×
Go back to Martindale-Avvo ➔

Sheppard MullinAssociate
John David Ellis

John David Ellis

Not yet reviewed

Seventeenth Floor, Four Embarcadero Center, San Francisco, CA 94111

Appellate, Labor and Employment, Labor and Employment Counseling and 9 more

About John David Ellis

John David Ellis is a lawyer practicing appellate, labor and employment, labor and employment counseling and 9 other areas of law. John received a B.A. degree from University of California, Los Angeles, in 2006, and has been licensed for 16 years. John practices at Sheppard Mullin in San Francisco, CA.

John David Ellis (San Francisco, California)

Reviews for John

This lawyer does not have any client reviews on Lawyers.com yet

Write a Review

Services

Areas of Law

  • Labor and Employment 1
    • Wrongful Termination
  • Transportation
  • Other 9
    • Appellate
    • Labor and Employment Counseling
    • Employee Hiring/Discipline/Termination
    • Employment Agreements
    • Handbooks and Personnel Policies
    • Unfair Competition and Trade Secrets
    • Labor and Employment Litigation
    • Wage and Hour Class Actions
    • Trucking and Logistics

Practice Details

  • Firm Information
    Position
    Associate
    Firm Name
    Sheppard Mullin
  • Representative Cases & Transactions
    Cases
    Experience: Defeated certification of a class of employee truck drivers in Burnell v. Swift Transportation Co of Arizona, LLC, No. EDCV10809VAPSPX, 2016 WL 2621616, (C.D. Cal. 2016)
    Mares v. Swift Transportation Co. of Arizona, LLC, No. CV 15-7920-VAP (KKX), 2017 WL 10592147, at *1 (C.D. Cal. 2017)
    Obtained summary judgment on all claims in Mares v. Swift Transportation Co. of Arizona, LLC, No. 215CV07920VAPKKX, 2018 WL 6928455, at *1 (C.D. Cal. 2018)
    Established the amount in controversy for purposes of federal diversity jurisdiction includes recoverable attorneys' fees anticipated to be incurred over the course of the litigation in Fritsch v. Swift Transportation Co. of Arizona, LLC, 899 F.3d 785 (9th Cir. 2018).
    Established that employees earning piece rate compensation need not be paid separate hourly compensation for particular work under Washington law in Sampson v. Knight Transportation, Inc., 193 Wash. 2d 878 (WA Supreme Court 2019)
    Drafted amicus brief for Employers Group
    California Employment Law Council in Canela v. Costco Wholesale Corp., 971 F.3d 845 (9th Cir. 2020)
    Assisted in preparation of amicus brief for Employers Group
    California Employment Law Council in Frlekin v. Apple Inc., 8 Cal. 5th 1038, 457 P.3d 526 (CA Supreme Court 2020)

Experience

  • Bar Admission & Memberships
    Admissions
    2010, California
  • Education & Certifications
    Law School
    University of California, Los Angeles,
    Class of 2009
    J.D.
    Other Education
    University of California, Los Angeles,
    Class of 2006
    B.A.

John David Ellis

Associate at Sheppard Mullin
Not yet reviewed

Seventeenth Floor, Four Embarcadero CenterSan Francisco, CA 94111U.S.A.

Show on map

Lawyers Nearby

Seth P. Chazin
Pro
Seth P. Chazin
4.8
22
Appellate Practice lawyer

Free Consultation

844-300-3342
View Profile
David H. Schwartz
Pro
David H. Schwartz
5.0
1
Appellate Practice lawyer

Free Consultation

628-303-0199
View Profile
Philip Borowsky
Pro
Philip Borowsky
5.0
2
Appellate Practice lawyer
628-222-1055
View Profile
Wallace M. Tice
Pro
Wallace M. Tice
5.0
1
Appellate Practice lawyer

Free Consultation

424-476-6042
View Profile
Ron Funk
Pro
Ron Funk
4.9
11
Appellate Practice lawyer

Free Consultation

844-781-7332
View Profile

Email John David Ellis

Case type is required.
I am is required.
First name is required.
Last name is required.
A valid zip code is required.
Country is required.
State is required.
A valid city is required.
A valid email address is required.
A valid phone number is required.
Message is required.
0/1000 characters

By clicking the Submit button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls, from Lawyers.com and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.

You should not send any sensitive or confidential information through this site. Emails sent through this site do not create an attorney-client relationship and may not be treated as privileged or confidential. The lawyer or law firm you are contacting is not required to, and may choose not to, accept you as a client. The internet is not necessarily secure and emails sent though this site could be intercepted or read by third parties.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA. See Google’s Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.

Thank you! Your message has been successfully sent.

For your records, a copy of this email has been sent to test@test.com.

Summary of Your Message
Case Type:
I am a/an:
First Name:
Last Name:
City:
Zip Code or Postal Code:
State:
Country:
Phone Number:
Message:
Return to Profile Reset Form
Lawyers.com Client Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review Ratings™ display reviews submitted by individuals who have either hired or consulted the lawyers or law firms.

The Client Review Rating score is determined through the aggregation of validated responses. People who submit reviews are either individuals who consulted with the lawyer/law firm or who hired the lawyer/law firm and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be anyone who consults or hires a lawyer including in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners, and private individuals.

Martindale-Hubbell validates that a reviewer is a person with a valid email address. As part of the review process, respondents must affirm that they have had an initial consultation, are currently a client or have been a client of the lawyer or law firm identified, although Martindale-Hubbell cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship as it is often confidential. The content of the responses is entirely from reviewers.

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review. For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Client Review Ratings, please visit our Client Review Page

Martindale Peer Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Peer Review Ratings™ are the gold standard in attorney ratings, and have been for more than a century. These ratings indicate attorneys who are widely respected by their peers for their ethical standards and legal expertise in a specific area of practice.

The Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings process is the gold standard due to its objectivity and comprehensiveness. Lawyers solicited for peer reviews include both those selected by the attorney being reviewed and lawyers independently selected by Martindale-Hubbell. All reviewers are verified as attorneys through Martindale-Hubbell’s extensive attorney database. Only attorneys practicing at least three years and receiving a sufficient number of reviews from non-affiliated attorneys are eligible to receive a Rating.

What are the different Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings?*

• AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies that a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

• Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

• Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Lawyers who have received peer reviews after 2009 will display more detailed information, including practice areas, summary ratings, detailed numeric ratings and written feedback (if available). Details for individual reviews received before 2009 are not displayed.

Attorneys that receive reviews from their peers, but not a sufficient number to establish a Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Rating, will have those reviews display on our websites.

For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings™, please visit our Ratings Page on Martindale.com and our Frequently Asked Questions