×
Go back to Martindale-Avvo ➔

Schnader Harrison Segal & Lewis LLPPartner
Ms. Anne Elizabeth Kane

Ms. Anne Elizabeth Kane

Not yet reviewed

1600 Market Street, Suite 3600, Philadelphia, PA 19103

Financial Services Litigation, Internal Investigations, Ethics & Compliance, Labor and Employment Counseling and 7 more

About Ms. Anne Elizabeth Kane

Ms. Anne Elizabeth Kane is a lawyer practicing financial services litigation, internal investigations, ethics & compliance, labor and employment counseling and 7 other areas of law. Anne received a B.A. degree from University of Iowa in 1979, and has been licensed for 31 years. Anne practices at Schnader Harrison Segal & Lewis LLP in Philadelphia, PA.

Ms. Anne Elizabeth Kane (Philadelphia, Pennsylvania)

Reviews for Anne

This lawyer does not have any client reviews on Lawyers.com yet

Write a Review

Services

Areas of Law

  • Litigation
  • Labor and Employment 1
    • Discrimination
  • Other 8
    • Financial Services Litigation
    • Internal Investigations, Ethics & Compliance
    • Labor and Employment Counseling
    • Labor and Employment Practices
    • Privacy and Data Security
    • Construction
    • Higher Education
    • Parking

Practice Details

  • Languages
    French
  • Firm Information
    Position
    Partner
    Firm Name
    Schnader Harrison Segal & Lewis LLP
  • Representative Cases & Transactions
    Cases
    Representative Matters: Employment Counseling: Conduct independent workplace investigations involving discrimination/harassment claims, whistleblower allegations
    corporate misconduct.
    Advise employers regarding employee termination issues, including the review
    drafting of severance
    non-compete agreements.
    Advise employers regarding the drafting, implementing
    updating of human resources policies.
    Advise employers regarding affirmative action obligations, defenses to OFCCP jurisdiction
    OFCCP compliance issues.
    Conduct training for management employees on workplace discrimination, harassment
    privacy laws.
    Advise employers regarding privacy
    data breach laws.
    Draft
    negotiate executive employment agreements.
    Labor
    Employment Litigation: Successfully defended a financial institution in ERISA breach of fiduciary duty litigation.
    Litigated
    brought to a successful conclusion an employment discrimination lawsuit filed by a former employee of a major financial institution.
    Defended Pennsylvania state agency in PHRC proceedings involving allegations of sexual discrimination.
    Defended EEOC charges of discrimination under Title VII, the Americans with Disabilities Act
    the Age Discrimination in Employment Act for a variety of clients including financial institutions, health care organizations
    national retailers.
    Obtained dismissal on summary judgment of a federal wage
    hour class action lawsuit filed by the employees of a national security firm providing paramedic services in remote areas along the Alaska pipeline.
    Assisted employers in a variety of lawsuits involving the enforcement of non-compete
    confidentiality agreements.
    Successfully defended a sexual discrimination lawsuit against a national security firm.
    Commercial Litigation: Represented national railroad in an economic loss class action arising out of a train derailment where denial of class certification was obtained.
    Successfully defended a national railroad against multimillion dollar construction overrun
    delay claims arising out of the installation of fiber optic cable along railroad right-of-way.
    Defense of research hospital in trade secret dispute arising out of collaboration with third party scientists.
    Represented a national manufacturer in environmental insurance coverage litigation.
    Represented both condemnors
    condemnees in eminent domain litigation.
    Obtained a summary judgment, affirmed on appeal, in contractual dispute between former
    current property owners regarding allocation of $42 million environmental clean up
    insurance rights.
    Represented regional
    national parking operators
    management companies in eminent domain, lease,
    maintenance disputes.

Experience

  • Bar Admission & Memberships
    Admissions
    1995, Alaska
    1998, Pennsylvania
    U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
    U.S. District Court for the District of Alaska
    U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third and Ninth Circuits
    Memberships

    Professional Affiliations

    •American Bar Association, member
    •Alaska Bar Association, member
    •Philadelphia Bar Association, member
    •Pennsylvania Parking Association, member

  • Education & Certifications
    Law School
    University of California, Davis
    Class of 1991
    J.D.
    Other Education
    University of Iowa
    Class of 1979
    B.A.

    University of Iowa
    Class of 1984
    M.A.
  • Personal Details & History
    Age
    Born in 1957
    1957

Email Ms. Anne Elizabeth Kane

Case type is required.
I am is required.
First name is required.
Last name is required.
A valid zip code is required.
Country is required.
State is required.
A valid city is required.
A valid email address is required.
A valid phone number is required.
Message is required.
0/1000 characters

By clicking the Submit button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls, from Lawyers.com and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.

You should not send any sensitive or confidential information through this site. Emails sent through this site do not create an attorney-client relationship and may not be treated as privileged or confidential. The lawyer or law firm you are contacting is not required to, and may choose not to, accept you as a client. The internet is not necessarily secure and emails sent though this site could be intercepted or read by third parties.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA. See Google’s Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.

Thank you! Your message has been successfully sent.

For your records, a copy of this email has been sent to test@test.com.

Summary of Your Message
Case Type:
I am a/an:
First Name:
Last Name:
City:
Zip Code or Postal Code:
State:
Country:
Phone Number:
Message:
Return to Profile Reset Form
Lawyers.com Client Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review Ratings™ display reviews submitted by individuals who have either hired or consulted the lawyers or law firms.

The Client Review Rating score is determined through the aggregation of validated responses. People who submit reviews are either individuals who consulted with the lawyer/law firm or who hired the lawyer/law firm and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be anyone who consults or hires a lawyer including in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners, and private individuals.

Martindale-Hubbell validates that a reviewer is a person with a valid email address. As part of the review process, respondents must affirm that they have had an initial consultation, are currently a client or have been a client of the lawyer or law firm identified, although Martindale-Hubbell cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship as it is often confidential. The content of the responses is entirely from reviewers.

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review. For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Client Review Ratings, please visit our Client Review Page

Martindale Peer Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Peer Review Ratings™ are the gold standard in attorney ratings, and have been for more than a century. These ratings indicate attorneys who are widely respected by their peers for their ethical standards and legal expertise in a specific area of practice.

The Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings process is the gold standard due to its objectivity and comprehensiveness. Lawyers solicited for peer reviews include both those selected by the attorney being reviewed and lawyers independently selected by Martindale-Hubbell. All reviewers are verified as attorneys through Martindale-Hubbell’s extensive attorney database. Only attorneys practicing at least three years and receiving a sufficient number of reviews from non-affiliated attorneys are eligible to receive a Rating.

What are the different Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings?*

• AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies that a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

• Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

• Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Lawyers who have received peer reviews after 2009 will display more detailed information, including practice areas, summary ratings, detailed numeric ratings and written feedback (if available). Details for individual reviews received before 2009 are not displayed.

Attorneys that receive reviews from their peers, but not a sufficient number to establish a Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Rating, will have those reviews display on our websites.

For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings™, please visit our Ratings Page on Martindale.com and our Frequently Asked Questions