×
Go back to Martindale-Avvo ➔

Greenberg Traurig, LLPShare Holder
no photo
Pro

Corey Leggett

Not yet reviewed

4 Embarcadero Center, Suite 3000, San Francisco, CA 94111-5983

Intellectual Property Litigation, Intellectual Property & Technology, Trade Secrets and 1 more

About Corey Leggett

Corey Leggett is an intellectual property and technology litigator who represents clients in high-stakes disputes involving critical technologies. With a technical background and jury trial experience, Corey effectively manages complex details while developing comprehensive litigation strategies.

Corey handles matters involving patent, trade secret, copyright, unfair competition, trademark, trade dress, contractual disputes over intellectual property, false advertising, and consumer product disputes. His experience spans the entire litigation process, from pre-suit strategic planning through jury trial, post-trial proceedings, and appeals. Corey has litigated cases in district courts nationwide, as well as before the International Trade Commission (ITC), the USPTO’s Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB), and arbitration tribunals.

Corey works with clients across multiple industries, including tech hardware and software, manufacturing and industrials, biotech and health care, and financial services. He has deep experience litigating cases involving health and fitness monitoring wearable technologies, chipset configurations, memory controllers, software vulnerability detection systems, industrial chemical products, antibody therapeutics, and autonomous driving technologies.

Concentrations

•Patent litigation
•Trade secret litigation

Recognition & Leadership

Awards & Accolades

•Listed, The Best Lawyers in America, 'Ones to Watch'
•Litigation - Patent, 2026
•Patent Law, 2026

 

Corey Leggett (San Francisco, California) View website

Reviews for Corey

This lawyer does not have any client reviews on Lawyers.com yet

Write a Review

Services

Areas of Law

  • Intellectual Property 1
    • Trade Secrets
  • Other 3
    • Intellectual Property Litigation
    • Intellectual Property & Technology
    • International Trade Commission's Section 337 Litigation

Practice Details

  • Firm Information
    Position
    Shareholder
    Firm Name
    Greenberg Traurig, LLP
  • Representative Cases & Transactions
    Cases
    Experience: Technology-Focused Commercial Disputes Experience: Defended one of the world's largest coatings companies against its rival competitor in a multi-week, multi-patent jury trial. Our team obtained a jury verdict of invalidity across-the-board on all asserted patents, which was affirmed on appeal by the Federal Circuit.
    Co-led defense of biopharmaceutical company in a USD 500+ million, bet-the-company arbitration about antibody discovery
    commercialization technologies
    involving breach of contract
    trade secret misappropriation claims, among others.
    Represented
    helped obtain summary judgment win for electronic design automation ('EDA') company defending against competitor claims for alleged trade secret misappropriation
    alleged copyright infringement.
    Defended automotive OEM in multiple alleged patent infringement lawsuits
    leveraged strategic IPRs to secure effectively 'walk away' settlements. Cases involved an array of technologies, such as car-to-mobile device communication protocols, wireless entry
    locking systems, autonomous driving systems,
    GPS navigation.
    Defended mobile device giant in st
    ard essential patent ('SEP') infringement cases across multiple U.S. district courts
    helped position client for positive cross-license settlement.
    Represented medical device company in offensive case against competitor for trade secret misappropriation, breach of contract,
    interference of contractual relations about patient imaging hardware/software solution.
    Defended aviation software company in trade secret misappropriation case.
    Represented foreign industrial chemical company in trade secret misappropriation case at ITC
    district court.
    Represented headphone manufacturer in patent infringement case at ITC involving noise cancellation technology.
    Represented cattle company in one of the earliest post grant review ('PGR') proceedings held at the PTAB.
    The above representations were h
    led by Mr. Leggett prior to his joining Greenberg Traurig, LLP.
  • Additional Links
    https://www.gtlaw.com/en/professionals/l/leggett-corey

Experience

  • Bar Admission & Memberships
    Admissions
    2015, District of Columbia
    2014, Ohio
    2022, California
    2017, Colorado
    U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California
    U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas
    U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
    U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
    Memberships

