×
Go back to Martindale-Avvo ➔

Copeland Cook Taylor & Bush P.A.Partner
Rebecca S Blunden

Rebecca S Blunden

Not yet reviewed

1076 Highland Colony Parkway, P.O. Box 6020, Ridgeland, MS 39157

Contracts, General Practice, Insurance Bad Faith and 16 more

About Rebecca S Blunden

Rebecca S Blunden is a lawyer practicing contracts, general practice, insurance bad faith and 16 other areas of law. Rebecca received a B.A. degree from Cornell University in 1993, and has been licensed for 27 years. Rebecca practices at Copeland Cook Taylor & Bush P.A. in Ridgeland, MS.

Rebecca S Blunden (Ridgeland, Mississippi)

Awards

AV Preeminent Peer Rated
This elite award is granted to attorneys who have been recognized by their peers for their very high ethical standards, with an average peer review score of 4.5 or higher.
Martindale-Hubbell Peer AV

Client Champion Awards

Client Champion awards recognize those attorneys who excel at service as affirmed by their clients. The awards, based on the quantity and quality of an attorney’s Martindale-Hubbell client reviews, demonstrate an ongoing commitment to delivering excellent client service. Award recipients stand out from their peers with a platinum, gold or silver icon.

Champion Badge Silver

At least three reviews and a score of 4.0 or higher.

Champion Badge Gold

At least six reviews and a score of 4.2 or higher.

Champion Badge Platinum

At least ten reviews and a score of 4.5 or higher.

Martindale Peer Awards

A lawyer who receives a minimum threshold of qualifying responses from fellow attorneys can qualify for one of three prestigious Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings:

Martindale-Hubbell Peer AV Preeminent Rating

AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

Rebecca S Blunden got this award in 2021

Martindale-Hubbell Peer Distinguished Rating

Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

Martindale-Hubbell Peer Notable Rating

Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Avvo Awards

Avvo Top Contributor

Avvo Top Contributor: The Avvo Top Contributor Award is granted to attorneys who have earned significant contribution points in a given year on our sister site, Avvo.com. Contribution points are earned by answering questions in Q&A, publishing Legal Guides, and other useful contributions to the Avvo community.

Avvo Client Choice

Avvo Client’s Choice: The Avvo Client's Choice Award Badge is granted to attorneys with a significant number of 4+ star reviews in a given year.

Reviews for Rebecca

This lawyer does not have any client reviews on Lawyers.com yet

Write a Review

Services

Areas of Law

  • Contracts
  • General Practice
  • Insurance 4
    • Insurance Bad Faith
    • Property Insurance
    • Commercial Insurance
    • Automobile Insurance
  • Insurance Defense
  • Labor and Employment 5
    • Employment Contracts
    • Sexual Harassment
    • Wage and Hour Law
    • Whistleblower Litigation
    • Wrongful Termination
  • Litigation
  • Property Damage
  • Professional Liability 2
    • Accountants Liability
    • Directors and Officers Liability
  • Torts 1
    • Negligence
  • Other 2
    • Insurance Fraud
    • Business

Practice Details

  • Firm Information
    Position
    Partner
    Firm Name
    Copeland Cook Taylor & Bush P.A.
  • Representative Cases & Transactions
    Cases
    Representative Matters: McKenzie v. Southern Farm bureau Cas. Ins. Co., 3:06cv013-B-A, 2007 U. S. Dist. LEXIS 49133 (N.D. Miss. July 5, 2007). Involved dismissing insurance company client from filed class action on basis of the McCarran-Ferguson Act.
    Tital Indem. Co. v. Old South Ins. Group, 221 S.W.3d 703 (Tex. Ct. App. 2006) Involved setting aside default judgments entered against client insurance companies.
    Robinson v. Southern Farm Bureau Cas. Ins. Co., 915 So. 2d 516 (Miss. Ct. App. 2005)
    Frye v. Southern Farm Bureau Cas. Ins. Co., 915 So. 2d 486 (Miss. Ct. App. 2005)

    Banks v. Southern Farm Bureau Cas. Ins. Co., 912 So. 2d 1094 (Miss. Ct. App. 2005). Involved affirming summary judgment in all three appeals on behalf of client insurance companies, which were accused of fraudulently selling insurance.
    Titan Indem. v. Carroll V. Hood, 895 So. 2d 138 (Miss. 2004). Involved reversing
    rendering trial court judgment against client insurance company defendants, which were in a contractual dispute with a marketing representative.
    Noxubee County Sch. Dist. v. United Nat' l Ins. Co., 883 So. 2d 1159 (Miss. 2004). Involved affirming summary judgment in favor of client insurance company.
    Luedke v. Mississippi Windstorm Underwriting Ass' n., 874 So. 2d 1029 (Miss. Ct. App. 2004). Involved affirming summary judgment for client insurance association, which was sued for coverage after policy had expired.
    Trotter v. Federal Ins. Co., 865 So. 2d 411 (Miss. Ct. App. 2004). Involved affirming summary judgment for client insurance company, which was sued for bad faith denial of coverage in uninsured motorist case.
    Martin v. Flanagan, 818 So. 2d 1124 (Miss. 2002). Involved affirming summary judgment for client regarding l
    use.
    Stubbs v. Miss. Farm Bureau Cas. Ins. Co., 825 So. 2d 8 (Miss. 2002). Involved appeal concerning venue.
    Hoover v. United Servs. Auto. Ass' n, 125 So. 3d 636 (Miss. 2013). Involved appeal concerning jury verdict in Hurricane Katrina case.
    Miss. Windstorm Underwriting Ass' n v. Union Nat' l Fire Ins. Co., 86 So. 3d 216 (Miss. 2012). Involved administrative appeal from Insurance Commissioner.
    S
    oz, Inc. v. State (In re Miss. Medicaid Pharm. Average Wholesale Price Litig.), 2015 Miss. LEXIS 545 (Miss. Oct. 29, 2015). Involved affirming trial verdict for State of Mississippi.
    Lewallen v. Slawson, 822 So. 2d 236 (Miss. 2002). Involved summary judgment on workers' compensation issue.
    United States v. $ 2,350,000.00, 718 F. Supp. 2d 215 (Ct. 2010). Invovled civil forfeiture to assist insurance company in liquidation.

