×
Go back to Martindale-Avvo ➔

Sheppard MullinPartner
Charles Andrew Danaher

Charles Andrew Danaher

Not yet reviewed

501 West Broadway, Nineteenth Floor (Downtown), San Diego, CA 92101

Litigation, Class Action Defense, Insurance Litigation and 1 more

About Charles Andrew Danaher

Charles Andrew Danaher is a lawyer practicing litigation, class action defense, insurance litigation and 1 other area of law. Charles received a B.A. degree from Rutgers College in 1986, and has been licensed for 37 years. Charles practices at Sheppard Mullin in San Diego, CA.

Charles Andrew Danaher (San Diego, California)

Awards

AV Preeminent Peer Rated
This elite award is granted to attorneys who have been recognized by their peers for their very high ethical standards, with an average peer review score of 4.5 or higher.
Martindale-Hubbell Peer AV

Client Champion Awards

Client Champion awards recognize those attorneys who excel at service as affirmed by their clients. The awards, based on the quantity and quality of an attorney’s Martindale-Hubbell client reviews, demonstrate an ongoing commitment to delivering excellent client service. Award recipients stand out from their peers with a platinum, gold or silver icon.

Champion Badge Silver

At least three reviews and a score of 4.0 or higher.

Champion Badge Gold

At least six reviews and a score of 4.2 or higher.

Champion Badge Platinum

At least ten reviews and a score of 4.5 or higher.

Martindale Peer Awards

A lawyer who receives a minimum threshold of qualifying responses from fellow attorneys can qualify for one of three prestigious Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings:

Martindale-Hubbell Peer AV Preeminent Rating

AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

Charles Andrew Danaher got this award in 2021

Martindale-Hubbell Peer Distinguished Rating

Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

Martindale-Hubbell Peer Notable Rating

Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Avvo Awards

Avvo Top Contributor

Avvo Top Contributor: The Avvo Top Contributor Award is granted to attorneys who have earned significant contribution points in a given year on our sister site, Avvo.com. Contribution points are earned by answering questions in Q&A, publishing Legal Guides, and other useful contributions to the Avvo community.

Avvo Client Choice

Avvo Client’s Choice: The Avvo Client's Choice Award Badge is granted to attorneys with a significant number of 4+ star reviews in a given year.

Reviews for Charles

This lawyer does not have any client reviews on Lawyers.com yet

Write a Review

Services

Areas of Law

  • Litigation
  • Insurance
  • Other 2
    • Class Action Defense
    • Insurance Litigation

Practice Details

  • Firm Information
    Position
    Partner
    Firm Name
    Sheppard Mullin
  • Representative Cases & Transactions
    Cases
    Experience: Du v. Deerbrook - Defended Deerbrook in a jury trial. Plaintiff alleged that Deerbrook refused to settle a claim against its insured for the policy's $100,000 limits. Because the claim was not settled, the insured was ultimately found liable for a $5 million judgment. Deerbrook was sued for the amount of the judgment based on a 'bad faith refusal to settle' theory. Defense verdict. This case was selected by the Daily Journal as a 'Top Defense Verdict' for 2010.
    Kelpe et al. v. Unum Group et al - Defended Unum Group
    Provident Life & Accident Insurance Company in a jury trial. Plaintiff asserted claims against Unum Group
    Provident Life & Accident Insurance Company for breach of contract, bad faith
    punitive damages arising out of the denial of a disability claim. Defense verdict. The jury returned a unanimous verdict (12-0) in favor of the defendants on all claims. This case was selected by the Daily Journal as a 'Top Defense Verdict' for 2022.

Experience

  • Bar Admission & Memberships
    Admissions
    1989, California
    2008, Maryland
  • Education & Certifications
    Law School
    Harvard University
    Class of 1989
    J.D.
    cum laude
    Other Education
    Rutgers College
    Class of 1986
    B.A.
    summa cum laude
  • Personal Details & History
    Age
    Born in 1964
    New York, N.Y., August 21, 1964

Charles Andrew Danaher

Partner at Sheppard Mullin
Not yet reviewed

501 West Broadway, Nineteenth Floor (Downtown)San Diego, CA 92101U.S.A.

Show on map

Lawyers Nearby

Valerie Ann Powers Smith, Esq.
Pro
Valerie Ann Powers Smith, Esq.
4.8
36
Litigation lawyer
640-230-5254
View Profile
Luis M. Avila
Pro
Luis M. Avila
5.0
29
Litigation lawyer

Free Consultation

855-646-2683
View Profile
Timothy G. Riley
Pro
Timothy G. Riley
5.0
1
Litigation lawyer
619-923-1551
View Profile
Gregg Spagnolia
Pro
Gregg Spagnolia
5.0
4
Litigation lawyer
619-317-1963
View Profile
Ward S. Clay
Pro
Ward S. Clay
4.3
2
Litigation lawyer
619-782-0217
View Profile

Email Charles Andrew Danaher

Case type is required.
A valid zip code is required.
A valid city is required.
State is required.
Country is required.
Outside the US or Canada?
Message is required.
0/1000 characters

Contact Information

First name is required.
Last name is required.
A valid email address is required.
A valid phone number is required.

By clicking the Submit button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls, from Lawyers.com and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.

Thank you! Your message has been successfully sent.

For your records, a copy of this email has been sent to

Summary of Your Message
Case Type:
Zip Code or Postal Code:
City:
State:
Country:
Case Description:
Contact Information
First Name:
Last Name:
Email:
Phone Number:
Return to Profile
Lawyers.com Client Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review Ratings™ display reviews submitted by individuals who have either hired or consulted the lawyers or law firms.

The Client Review Rating score is determined through the aggregation of validated responses. People who submit reviews are either individuals who consulted with the lawyer/law firm or who hired the lawyer/law firm and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be anyone who consults or hires a lawyer including in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners, and private individuals.

Martindale-Hubbell validates that a reviewer is a person with a valid email address. As part of the review process, respondents must affirm that they have had an initial consultation, are currently a client or have been a client of the lawyer or law firm identified, although Martindale-Hubbell cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship as it is often confidential. The content of the responses is entirely from reviewers.

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review. For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Client Review Ratings, please visit our Client Review Page

Martindale Peer Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Peer Review Ratings™ are the gold standard in attorney ratings, and have been for more than a century. These ratings indicate attorneys who are widely respected by their peers for their ethical standards and legal expertise in a specific area of practice.

The Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings process is the gold standard due to its objectivity and comprehensiveness. Lawyers solicited for peer reviews include both those selected by the attorney being reviewed and lawyers independently selected by Martindale-Hubbell. All reviewers are verified as attorneys through Martindale-Hubbell’s extensive attorney database. Only attorneys practicing at least three years and receiving a sufficient number of reviews from non-affiliated attorneys are eligible to receive a Rating.

What are the different Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings?*

• AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies that a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

• Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

• Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Lawyers who have received peer reviews after 2009 will display more detailed information, including practice areas, summary ratings, detailed numeric ratings and written feedback (if available). Details for individual reviews received before 2009 are not displayed.

Attorneys that receive reviews from their peers, but not a sufficient number to establish a Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Rating, will have those reviews display on our websites.

For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings™, please visit our Ratings Page on Martindale.com and our Frequently Asked Questions