Cases
Summary of Cases: Arthur J. Shartsis Sample of Major Litigation Pharmaceutical Research
Manufacturers of America, et al. v. County of Alameda Successfully defended Alameda County in a l
mark case brought by the pharmaceutical industry challenging a first-in-the-nation regulation requiring drug companies to provide for disposal of all unused prescription drugs sold in the county. The case was won in federal district court
upheld on appeal by the Ninth Circuit. Mr. Shartsis' argument in the Ninth Circuit. Steven Poizner, as Insurance Commissioner of the State of California, etc. v. ALTUS Finance S.A., et al. Retained by the California Department of Insurance to serve as lead trial counsel in the federal jury trial of a fraud claim arising out of the failure of the Executive Life Insurance Company. Obtained $241 million in restitution. Alej
ro Madrid v. James E. Tilton Represented Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger in a federal court proceeding in which a court-appointed Special Master sought authority to conduct a public investigation of the Governor's Office in connection with prison reform matters. The Governor's two most senior staff members were alleged by the Special Master to have committed perjury. Mr. Shartsis successfully opposed the proposed investigation. Mikhail Khodorkovsky Accusation By the Russian Federation Retained to assist in the defense of Mikhail Khodorkovsky, former owner of Yukos Oil Company in Russia, involving criminal claims by the Russian Federation for allegedly embezzling $30 billion from Yukos. Rabobank v. National Westminster Bank Concluded a seven-year defense of NatWest (formerly National Westminster Bank
now owned by Royal Bank of Scotl
) in a claim by a major Dutch bank for approximately $200, 000, 000, involving litigation both in Engl
California. The case was defended successfully at trial in Engl
, with full indemnity fees of approximately $25 million awarded to our client after trial. Charles Davis, et al. v. California Health And Human Services Agency, et al. Retained to assist the Attorney General's Office of California defending California State health
welfare agencies in a federal case challenging the long-term health care system of the State of California, with multi-billion dollar annual exposure. The case was resolved on favorable terms. Eureka Federal v. Kidwell Retained to replace Joseph Alioto as lead defense trial counsel in this $500, 000, 000 claim arising out of the savings
loan crisis. The matter was settled for $13, 000, 000 less than the defendants' pre-trial settlement offer after six weeks of jury trial in a case which the federal government had publicly asserted it would never settle. In re National Mortgage Equity Corporation Securities Litigation, MDL 647 Served as lead plaintiffs' counsel in obtaining approximately $120, 000, 000 of recovery from parties including the Bank of America
Wells Fargo Bank on behalf of a number of savings
loans in what at the time was one of the largest mortgage-backed securities frauds in American history. This case was featured as a cover story in the American Lawyer. Hummel v. Bank of America Retained by the Bank of America after other counsel failed in eight years to resolve complicated trust litigation involving over $90, 000, 000. Mr. Shartsis settled the matter within months for a small fraction of the claim. HBOC/McKesson Retained by Arthur Andersen to represent one of its senior auditors in SEC proceedings arising from one of the largest securities fraud claims in history, involving an $8, 000, 000, 000 loss of capital value. Successfully represented the client through SEC proceedings. Henriquez v. Comdisco Retained to obtain contractual benefits for two former venture investment specialists. After extensive litigation in bankruptcy court in the Northern District of Illinois, the case settled for $31, 000, 000, which represents the full amount of the claim. Fair v. Bakhtiari Successfully argued in the California Supreme Court a major case upholding important aspects of confidential communications in mediation. The Supreme Court voted 7-0 to overturn a unanimous decision in the California Court of Appeal,
return the case to the trial court. The case was tried successfully in 2008, defeating a claim of $14 million
recovering property rights for our clients worth $5 million. The case was featured in the San Francisco Daily Journal: Mixing Client, Business Ends Badly. Simpson Strong-Tie Company, Inc. v. Stewart, Estes & Donnell Won a l
mark decision in the Tennessee Supreme Court regarding lawyer advertising
defamation. Eshelman, et al, v. Orthorclear Holdings, Inc. Successfully defended securities class action against manufacturer that was accused of misleading investors about the prospects of patent litigation brought by its major competitor that was eventually settled on unfavorable terms. Representing the company, directors
officers, Succeeded in winning a motion to dismiss all claims without leave to amend. The case was featured in The Recorder: Suit over lost patent trial rejected. Sierra REIT securities litigation Successfully defended the officers, directors
entities in state
federal derivative
securities class action litigation against the seven Sierra REITS. Harbor Bay Business Park Litigation Retained by Harbor Bay Business Park in Alameda County to develop
execute a strategy to avoid impending foreclosure. After litigating simultaneously in three forums, caused the creditors to cease foreclosure proceedings. Harbor Bay Business Park is successfully operating today. Point Tiburon Construction Defect Litigation Represented the developer in a massive construction defect case, simultaneously defending two class actions
successfully obtaining full recovery from over thirty defendants. Success for All Foundation v. Education Partners Retained by Success for All, the largest educational reform program in the United States, to attempt to void a 25-year license agreement
a 7-year, $10 million-per year printing contract following their second year of performance. Termination of the license agreement was obtained following a full arbitration of the matter,
the printing agreement was terminated by subsequent settlement. Computerized Ticket Distribution Antitrust cases
Department of Justice Inquiry into Computerized Ticket Distribution As counsel to Bay Area Seating Services (BASS), persuaded the United States Justice Department to take no action with regard to complaints (including the complaint of the rock group Pearl Jam) against the computerized ticket distribution industry. Also acted as counsel in the California class actions challenging computerized ticket distribution practices. Rudolph & Sletten v. DPR Construction Retained by Rudolph & Sletten, the premier California construction company for high-tech plants
facilities, to seek damages from former executives who had left the company with know-how, customer
prospect lists
employee information. Obtained a $7 million recovery for the client. Alex
er, et al. v. Masters Institute Retained by a vocational school to defend 170 individual claims by former students alleging fraud in connection with their vocational education. After the voluntary or court-ordered dismissal of nearly 100 plaintiffs' actions, the remainder of the plaintiffs were dismissed by the Santa Clara Superior Court as a result of a motion brought based upon discovery abuse. This unique dismissal ruling was discussed in a feature article in the Daily Journal on May 24, 2000. Dismissal was upheld by the California Court of Appeal. California Corporations Code section 2000 Proceeding Represented one of two 50% shareholders in what appears to be one of the largest disputed dissolutions of a privately held corporation in the history of California. Tri-Valley Growers Litigation Represented the former president of Tri-Valley Growers, formerly the largest agricultural co-op in the United States, defending claims in excess of $100, 000, 000. Ida Eu v. Regents of the University of California Retained by the Regents to represent them on appeal from a judgment in their favor in their most high profile sexual harassment case. Prevailed in the California Court of Appeal. Lillick & Charles v. Pillsbury, Madison & Sutro Retained by the San Francisco law firm of Lillick & Charles to attempt to enjoin the use of the Lillick name in the merger between Pillsbury, Madison & Sutro
Lillick & McHose,
succeeded in doing so. Olympic Club v. Lloyds of London Retained by Lloyds of London to dispute the Olympic Club's entitlement to insurance coverage in its defense of claims by the City
County of San Francisco of race
sex discrimination. Won in the Federal District Court,
the case was affirmed on appeal by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. The People of the State of California v. Honig Retained by former California State Superintendent of Public Instruction Bill Honig
successfully represented him in connection with reducing his four-count felony sentence to misdemeanors.