Experience

  • Bar Admission & Memberships
    Admissions
    1999, Mississippi
    1999, Mississippi State
    U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
    Memberships

    Associations

    •The Mississippi Bar
    •Charles Clark Inns of Court
    •Mississippi Defense Lawyers Association

  • Education & Certifications
    Law School
    University of Mississippi
    Class of 1999
    J.D.
    Other Education
    Cornell University
    Class of 1993
    B.A.
    English
  • Personal Details & History
    Age
    Born in 1970
    November 21, 1970

Rebecca S Blunden

Partner at Copeland Cook Taylor & Bush P.A.
Not yet reviewed

600 Concourse, Suite 2001076 Highland Colony ParkwayP.O. Box 6020Ridgeland, MS 39157U.S.A.

Show on map

Lawyers Nearby

Keith D. Obert
Pro
Keith D. Obert
4.8
38
Contracts lawyer

Free Consultation

601-612-8103
View Profile
Edward E. Lawler, Jr.
Pro
Edward E. Lawler, Jr.
4.9
3
Contracts lawyer

Free Consultation

601-524-2510
View Profile
Jon H Powell
Pro
Jon H Powell
4.3
16
Contracts lawyer
601-829-5690
View Profile
Lynn Patton Thompson
Pro
Lynn Patton Thompson
4.8
22
Contracts lawyer
601-519-0028
View Profile
Christopher Solop
Pro
Christopher Solop
4.9
5
Contracts lawyer
601-519-0028
View Profile

Email Rebecca S Blunden

Case type is required.
I am is required.
First name is required.
Last name is required.
A valid zip code is required.
Country is required.
State is required.
A valid city is required.
A valid email address is required.
A valid phone number is required.
Message is required.
0/1000 characters

By clicking the Submit button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls, from Lawyers.com and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.

You should not send any sensitive or confidential information through this site. Emails sent through this site do not create an attorney-client relationship and may not be treated as privileged or confidential. The lawyer or law firm you are contacting is not required to, and may choose not to, accept you as a client. The internet is not necessarily secure and emails sent though this site could be intercepted or read by third parties.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA. See Google’s Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.

Thank you! Your message has been successfully sent.

For your records, a copy of this email has been sent to test@test.com.

Summary of Your Message
Case Type:
I am a/an:
First Name:
Last Name:
City:
Zip Code or Postal Code:
State:
Country:
Phone Number:
Message:
Return to Profile Reset Form

Related Lawyers Near You

Lawyers.com Client Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review Ratings™ display reviews submitted by individuals who have either hired or consulted the lawyers or law firms.

The Client Review Rating score is determined through the aggregation of validated responses. People who submit reviews are either individuals who consulted with the lawyer/law firm or who hired the lawyer/law firm and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be anyone who consults or hires a lawyer including in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners, and private individuals.

Martindale-Hubbell validates that a reviewer is a person with a valid email address. As part of the review process, respondents must affirm that they have had an initial consultation, are currently a client or have been a client of the lawyer or law firm identified, although Martindale-Hubbell cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship as it is often confidential. The content of the responses is entirely from reviewers.

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review. For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Client Review Ratings, please visit our Client Review Page

Martindale Peer Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Peer Review Ratings™ are the gold standard in attorney ratings, and have been for more than a century. These ratings indicate attorneys who are widely respected by their peers for their ethical standards and legal expertise in a specific area of practice.

The Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings process is the gold standard due to its objectivity and comprehensiveness. Lawyers solicited for peer reviews include both those selected by the attorney being reviewed and lawyers independently selected by Martindale-Hubbell. All reviewers are verified as attorneys through Martindale-Hubbell’s extensive attorney database. Only attorneys practicing at least three years and receiving a sufficient number of reviews from non-affiliated attorneys are eligible to receive a Rating.

What are the different Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings?*

• AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies that a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

• Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

• Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Lawyers who have received peer reviews after 2009 will display more detailed information, including practice areas, summary ratings, detailed numeric ratings and written feedback (if available). Details for individual reviews received before 2009 are not displayed.

Attorneys that receive reviews from their peers, but not a sufficient number to establish a Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Rating, will have those reviews display on our websites.

For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings™, please visit our Ratings Page on Martindale.com and our Frequently Asked Questions