Schnader Harrison Segal & Lewis LLPPartner

Deena Jo Schneider

About Deena Jo Schneider

Deena Jo Schneider is a lawyer practicing antitrust and trade regulation, appellate practice, e-commerce and technology and 4 other areas of law. Deena received a B.A. degree from Yale University in 1971, and has been licensed for 52 years. Deena practices at Schnader Harrison Segal & Lewis LLP in Philadelphia, PA.

Awards

Reviews for Deena

This lawyer does not have any client reviews on Lawyers.com yet

Write a Review

Services

Areas of Law

  • Antitrust and Trade Regulation
  • Appellate Practice
  • Litigation
  • Administrative Law
  • Other 3
    • E-Commerce and Technology
    • Labor and Employment Counseling
    • Labor and Employment Practices

Practice Details

  • Firm Information
    Position
    Partner
    Firm Name
    Schnader Harrison Segal & Lewis LLP
  • Representative Cases & Transactions
    Cases
    Representative Matters: Appellate Practice: Deena served as co-chair of Schnader's appellate practice for many years. Some of her notable appellate successes have involved: Bankruptcy: - defeated efforts to remove a Chapter 11 trustee based on alleged invasion of privacy
    to stay proceedings based on the former company owner's Fifth Amendment rights
    sustained remedies to prevent movement of assets offshore
    Charter Schools: - obtained review
    reversal of state diversion of school district funds to pay a charter school for students enrolled above enrollment caps in the school's charter
    Conflict of Interest: - successfully defended an AmLaw 10 law firm in recusal proceedings designed to derail restructuring of a major national insurance company
    Employment Discrimination: - won
    preserved on appeal summary judgment for a Fortune 50 employer charged with nationwide race discrimination in managers' promotion, pay,
    working conditions
    secured reversals of discrimination findings
    judgments for employers in bet-the-company age discrimination class actions involving pension
    severance plans
    in the first sex discrimination suit tried against a law firm
    ERISA: - established for the first time in the U.S. Supreme Court the scope of judicial review of a plan administrator's denial of benefits
    who is a plan participant
    Federal Procedure: - won the first ruling from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit that a judgment may be altered or amended based on legal error without a prior trial motion
    Information Disclosure: - procured the first U.S. Supreme Court rulings precluding release of television fire data collected by manufacturers
    being sought by public interest groups
    Privilege
    Recusal: - obtained m
    amus review
    orders prohibiting release of attorney-client privileged documents
    directing trial judge's recusal in tobacco litigation
    Public Financing: -defeated multiple challenges to municipal financing
    construction of a new professional football stadium
    baseball park in Philadelphia
    Taxation: - obtained rulings that local government efforts to tax receipts from business activities outside the jurisdiction are unconstitutional
    Trust Indentures: - won reversal of a judgment on defaulted notes based on failure to follow statutory requirements
    affirmance of the dismissal of a suit concerning the collateral for the notes based on lack of personal jurisdiction
    forum non conveniens
    Family Law: - established law in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit concerning child custody disputes under the Hague Convention
    defeated constitutional challenges to Pennsylvania's alimony pendente lite formula
    gr
    parent visitation statute
    Section 1983: - obtained the first rulings from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit permitting prison guard liability for failing to prevent unconstitutional acts by fellow officers
    prisoner claims for being held in administrative segregation in retaliation for filing civil rights actions
    for damages for violations of their religious freedom.
    Complex Litigation: Some of Deena's other major cases have involved: Breach of Fiduciary Duties
    ERISA: - won dismissal of nationwide class claims against a major mortgage reinsurer holding company stock in employees' retirement plan during the sub-prime crisis
    defended a mega-retailer's retirement plan fiduciaries in nationwide class action alleging failure to make adequate contributions to employees' accounts
    Class Actions: - limited a class based on counsel's communications to potential members
    obtained permission to appeal overlapping national opt-in
    state-law opt-out classes
    Collection of Judgments: - defended multiple proceedings to enforce hundreds of millions of dollars in judgments against a foreign manufacturing conglomerate
    Eminent Domain: - defended compensation paid by a major city for a large tract of l
    designated for redevelopment
    later taken for use as an airport employee parking lot
    Historic Preservation: - defended municipal protection of a privately owned glass mosaic mural, preventing its removal from its original location in a building under separate ownership
    Antitrust
    Trade Regulation: Deena counsels clients concerning antitrust best practices
    assists in developing overall strategies. She also advises on specific pricing
    distribution practices
    tying
    exclusive dealing arrangements
    market definition, analysis,
    allocations
    intellectual property administration

