×
Go back to Martindale-Avvo ➔

Jensen & Leiberan, Attorneys at LawOwner
Ms. Margaret Haze Leiberan

Ms. Margaret Haze Leiberan

Not yet reviewed

10300 SW Greenburg Road, Suite 300, Portland, OR 97223

Appeals

About Ms. Margaret Haze Leiberan

Ms. Margaret Haze Leiberan is a lawyer practicing appeals. Margaret received a B.S. degree from University of Oregon in 1972, and has been licensed for 49 years. Margaret practices at Jensen & Leiberan, Attorneys at Law in Portland, OR.

Ms. Margaret Haze Leiberan (Portland, Oregon)

Awards

AV Preeminent Peer Rated
This elite award is granted to attorneys who have been recognized by their peers for their very high ethical standards, with an average peer review score of 4.5 or higher.
Martindale-Hubbell Peer AV

Client Champion Awards

Client Champion awards recognize those attorneys who excel at service as affirmed by their clients. The awards, based on the quantity and quality of an attorney’s Martindale-Hubbell client reviews, demonstrate an ongoing commitment to delivering excellent client service. Award recipients stand out from their peers with a platinum, gold or silver icon.

Champion Badge Silver

At least three reviews and a score of 4.0 or higher.

Champion Badge Gold

At least six reviews and a score of 4.2 or higher.

Champion Badge Platinum

At least ten reviews and a score of 4.5 or higher.

Martindale Peer Awards

A lawyer who receives a minimum threshold of qualifying responses from fellow attorneys can qualify for one of three prestigious Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings:

Martindale-Hubbell Peer AV Preeminent Rating

AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

Ms. Margaret Haze Leiberan got this award in 2021

Martindale-Hubbell Peer Distinguished Rating

Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

Martindale-Hubbell Peer Notable Rating

Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Avvo Awards

Avvo Top Contributor

Avvo Top Contributor: The Avvo Top Contributor Award is granted to attorneys who have earned significant contribution points in a given year on our sister site, Avvo.com. Contribution points are earned by answering questions in Q&A, publishing Legal Guides, and other useful contributions to the Avvo community.

Avvo Client Choice

Avvo Client’s Choice: The Avvo Client's Choice Award Badge is granted to attorneys with a significant number of 4+ star reviews in a given year.

Reviews for Margaret

This lawyer does not have any client reviews on Lawyers.com yet

Write a Review

Services

Areas of Law

  • Other 1
    • Appeals

Practice Details

  • Payment Information
    Payment & Cost Features
    Fixed hourly rates
    Fixed fees available
    Accepted Credit Cards
    American Express
    Discover
  • Firm Information
    Position
    Owner
    Firm Name
    Jensen & Leiberan, Attorneys at Law
  • Representative Cases & Transactions
    Cases
    Wilson v. Walluski Western Ltd., 226 Or App 155, 203 P3d 284 (2009)
    Jensen v. Bevard, 215 Or App 215, 168 P3d 1209, on reconsideration 225 Or App 309, 175 P3d 518 (2007)
    Roe v. Doe, 161 Or App 477, 984 P3d 344 (1999)
    Foster v. Gibbons, 177 Or App 45, 33 P3d 329 (2001)
    Connelly
    Connelly, 215 Or App 465, 169 P3d 1279 (2007)
    Olesberg
    Olesberg, 206 Or App 496, 136 P3d 1202 (2006)
    D&L Excavating
    Trucking v. Eden Gate, Inc., 208 Or App 98, 144 P3d 999 (2006)
    Muresan v. Philadephia Romanian Pentecostal Church, 154 Or App 465, 962 P2d 716 (1998)
    Owens Koenig
    Koenig, 194 Or App 573, 95 P3d 1152 (2004)
    Cat Champion Corporation v. Primrose, 210 Or App 206, 149 P3d 1276 (2006)
    Goddard v. Farmers Ins. Co., 177 Or App 621, 33 P3d 1075 (2001)
    Kim v. Park, 192 Or App 365, 86 P3d 631 (2004)
    Berry
    Berry, 196 Or App 296, 101 P3d 904 (2005)
    McArthur v. Paradis, 201 Or App 530, 120 P3d 904 (2005)
    Turudic v. Stephens
    Susan Estates Homeowners Association, 176 Or App 175, 31 P3d 465 (2001).

