About Robert J. Sullivan

Bob Sullivan is a senior litigator with significant trial and appellate experience. He focuses his practice on administrative, governmental, labor, and healthcare law. He has represented clients before state and local government agencies since 1967, having tried approximately 300 contested adjudicatory hearings under the California Administrative Procedure Act.

Bob represents lawyers, real estate brokers, doctors, contractors, and engineers, as well as most other professionals who are regulated by the state. He also counsels a variety of healthcare providers, including individual physicians, medical groups, ambulance companies, hospitals, and mental health clinics before state and federal agencies in the areas of malpractice suits, employment disputes, medical staff credentialing, licensing, and regulatory disputes. He also is experienced as an arbitrator in healthcare law disputes.

Bob has been recognized by San Francisco magazine (2004 – 2017) as one of the Northern California “Super Lawyers” in healthcare and is also AV Preeminent® Peer Review Rated by Martindale-Hubbell.

Cases

Skelly v. California State Personnel Board. As Chief Counsel of the California State Employees Association I represented Dr. Skelly in challenging the due process provisions of the State Civil Service Act. The California Supreme Court ruled in favor of Dr. Skelly holding that state civil service employees were entitled to a pre-termination due process hearing and held that the post-termination hearing provisions of the Civil Service Act was an unconstitutional deprivation of due process.

Barber v. State Personnel Board. As a companion case of Skelly v. State Personnel Board, the Supreme Court, following the Skelly decision, held that Mr. Barber was entitled to be paid until such time as he received a hearing on his appeal from termination of his employment.

Wood v. Superior Court. Board of Medical Quality Assurance issued administrative subpoenas for medical records pertaining to certain patients of two doctors who were suspected of prescribing medication under suspicious circumstances. The doctors refused to comply and the board sought judicial enforcement of the subpoenas. Court of Appeals granted a peremptory writ directing the trial court to set aside its judgments ordering compliance. The court held that “good cause” must be demonstrated before government can compel disclosure of medical records.

Menefee & Son v. Department of Food & Agriculture. Growers brought action against the Department of Food and Agriculture challenging seizure of crops because of illegal application of poison. Superior Court, Sacramento County entered judgment in favor of department, and growers appealed. The Court of Appeal reversed the decision, holding that the seizure and the statute authorizing it were unconstitutional.

Armistead v. California State Personnel Board. Former civil service employee filed petition for writ of mandate, seeking to compel State Personnel Board to set aside his resignation. Then Superior Court, Sacramento County dismissed petition, and employee appealed. The Supreme Court reversed the decision. This case defines underground regulations and its holding applies to all state agencies.

Antioch Park Medical Group v. Dept. of Health Services. Medical group successfully sued Department to invalidate an overpayment audit and finding of the department based solely on a statistical sample extrapolation. The court found the use of such a statistical method is unreliable and unauthorized by California law. The Department did not appeal and paid the plaintiff’s attorney fees and costs.

Vielehr v. State Personnel Board. Proceeding on petition for administrative mandamus to review decision of State Personnel Board discharging tax representative trainee in state Department of Human Resources Development. Superior Court, Fresno County denied petition and petitioner appealed. Court of Appeal held that petitioner’s conviction of possession of marijuana off the job, did not establish a sufficient probative nexus between the failure of good behavior of tax representative trainee in state Department of Human Resources Development and the finding of discredit to the agency or employment to justify disciplinary action. The decision was reversed and remanded.

Professional Experience / Clients

HealthCare Partners. A diverse group of physicians whose purpose is to contract with HMOs to provide medical services to clients of the HMO on a capitation basis. We do acquisitions, joint ventures, corporate structuring, employment issues, real estate leasing and litigation; we are currently assisting in securing a “limited” Knox-Keene license.

Healthcare Professional Licensure. Represented HMOs, hospitals, physicians, nurses and other healthcare professionals regarding professional licensing issues, e.g., application, suspension and revocation and reinstatement of licenses.

Plumbing Company. Represented a large plumbing company in central California, which was accused of taking advantage of elderly customers in plumbing jobs and charging them outrageous fees. The case received widespread publicity in both print and television. The charges were resolved with a citation and fine after a lengthy settlement conference where it was demonstrated that the fees charged were standard in the industry for the work outlined and that there was no unnecessary work proposed by the contractor. A citation and fine is not license discipline.

Electrical Contractor. Successfully negotiated a settlement with the Contractors State License Board of California for a statewide emergency electrical contractor accused of fraudulent advertising and performing unnecessary work. The company changed its advertising and its practices in how it performed job estimates and the company retained its license.

Pool Contractor. Represented a large pool contractor whose business failed leaving numerous homeowners with dry holes. The majority shareholders were unaware that the responsible managing employee of the company had looted it. We convinced the District Attorney that our client had been a victim of embezzlement and felony criminal charges were filed against the responsible managing employee and his wife. The corporate license of the pool company was surrendered, but other licenses of the majority shareholders, who were not involved in the management of the pool company, and whose companies operated distinctly separate from the pool company were preserved.

