×
Go back to Martindale-Avvo ➔
Office | Oakland, CA
Choose Office Branch
California

Bennett Johnson, LLP

5.0
2 reviews

1939 Harrison Street, Suite 200, Oakland, CA 94612, U.S.A.

Plaintiff’s Personal Injury, Medical Malpractice, Personal Injury and 119 more

MEET OUR TEAM

Member Richard Cross
Bennett
Meet all 3 Lawyers

About Bennett Johnson, LLP

Bennett Johnson, LLP is a law firm with an office in Oakland, CA. At this office location, there are 3 lawyers practicing plaintiff’s personal injury, medical malpractice, personal injury and 119 other areas of law.

Awards

Client Reviewed
This badge is granted to attorneys who have been reviewed by a past client.
Champion Badge Reviewed
AV Preeminent Peer Rated
This elite award is granted to attorneys who have been recognized by their peers for their very high ethical standards, with an average peer review score of 4.5 or higher.
Martindale-Hubbell Peer AV

Client Champion Awards

Client Champion awards recognize those attorneys who excel at service as affirmed by their clients. The awards, based on the quantity and quality of an attorney’s Martindale-Hubbell client reviews, demonstrate an ongoing commitment to delivering excellent client service. Award recipients stand out from their peers with a platinum, gold or silver icon.

Champion Badge Silver

At least three reviews and a score of 4.0 or higher.

Champion Badge Gold

At least six reviews and a score of 4.2 or higher.

Champion Badge Platinum

At least ten reviews and a score of 4.5 or higher.

Martindale Peer Awards

A lawyer who receives a minimum threshold of qualifying responses from fellow attorneys can qualify for one of three prestigious Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings:

Martindale-Hubbell Peer AV Preeminent Rating

AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

Bennett Johnson, LLP got this award in 2021

Martindale-Hubbell Peer Distinguished Rating

Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

Martindale-Hubbell Peer Notable Rating

Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Avvo Awards

Avvo Top Contributor

Avvo Top Contributor: The Avvo Top Contributor Award is granted to attorneys who have earned significant contribution points in a given year on our sister site, Avvo.com. Contribution points are earned by answering questions in Q&A, publishing Legal Guides, and other useful contributions to the Avvo community.

Avvo Client Choice

Avvo Client’s Choice: The Avvo Client's Choice Award Badge is granted to attorneys with a significant number of 4+ star reviews in a given year.

Reviews for Bennett Johnson, LLP

Have you consulted or hired this firm?

Leave a review about your experience with this firm.

Write a Review

Overall Rating
5.0
See All Reviews
2
Showing 1-2 of 2 client reviews from Lawyers.com
Lawyers.com Rating Snapshot
5 stars
100%
4 stars
0%
3 stars
0%
2 stars
0%
1 star
0%
What do people say on Lawyers.com?
Communication
5.0
Quality of Service
5.0
Responsiveness
5.0
Value for Money
5.0
Personal Injury
Posted by anonymous
November 17, 2021
Hired Law Firm

Explain from the 1st visit what our chance was to have a case. Said he needed to talk a ENT specialist and pull all medical records and then let us know whether he would take the case and make a decision if he thought our chances were good. He was very professional. Acquired all records. Always kept us informed of his findings. Very satisfied on all that he did for us.

 
Automobile Accidents
Posted by anonymous
November 08, 2021
Hired Law Firm

I hired William C. Johnson to represent me in a personal injury claim. My car had been rear-ended on the freeway at very high speeds which totaled the car and left me with neck and back injuries. My insurer, Nationwide, tried to impugn my description of the incident by scoffing at it. For several months in meetings, they insinuated that I had caused the accident on purpose! Mr. Johnson heatedly defended me against their insulting and improbable accusations, which went a long way towards mitigating the nightmarish situation. Finally a witness was found who had seen the whole thing, not that Nationwide didn't persist in its false allegations. But Mr. Johnson held firm and tough, and eventually the case was awarded a good settlement. Nationwide is NOT on your side, but William C. Johnson is!

 

Services

Areas of Law

  • Medical Malpractice 22
    • Birth Trauma
    • Chiropractors Malpractice
    • Cosmetic Surgery Malpractice
    • Failure to Diagnose
    • Medical Liability
    • Medical Malpractice Defense
    • Medical Negligence
    • Medical-Legal Law
    • Medication Errors
    • Nursing Liability
    • Nursing Malpractice
    • Nursing Negligence
    • Obstetric Malpractice
    • Orthopedic Malpractice
    • Pediatric Malpractice
    • Physicians Professional Liability
    • Podiatric Malpractice
    • Psychiatric Malpractice
    • Psychology Malpractice
    • Psychotherapy Law
    • Surgeons Liability
    • Wrong Site Surgery

