About Nathaniel Kelly

Nathaniel G. Kelly is the founder of the Law Offices of Nate Kelly, a California litigation practice representing companies, founders, shareholders, and boards in high-stakes commercial disputes. His practice focuses on three areas: high-stakes litigation, business breakups, and corporate governance disputes.

Mr. Kelly represents clients at every stage of dispute resolution — from pre-filing demand and negotiation through arbitration, trial, and appeal. He is admitted to all California state and federal courts, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, and federal courts in Philadelphia, Seattle, and Washington D.C.

His practice includes bet-the-company commercial litigation, trade secret misappropriation and enforcement, breach of fiduciary duty and shareholder oppression claims, derivative actions, hostile takeover defense, forced buyout and dissolution proceedings, and post-acquisition disputes including earn-out enforcement.

Selected results include a $7,418,642 judgment entered by the Superior Court of California, County of Orange (March 2026) on claims of breach of fiduciary duty and trade secret misappropriation; a judgment after bench trial dismissing with prejudice a hostile takeover complaint on all causes of action (Alameda County Superior Court, 2025); a property partition bench trial result in which the client received 76% of $1,530,000 in sale proceeds (Alameda County Superior Court, 2025); a $3.5M minority shareholder buyout following 16 months of contentious litigation (2025); a $1.5M corporate dissolution resolved through mediation following a successful preliminary injunction motion (2024); a successful defense of a federal trade secret preliminary injunction in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania (2024); and an appellate court victory in a breach of contract appeal, with costs and attorneys' fees awarded to the client (2024).

Mr. Kelly has resolved over $200M in business disputes across California state and federal courts, AAA and JAMS arbitration, and appellate proceedings.

Prior to founding his firm in 2010, Mr. Kelly practiced at Kaye Scholer LLP (now Arnold & Porter), where he advised on complex commercial transactions for institutional clients.

Recognition:

— Top 100 Bet-the-Company Litigators® in America (top 0.5% of business litigators nationally)

— Super Lawyers, Business Litigation — Northern California 2024–2026; Southern California 2025–2026. The only attorney to appear on both regional Business Litigation lists in 2025.

— Super Lawyers Rising Star — Northern and Southern California, 2016–2022

— Avvo Rating 10.0 — "Superb"

J.D., USC Gould School of Law — High Honors, Merit Scholarship

B.A., University of Maryland — Dean's Scholar, cum laude, Phi Beta Kappa

Offices in San Francisco, Beverly Hills, and Laguna Beach

 

Awards

Reviews for Nathaniel

Have you consulted or hired this lawyer?

Leave a review about your experience with this lawyer.

Write a Review

Overall Rating
Showing 1-1 of 1 client reviews from Lawyers.com
Lawyers.com Rating Snapshot
5 stars
100%
4 stars
0%
3 stars
0%
2 stars
0%
1 star
0%
What do people say on Lawyers.com?
Communication
5.0
Quality of Service
5.0
Responsiveness
5.0
Value for Money
5.0
Business Litigation
Posted by Aryan
April 08, 2026
Hired Attorney

I recently went through a dispute with my business partner stealing and taking over the business and its assets. I reached out to several lawyers, and after speaking with Nate, I felt comfortable with him representing me mainly due to his attitude and approach. He genuinely came off as caring and wanting my best interest in mind. We filed in AAA Arbitration and the matter went all the way through a final hearing. The outcome was exactly what we wanted, we won the case with a favorable reward and judgement. Everything that Nate handled for the case was done with very high attention to detail and he didn't leave anything out that would have affected my reward. During the case, Nate thoroughly answered all my questions and addressed all my concerns. He gave excellent advice, which was a relief seeing as how this was the first time I was involved in any sort of lawsuit. Happy to retain him as counsel in any future cases (hopefully there won't be any)

 

Services

Areas of Law

  • Intellectual Property
  • Business Law 1
    • Business Litigation
  • Corporate Law 1
    • Corporate Litigation
  • Commercial Litigation
  • Other 1
    • Alternative Dispute Resolution and Litigation

