×
Go back to Martindale-Avvo ➔

Jackson Lewis P.C.Principal
no photo

Kevin Durrell Reese

Not yet reviewed

50 California Street, 9th Floor, San Francisco, CA 94111

Class Actions and Complex Litigation, California Class and PAGA Action, Managing Your Work Force and WARN Act Compliance and 1 more

About Kevin Durrell Reese

Kevin Durrell Reese is a lawyer practicing class actions and complex litigation, california class and paga action, managing your work force and warn act compliance and 1 other area of law. Kevin received a B.S. degree from San Jose State University in 1989, and has been licensed for 32 years. Kevin practices at Jackson Lewis P.C. in San Francisco, CA.

Kevin Durrell Reese (San Francisco, California)

Reviews for Kevin

This lawyer does not have any client reviews on Lawyers.com yet

Write a Review

Services

Areas of Law

  • Other 4
    • Class Actions and Complex Litigation
    • California Class and PAGA Action
    • Managing Your Work Force and WARN Act Compliance
    • Labor & Employment

Practice Details

  • Firm Information
    Position
    Principal
    Firm Name
    Jackson Lewis P.C.
  • Representative Cases & Transactions
    Cases
    Representative Experience: Lead defense counsel for restaurant for wage
    hour violations
    Lead defense counsel for staffing company in wage
    hour class action case involving off-the-clock work claims
    Lead counsel for national museum involving class claims for unpaid wages, meal
    rest breaks
    Lead defense counsel for tire manufacturer in wage
    hour class action involving overtime
    payment of wages due at termination
    Lead defense counsel for national healthcare transportation company in wage
    hour class action litigation involving ADA preemption, federal enclave doctrine, overtime, sleep time,
    meal
    rest break claims
    Lead defense counsel for transportation companies in wage
    hour class audits
    actions involving split shift premium, meal
    rest break claims, off-the-clock claims, expense reimbursement claims, failure to pay wages at termination,
    misclassification actions post-Dynamex
    Represented transportation company at multiple administrative hearings on wage
    hour claims
    Defense counsel for misclassification audit for national technology client
    Lead Defense counsel for major airline in single plaintiff discrimination case
    Lead Defense counsel for national catering company in single plaintiff wrongful termination case
    Lead Defense counsel for national broadcasting company for reduction in force
    Lead Defense counsel in 16 plaintiff racial discrimination action against manufacturing company
    Represented national retailer in dozens of single
    multiple plaintiff claims involving wrongful termination, disability discrimination
    sexual harassment
    Represented national bank in case alleging wrongful termination in violation of public policy

Experience

  • Bar Admission & Memberships
    Admissions
    1994, California
    1996, 9th Circuit Court of Appeals
    1996, California - C.D. Cal.
    1996, California - E.D. Cal.
    1996, California - N.D. Cal.
    2014, California - S.D. Cal.
    Memberships

    Professional Associations and Activities

    •American Bar Association
    •Charles Houston Bar Association
    •National Bar Association Labor & Employment Section Chair (2015-present), Region IX Director (2012-2015)
    •San Francisco Bar Association
    •Wiley Manuel Law Foundation

  • Education & Certifications
    Law School
    University of California, Hastings College of the Law
    Class of 1994
    J.D.
    Other Education
    San Jose State University
    Class of 1989
    B.S.
  • Personal Details & History
    Age
    Born in 1965
    1965
    Hobbies & Interests
    Fantasy sports, music, reading, enjoying Game of Thrones.

Email Kevin Durrell Reese

Case type is required.
I am is required.
First name is required.
Last name is required.
A valid zip code is required.
Country is required.
State is required.
A valid city is required.
A valid email address is required.
A valid phone number is required.
Message is required.
0/1000 characters

By clicking the Submit button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls, from Lawyers.com and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.

You should not send any sensitive or confidential information through this site. Emails sent through this site do not create an attorney-client relationship and may not be treated as privileged or confidential. The lawyer or law firm you are contacting is not required to, and may choose not to, accept you as a client. The internet is not necessarily secure and emails sent though this site could be intercepted or read by third parties.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA. See Google’s Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.

Thank you! Your message has been successfully sent.

For your records, a copy of this email has been sent to test@test.com.

Summary of Your Message
Case Type:
I am a/an:
First Name:
Last Name:
City:
Zip Code or Postal Code:
State:
Country:
Phone Number:
Message:
Return to Profile Reset Form
Lawyers.com Client Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review Ratings™ display reviews submitted by individuals who have either hired or consulted the lawyers or law firms.

The Client Review Rating score is determined through the aggregation of validated responses. People who submit reviews are either individuals who consulted with the lawyer/law firm or who hired the lawyer/law firm and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be anyone who consults or hires a lawyer including in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners, and private individuals.

Martindale-Hubbell validates that a reviewer is a person with a valid email address. As part of the review process, respondents must affirm that they have had an initial consultation, are currently a client or have been a client of the lawyer or law firm identified, although Martindale-Hubbell cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship as it is often confidential. The content of the responses is entirely from reviewers.

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review. For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Client Review Ratings, please visit our Client Review Page

Martindale Peer Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Peer Review Ratings™ are the gold standard in attorney ratings, and have been for more than a century. These ratings indicate attorneys who are widely respected by their peers for their ethical standards and legal expertise in a specific area of practice.

The Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings process is the gold standard due to its objectivity and comprehensiveness. Lawyers solicited for peer reviews include both those selected by the attorney being reviewed and lawyers independently selected by Martindale-Hubbell. All reviewers are verified as attorneys through Martindale-Hubbell’s extensive attorney database. Only attorneys practicing at least three years and receiving a sufficient number of reviews from non-affiliated attorneys are eligible to receive a Rating.

What are the different Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings?*

• AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies that a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

• Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

• Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Lawyers who have received peer reviews after 2009 will display more detailed information, including practice areas, summary ratings, detailed numeric ratings and written feedback (if available). Details for individual reviews received before 2009 are not displayed.

Attorneys that receive reviews from their peers, but not a sufficient number to establish a Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Rating, will have those reviews display on our websites.

For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings™, please visit our Ratings Page on Martindale.com and our Frequently Asked Questions