×
Go back to Martindale-Avvo ➔

Snell & Wilmer L.L.P.Partner
Jennifer R. Yee

Jennifer R. Yee

Not yet reviewed

One East Washington Street, Suite 2700, Phoenix, AZ 85004

Commercial Litigation, Coronavirus (COVID-19) Response Team, Employment Litigation and 5 more

About Jennifer R. Yee

Jennifer R. Yee is a lawyer practicing commercial litigation, coronavirus (covid-19) response team, employment litigation and 5 other areas of law. Jennifer received a B.A. degree from University of Arizona, and . Jennifer practices at Snell & Wilmer L.L.P. in Phoenix, AZ.

Jennifer R. Yee (Phoenix, Arizona)

Reviews for Jennifer

This lawyer does not have any client reviews on Lawyers.com yet

Write a Review

Services

Areas of Law

  • Commercial Litigation
  • Labor and Employment
  • Other 6
    • Coronavirus (COVID-19) Response Team
    • Employment Litigation
    • Internal Investigations, Workforce Counseling and Training
    • Labor Counseling and NLRB Practice
    • Restrictive Covenants and Trade Secrets
    • Wage and Hour Compliance and Litigation

Practice Details

  • Languages
    Spanish
  • Firm Information
    Position
    Partner
    Firm Name
    Snell & Wilmer L.L.P.
  • Representative Cases & Transactions
    Cases
    Representative Experience: Represented construction contractor, supply chain company,
    national retailer in subpoena enforcement actions
    discrimination, harassment,
    retaliation lawsuits brought by the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
    Represented national healthcare organization in wrongful termination
    discrimination lawsuit under the ADA
    FMLA, which culminated in two-week jury trial
    Represented international hospitality company in constructive discharge/wrongful termination lawsuit under the Arizona Employment Protection Act which culminated in a one-week jury trial
    Conducted internal investigations for start-up companies, financial institutions, healthcare organizations, retailers,
    non-profit organizations regarding allegations of misconduct by officers
    /or employees
    Represented construction contractors, a financial institution,
    an automobile parts company in putative class actions
    /or lawsuits by the U.S. Department of Labor alleging failure to pay wages under the Fair Labor St
    ards Act

Experience

  • Bar Admission & Memberships
    Admissions
    Arizona
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
    United States District Court, District of Arizona
    Supreme Court of Arizona
    Memberships

    Professional Memberships and Activities

    •American Bar Association, Section of Litigation
    •Employment & Labor Relations Law Committee
    •State Bar of Arizona, Labor & Employment Section
    •CLE Committee (2014-present)
    •Executive Council (2019-present)
    •Arizona Women Lawyers Association (AWLA)
    •Ladder Down Graduate (2018)
    •Ladder Down Alumni Facilitator (2019-present)
    •Snell & Wilmer Summer Associate Committee (2014-2016)
    •Snell & Wilmer Hiring Committee (2016-2022)
    •Snell & Wilmer Expanded Hiring Committee (2022-present)

  • Education & Certifications
    Law School
    University of Southern California Law School
    J.D.
    2012 Order of the Coif

    University of Southern California Law School
    J.D.
    Senior Notes Submissions Editor

    University of Southern California Law School
    J.D.
    Southern California Law Review
    Other Education
    University of Arizona
    B.A.
    Spain

    University of Arizona
    B.A.
    summa cum laude

    University of Arizona
    B.A.
    Political Science and Spanish Literature

    University of Arizona
    B.A.
    2009 Dean's List

    University of Arizona
    B.A.
    President's Academic Scholarship

    University of Arizona
    B.A.
    Universidad SEK

    University of Arizona
    B.A.
    Segovia

    University of Arizona
    B.A.
    Study Abroad Program

Email Jennifer R. Yee

Case type is required.
I am is required.
First name is required.
Last name is required.
A valid zip code is required.
Country is required.
State is required.
A valid city is required.
A valid email address is required.
A valid phone number is required.
Message is required.
0/1000 characters

By clicking the Submit button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls, from Lawyers.com and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.

You should not send any sensitive or confidential information through this site. Emails sent through this site do not create an attorney-client relationship and may not be treated as privileged or confidential. The lawyer or law firm you are contacting is not required to, and may choose not to, accept you as a client. The internet is not necessarily secure and emails sent though this site could be intercepted or read by third parties.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA. See Google’s Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.

Thank you! Your message has been successfully sent.

For your records, a copy of this email has been sent to test@test.com.

Summary of Your Message
Case Type:
I am a/an:
First Name:
Last Name:
City:
Zip Code or Postal Code:
State:
Country:
Phone Number:
Message:
Return to Profile Reset Form
Lawyers.com Client Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review Ratings™ display reviews submitted by individuals who have either hired or consulted the lawyers or law firms.

The Client Review Rating score is determined through the aggregation of validated responses. People who submit reviews are either individuals who consulted with the lawyer/law firm or who hired the lawyer/law firm and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be anyone who consults or hires a lawyer including in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners, and private individuals.

Martindale-Hubbell validates that a reviewer is a person with a valid email address. As part of the review process, respondents must affirm that they have had an initial consultation, are currently a client or have been a client of the lawyer or law firm identified, although Martindale-Hubbell cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship as it is often confidential. The content of the responses is entirely from reviewers.

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review. For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Client Review Ratings, please visit our Client Review Page

Martindale Peer Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Peer Review Ratings™ are the gold standard in attorney ratings, and have been for more than a century. These ratings indicate attorneys who are widely respected by their peers for their ethical standards and legal expertise in a specific area of practice.

The Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings process is the gold standard due to its objectivity and comprehensiveness. Lawyers solicited for peer reviews include both those selected by the attorney being reviewed and lawyers independently selected by Martindale-Hubbell. All reviewers are verified as attorneys through Martindale-Hubbell’s extensive attorney database. Only attorneys practicing at least three years and receiving a sufficient number of reviews from non-affiliated attorneys are eligible to receive a Rating.

What are the different Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings?*

• AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies that a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

• Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

• Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Lawyers who have received peer reviews after 2009 will display more detailed information, including practice areas, summary ratings, detailed numeric ratings and written feedback (if available). Details for individual reviews received before 2009 are not displayed.

Attorneys that receive reviews from their peers, but not a sufficient number to establish a Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Rating, will have those reviews display on our websites.

For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings™, please visit our Ratings Page on Martindale.com and our Frequently Asked Questions