About Nataliana A. Guida

Nataliana (Talia) devotes her practice to medical malpractice litigation, defending the interests of physicians, dentists, nurses, hospitals, and other health care providers and institutions. She is experienced in all aspects of litigation, and brings hands on trial experience, including examining expert witnesses and presenting complex medical issues to juries. Talia also represents health care providers in licensing and disciplinary board matters. In addition to her litigation work, Talia advises clients on effective risk management strategies.

A strong advocate for her clients, Talia works closely with them to shape a defense strategy that reflects the unique aspects of each case and the outcome they hope to achieve.

Talia began her legal career as a law clerk to the Hon. Rachelle L. Harz, J.S.C. in the Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Bergen County, where she was involved in handling the Multi-County Litigation (mass tort) docket. She graduated from Quinnipiac University with a degree in Criminal Justice and received her juris doctor from New York Law School.

Honors & awards

New Jersey Super Lawyer Rising Star
2026

The Super Lawyers list is issued by Thomson Reuters. A description of the selection methodology can be found here . No aspect of this advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Year joined

2017

Results

unanimous verdict obtained in a medical malpractice matter in Bergen County, New Jersey

Health Care Liability
February 23, 2026

We received a unanimous defense verdict of behalf of our clients. The plaintiff was a seven-year-old girl who presented with a sacral aneurysmal bone cyst, an expansile, lytic lesion that destroyed sacral bone and was causing compression on her lower lumbar and sacral nerve roots. The plaintiff experienced the inability to control her bladder and bowel post-operatively, and had no sensation in her sex organs.

Defense Verdict Secured in a New Jersey Medical Malpractice Case

Health Care Liability
November 24, 2025

We secured a defense verdict on behalf of an oral surgeon in a medical malpractice matter. The plaintiff alleged that our client deviated from accepted standards of care when extracting four wisdom teeth resulting in permanent injury to the inferior alveolar nerve. The jury returned a unanimous verdict for the defense.

Thought Leadership

Marshall Dennehey Announces 2026 New Jersey Super Lawyers And Rising Stars

March 20, 2026
Eight attorneys from Marshall Dennehey’s Mount Laurel and Roseland, New Jersey offices have been selected to the 2026 edition of New Jersey Super Lawyers magazine.

Marshall Dennehey Announces 2026 Shareholder Class and Special Counsel Promotions

December 15, 2025
Marshall Dennehey is pleased to announce that 16 attorneys have been elected shareholders of the firm effective Jan. 1, 2026. Additionally, two attorneys have been promoted from associate to special counsel.

Need for competent physician testimony to establish proximate cause in nursing malpractice matters.

Roseland
Health Care Liability
Long-Term Care Liability
January 3, 2022
The plaintiff argued that her decedent developed pressure sores to her sacrum and heels at the defendant hospital, which worsened there, and later at nursing facilities, causing her pain and suffering and contributing to her death the following ye Case Law Alerts, 1st Quarter, Janu

Vicarious Liability-Do You Really Need an Affidavit of Merit?

Roseland
Health Care Liability
May 6, 2021

 

Reviews for Nataliana A.

This lawyer does not have any client reviews on Lawyers.com yet

Write a Review

Services

Areas of Law

  • Other 1
    • Health Care Liability

Practice Details

  • Firm Information
    Position
    Shareholder
    Firm Name
    Marshall Dennehey
  • Representative Cases & Transactions
    Cases
    Significant Representative Matters: Received a unanimous defense verdict of behalf of a neurosurgeon
    neurosurgical practice. The plaintiff presented with a sacral aneurysmal bone cyst that was causing compression on her lower lumbar
    sacral nerve roots. Post-surgery, the plaintiff's experts alleged that the lower sacral nerve roots were transected by the defendants during the surgery. The defendants (
    their experts) contended that the nerves were not transected, but instead were further injured by the necessary manipulation involved in removing the tumor - a recognized
    accepted potential complication of this type of surgery.
    Published Works: 'Vicarious Liability -- Do You Really Need an Affidavit of Merit?' New Jersey Law Journal, Medical Malpractice Supplement, May 6, 2021
    Case Law Alert, regular contributor, April 2019-present
    CLASSES/SEMINARS TAUGHT
    Coming to a Case Near You: AI in Medicine, Marshall Dennehey Trends in Health Care
    Health Law Seminar, May 9, 2024
  • Additional Links

Experience

  • Bar Admission & Memberships
    Admissions
    2017, New Jersey
    2017, U.S. District Court District of New Jersey
    Memberships

    Associations & memberships

    Bergen County Bar Association

    Justice Morris Pashman American Inns of Court, pupil, 2019-2022

    New Jersey State Bar Association

    Women Lawyers in Bergen, publicity co-chair, 2017

  • Education & Certifications
    Law School
    New York Law School
    Class of 2016
    J.D.
    Other Education
    Quinnipiac University
    Class of 2013
    B.A.
    cum laude

Activity

Legal Community Contributions

Case type is required.
I am is required.
First name is required.
Last name is required.
A valid zip code is required.
Country is required.
State is required.
A valid city is required.
A valid email address is required.
A valid phone number is required.
Message is required.
0/1000 characters

By clicking the Submit button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls, from Lawyers.com and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.

You should not send any sensitive or confidential information through this site. Emails sent through this site do not create an attorney-client relationship and may not be treated as privileged or confidential. The lawyer or law firm you are contacting is not required to, and may choose not to, accept you as a client. The internet is not necessarily secure and emails sent though this site could be intercepted or read by third parties.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA. See Google’s Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.

Thank you! Your message has been successfully sent.

For your records, a copy of this email has been sent to test@test.com.

Summary of Your Message
Case Type:
I am a/an:
First Name:
Last Name:
City:
Zip Code or Postal Code:
State:
Country:
Phone Number:
Message:

Attorneys FAQs

  • What year was this attorney first admitted to the bar?
    Nataliana A. Guida was admitted in 2017 to the State of New Jersey.
  • What law school did this attorney attend?
    Nataliana A. Guida attended New York Law School.