×
Go back to Martindale-Avvo ➔

Procopio, Cory, Hargreaves & Savitch LLPAttorney
no photo

Alexandra Natalie Selfridge

Not yet reviewed

525 B Street, Suite 2200, San Diego, CA 92101

Appellate Law Services, Insurance Recovery, Litigation, Corporate and Commercial and 1 more

About Alexandra Natalie Selfridge

Alexandra Natalie Selfridge is a lawyer practicing appellate law services, insurance recovery, litigation, corporate and commercial and 1 other area of law. Alexandra received a degree from Institute of International and Comparative Law, Florence, Italy, and has been licensed for 20 years. Alexandra practices at Procopio, Cory, Hargreaves & Savitch LLP in San Diego, CA.

 

Alexandra Natalie Selfridge (San Diego, California)

Awards

AV Preeminent Peer Rated
This elite award is granted to attorneys who have been recognized by their peers for their very high ethical standards, with an average peer review score of 4.5 or higher.
Martindale-Hubbell Peer AV

Client Champion Awards

Client Champion awards recognize those attorneys who excel at service as affirmed by their clients. The awards, based on the quantity and quality of an attorney’s Martindale-Hubbell client reviews, demonstrate an ongoing commitment to delivering excellent client service. Award recipients stand out from their peers with a platinum, gold or silver icon.

Champion Badge Silver

At least three reviews and a score of 4.0 or higher.

Champion Badge Gold

At least six reviews and a score of 4.2 or higher.

Champion Badge Platinum

At least ten reviews and a score of 4.5 or higher.

Martindale Peer Awards

A lawyer who receives a minimum threshold of qualifying responses from fellow attorneys can qualify for one of three prestigious Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings:

Martindale-Hubbell Peer AV Preeminent Rating

AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

Alexandra Natalie Selfridge got this award in 2021

Martindale-Hubbell Peer Distinguished Rating

Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

Martindale-Hubbell Peer Notable Rating

Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Avvo Awards

Avvo Top Contributor

Avvo Top Contributor: The Avvo Top Contributor Award is granted to attorneys who have earned significant contribution points in a given year on our sister site, Avvo.com. Contribution points are earned by answering questions in Q&A, publishing Legal Guides, and other useful contributions to the Avvo community.

Avvo Client Choice

Avvo Client’s Choice: The Avvo Client's Choice Award Badge is granted to attorneys with a significant number of 4+ star reviews in a given year.

Reviews for Alexandra

This lawyer does not have any client reviews on Lawyers.com yet

Write a Review

Services

Areas of Law

  • Litigation
  • Other 3
    • Appellate Law Services
    • Insurance Recovery
    • Litigation, Corporate and Commercial

Practice Details

  • Firm Information
    Position
    Attorney
    Firm Name
    Procopio, Cory, Hargreaves & Savitch LLP
  • Representative Cases & Transactions
    Cases
    Representative Matters: Defended client against breach of an insurance contract claim arising out of a water loss. First chaired jury trial, which resulted in a unanimous defense verdict after a 28-minute deliberation.
    Co-chaired jury trial arising out of the sale of a business. Obtained a complete defense verdict for the sellers of the business,
    obtained a six-figure judgment against the buyers for breach of contract, including an award of contractual attorney fees. Successfully pierced the corporate veil of the LLC buyer.
    Co-chaired jury trial regarding breach of residential lease, negligence,
    breach of the implied warranty of habitability. Obtained substantial verdict for rent abatement damages on behalf of tenants, as well as an award of contractual attorney fees.
    Second-chaired jury trial regarding breach of insurance contract
    insurance bad faith. After plaintiff rested his case, the court granted partial motion for nonsuit regarding the bad faith cause of action. The jury then awarded minimal damages on breach of contract claim.
    Prevailed in arbitration arising out of a real estate dispute, resulting in return of earnest money to client, plus attorney fees.
    Authored
    argued a successful response to a consolidated appeal arising out of two separate insurance bad faith cases. Opinion available at 2009 Cal.App.Unpub. LEXIS 3117.
    Authored
    argued a successful response to an appeal from an order denying attorney fees. Opinion available at 2012 Cal.App.Unpub. LEXIS 3166.
    Authored
    argued a successful response to an appeal challenging the lower court's decision to apply the alter ego doctrine before the California Court of Appeal, Fourth District. Opinion available at 2014 Cal.App.Unpub. LEXIS 8768.
    Authored a successful motion to dismiss untimely appeal after prevailing by Motion for Summary Judgment in the underlying action. Opinion available at 2015 Cal.App.Unpub. LEXIS 1617.

Experience

  • Bar Admission & Memberships
    Admissions
    2006, California
    Memberships

    Community

    •Member of San Diego Defense Lawyers
    •Lawyers Club of San Diego
    •San Diego County Bar Association

  • Education & Certifications
    Other Education
    Institute of International and Comparative Law, Florence, Italy

    University of California, San Diego
    Class of 2002
    B.A.
    Political Science

    University of San Diego School of Law
    Class of 2006
    J.D.

Alexandra Natalie Selfridge

Attorney at Procopio, Cory, Hargreaves & Savitch LLP
Not yet reviewed

525 B Street, Suite 2200San Diego, CA 92101U.S.A.

Show on map

Lawyers Nearby

Cathleen Gilliland Fitch
Pro
Cathleen Gilliland Fitch
4.6
4
General Practice lawyer
619-727-6146
View Profile
Lena D. Wade
Pro
Lena D. Wade
4.9
11
General Practice lawyer
760-683-1719
View Profile
Garrett Anderson Smee
Pro
Garrett Anderson Smee
4.7
4
General Practice lawyer
858-321-8079
View Profile
James John Eischen, Jr
Pro
James John Eischen, Jr
4.1
2
General Practice lawyer
619-374-3518
View Profile
LaToya Shontae Redd
Pro
LaToya Shontae Redd
4.9
8
General Practice lawyer
858-466-0106
View Profile

Email Alexandra Natalie Selfridge

Case type is required.
I am is required.
First name is required.
Last name is required.
A valid zip code is required.
Country is required.
State is required.
A valid city is required.
A valid email address is required.
A valid phone number is required.
Message is required.
0/1000 characters

By clicking the Submit button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls, from Lawyers.com and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.

You should not send any sensitive or confidential information through this site. Emails sent through this site do not create an attorney-client relationship and may not be treated as privileged or confidential. The lawyer or law firm you are contacting is not required to, and may choose not to, accept you as a client. The internet is not necessarily secure and emails sent though this site could be intercepted or read by third parties.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA. See Google’s Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.

Thank you! Your message has been successfully sent.

For your records, a copy of this email has been sent to test@test.com.

Summary of Your Message
Case Type:
I am a/an:
First Name:
Last Name:
City:
Zip Code or Postal Code:
State:
Country:
Phone Number:
Message:
Return to Profile Reset Form
Lawyers.com Client Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review Ratings™ display reviews submitted by individuals who have either hired or consulted the lawyers or law firms.

The Client Review Rating score is determined through the aggregation of validated responses. People who submit reviews are either individuals who consulted with the lawyer/law firm or who hired the lawyer/law firm and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be anyone who consults or hires a lawyer including in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners, and private individuals.

Martindale-Hubbell validates that a reviewer is a person with a valid email address. As part of the review process, respondents must affirm that they have had an initial consultation, are currently a client or have been a client of the lawyer or law firm identified, although Martindale-Hubbell cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship as it is often confidential. The content of the responses is entirely from reviewers.

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review. For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Client Review Ratings, please visit our Client Review Page

Martindale Peer Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Peer Review Ratings™ are the gold standard in attorney ratings, and have been for more than a century. These ratings indicate attorneys who are widely respected by their peers for their ethical standards and legal expertise in a specific area of practice.

The Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings process is the gold standard due to its objectivity and comprehensiveness. Lawyers solicited for peer reviews include both those selected by the attorney being reviewed and lawyers independently selected by Martindale-Hubbell. All reviewers are verified as attorneys through Martindale-Hubbell’s extensive attorney database. Only attorneys practicing at least three years and receiving a sufficient number of reviews from non-affiliated attorneys are eligible to receive a Rating.

What are the different Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings?*

• AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies that a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

• Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

• Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Lawyers who have received peer reviews after 2009 will display more detailed information, including practice areas, summary ratings, detailed numeric ratings and written feedback (if available). Details for individual reviews received before 2009 are not displayed.

Attorneys that receive reviews from their peers, but not a sufficient number to establish a Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Rating, will have those reviews display on our websites.

For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings™, please visit our Ratings Page on Martindale.com and our Frequently Asked Questions