    joint ventures, mergers,
    acquisitions. Her major cases have involved: Robinson-Patman Act: - defense of a major publisher in a price
    promotional discrimination action, which concluded with a consent decree changing industry practices
    Unfair Competition: - defense of a national waste management company in a Sherman
    Lanham Act suit by a new market entrant
    of a software developer in a licensee's suit under the Sherman Act
    California antitrust
    unfair business practice laws
    Sherman Act: - defense of a major television network in long-running government litigation claiming anti-competitive practices, including negotiation of a consent decree setting new industry st
    ards
    later modification of the same in light of changing market conditions
    Regulatory Proceedings: - representation of clients in administrative rulemakings, inquiries,
    related appeals, including factual submissions
    economic analyses as well as briefs.
    Business, E-Commerce
    Technology Counseling: Deena has advised
    represented clients of all sizes
    types in multiple industries on issues ranging from governance, corporate conduct,
    general business practices to specific uses of IT systems
    the Internet, licensing,
    technology. Her matters in this area have involved: Best Practices: - preparation of corporate codes of conduct
    governance documents
    briefing of organizations, management,
    employees on fiduciary
    other duties
    Computers
    Records: - drafting of policies
    counseling on use of information services, e-mail, voicemail,
    records, including data retention
    destruction
    Internet Use: - preparation
    review of website privacy statements
    terms of use
    advertising
    other policy statements
    Contracts: - negotiation of agreements covering product
    technology development, distribution arrangements,
    licensing
    provision of consulting
    other services.

Experience

  • Bar Admission & Memberships
    Admissions
    1974, Pennsylvania
    Supreme Court of the United States
    U.S. Court of Appeals for the First, Third, Eighth and Ninth Circuits
    U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
    Memberships

    Professional Affiliations

    •American Bar Association, Judicial Division (Council 2019-20), Appellate Judges Conference (Executive Committee & Appellate Judges Education Institute Board 2019-20 & Education Committee 2019-present), & Council of Appellate Lawyers (Chair 2019-20
    Chair-Elect 2018-19
    Secretary 2017-18
    Executive Board 2011-15 & 2016-21
    Chair of Rules Committee 2014-17
    Chair of Membership Committee 2012-14
    Long Range Planning, Programming, Appellate Judges Education Institute Summit Planning, and Website & Social Media Committees)
    •American Bar Association, Antitrust Section: Co-Chair of Distribution and Franchising Committee 2017-present
    Vice Chair of Economics Committee 2014-17
    Vice Chair of Pricing Conduct Committee 2011-14
    Advisory Board of Pricing Conduct Committee 2009-11
    •American Bar Association, Litigation Section, Appellate Practice Committee
    •Bar Association of the Third Federal Circuit, founding member
    President 2021-22
    President-Elect 2020-21
    Treasurer 2017-18
    Board of Governors 2012-present
    Co-Chair of Rules Committee 2012-21
    Chair of Website Committee 2013-present
    •Pennsylvania Bar Association: Appellate Advocacy and Women in the Profession Committees
    •Philadelphia Bar Association: Appellate Courts, Federal Courts, and Women in the Profession Committees
    Women’s Initiative Task Force
    •Supreme Court Historical Society

  • Education & Certifications
    Law School
    Harvard Law School
    Class of 1974
    J.D.
    Other Education
    Yale University
    Class of 1971
    B.A.
    magna cum laude
  • Personal Details & History
    Age
    Born in 1950
    1950
Case type is required.
I am is required.
First name is required.
Last name is required.
A valid zip code is required.
Country is required.
State is required.
A valid city is required.
A valid email address is required.
A valid phone number is required.
Message is required.
0/1000 characters

By clicking the Submit button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls, from Lawyers.com and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.

You should not send any sensitive or confidential information through this site. Emails sent through this site do not create an attorney-client relationship and may not be treated as privileged or confidential. The lawyer or law firm you are contacting is not required to, and may choose not to, accept you as a client. The internet is not necessarily secure and emails sent though this site could be intercepted or read by third parties.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA. See Google’s Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.

Thank you! Your message has been successfully sent.

For your records, a copy of this email has been sent to test@test.com.

Summary of Your Message
Case Type:
I am a/an:
First Name:
Last Name:
City:
Zip Code or Postal Code:
State:
Country:
Phone Number:
Message: