×
Go back to Martindale-Avvo ➔

Sheppard MullinPartner
Jennifer Elizabeth Renk

Jennifer Elizabeth Renk

Not yet reviewed

Seventeenth Floor, Four Embarcadero Center, San Francisco, CA 94111

Real Estate, Energy, Land Use & Environmental, Real Estate, CEQA Documentation and Defense and 4 more

About Jennifer Elizabeth Renk

Jennifer Elizabeth Renk is a lawyer practicing real estate, energy, land use & environmental, real estate, ceqa documentation and defense and 4 other areas of law. Jennifer received a B.A. degree from Bryn Mawr College, in 1990, and has been licensed for 23 years. Jennifer practices at Sheppard Mullin in San Francisco, CA.

Jennifer Elizabeth Renk (San Francisco, California)

Reviews for Jennifer

This lawyer does not have any client reviews on Lawyers.com yet

Write a Review

Services

Areas of Law

  • Real Estate
  • Environmental Law
  • Eminent Domain
  • Other 4
    • Real Estate, Energy, Land Use & Environmental
    • CEQA Documentation and Defense
    • Cannabis
    • Multifamily Housing

Practice Details

  • Firm Information
    Position
    Partner
    Firm Name
    Sheppard Mullin
  • Representative Cases & Transactions
    Cases
    Experience: Representative Matters: Residential: SummerHill Apartment Communities: - L
    use advice for multiple projects in Santa Clara, Burlingame, Mountain View,
    South San Francisco.
    Wood Partners: - L
    use advice for projects in San Francisco, Oakl
    ,
    Millbrae.
    Hanover Company: - L
    use advice for projects in San Jose, Oakl
    , Burlingame, South San Francisco,
    Contra Costa County.
    Fortbay: - L
    use advice for project in Mountain View.
    Miramar Capital: - L
    use advice for projects in Mountain View
    San Jose.
    Avalon Bay: - L
    use advice for projects in San Jose
    Dublin.
    Greystar: - L
    use advice for projects in San Jose
    Santa Clara.
    Anton Development Company: - L
    use advice for project in Mountain View.
    Integral Communities: - L
    use advice for project in Union City.
    Trammell Crow Residential: - L
    use advice for projects in Oakl

    Milpitas.
    Dutchints: - L
    use advice for projects in Los Altos
    San Carlos.
    Oppidan: - L
    use advice for senior housing project in Santa Cruz.
    The Pacific Cos.: - L
    use advice for affordable housing project in Burlingame.
    Office/Mixed-Use/Retail/Industrial: Jay Paul Company: -L
    use advice for Cityview project in San Jose.
    Trammell Crow Company: - L
    use advice for Diridon project in San Jose.
    Hines: - L
    use advice for office project in Redwood City.
    Minkoff Group: - L
    use advice for office projects in Sunnyvale.
    PS Business Parks: - L
    use advice for projects in Hayward, Santa Clara,
    San Mateo.
    Vince Muzzi: - L
    use advice for mixed-use Serra Station project in Millbrae.
    Fortbay: - L
    use advice for mixed-use Stevens Creek project in San Jose.
    Vantage Data Centers: - L
    use advice for numerous data center projects in Santa Clara.
    Oppidan: - L
    use advice for data center project in Santa Clara.
    Carlyle Group: - L
    use advice for office project in Mountain View.
    Dewey L
    Company: - L
    use advice for office projects in
    Burlingame
    San Carlos.
    Bohannon Development Company: - L
    use advice for Menlo Gateway mixed-use project in Menlo Park.
    Regency Centers: - L
    use advice for retail centers in San Bruno, Daly City,
    Santa Clara.
    Non-Profit Institutions: Hillbrook School: - L
    use advice for conditional use permit amendment in Los Gatos.
    Crystal Springs Upl
    s School: - L
    use advice for new middle school campus in Belmont.
    Phillips Brooks School: - L
    use advice for conditional use permit amendments in Menlo Park.
    The Carey School: - L
    use advice for conditional use permit amendment in San Mateo.
    Peninsula Humane Society & SPCA: - L
    use advice for adoption facility in Burlingame.
    The Primary School: - L
    use advice for school campus in East Palo Alto.
    Technology/Biotech: Facebook: - L
    use advice for headquarters in Menlo Park.
    LinkedIn: - L
    use advice for headquarters in Mountain View.
    Ultragenyx: - L
    use advice for campuses in Novato
    South San Francisco.

Experience

  • Bar Admission & Memberships
    Admissions
    2003, California
    Memberships

    Memberships

    State Bar of California

    Bar Association of San Francisco

    Oakland Planning Commission

    Urban Land Institute (ULI)

    San Francisco Planning and Urban Research Association (SPUR)

    CREWSF

  • Education & Certifications
    Law School
    Santa Clara University,
    Class of 2003
    J.D.
    Other Education
    Bryn Mawr College,
    Class of 1990
    B.A.

Email Jennifer Elizabeth Renk

Case type is required.
I am is required.
First name is required.
Last name is required.
A valid zip code is required.
Country is required.
State is required.
A valid city is required.
A valid email address is required.
A valid phone number is required.
Message is required.
0/1000 characters

By clicking the Submit button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls, from Lawyers.com and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.

You should not send any sensitive or confidential information through this site. Emails sent through this site do not create an attorney-client relationship and may not be treated as privileged or confidential. The lawyer or law firm you are contacting is not required to, and may choose not to, accept you as a client. The internet is not necessarily secure and emails sent though this site could be intercepted or read by third parties.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA. See Google’s Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.

Thank you! Your message has been successfully sent.

For your records, a copy of this email has been sent to test@test.com.

Summary of Your Message
Case Type:
I am a/an:
First Name:
Last Name:
City:
Zip Code or Postal Code:
State:
Country:
Phone Number:
Message:
Return to Profile Reset Form
Lawyers.com Client Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review Ratings™ display reviews submitted by individuals who have either hired or consulted the lawyers or law firms.

The Client Review Rating score is determined through the aggregation of validated responses. People who submit reviews are either individuals who consulted with the lawyer/law firm or who hired the lawyer/law firm and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be anyone who consults or hires a lawyer including in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners, and private individuals.

Martindale-Hubbell validates that a reviewer is a person with a valid email address. As part of the review process, respondents must affirm that they have had an initial consultation, are currently a client or have been a client of the lawyer or law firm identified, although Martindale-Hubbell cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship as it is often confidential. The content of the responses is entirely from reviewers.

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review. For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Client Review Ratings, please visit our Client Review Page

Martindale Peer Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Peer Review Ratings™ are the gold standard in attorney ratings, and have been for more than a century. These ratings indicate attorneys who are widely respected by their peers for their ethical standards and legal expertise in a specific area of practice.

The Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings process is the gold standard due to its objectivity and comprehensiveness. Lawyers solicited for peer reviews include both those selected by the attorney being reviewed and lawyers independently selected by Martindale-Hubbell. All reviewers are verified as attorneys through Martindale-Hubbell’s extensive attorney database. Only attorneys practicing at least three years and receiving a sufficient number of reviews from non-affiliated attorneys are eligible to receive a Rating.

What are the different Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings?*

• AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies that a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

• Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

• Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Lawyers who have received peer reviews after 2009 will display more detailed information, including practice areas, summary ratings, detailed numeric ratings and written feedback (if available). Details for individual reviews received before 2009 are not displayed.

Attorneys that receive reviews from their peers, but not a sufficient number to establish a Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Rating, will have those reviews display on our websites.

For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings™, please visit our Ratings Page on Martindale.com and our Frequently Asked Questions