Speaking Engagements

Speaker, “Admissibility of Evidence of Retaliation or Discrimination,” California Society of Healthcare Attorneys’ Hearing Officer Update Program, Sacramento, CA, 11.07.2019

Speaker, “Show and Tell Time for the MBC: The Use of Demonstrative Evidence in Obtaining Favorable Settlements and Winning Cases,” California Academy of Attorneys for Healthcare Professionals 2018 Fall Conference, Manhattan Beach, CA, 09.30.2018

Speaker, “Evidence in the Hearing,” California Society for Healthcare Attorneys 2010 Fall Seminar & Hearing Officer Program, San Francisco, CA, 11.13.2010

Speaker, “Medical Board of California Enforcement Process,” Northern California Physicians Council (NORCAP) Educational Forum, San Francisco, CA, 12.02.2006

Speaker, “Clinical Dilemmas from the View Points of a Clinician and a Defense Attorney,” California Medical Association (CMA) Pain Management Conference, Anaheim, CA, 12.01.2006

Speaker, “Representation of Physicians Before the Medical Board of California,” Association of Defense Counsel of Northern California and Nevada, 09.13.2006

Speaker, “California Medical Association and California Medical Association Foundation’s Pain Management Conference,” Physicians’ Rights & Responsibilities Under California Law, 09.08.2006

Honors & Recognitions

AV Preeminent® Peer Review Rated by Martindale-Hubbell; Selected to the Northern California Super Lawyers list, 2004-2018

Member

California Society for Healthcare Attorneys; California Academy of Attorneys for Health Care Professionals; Sacramento County Bar Association

 

Awards

Reviews for Robert J.

This lawyer does not have any client reviews on Lawyers.com yet

Write a Review

Services

Areas of Law

  • Alternative Dispute Resolution
  • Other 3
    • Healthcare Law
    • Professional Licensing
    • Peer Review Litigation

Practice Details

  • Payment Information
    Payment & Cost Features
    Fixed hourly rates
    Accepted Credit Cards
    MasterCard
    Visa
  • Firm Information
    Position
    Of Counsel
    Firm Name
    Rothschild, Wishek & Sands LLP
  • Additional Links

Experience

  • Bar Admission & Memberships
    Admissions
    1967, California
    U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
    U.S. District Court, Eastern District of California
  • Education & Certifications
    Law School
    University of California, Los Angeles School of Law
    Class of 1966
    LL.B.
    Other Education
    Stanford University
    Class of 1963
    B.A.
  • Personal Details & History
    Age
    Born in 1940
    Asheville, North Carolina, October 8, 1940

Contact Robert J. Sullivan

Of Counsel at Rothschild, Wishek & Sands LLP
5.0
1 review

765 University AvenueSacramento, CA 95825-6748U.S.A.

Show on map
Office Hours:
  • Monday 08:00 AM - 05:00 PM
  • Tuesday 08:00 AM - 05:00 PM
  • Wednesday 08:00 AM - 05:00 PM
  • Thursday 08:00 AM - 05:00 PM
  • Friday 08:00 AM - 05:00 PM
Case type is required.
I am is required.
First name is required.
Last name is required.
A valid zip code is required.
Country is required.
State is required.
A valid city is required.
A valid email address is required.
A valid phone number is required.
Message is required.
0/1000 characters

By clicking the Submit button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls, from Lawyers.com and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.

You should not send any sensitive or confidential information through this site. Emails sent through this site do not create an attorney-client relationship and may not be treated as privileged or confidential. The lawyer or law firm you are contacting is not required to, and may choose not to, accept you as a client. The internet is not necessarily secure and emails sent though this site could be intercepted or read by third parties.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA. See Google’s Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.

Thank you! Your message has been successfully sent.

For your records, a copy of this email has been sent to test@test.com.

Summary of Your Message
Case Type:
I am a/an:
First Name:
Last Name:
City:
Zip Code or Postal Code:
State:
Country:
Phone Number:
Message:

Attorneys FAQs

  • Is this attorney admitted to practice in any U.S. Federal Courts?
    Robert J. Sullivan is admitted to practice before the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit and United States District Court for the Eastern District of California.
  • Is this attorney Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review rated?
    Yes, Robert J. Sullivan has a 5.0 Peer Rating from Martindale-Hubbell.
  • Does this attorney accept major credit cards?
    Yes, Robert J. Sullivan will accept Visa and MasterCard.
  • How many attorneys are in this law firm?
    Rothschild, Wishek & Sands LLP has 8 attorneys at this location.
  • What law school did this attorney attend?
    Robert J. Sullivan attended University of California, Los Angeles School of Law.