Duane Morris LLPPartner

Mr. Aleksander Jerzy Goranin

About Mr. Aleksander Jerzy Goranin

Mr. Aleksander Jerzy Goranin is a lawyer practicing patent litigation, trade secret litigation, copyright litigation and 4 other areas of law. Aleksander received a B.A. degree from University of Maryland in 1997, and has been licensed for 24 years. Aleksander practices at Duane Morris LLP in Philadelphia, PA.

Reviews for Aleksander

This lawyer does not have any client reviews on Lawyers.com yet

Write a Review

Services

Areas of Law

  • Intellectual Property
  • Other 6
    • Patent Litigation
    • Trade Secret Litigation
    • Copyright Litigation
    • Trademark, Trade Dress, and Unfair Competition Litigation
    • Computer Fraud & Abuse Act Litigation
    • Licensing

Practice Details

  • Firm Information
    Position
    Partner
    Firm Name
    Duane Morris LLP
  • Representative Cases & Transactions
    Cases
    Representative Matters: Obtained summary judgment on behalf of internationally recognized card payment
    financial services company dismissing multimillion dollar claim for software copyright infringement. See Micro Focus (US), Inc. et al. v. American Express Company, 1:15-cv-07438-PGG, Docket # 119, Southern District of New York, Sept. 30, 2017.
    Currently representing the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Department of Labor
    Industry in breach of contract
    fraud case against International Business Machines Corp. over failed enterprise software system implementation.
    Co-led successful defense of a biomedical device start-up company in parallel bet-the-company patent
    trade secret litigation in the District of New Jersey
    New Jersey Superior Court.
    Co-led successful defense of pharmaceutical consulting company in an $18 million dollar trade secret
    copyright case concerning incentive compensation reports used in the pharmaceutical industry, pending in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania.
    Successfully defended leading enterprise software company
    its decision-support software in a $40 million case involving a patent to object-oriented programming
    relational database technology, in the Southern District of New York. Following a favorable claim construction, the district court entered summary judgment of non-infringement,
    the Federal Circuit affirmed on appeal. See Microsoft Corp. v. DataTern, Inc., 1:11-cv-02365-KBF, Docket # 70, Southern District of New York, Mar. 5, 2012
    SAP AG
    Microsoft Corp. v. DataTern, Inc., 755 F.3d 899 (Fed. Cir. 2014).
    Successfully represented commercial insurance broker in a six-year copyright infringement case against a competitor, ultimately resulting in a $18.9 million jury verdict, affirmed through two appeals to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit. See The Graham Company v. Thomas P. Haughey
    USI MidAtlantic, Inc, 568 F.3d 425 (3d Cir. 2009)
    646 F.3d 138 (3d Cir. 2011).
    Successfully negotiated settlement
    redesign of a hotel br
    in a trade dress dispute over hotel lobby decor
    design.
    Defended leading enterprise software company in a five-patent case concerning machine learning
    artificial intelligence technology, filed in the Eastern District of Tennessee. Case successfully settled at an early stage.
    Co-led a five-patent investigation initiated by Microsoft against Barnes & Noble
    its Nook e-reader software platform before the U.S. International Trade Commission, resulting in successful settlement after a one-week bench trial. In the Matter of Certain H
    held Electronic Computing Devices, Related Software,
    Components Thereof, Inv. No. 337-TA-769 (2011-2012).
    Defended leading enterprise software company in a four-patent case concerning software development platforms
    decision-support software, filed in the Eastern District of Texas. Case successfully settled at an early stage.
    Successfully defended world-leading computer networking company in a patent infringement case concerning server caching technology, pending in the District of Delaware. Secured early dismissal with prejudice of all claims, with no monies paid to plaintiff.
    Successfully defended leading enterprise software company in a copyright infringement dispute involving multimillion claims over the use of sales training materials, in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. Case settled at the end of discovery on favorable terms.
    Successfully represented well-known online business directory on appeal of a copyright infringement verdict to the Eleventh Circuit, in which the appeals court favorably clarified the framework for calculating statutory damages under the Copyright Act. See Yellow Pages Photos, Inc. v. Ziplocal LP
    Yellow Pages Group, LLC, 795 F.3d 1255 (11th Cir. 2015).
    Represented leading beverage can manufacturer on multiple successful appeals to the Federal Circuit in cases involving patents on beverage container technology. See Crown Packaging v. Rexam Beverage Can, 559 F.3d 1308 (Fed. Cir. 2009)
    Crown Packaging v. Ball Metal Beverage, 635 F.3d 1373 (Fed. Cir. 2011).
    Defended medical device company
    tissue bank in a patent dispute over biologic tissues containing viable stem cells
    osteoprogenitor cells
    the case settled on favorable terms. NuVasive, Inc.
    Osiris Therapeutics, Inc. v. Orthofix International N.V., et al.
    Musculoskeletal Transplant Foundation, Civ. No. 10-01995 (2010-2011), District of New Jersey.
    Defended medical device company Synthes in a patent infringement dispute involving polyethylene-titanium surgical implants
    the case settled on favorable terms. Porex Surgical, Inc.
    Porex Corporation v. Synthes USA Sales, LLC
    Synthes, Inc., Civ. No. 10-00023 (2010), Northern District of Georgia.
    Represented biotechnology company Centocor in a patent infringement
    licensing dispute involving recombinant monoclonal antibody technology. Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc. v. Genentech, Inc.
    City of Hope National Medical Center, Civ. No. 08-03573 (2008-2009), Central District of California.
    Successfully defended medical device company Cordis Corporation in an arbitration involving a doctor's claims to intellectual property rights over cardiovascular medical device technology. Dr. Juan Carlos Parodi v. Cordis Corporation, No. 50 133 T 00108 06 (2007-2009), AAA International Centre for Dispute Resolution.
    Advised multiple start-ups on data acquisition, data usage,
    Computer Fraud
    Abuse Act issues.

