×
Go back to Martindale-Avvo ➔

Greenberg Traurig, LLPShare Holder
Will Wagner
Pro

Will Wagner

Not yet reviewed

1201 K Street, Suite 1100, Sacramento, CA 95814

Litigation, Proposition 65 & Green Chemistry, Food, Beverage & Agribusiness and 4 more

About Will Wagner

Will Wagner focuses his practice on consumer product defense and regulatory compliance. His practice centers on the defense of environmental consumer claims involving California’s unique Proposition 65 and consumer false advertising class actions. He defends companies in the personal care, fashion, food and beverage, and textile industries relating to substances of concern including heavy metals, microplastics, PFAS, titanium dioxide, and phthalates. Will also defends consumer product companies against deceptive advertising claims, including greenwashing, recyclability, nonfunctional slack-fill, structure/function claims, and ingredient content deficiencies.

Further, Will has broad experience navigating California and other states’ environmental laws and regulations that impact consumer product companies. This includes advising companies on the proliferation of PFAS prohibitions, recycling laws (such as Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR)), and other greenwashing advertising regulations. He also has experience with pertinent California agencies, including the Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA), Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC), Department of Public Health, California Air Resources Board (CARB), and the South Coast Air Quality Management District.

Will is also a registered lobbyist in California, focusing on legislation that impacts product companies.

Recognition & Leadership

Awards & Accolades

•Listed, The Best Lawyers in America, 'Ones to Watch,' 2026
•Administrative / Regulatory Law, 2026
•Environmental Law, 2026
•Listed, Chambers USA Guide, 'Up and Coming,' California - Environment, 2024-2025
•Listed, The Legal 500 United States
•Environment: Regulatory, 2025
•Dispute Resolution> Product Liability, Mass Tort and Class Action - Defense: Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices, 2025
•Environment: Litigation, 2020 and 2024

 

Will Wagner (Sacramento, California) View website

Reviews for Will

This lawyer does not have any client reviews on Lawyers.com yet

Write a Review

Services

Areas of Law

  • Litigation
  • Other 6
    • Proposition 65 & Green Chemistry
    • Food, Beverage & Agribusiness
    • Environmental
    • Complex Torts
    • Retail
    • Restaurant Industry

Practice Details

  • Firm Information
    Position
    Shareholder
    Firm Name
    Greenberg Traurig, LLP
  • Representative Cases & Transactions
    Cases
    Experience: Representative Matters: Many significant cosmetic companies, including Estee Lauder, Chanel, Shiseido,
    Unilever in a coordinated action in California under Proposition 65 relating to the use of titanium dioxide in powder cosmetics.
    Shiseido Americas Corporation in the Southern District of New York against allegations that bareMinerals products are falsely advertised because they contain PFAS. Case pending.
    Coty Inc. in PFAS false advertising cases in California
    Washington, D.C. that resulted in dismissals.
    Significant food companies in defense of claims that their products require a Proposition 65 warning for lead.
    L'Oreal USA in the first PFOA case involving cosmetics under Proposition 65. Case settled.
    Group of defendants that produce fiberglass products against allegations that their facilities must provide Proposition 65 warnings for styrene. Case settled.
    Bausch Health USA against claims that certain talc products required Proposition 65 warnings for heavy metal. Summary judgment granted in favor of client.
    Bausch Health USA against the claims that certain talc products were falsely advertised because they contained heavy metals
    asbestos under the CLRA
    UCL. Motion to dismiss granted for client.
    Subsidiary of the Men's Wearhouse against allegations that airline uniforms required warnings for formaldehyde (gas) under Proposition 65. Case settled.
    The above representations were h
    led by Mr. Wagner prior to his joining Greenberg Traurig, LLP.
    Previous Experience: Clerkship, Justice James W. Hardesty, Supreme Court of Nevada
    Internships: Legal Extern, Arizona Governor's Office
    Judicial Extern, Chief Judge Daniel P. Collins, U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Arizona
    Judicial Extern, Hon. David G. Campbell, U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona
  • Additional Links
    https://www.gtlaw.com/en/professionals/w/wagner-will

Experience

  • Bar Admission & Memberships
    Admissions
    California
    Nevada
    Arizona
    U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California
    U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California
    U.S. District Court for the Central District of California
    U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
    Memberships

    Professional & Community Involvement

    •Member, Law360 Editorial Advisory Board, California, 2025
    •Member, American Apparel and Footwear Association (AAFA)
    •Member, Personal Care Products Council (PCPC)
    •Member, State Bar of California
    •Member, State Bar of Nevada
    •Member, State Bar of Arizona

  • Education & Certifications
    Law School
    Arizona State University Sandra Day O'Connor College of Law
    Class of 2015
    J.D.
    cum laude; Editor-in-Chief, Jurimetrics: The Journal of Law, Science, and Technology
    Other Education
    University of Nevada
    Class of 2012
    B.A.