Practice Details

  • Languages
    English
  • Payment Information
    Payment & Cost Features
    Free initial consultation
    Fixed hourly rates: $275 - $475/hr
    Fixed fees available
    Contingency Fee: 10% - 55%
    Accepted Credit Cards
    MasterCard
    Other
    Visa
  • Video Calls
    Offers Video Calls
    Video Call Options
    Zoom
    Google Hangouts
    FaceTime
  • Firm Information
    Position
    Founder
    Firm Name
    Law Offices of Nate Kelly
  • Representative Cases & Transactions
    Cases

    Breach of Fiduciary Duty & Trade Secret Misappropriation — $7,418,642 JudgmentSuperior Court of California, County of Orange | March 12, 2026Represented a 50% co-founder after his co-owner secretly formed a competing entity while still serving as manager of the original company,
    took all company assets — including a proprietary lead-screening algorithm, customer lists, sales scripts, computers,
    cash. The respondent then actively solicited existing customers to cancel their policies
    purchase from the competing entity. AAA arbitrator found willful
    malicious misappropriation of trade secrets
    breach of fiduciary duty by clear
    convincing evidence. Award confirmed as judgment by the Superior Court of California, County of Orange. Judgment: $7,418,642.57 — $5,000,000 compensatory damages, $2,000,000 exemplary damages, $337,217.57 attorneys' fees, $35,763.50 arbitration costs. Respondent terminated as manager
    member of the company.---Hostile Takeover Defeated — Judgment After Bench TrialSuperior Court of California, County of Alameda | Case No. HG20077657 | October 2025Represented the board of a California corporation against a plaintiff who filed a Fifth Amended Complaint claiming to be an authorized director
    seeking to assert control over the organization. Case proceeded through bifurcated bench trial on the threshold issue of st
    ing. Defendants moved for judgment under Code of Civil Procedure § 631.8 after plaintiff's case-in-chief. Court granted judgment in favor of defendants in full. Complaint dismissed with prejudice on all causes of action. Plaintiff failed to demonstrate she was a member, board member, or authorized to bring suit on behalf of the corporation.---Property Partition — Bench TrialSuperior Court of California, County of Alameda | Case No. 21CV000122 | 2025Represented defendant in a partition action filed by a co-owner organization seeking forced sale
    apportionment of a jointly held property. Case proceeded through four years of litigation including a full bench trial. Following trial
    tentative rulings, mediator's proposal accepted by both parties. Client received 76% of $1,530,000 in sale proceeds — more than three times the opposing party's share.---Minority Shareholder Buyout — $3.5M2025Represented a 20% minority owner who was terminated, excluded from distributions,
    sued by the majority for trade secret misappropriation. After 16 months of contentious litigation, secured a $3.5M buyout through mediation.---

    Corporate Dissolution — $1.5M Settlement

    Superior Court of California, County of San Francisco | 2024Represented a business owner in a corporate dissolution action. Partners could not agree on a reasonable buyout
    made various claims against each other. Won motion for preliminary injunction. Resolved through mediation. $1.5M settlement.---Trade Secret Defense — Federal CourtUnited States District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania | 2024Defended the former division COO of a large national company against federal trade secret claims. Successfully defended preliminary injunction motion that, if granted, would have prevented client from continuing in his new role. Matter resolved through mediation. Client retained his position at his new company.---Appellate Victory — Breach of ContractCalifornia Court of Appeal | 2024Represented respondent in breach of contract appeal following bench trial. Defeated appellant's claims on incorporation by reference
    application of the parol evidence rule. Appeal defeated in full. Costs
    attorneys' fees awarded to client by the appellate court.---Derivative Action — Court-Approved Monetary JudgmentSuperior Court of California |Obtained court-approved monetary judgment against board of directors in derivative action stemming from the failure of a private company. Represented group of 16 plaintiffs.---Summary Judgment — Trademark DilutionClearly Canadian Beverage Corp. v. Top Shelf Beverages (Clearly Kombucha) | 2015Defended Top Shelf Beverages against claims that its mark, Clearly Kombucha, infringed the mark Clearly Canadian — including patent infringement, copyright claims,
    trademark dilution. Won partial summary judgment on the dilution claim. Achieved highly favorable settlement resolving all remaining claims.---UCC Breach of Contract — $1.3M Pre-Filing Resolution2024Represented an Illinois-based steel parts supplier with over $700,000 in outst
    ing invoices
    $700,000 in half-complete inventory after a unicorn startup experienced funding issues. Negotiated pre-filing on the enforceability of a notice provision
    the treatment of in-process inventory. Recovered full $1.3M. Business relationship preserved, enabling an additional $1.1M in subsequent orders.---Airport Authority Penalty — $500,000 Reduced to $60,0002023

    Represented an airplane servicing company that received a notice of penalty exceeding $500,000 from a San Francisco Airport authority. After approximately four weeks of representation, penalty reduced to $60,000 with an affordable payment plan — without filing suit.

    Transactions
    The Chainsmokers Limited, Mood-Altering Shades With Futuremood

    May 02, 2022

    Nate Kelly led and completed a negotiated investment, collaboration, and licensing agreement between client, Futuremood Studios, and international DJ duo The Chainsmokers. See, https://www.themanual.com/fashion/chainsmokers-mood-altering-shades-with-futuremood/.

    Lil Yachty Is Latest Investor As Sunglasses Brand Futuremood Expands Its Pop Culture Lens

    Mar 03, 2022

    Nate Kelly led negotiation to bring in Rap/Pop Superstar as a lead investor and collaborator to the sunglasses brand, Futuremood. We negotiated and completed a unique investment, collaboration, and licensing agreement, which sets a new standard for celebrity - brand partnerships. See, https://www.forbes.com/sites/cathyolson/2022/07/07/lil-yachty-is-latest-investor-as-sunglasses-company-futuremood-expands-its-pop-culture-lens/amp/.
  • Additional Links

Experience

  • Bar Admission & Memberships
    Admissions
    Memberships

    State of California:

    State Bar of California — 2009

    Federal Courts:

    U.S. District Court, Northern District of California U.S. District Court, Central District of California U.S. District Court, Eastern District of California U.S. District Court, Southern District of California U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
  • Education & Certifications
    Law School
    University of Southern California, Gould School of Law School
    Class of 2008
    J.D.
    American Jurisprudence Award; High Honors; Merit Scholarship
    Other Education
    University of Maryland
    Class of 2005
    B.A.
    Government and Politics, Cum Laude; Phi Beta Kappa; Dean’s Scholar
  • Personal Details & History
    Hobbies & Interests
    Physical fitness, including soccer, volleyball and surfing; movies, television and live performance; reading and writing.

Contact Nathaniel Kelly

Founder at Law Offices of Nate Kelly
4.9
32 reviews

201 Spear Street, Suite 1100San Francisco, CA 94105U.S.A.

Show on map

9107 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 450Beverly Hills, CA 90210U.S.A.

Show on map
Office Hours:
  • Monday 09:00 AM - 05:00 PM
  • Tuesday 09:00 AM - 05:00 PM
  • Wednesday 09:00 AM - 05:00 PM
  • Thursday 09:00 AM - 05:00 PM
  • Friday 09:00 AM - 05:00 PM
view 1 other office Location
hide 1 other office Location

Other Office Location

Beverly Hills, CA

9107 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 450Beverly Hills, CA 90210U.S.A.

Show on map

Activity

Case type is required.
A valid zip code is required.
A valid city is required.
State is required.
Country is required.
Outside the US or Canada? Click here
Message is required.
0/1000 characters

Contact Information

First name is required.
Last name is required.
A valid email address is required.
A valid phone number is required.

By clicking the Submit button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls, from Lawyers.com and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.

Thank you! Your message has been successfully sent.

For your records, a copy of this email has been sent to

Summary of Your Message
Case Type:
Zip Code or Postal Code:
City:
State:
Country:
Case Description:
Contact Information
First Name:
Last Name:
Email:
Phone Number:

Attorneys FAQs

  • What year was this attorney first admitted to the bar?
    Nathaniel Kelly was admitted in 2009 to the State of California.
  • What is this attorney's primary practice area?
    The practice area Nathaniel Kelly spends the most time on is Business Litigation.
  • Is this attorney admitted to practice in any U.S. Federal Courts?
    Nathaniel Kelly is admitted to practice before the United States District Court for the Central District of California and United States District Court for the Northern District of California.
  • Does this attorney maintain a professional presence on any social networks?
    Yes, Nathaniel Kelly has a professional profile on Twitter and LinkedIn.
  • What law school did this attorney attend?
    Nathaniel Kelly attended University of Southern California, Gould School of Law School.