×
Go back to Martindale-Avvo ➔

Snell & Wilmer L.L.P.Counsel
no photo

Christopher Mark Franich

Not yet reviewed

12230 El Camino Real, Suite 300, San Diego, CA 92122

Technology Transactions, Intellectual Property, Patents and 3 more

About Christopher Mark Franich

Christopher Mark Franich is a lawyer practicing technology transactions, intellectual property, patents and 3 other areas of law. Christopher received a B.S. degree from University of California, San Diego in 2005, and has been licensed for 14 years. Christopher practices at Snell & Wilmer L.L.P. in San Diego, CA.

Christopher Mark Franich (San Diego, California)

Reviews for Christopher

This lawyer does not have any client reviews on Lawyers.com yet

Write a Review

Services

Areas of Law

  • Intellectual Property 1
    • Patents
  • Other 4
    • Technology Transactions
    • Patent Litigation
    • Life Sciences and Medical Technology
    • Technology

Practice Details

  • Languages
    Spanish
  • Firm Information
    Position
    Counsel
    Firm Name
    Snell & Wilmer L.L.P.
  • Representative Cases & Transactions
    Cases
    Representative Experience: Provided day-to-day patent portfolio counseling for several subsidiaries of multinational pharmaceutical industry companies, including ischemic
    hemorrhagic stroke therapies, stents, flow diverters, revascularization devices, cardiac ablation catheters, balloon catheters, programmable neurovascular implants, cardiac support jackets, related instrumentation, contact lenses, auto injectors, clinically evaluated medical devices,
    related operational
    dosing software applications
    Represented an Artificial Intelligence (AI)-driven healthcare technology company working in the life sciences, oncology, pathology, machine learning,
    healthcare spaces with patent prosecution
    Represented a San Diego-based medical device firm with patent portfolio development
    patent ownership dispute related to electrostatic sprayers
    Provided day-to-day patent portfolio counseling for a publicly traded electric vehicle company
    Represented a multinational aerospace technology company with patent prosecution
    Represented a mobile navigation software developer in a funded patent litigation dispute
    Represented a San Diego-based tactical training service
    product provider in litigation related to the enforcement of patent rights
    Represented a sheet wave developer in litigation before district court, the Federal Circuit,
    inter partes review (IPR) before the USPTO on issues related to patent litigation, trade secrets,
    patent ownership
    Represented a therapeutic compression garment manufacturer with patent portfolio development
    patent litigation
    Represented a military grade device case manufacturer with its development of an extensive patent portfolio as part of an acquisition strategy
    Assisted with the representation of a luxury c
    y provider with its development of an extensive patent portfolio
    intellectual property enforcement
    Represented a large foreign consumer goods ecommerce company with extensive product base operating throughout the United States with the patent portfolio development as well as patent dispute resolution

Experience

  • Bar Admission & Memberships
    Admissions
    2012, California
    United States District Court, Central District of California
    nited States District Court, Southern District of California
    United States Patent and Trademark Office
    Memberships

    Professional Memberships and Activities

    •Biocom California
    •Medical Device & Diagnostics Committee, Member

  • Education & Certifications
    Law School
    University of Miami School of Law
    Class of 2012
    J.D.
    cum laude
    Other Education
    University of California, San Diego
    Class of 2005
    B.S.
    Aerospace Engineering

Email Christopher Mark Franich

Case type is required.
I am is required.
First name is required.
Last name is required.
A valid zip code is required.
Country is required.
State is required.
A valid city is required.
A valid email address is required.
A valid phone number is required.
Message is required.
0/1000 characters

By clicking the Submit button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls, from Lawyers.com and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.

You should not send any sensitive or confidential information through this site. Emails sent through this site do not create an attorney-client relationship and may not be treated as privileged or confidential. The lawyer or law firm you are contacting is not required to, and may choose not to, accept you as a client. The internet is not necessarily secure and emails sent though this site could be intercepted or read by third parties.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA. See Google’s Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.

Thank you! Your message has been successfully sent.

For your records, a copy of this email has been sent to test@test.com.

Summary of Your Message
Case Type:
I am a/an:
First Name:
Last Name:
City:
Zip Code or Postal Code:
State:
Country:
Phone Number:
Message:
Return to Profile Reset Form
Lawyers.com Client Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review Ratings™ display reviews submitted by individuals who have either hired or consulted the lawyers or law firms.

The Client Review Rating score is determined through the aggregation of validated responses. People who submit reviews are either individuals who consulted with the lawyer/law firm or who hired the lawyer/law firm and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be anyone who consults or hires a lawyer including in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners, and private individuals.

Martindale-Hubbell validates that a reviewer is a person with a valid email address. As part of the review process, respondents must affirm that they have had an initial consultation, are currently a client or have been a client of the lawyer or law firm identified, although Martindale-Hubbell cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship as it is often confidential. The content of the responses is entirely from reviewers.

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review. For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Client Review Ratings, please visit our Client Review Page

Martindale Peer Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Peer Review Ratings™ are the gold standard in attorney ratings, and have been for more than a century. These ratings indicate attorneys who are widely respected by their peers for their ethical standards and legal expertise in a specific area of practice.

The Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings process is the gold standard due to its objectivity and comprehensiveness. Lawyers solicited for peer reviews include both those selected by the attorney being reviewed and lawyers independently selected by Martindale-Hubbell. All reviewers are verified as attorneys through Martindale-Hubbell’s extensive attorney database. Only attorneys practicing at least three years and receiving a sufficient number of reviews from non-affiliated attorneys are eligible to receive a Rating.

What are the different Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings?*

• AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies that a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

• Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

• Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Lawyers who have received peer reviews after 2009 will display more detailed information, including practice areas, summary ratings, detailed numeric ratings and written feedback (if available). Details for individual reviews received before 2009 are not displayed.

Attorneys that receive reviews from their peers, but not a sufficient number to establish a Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Rating, will have those reviews display on our websites.

For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings™, please visit our Ratings Page on Martindale.com and our Frequently Asked Questions