Email Will Wagner

Case type is required.
I am is required.
First name is required.
Last name is required.
A valid zip code is required.
Country is required.
State is required.
A valid city is required.
A valid email address is required.
A valid phone number is required.
Message is required.
0/1000 characters

By clicking the Submit button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls, from Lawyers.com and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.

You should not send any sensitive or confidential information through this site. Emails sent through this site do not create an attorney-client relationship and may not be treated as privileged or confidential. The lawyer or law firm you are contacting is not required to, and may choose not to, accept you as a client. The internet is not necessarily secure and emails sent though this site could be intercepted or read by third parties.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA. See Google’s Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.

Thank you! Your message has been successfully sent.

For your records, a copy of this email has been sent to test@test.com.

Summary of Your Message
Case Type:
I am a/an:
First Name:
Last Name:
City:
Zip Code or Postal Code:
State:
Country:
Phone Number:
Message:
Return to Profile Reset Form

Attorneys FAQs

  • Is this attorney admitted to practice in any U.S. Federal Courts?
    Will Wagner is admitted to practice before the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, United States District Court for the Central District of California, United States District Court for the Eastern District of California and United States District Court for the Northern District of California.
  • How many attorneys are in this law firm?
    Greenberg Traurig, LLP has 2750 attorneys at this location.
  • What law school did this attorney attend?
    Will Wagner attended Arizona State University Sandra Day O'Connor College of Law.

Attorney information displayed in this FAQ section is based upon information the lawyer has included on their profile, in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals.

These FAQs include information about a lawyer's background, but do not evaluate their knowledge of the law, past performance on individual cases, personality, or communication skills.

It is solely the responsibility of lawyers and law firms to ensure that any information they provide complies with all applicable laws and rules of professional conduct.

You should be aware that the information we rely upon may not be comprehensive, or frequently updated.

Always research the lawyer further to get a better understanding of their license credentials, disciplinary status, background, and experience.

Lawyers.com Client Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review Ratings™ display reviews submitted by individuals who have either hired or consulted the lawyers or law firms.

The Client Review Rating score is determined through the aggregation of validated responses. People who submit reviews are either individuals who consulted with the lawyer/law firm or who hired the lawyer/law firm and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be anyone who consults or hires a lawyer including in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners, and private individuals.

Martindale-Hubbell validates that a reviewer is a person with a valid email address. As part of the review process, respondents must affirm that they have had an initial consultation, are currently a client or have been a client of the lawyer or law firm identified, although Martindale-Hubbell cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship as it is often confidential. The content of the responses is entirely from reviewers.

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review. For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Client Review Ratings, please visit our Client Review Page

Martindale Peer Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Peer Review Ratings™ are the gold standard in attorney ratings, and have been for more than a century. These ratings indicate attorneys who are widely respected by their peers for their ethical standards and legal expertise in a specific area of practice.

The Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings process is the gold standard due to its objectivity and comprehensiveness. Lawyers solicited for peer reviews include both those selected by the attorney being reviewed and lawyers independently selected by Martindale-Hubbell. All reviewers are verified as attorneys through Martindale-Hubbell’s extensive attorney database. Only attorneys practicing at least three years and receiving a sufficient number of reviews from non-affiliated attorneys are eligible to receive a Rating.

What are the different Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings?*

• AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies that a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

• Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

• Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Lawyers who have received peer reviews after 2009 will display more detailed information, including practice areas, summary ratings, detailed numeric ratings and written feedback (if available). Details for individual reviews received before 2009 are not displayed.

Attorneys that receive reviews from their peers, but not a sufficient number to establish a Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Rating, will have those reviews display on our websites.

For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings™, please visit our Ratings Page on Martindale.com and our Frequently Asked Questions