×
Go back to Martindale-Avvo ➔

Sheppard MullinPartner
Ericka J. Schulz

Ericka J. Schulz

Not yet reviewed

12275 El Camino Real, Suite 100 (Del Mar), San Diego, CA 92130

Appellate, ESG and Sustainability, Intellectual Property and 18 more

About Ericka J. Schulz

Ericka J. Schulz is a lawyer practicing appellate, esg and sustainability, intellectual property and 18 other areas of law. Ericka received a M.S. degree from California Polytechnic State University San Luis Obispo in 2000, and has been licensed for 20 years. Ericka practices at Sheppard Mullin in San Diego, CA.

Ericka J. Schulz (San Diego, California)

Reviews for Ericka

This lawyer does not have any client reviews on Lawyers.com yet

Write a Review

Services

Areas of Law

  • Intellectual Property 2
    • Copyrights
    • Trade Secrets
  • Litigation
  • Alternative Dispute Resolution
  • Other 16
    • Appellate
    • ESG and Sustainability
    • International Trade Commission (ITC)
    • IP Licensing, Technology and Commercial Transactions
    • Patent Litigation
    • Patent Prosecution and Counseling
    • Post-Grant Proceedings
    • Trademark Applications and Prosecution
    • Trademarks and Trade Dress
    • E-Discovery
    • Artificial Intelligence
    • Blockchain and Fintech
    • Blockchain
    • Fintech
    • Life Sciences
    • Semiconductors

Practice Details

  • Firm Information
    Position
    Partner
    Firm Name
    Sheppard Mullin
  • Representative Cases & Transactions
    Cases
    Experience: INVT SPE LLC v. HTC (New Jersey)
    Certain LTE-
    3G- Cellular Communications Devices, 337-TA-1138 (ITC). Represent HTC Corporation
    HTC America in a multi-district patent litigation against a Fortress backed non-practicing entity, INVT, regarding eight asserted patents. We successfully invalidated a number of patents through inter partes review petitions, forced INVT to drop the majority of the asserted patents,
    received an initial determination of non-infringement by ALJ McNamara in the ITC on the remaining three asserted patents.
    Evolved Wireless v. HTC (Delaware). Represent HTC Corporation
    HTC America, Inc., in a five-patent lawsuit relating to St
    ard Essential Patents (SEPs) alleged to cover the LTE st
    ard. HTC has also asserted a counter-claim for breach of contract alleging that Evolved Wireless has failed to license its patents on Fair, Reasonable
    Non-Discriminatory (FRAND) terms. HTC successfully forced Evolved to drop three out of the five patents, successfully invalidated one patent in front of the Patent Trial
    Appeal Board,
    HTC subsequently won on the last patent in summary judgment in regards to its license defense.
    Rosetta Wireless v. HTC (N.D. of Illinois). Represented HTC Corporation
    HTC America, Inc. in a patent lawsuit relating to storage of data files in mobile wireless devices.
    Represented Align Technology, Inc. in various patent infringement matters relating to its patents directed to clear dental aligner technology before the International Trade Commission
    in Texas district court.
    Intellect Wireless v. HTC (N.D. Ill.). Represented HTC Corporation
    HTC America, Inc., in a two-patent lawsuit relating to sending pictures to a paging receiver. The accused technology is multimedia messaging service (MMS). After a four-day bench trial, the court found the patents were unenforceable due to inequitable conduct-a decision which led to an order for reimbursement of attorney fees.
    Represented multi-billion dollar computer manufacturer in a high stakes patent litigation in the Eastern District of Texas defending its computer operating system,
    successfully overturning a jury verdict of infringement.

Experience

  • Bar Admission & Memberships
    Admissions
    2006, California
    U.S. District Court for the Central District of California
    U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California
    U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California
    U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas
    U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
    Memberships

    Memberships

    •Member, State Bar of California

  • Education & Certifications
    Law School
    University of San Diego School of Law
    Class of 2006
    J.D.
    Other Education
    California Polytechnic State University San Luis Obispo
    Class of 2000
    M.S.
    Electrical Engineering

    California Polytechnic State University San Luis Obispo
    Class of 1999
    B.S.
    Electrical Engineering

Ericka J. Schulz

Partner at Sheppard Mullin
Not yet reviewed

12275 El Camino Real, Suite 100 (Del Mar)San Diego, CA 92130U.S.A.

Show on map

Lawyers Nearby

Annie Featherman Fraser, Esq.
Pro
Annie Featherman Fraser, Esq.
4.5
1
Appellate Practice lawyer
858-252-1215
View Profile
Douglas A. Pettit, Esq.
Pro
Douglas A. Pettit, Esq.
5.0
1
Appellate Practice lawyer
858-280-0324
View Profile
Matthew C. Smith, Esq.
Pro
Matthew C. Smith, Esq.
4.9
15
Appellate Practice lawyer
858-252-1215
View Profile
no photo
Pro
Jerald E. Gale
5.0
1
Appellate Practice lawyer

Free Consultation

213-900-2573
View Profile

Email Ericka J. Schulz

Case type is required.
I am is required.
First name is required.
Last name is required.
A valid zip code is required.
Country is required.
State is required.
A valid city is required.
A valid email address is required.
A valid phone number is required.
Message is required.
0/1000 characters

By clicking the Submit button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls, from Lawyers.com and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.

You should not send any sensitive or confidential information through this site. Emails sent through this site do not create an attorney-client relationship and may not be treated as privileged or confidential. The lawyer or law firm you are contacting is not required to, and may choose not to, accept you as a client. The internet is not necessarily secure and emails sent though this site could be intercepted or read by third parties.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA. See Google’s Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.

Thank you! Your message has been successfully sent.

For your records, a copy of this email has been sent to test@test.com.

Summary of Your Message
Case Type:
I am a/an:
First Name:
Last Name:
City:
Zip Code or Postal Code:
State:
Country:
Phone Number:
Message:
Return to Profile Reset Form
Lawyers.com Client Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review Ratings™ display reviews submitted by individuals who have either hired or consulted the lawyers or law firms.

The Client Review Rating score is determined through the aggregation of validated responses. People who submit reviews are either individuals who consulted with the lawyer/law firm or who hired the lawyer/law firm and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be anyone who consults or hires a lawyer including in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners, and private individuals.

Martindale-Hubbell validates that a reviewer is a person with a valid email address. As part of the review process, respondents must affirm that they have had an initial consultation, are currently a client or have been a client of the lawyer or law firm identified, although Martindale-Hubbell cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship as it is often confidential. The content of the responses is entirely from reviewers.

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review. For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Client Review Ratings, please visit our Client Review Page

Martindale Peer Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Peer Review Ratings™ are the gold standard in attorney ratings, and have been for more than a century. These ratings indicate attorneys who are widely respected by their peers for their ethical standards and legal expertise in a specific area of practice.

The Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings process is the gold standard due to its objectivity and comprehensiveness. Lawyers solicited for peer reviews include both those selected by the attorney being reviewed and lawyers independently selected by Martindale-Hubbell. All reviewers are verified as attorneys through Martindale-Hubbell’s extensive attorney database. Only attorneys practicing at least three years and receiving a sufficient number of reviews from non-affiliated attorneys are eligible to receive a Rating.

What are the different Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings?*

• AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies that a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

• Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

• Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Lawyers who have received peer reviews after 2009 will display more detailed information, including practice areas, summary ratings, detailed numeric ratings and written feedback (if available). Details for individual reviews received before 2009 are not displayed.

Attorneys that receive reviews from their peers, but not a sufficient number to establish a Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Rating, will have those reviews display on our websites.

For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings™, please visit our Ratings Page on Martindale.com and our Frequently Asked Questions