Experience

  • Bar Admission & Memberships
    Admissions
    1977, Oregon
    1979, U.S. District Court, District of Oregon
    1979, U.S. Court of Appeals, 9th Circuit
    1980, U.S. Supreme Court
    Memberships
    Multnomah County, Washington County and American Bar Associations
    Oregon State Bar (Member: Appellate Law Section
    Family Law Section).
  • Education & Certifications
    Law School
    Harvard Law School
    Class of 1976
    J.D.
    Other Education
    University of Oregon
    Class of 1972
    B.S.
    Political Science

Ms. Margaret Haze Leiberan

Owner at Jensen & Leiberan, Attorneys at Law
Not yet reviewed

One Lincoln Center, 10300 SW Greenburg Road, Suite 300Portland, OR 97223U.S.A.

Show on map

Lawyers Nearby

Eric D. Wilson
Pro
Eric D. Wilson
5.0
11
Appellate Practice lawyer
971-417-2308
View Profile
Per C. Olson
Pro
Per C. Olson
5.0
19
Appellate Practice lawyer
971-228-2852
View Profile
Navid David Shamloo
Pro
Navid David Shamloo
5.0
166
Appellate Practice lawyer
971-431-7059
View Profile
Andrew M Kohlmetz
Pro
Andrew M Kohlmetz
4.7
15
Appellate Practice lawyer

Free Consultation

503-987-3746
View Profile
Ryan E Scott
Pro
Ryan E Scott
5.0
34
Appellate Practice lawyer
971-449-0611
View Profile

Email Ms. Margaret Haze Leiberan

Case type is required.
I am is required.
First name is required.
Last name is required.
A valid zip code is required.
Country is required.
State is required.
A valid city is required.
A valid email address is required.
A valid phone number is required.
Message is required.
0/1000 characters

By clicking the Submit button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls, from Lawyers.com and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.

You should not send any sensitive or confidential information through this site. Emails sent through this site do not create an attorney-client relationship and may not be treated as privileged or confidential. The lawyer or law firm you are contacting is not required to, and may choose not to, accept you as a client. The internet is not necessarily secure and emails sent though this site could be intercepted or read by third parties.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA. See Google’s Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.

Thank you! Your message has been successfully sent.

For your records, a copy of this email has been sent to test@test.com.

Summary of Your Message
Case Type:
I am a/an:
First Name:
Last Name:
City:
Zip Code or Postal Code:
State:
Country:
Phone Number:
Message:
Return to Profile Reset Form
Lawyers.com Client Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review Ratings™ display reviews submitted by individuals who have either hired or consulted the lawyers or law firms.

The Client Review Rating score is determined through the aggregation of validated responses. People who submit reviews are either individuals who consulted with the lawyer/law firm or who hired the lawyer/law firm and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be anyone who consults or hires a lawyer including in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners, and private individuals.

Martindale-Hubbell validates that a reviewer is a person with a valid email address. As part of the review process, respondents must affirm that they have had an initial consultation, are currently a client or have been a client of the lawyer or law firm identified, although Martindale-Hubbell cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship as it is often confidential. The content of the responses is entirely from reviewers.

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review. For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Client Review Ratings, please visit our Client Review Page

Martindale Peer Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Peer Review Ratings™ are the gold standard in attorney ratings, and have been for more than a century. These ratings indicate attorneys who are widely respected by their peers for their ethical standards and legal expertise in a specific area of practice.

The Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings process is the gold standard due to its objectivity and comprehensiveness. Lawyers solicited for peer reviews include both those selected by the attorney being reviewed and lawyers independently selected by Martindale-Hubbell. All reviewers are verified as attorneys through Martindale-Hubbell’s extensive attorney database. Only attorneys practicing at least three years and receiving a sufficient number of reviews from non-affiliated attorneys are eligible to receive a Rating.

What are the different Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings?*

• AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies that a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

• Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

• Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Lawyers who have received peer reviews after 2009 will display more detailed information, including practice areas, summary ratings, detailed numeric ratings and written feedback (if available). Details for individual reviews received before 2009 are not displayed.

Attorneys that receive reviews from their peers, but not a sufficient number to establish a Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Rating, will have those reviews display on our websites.

For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings™, please visit our Ratings Page on Martindale.com and our Frequently Asked Questions