Experience

  • Bar Admission & Memberships
    Admissions
    2004, Pennsylvania
    2004, New Jersey
    2002, District of Columbia
    Supreme Court of the United States
    U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
    U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
    U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia
    U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey
    U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
    U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas
    Memberships

    Professional Activities

    •Co-chair, Copyright Society's Pennsylvania Chapter
    •Adjunct Lecturer in Law, Villanova University School of Law - Trade Secrets Law

    •American Intellectual Property Law Association
    - Trade Secrets Subcommittee

  • Education & Certifications
    Law School
    University of Virginia School of Law
    Class of 2000
    J.D.
    2000 Managing Board

    University of Virginia School of Law
    Class of 2000
    J.D.
    Virginia Law Review

    University of Virginia School of Law
    Class of 2000
    J.D.
    Order of the Coif
    Other Education
    University of Maryland
    Class of 1997
    B.A.
    summa cum laude

    University of Virginia School of Law
    2000 Managing Board

    University of Virginia School of Law
    Virginia Law Review

    University of Virginia School of Law
    Order of the Coif
Case type is required.
I am is required.
First name is required.
Last name is required.
A valid zip code is required.
Country is required.
State is required.
A valid city is required.
A valid email address is required.
A valid phone number is required.
Message is required.
0/1000 characters

By clicking the Submit button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls, from Lawyers.com and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.

You should not send any sensitive or confidential information through this site. Emails sent through this site do not create an attorney-client relationship and may not be treated as privileged or confidential. The lawyer or law firm you are contacting is not required to, and may choose not to, accept you as a client. The internet is not necessarily secure and emails sent though this site could be intercepted or read by third parties.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA. See Google’s Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.

Thank you! Your message has been successfully sent.

For your records, a copy of this email has been sent to test@test.com.

Summary of Your Message
Case Type:
I am a/an:
First Name:
Last Name:
City:
Zip Code or Postal Code:
State:
Country:
Phone Number:
Message: