×
Go back to Martindale-Avvo ➔

Smart & BiggarBarrister and Solicitor; Trademark Agent
Timothy O. Stevenson

Timothy O. Stevenson

Not yet reviewed

55 Metcalfe Street Suite 900, P.O. Box 2999 Station D, Ottawa, ON K1P 5Y6

Trademarks, Litigation, Domain Names & Internet Law and 3 more

About Timothy O. Stevenson

Timothy O. Stevenson is a lawyer practicing trademarks, litigation, domain names & internet law and 3 other areas of law. Timothy O. received a degree from University of Victoria in 2000, and has been licensed for 20 years. Timothy O. practices at Smart & Biggar in Ottawa, ON.

Timothy O. Stevenson (Ottawa, Ontario)

Reviews for Timothy O.

This lawyer does not have any client reviews on Lawyers.com yet

Write a Review

Services

Areas of Law

  • Intellectual Property 1
    • Trademarks
  • Litigation
  • Other 4
    • Domain Names & Internet Law
    • Copyright & Media
    • Industrial Designs
    • IP Management & Strategic Counselling

Practice Details

  • Firm Information
    Position
    Barrister and Solicitor; Trademark Agent
    Firm Name
    Smart & Biggar
  • Representative Cases & Transactions
    Cases
    Experience: PicMonkey International Limited
    PicMonkey LLC v Whois Privacy Services Inc, CDRP Dispute No 00337 - Successfully recovered the domain picmonkey.ca on behalf of the Complainant in a CIRA Domain Name Dispute Resolution Proceeding (CDRP).
    Ares Trading SA v Victor Vickl
    , 2017 TMOB 55 - Successfully represented the opponent Ares Trading S.A. in a trademark opposition proceeding in the field of medical computer software.
    Smart & Biggar v Adhoc Ventures Canada Inc, 2014 TMOB 259 - Successful cancellation for lack of use of a registration for the trademark INFINITI in association with golf equipment.
    Optrex Limited v Nameshield Inc, CIRA Case No. 00274 - Successfully obtained a transfer of the domain optrex.ca in a defended CIRA Domain Name Dispute Resolution Proceeding (CDRP).
    911979 Alberta Ltd
    Shoppers Drug Mart Inc v Hero Nutritionals Inc, 2014 TMOB 72 - Successfully represented the opponents 911979 Alberta Ltd.
    Shoppers Drug Mart Inc. in a trademark opposition proceeding involving the trademark Sliceoflife.
    dm-drogerie markt GmbH & Co KG v 911979 Alberta Ltd, 2014 TMOB 59 - Successfully represented the applicant in a trademark opposition matter involving the trademark BALEA.
    Cheah v McDonald's Corp, 2012 TMOB 138 aff'd 2013 FC 774 - Successful opposition on behalf of McDonald's Corporation to prevent registration of the trademark MACDIMSUM.
    JTI Macdonald TM Corp v Imperial Tobacco Products Ltd, 2012 TMOB 117 aff'd 2013 FC 608
    Rothmans, Benson & Hedges Inc v Imperial Tobacco Products Ltd, 2012 TMOB 226 aff'd 2014 FC 300, aff'd 2015 FCA 111 - Successfully represented the applicant for a single colour trademark as applied to particular packaging.
    Eli Lilly & Co v Apotex Inc, 2009 FC 991 - Successfully represented defendant by counterclaim, Shionogi & Co. Ltd., in this leading Canadian case on anti-trust claims relating to the use
    assignment of patent rights.

Experience

  • Bar Admission & Memberships
    Admissions
    2006, Ontario
    2008, Registered Trade-mark Agent
    Memberships

    Professional Involvement

    Memberships
    •Member, International Trademark Association
    member of the INTA Bulletin Committee
    •Associate, Intellectual Property Institute of Canada
    member of the Basicis of Law Course Committee
    •Member, Trademark Agent Examination Board

  • Education & Certifications
    Law School
    University of Victoria
    Class of 2005
    LL.B.
    Other Education
    University of Victoria
    Class of 2000
    B.Sc.

    University of Victoria
    Class of 2000
    Biochemistry

Timothy O. Stevenson

Barrister and Solicitor; Trademark Agent at Smart & Biggar
Not yet reviewed

55 Metcalfe Street Suite 900P.O. Box 2999 Station DOttawa, ON K1P 5Y6Canada

Show on map

Email Timothy O. Stevenson

Case type is required.
I am is required.
First name is required.
Last name is required.
A valid zip code is required.
Country is required.
State is required.
A valid city is required.
A valid email address is required.
A valid phone number is required.
Message is required.
0/1000 characters

By clicking the Submit button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls, from Lawyers.com and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.

You should not send any sensitive or confidential information through this site. Emails sent through this site do not create an attorney-client relationship and may not be treated as privileged or confidential. The lawyer or law firm you are contacting is not required to, and may choose not to, accept you as a client. The internet is not necessarily secure and emails sent though this site could be intercepted or read by third parties.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA. See Google’s Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.

Thank you! Your message has been successfully sent.

For your records, a copy of this email has been sent to test@test.com.

Summary of Your Message
Case Type:
I am a/an:
First Name:
Last Name:
City:
Zip Code or Postal Code:
State:
Country:
Phone Number:
Message:
Return to Profile Reset Form
Lawyers.com Client Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review Ratings™ display reviews submitted by individuals who have either hired or consulted the lawyers or law firms.

The Client Review Rating score is determined through the aggregation of validated responses. People who submit reviews are either individuals who consulted with the lawyer/law firm or who hired the lawyer/law firm and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be anyone who consults or hires a lawyer including in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners, and private individuals.

Martindale-Hubbell validates that a reviewer is a person with a valid email address. As part of the review process, respondents must affirm that they have had an initial consultation, are currently a client or have been a client of the lawyer or law firm identified, although Martindale-Hubbell cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship as it is often confidential. The content of the responses is entirely from reviewers.

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review. For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Client Review Ratings, please visit our Client Review Page

Martindale Peer Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Peer Review Ratings™ are the gold standard in attorney ratings, and have been for more than a century. These ratings indicate attorneys who are widely respected by their peers for their ethical standards and legal expertise in a specific area of practice.

The Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings process is the gold standard due to its objectivity and comprehensiveness. Lawyers solicited for peer reviews include both those selected by the attorney being reviewed and lawyers independently selected by Martindale-Hubbell. All reviewers are verified as attorneys through Martindale-Hubbell’s extensive attorney database. Only attorneys practicing at least three years and receiving a sufficient number of reviews from non-affiliated attorneys are eligible to receive a Rating.

What are the different Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings?*

• AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies that a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

• Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

• Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Lawyers who have received peer reviews after 2009 will display more detailed information, including practice areas, summary ratings, detailed numeric ratings and written feedback (if available). Details for individual reviews received before 2009 are not displayed.

Attorneys that receive reviews from their peers, but not a sufficient number to establish a Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Rating, will have those reviews display on our websites.

For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings™, please visit our Ratings Page on Martindale.com and our Frequently Asked Questions