×
Go back to Martindale-Avvo ➔

Ropers MajeskiOf Counsel
Nathaniel Le Roi Dunn

Nathaniel Le Roi Dunn

Not yet reviewed

150 Spear Street, Suite 850, San Francisco, CA 94105

Construction, Product Liability & Torts, Real Estate and 5 more

About Nathaniel Le Roi Dunn

Nathaniel Le Roi Dunn is a lawyer practicing construction, product liability & torts, real estate and 5 other areas of law. Nathaniel received a B.A. degree from California State Polytechnic University, San Luis Obispo in 2001, and has been licensed for 18 years. Nathaniel practices at Ropers Majeski in San Francisco, CA.

Nathaniel Le Roi Dunn (San Francisco, California)

Reviews for Nathaniel

This lawyer does not have any client reviews on Lawyers.com yet

Write a Review

Services

Areas of Law

  • Real Estate
  • Litigation
  • General Practice
  • Insurance
  • Other 4
    • Construction
    • Product Liability & Torts
    • Bankruptcy & Debt
    • Lawsuits & Disputes

Practice Details

  • Firm Information
    Position
    Of Counsel
    Firm Name
    Ropers Majeski
  • Representative Cases & Transactions
    Cases
    Representative Matters: Defended a building owner in a case where one of its tenants in a residential apartment building assaulted another resident with a gun. The plaintiff alleged that our clients should have prevented the attack by evicting the perpetrator of the assault sooner. The case was settled for one sixth of plaintiff's original dem
    .
    Successfully obtained a voluntary dismissal on behalf of an insured company when the plaintiff, a workers' compensation carrier, sought to recover $35,000 paid out on our client's workplace injury policy following an industrial accident in which a worker fell from an unsupported ceiling crawl space. The plaintiff withdrew its complaint after we sent a series of meet
    confer letters stipulating why its claims were meritless.
    Advised a large public university on its liability policies
    operating procedures related to its private health club.
    Obtained a favorable settlement
    early dismissal of a l
    lord-tenant lawsuit in which 13 former tenants complained of habitability defects in each of their units in a building previously owned by our clients.
    Negotiated a favorable early settlement in a personal injury action in which the plaintiff alleged our client's failure to keep a worksite safe led to the plaintiff tripping
    falling down a flight of stairs.

Experience

  • Bar Admission & Memberships
    Admissions
    2008, California
    US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
    USDC: Northern District of California
    USDC: Central District of California
    USDC: Eastern District of California
    USDC: Southern District of California
    Memberships

    Professional Activities

    •Co-Membership Chair, Board of Directors, Charles Houston Bar Association

  • Education & Certifications
    Law School
    Wake Forest University School of Law
    Class of 2007
    J.D.
    Other Education
    California State Polytechnic University, San Luis Obispo
    Class of 2001
    B.A.
  • Personal Details & History
    Age
    Born in 1979
    Oakland, California

Email Nathaniel Le Roi Dunn

Case type is required.
A valid zip code is required.
A valid city is required.
State is required.
Country is required.
Outside the US or Canada?
Message is required.
0/1000 characters

Contact Information

First name is required.
Last name is required.
A valid email address is required.
A valid phone number is required.

By clicking the Submit button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls, from Lawyers.com and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.

Thank you! Your message has been successfully sent.

For your records, a copy of this email has been sent to

Summary of Your Message
Case Type:
Zip Code or Postal Code:
City:
State:
Country:
Case Description:
Contact Information
First Name:
Last Name:
Email:
Phone Number:
Return to Profile
Lawyers.com Client Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review Ratings™ display reviews submitted by individuals who have either hired or consulted the lawyers or law firms.

The Client Review Rating score is determined through the aggregation of validated responses. People who submit reviews are either individuals who consulted with the lawyer/law firm or who hired the lawyer/law firm and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be anyone who consults or hires a lawyer including in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners, and private individuals.

Martindale-Hubbell validates that a reviewer is a person with a valid email address. As part of the review process, respondents must affirm that they have had an initial consultation, are currently a client or have been a client of the lawyer or law firm identified, although Martindale-Hubbell cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship as it is often confidential. The content of the responses is entirely from reviewers.

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review. For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Client Review Ratings, please visit our Client Review Page

Martindale Peer Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Peer Review Ratings™ are the gold standard in attorney ratings, and have been for more than a century. These ratings indicate attorneys who are widely respected by their peers for their ethical standards and legal expertise in a specific area of practice.

The Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings process is the gold standard due to its objectivity and comprehensiveness. Lawyers solicited for peer reviews include both those selected by the attorney being reviewed and lawyers independently selected by Martindale-Hubbell. All reviewers are verified as attorneys through Martindale-Hubbell’s extensive attorney database. Only attorneys practicing at least three years and receiving a sufficient number of reviews from non-affiliated attorneys are eligible to receive a Rating.

What are the different Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings?*

• AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies that a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

• Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

• Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Lawyers who have received peer reviews after 2009 will display more detailed information, including practice areas, summary ratings, detailed numeric ratings and written feedback (if available). Details for individual reviews received before 2009 are not displayed.

Attorneys that receive reviews from their peers, but not a sufficient number to establish a Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Rating, will have those reviews display on our websites.

For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings™, please visit our Ratings Page on Martindale.com and our Frequently Asked Questions