21, 2006

    • "Corps Proposes New, Reissued, and Modified Nationwide Permits", September 26, 2006

    • "Nationwide Permits Scheduled to Expire on March 19, 2007", September 22, 2006

    • "Supreme Court Curtails Army Corps of Engineers' Jurisdiction", June 22, 2006

    • "Court Concludes Fish and Wildlife Service Improperly Ignored Recovery Goal of Critical Habitat Designation", April 3, 2006

    • "Activity on Reform of The Endangered Species Act", September 27, 2005

    • "Ninth Circuit Raises the Level of Protection Afforded to Critical Habitat", October 1, 2004

    • "Statewide Listing of California Tiger Salamander As a Federal Endangered Species Took Effect on September 3, 2004, Critical Habitat Proposed", September 1, 2004

    • "Major New ESA Decision Limits Mitigation the Services May Require", July 1, 2004

    Speeches

    • Uram, R. "Recent Developments Under the National Environmental Policy Act: Integrating Nepa with Federal Requirements." CLE International NEPA Conference, January 2012.

    • Uram, R. and panel. "Working through the Permitting Phase for Energy Projects: Noteworthy Challenges and Outcomes." Law Seminars International, 2011.

    • Uram, R. "Putting the Pieces Together: Integrating NEPA with Other Federal Requirements." CLE International NEPA Conference, 2010.

    • Uram, R. and panel. "The Future of the Waterfront and Contiguous Land," Bay Planning Coalition's 22nd Annual S. F. Bay Decisionmakers Conference, "Sustainability Strategies for a Changing Bay," 2009.

    • Uram, R. and panel. "New Rules for Compensatory Mitigation Under Clean Water Act Section 404." Lorman Education Service Teleconference, 2009.

    • Uram, R. "Endangered Species Act Enforcement: Conflicts of Interest, Duty of Confidentiality, and Liability Issues." CLE International ESA conference, 2008.

    • Uram, R. and panel. "State Wetland Policy?" Urban Water Institutes Seventh Annual Clean Water Conference, 2008.

    • Uram, R. and panel. "Conservation Planning and the Law: Key Legal Issues That Will Shape the Future Development and Implementation of HCP/NCCPs." The Northern California Conservation Planning Partners Sixth Annual Workshop, 2008.

    • Uram, R. "Special Area Management Plans/Master Streambed Alteration Agreements (SAMP/MSAA) - Watershed Approaches to Permitting." CLE International Wetlands Conference, 2005.

    • Uram, R. "Status of the California Tiger Salamander." CLE International ESA Conference, 2005.

    • Uram, R. "Overview of Wetlands Regulation." CLE International Wetlands Conference, 2004.

    • Uram, R. "Permitting Requirements & Options under the Endangered Species Act." CLE International ESA Conference, 2003.

    • Uram, R. "The Essential Elements of a Biological Opinion." CLE International ESA Conferences, 2002 - 2003.

  • Education & Certifications
    Law School
    Northwestern Law School
    Class of 1973
    J.D.
    cum laude
    Other Education
    University of Pennsylvania
    Class of 1969
    B.A.

Robert J. Uram

Of Counsel at Sheppard Mullin
Not yet reviewed

Seventeenth Floor, Four Embarcadero CenterSan Francisco, CA 94111U.S.A.

Show on map

Lawyers Nearby

David G. Leach
Pro
David G. Leach
5.0
Environmental Law lawyer
Craig M. Peters
Pro
Craig M. Peters
4.9
Environmental Law lawyer
David A. Robinson
Pro
David A. Robinson
5.0
Environmental Law lawyer
no photo
Pro
Richard E. McGreevy
5.0
Environmental Law lawyer
John D. O'Connor
Pro
John D. O'Connor
5.0
Environmental Law lawyer
Case type is required.
I am is required.
First name is required.
Last name is required.
A valid zip code is required.
Country is required.
State is required.
A valid city is required.
A valid email address is required.
A valid phone number is required.
Message is required.
0/1000 characters

By clicking the Submit button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls, from Lawyers.com and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.

You should not send any sensitive or confidential information through this site. Emails sent through this site do not create an attorney-client relationship and may not be treated as privileged or confidential. The lawyer or law firm you are contacting is not required to, and may choose not to, accept you as a client. The internet is not necessarily secure and emails sent though this site could be intercepted or read by third parties.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA. See Google’s Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.

Thank you! Your message has been successfully sent.

For your records, a copy of this email has been sent to test@test.com.

Summary of Your Message
Case Type:
I am a/an:
First Name:
Last Name:
City:
Zip Code or Postal Code:
State:
Country:
Phone Number:
Message: