×
Go back to Martindale-Avvo ➔

Heyl, Royster, Voelker & Allen Professional CorporationAssociate
Tyler James Pratt

Tyler James Pratt

Not yet reviewed

300 Hamilton Boulevard, P.O. Box 6199, Peoria, IL 61601-6199

Cybersecurity and Data Privacy, Medical Malpractice Defense, Trucking and 8 more

About Tyler James Pratt

Tyler James Pratt is a lawyer practicing cybersecurity and data privacy, medical malpractice defense, trucking and 8 other areas of law. Tyler received a degree from University of St. Francis in 2007, and has been licensed for 16 years. Tyler practices at Heyl, Royster, Voelker & Allen Professional Corporation in Peoria, IL.

Tyler James Pratt (Peoria, Illinois)

Reviews for Tyler

This lawyer does not have any client reviews on Lawyers.com yet

Write a Review

Services

Areas of Law

  • Elder Law
  • Personal Injury
  • Professional Liability
  • Other 8
    • Cybersecurity and Data Privacy
    • Medical Malpractice Defense
    • Trucking
    • Business and Commercial Litigation
    • Professional Regulation/Licensure
    • Legal Malpractice Defense
    • Estate, Wealth and Succession Planning
    • Trusts and Probate

Practice Details

  • Firm Information
    Position
    Associate
    Firm Name
    Heyl, Royster, Voelker & Allen Professional Corporation
  • Representative Cases & Transactions
    Cases
    Significant Cases: Burch v. Earle M. Jorgenson v. Morton Welding: Circuit Court of Tazewell County, Illinois, Case No: 04 L 56 - Obtained summary judgment on the eve of trial for a welding company. Plaintiff suffered injuries during the unloading of a flat bed semi. Plaintiff had a career ending back injury, which resulted in three surgeries. After summary judgment was entered for our client, the case settled for $2.2 million.
    Illinois High School Association v. Illinois Attorney General: US District Court Northern District Illinois, Case Nos: 12 MR 151, 12 CV 1155, 12 CV 3758 - Successfully resolved litigation on behalf of the IHSA involving the rights of student athletes with disabilities in high school athletics. In a case of first impression, the Illinois Attorney General argued that student athletes with disabilities needed separate events
    modified qualifying times to earn points for their team
    have an equal opportunity to participate in high school athletics. The case was successfully resolved on behalf of the IHSA after 2.5 years of intense litigation, which focused upon the application
    scope of Titles 2
    3 of the Americans with Disabilities Act
    Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973.
    Likes v. GCH: - Circuit Court of Knox County, Illinois - Medical malpractice action alleging failure to timely diagnose
    treat cauda equina syndrome. Obtained summary judgement for defendant hospital.
    Marsh v. KCC: - Circuit Court of Knox County, Illinois - Medical malpractice action alleging failure to timely diagnose
    treat diabetes. Obtained summary judgement for defendant medical clinic
    defendant hospital.

Experience

  • Bar Admission & Memberships
    Admissions
    2010, Illinois
    State Courts of Illinois
    United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit
    United States District Court, Central District of Illinois
    United States District Court, Northern District of Illinois
    Memberships

    Professional Associations

    •Illinois Association of Defense Trial Counsel
    •Illinois Trucking Association
    •American Bar Association
    •Illinois State Bar Association
    •Champaign County Bar Association

  • Education & Certifications
    Law School
    Valparaiso University School of Law
    Class of 2010
    JD - Juris Doctor
    Other Education
    University of St. Francis
    Class of 2007
    Bachelor of Arts

    University of St. Francis
    Class of 2007
    History

    University of St. Francis
    Class of 2007
    Magna Cum Laude

Email Tyler James Pratt

Case type is required.
I am is required.
First name is required.
Last name is required.
A valid zip code is required.
Country is required.
State is required.
A valid city is required.
A valid email address is required.
A valid phone number is required.
Message is required.
0/1000 characters

By clicking the Submit button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls, from Lawyers.com and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.

You should not send any sensitive or confidential information through this site. Emails sent through this site do not create an attorney-client relationship and may not be treated as privileged or confidential. The lawyer or law firm you are contacting is not required to, and may choose not to, accept you as a client. The internet is not necessarily secure and emails sent though this site could be intercepted or read by third parties.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA. See Google’s Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.

Thank you! Your message has been successfully sent.

For your records, a copy of this email has been sent to test@test.com.

Summary of Your Message
Case Type:
I am a/an:
First Name:
Last Name:
City:
Zip Code or Postal Code:
State:
Country:
Phone Number:
Message:
Return to Profile Reset Form
Lawyers.com Client Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review Ratings™ display reviews submitted by individuals who have either hired or consulted the lawyers or law firms.

The Client Review Rating score is determined through the aggregation of validated responses. People who submit reviews are either individuals who consulted with the lawyer/law firm or who hired the lawyer/law firm and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be anyone who consults or hires a lawyer including in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners, and private individuals.

Martindale-Hubbell validates that a reviewer is a person with a valid email address. As part of the review process, respondents must affirm that they have had an initial consultation, are currently a client or have been a client of the lawyer or law firm identified, although Martindale-Hubbell cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship as it is often confidential. The content of the responses is entirely from reviewers.

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review. For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Client Review Ratings, please visit our Client Review Page

Martindale Peer Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Peer Review Ratings™ are the gold standard in attorney ratings, and have been for more than a century. These ratings indicate attorneys who are widely respected by their peers for their ethical standards and legal expertise in a specific area of practice.

The Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings process is the gold standard due to its objectivity and comprehensiveness. Lawyers solicited for peer reviews include both those selected by the attorney being reviewed and lawyers independently selected by Martindale-Hubbell. All reviewers are verified as attorneys through Martindale-Hubbell’s extensive attorney database. Only attorneys practicing at least three years and receiving a sufficient number of reviews from non-affiliated attorneys are eligible to receive a Rating.

What are the different Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings?*

• AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies that a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

• Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

• Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Lawyers who have received peer reviews after 2009 will display more detailed information, including practice areas, summary ratings, detailed numeric ratings and written feedback (if available). Details for individual reviews received before 2009 are not displayed.

Attorneys that receive reviews from their peers, but not a sufficient number to establish a Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Rating, will have those reviews display on our websites.

For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings™, please visit our Ratings Page on Martindale.com and our Frequently Asked Questions