    Professional & Community Involvement

    •Member, American Bar Association
    •Co-Chair, Business Torts & Unfair Competition Committee, Trade Secrets Subcommittee
    •Member, American Intellectual Property Law Association

  • Education & Certifications
    Law School
    Capital University Law School
    J.D.
    magna cum laude; Managing Editor, Capital University Law Review
    Other Education
    Virginia Tech
    B.S.
    Chemical Engineering, cum laude

Email Corey Leggett

Case type is required.
A valid zip code is required.
A valid city is required.
State is required.
Country is required.
Outside the US or Canada?
Message is required.
0/1000 characters

Contact Information

First name is required.
Last name is required.
A valid email address is required.
A valid phone number is required.

By clicking the Submit button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls, from Lawyers.com and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.

Thank you! Your message has been successfully sent.

For your records, a copy of this email has been sent to

Summary of Your Message
Case Type:
Zip Code or Postal Code:
City:
State:
Country:
Case Description:
Contact Information
First Name:
Last Name:
Email:
Phone Number:
Return to Profile

Attorneys FAQs

  • Is this attorney admitted to the bar in more than one state?
    Yes, Corey Leggett is admitted to practice in California, Colorado, District of Columbia and Ohio.
  • Is this attorney admitted to practice in any U.S. Federal Courts?
    Corey Leggett is admitted to practice before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas and United States District Court for the Northern District of California.
  • How many attorneys are in this law firm?
    Greenberg Traurig, LLP has 2750 attorneys at this location.
  • What law school did this attorney attend?
    Corey Leggett attended Capital University Law School.
  • What year was this attorney's law firm established?
    Greenberg Traurig, LLP was established in 1967.

Attorney information displayed in this FAQ section is based upon information the lawyer has included on their profile, in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals.

These FAQs include information about a lawyer's background, but do not evaluate their knowledge of the law, past performance on individual cases, personality, or communication skills.

It is solely the responsibility of lawyers and law firms to ensure that any information they provide complies with all applicable laws and rules of professional conduct.

You should be aware that the information we rely upon may not be comprehensive, or frequently updated.

Always research the lawyer further to get a better understanding of their license credentials, disciplinary status, background, and experience.

Lawyers.com Client Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review Ratings™ display reviews submitted by individuals who have either hired or consulted the lawyers or law firms.

The Client Review Rating score is determined through the aggregation of validated responses. People who submit reviews are either individuals who consulted with the lawyer/law firm or who hired the lawyer/law firm and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be anyone who consults or hires a lawyer including in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners, and private individuals.

Martindale-Hubbell validates that a reviewer is a person with a valid email address. As part of the review process, respondents must affirm that they have had an initial consultation, are currently a client or have been a client of the lawyer or law firm identified, although Martindale-Hubbell cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship as it is often confidential. The content of the responses is entirely from reviewers.

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review. For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Client Review Ratings, please visit our Client Review Page

Martindale Peer Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Peer Review Ratings™ are the gold standard in attorney ratings, and have been for more than a century. These ratings indicate attorneys who are widely respected by their peers for their ethical standards and legal expertise in a specific area of practice.

The Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings process is the gold standard due to its objectivity and comprehensiveness. Lawyers solicited for peer reviews include both those selected by the attorney being reviewed and lawyers independently selected by Martindale-Hubbell. All reviewers are verified as attorneys through Martindale-Hubbell’s extensive attorney database. Only attorneys practicing at least three years and receiving a sufficient number of reviews from non-affiliated attorneys are eligible to receive a Rating.

What are the different Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings?*

• AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies that a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

• Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

• Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Lawyers who have received peer reviews after 2009 will display more detailed information, including practice areas, summary ratings, detailed numeric ratings and written feedback (if available). Details for individual reviews received before 2009 are not displayed.

Attorneys that receive reviews from their peers, but not a sufficient number to establish a Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Rating, will have those reviews display on our websites.

For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings™, please visit our Ratings Page on Martindale.com and our Frequently Asked Questions