  • Personal Injury 35
    • Animal Attacks
    • Aquatic Injuries
    • Automobile Accidents and Injuries
    • Automobile Negligence
    • Bicycle Accidents
    • Boating Accidents
    • Bodily Injury
    • Brain Injury
    • Bus Accidents
    • Carpal Tunnel Syndrome
    • Catastrophic Injury
    • Cumulative Trauma
    • Dog Bites
    • Electrical Injury
    • Head Injury
    • Motor Vehicle Accidents and Injuries
    • Motorcycle Accidents
    • Neurolaw
    • Personal Injury Arbitration
    • Personal Injury Mediation
    • Power Line Contact Injury
    • Psychological Injury
    • Repetitive Stress Injury
    • School Bus Accidents
    • Severe Burns
    • Sexual Abuse
    • Slip and Fall
    • Spinal Injury
    • Subway Accidents
    • Third Party Wrongful Death
    • TMJ Dysfunction
    • Tourist Injuries
    • Traumatic Brain Injury
    • Unintended Acceleration
    • Wrongful Death
  • Commercial Law 1
    • Commercial Vehicle Liability
  • Litigation 7
    • Electromagnetic Field Litigation
    • Rental Vehicle Litigation
    • Breast Implant Litigation
    • Diet Drug Litigation
    • Drug and Medical Device Litigation
    • Firearms Litigation
    • Tire Defect Litigation
  • Appellate Practice 1
    • Personal Injury Appeals
  • Airbag Injury
  • Products Liability 38
    • All Terrain Vehicle Products Liability
    • Automotive Crashworthiness
    • Automotive Design Liability
    • Automotive Products Liability
    • Automotive Restraints
    • Automotive Warranty Law
    • Bicycle Products Liability
    • Biomedical Products Liability
    • Breach of Warranty
    • Chemical Explosions
    • Chemical Products Liability
    • Drug Contamination
    • Elevator Liability
    • Engineering Products Liability
    • Escalator Liability
    • Explosions
    • Flammable Fabrics
    • Food Borne Disease
    • Food Products Liability
    • Gas Explosions
    • Heavy Equipment Products Liability
    • Industrial Products Liability
    • Manufacturers Liability
    • Motorcycle Products Liability
    • Office Equipment Products Liability
    • Product Defects
    • Product Failure
    • Product Recall
    • Product Safety
    • Product Warning Labels
    • Products Liability Arbitration
    • Products Liability Mediation
    • Propane Products Liability
    • Recreational Products Liability
    • Recreational Vehicle Products Liability
    • Tire/Rim Mismatch
    • Vehicle Rollovers
    • Warranty Law
  • Environmental Law 1
    • Environment Products Liability
  • Whiplash
  • Health Care 1
    • Mental Health Professionals Malpractice
  • Seat Belt Injury
  • Welding Rod Litigation 1
    • Welding Products Liability
  • Premises Liability 4
    • Inadequate Security
    • Negligent Security
    • Premises Security
    • Private Security Litigation
  • Other 4
    • Plaintiff’s Personal Injury
    • Heat Device Litigation
    • Gynecology malpractice
    • Pharmacist Liability

Bennett Johnson, LLP

5.0
2 reviews

1939 Harrison Street, Suite 200Oakland, CA 94612U.S.A.

Show on map

Email Bennett Johnson, LLP

Case type is required.
A valid zip code is required.
A valid city is required.
State is required.
Country is required.
Outside the US or Canada?
Message is required.
0/1000 characters

Contact Information

First name is required.
Last name is required.
A valid email address is required.
A valid phone number is required.

By clicking the Submit button, you agree to the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms and Privacy Policy. You also consent to be contacted at the phone number you provided, including by autodials, text messages and/or pre-recorded calls, from Lawyers.com and its affiliates and from or on behalf of attorneys you request or contact through this site. Consent is not a condition of purchase.

Thank you! Your message has been successfully sent.

For your records, a copy of this email has been sent to

Summary of Your Message
Case Type:
Zip Code or Postal Code:
City:
State:
Country:
Case Description:
Contact Information
First Name:
Last Name:
Email:
Phone Number:
Return to Profile
Lawyers.com Client Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Client Review Ratings™ display reviews submitted by individuals who have either hired or consulted the lawyers or law firms.

The Client Review Rating score is determined through the aggregation of validated responses. People who submit reviews are either individuals who consulted with the lawyer/law firm or who hired the lawyer/law firm and want to share their experience of that lawyer or law firm with other potential clients. Reviewers can be anyone who consults or hires a lawyer including in-house counsel, corporate executives, small business owners, and private individuals.

Martindale-Hubbell validates that a reviewer is a person with a valid email address. As part of the review process, respondents must affirm that they have had an initial consultation, are currently a client or have been a client of the lawyer or law firm identified, although Martindale-Hubbell cannot confirm the lawyer/client relationship as it is often confidential. The content of the responses is entirely from reviewers.

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome and Martindale-Hubbell accepts no responsibility for the content or accuracy of any review. For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Client Review Ratings, please visit our Client Review Page

Martindale Peer Reviews

Martindale-Hubbell® Peer Review Ratings™ are the gold standard in attorney ratings, and have been for more than a century. These ratings indicate attorneys who are widely respected by their peers for their ethical standards and legal expertise in a specific area of practice.

The Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings process is the gold standard due to its objectivity and comprehensiveness. Lawyers solicited for peer reviews include both those selected by the attorney being reviewed and lawyers independently selected by Martindale-Hubbell. All reviewers are verified as attorneys through Martindale-Hubbell’s extensive attorney database. Only attorneys practicing at least three years and receiving a sufficient number of reviews from non-affiliated attorneys are eligible to receive a Rating.

What are the different Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings?*

• AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This rating signifies that a large number of the lawyer’s peers rank him or her at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal knowledge, communication skills and ethical standards.

• Distinguished: An excellent rating for a lawyer with some experience. This rating indicates the attorney is widely respected by their peers for high professional achievement and ethical standards.

• Notable: This rating indicates that the lawyer has been recognized by a large number of their peers for strong ethical standards.

Lawyers who have received peer reviews after 2009 will display more detailed information, including practice areas, summary ratings, detailed numeric ratings and written feedback (if available). Details for individual reviews received before 2009 are not displayed.

Attorneys that receive reviews from their peers, but not a sufficient number to establish a Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Rating, will have those reviews display on our websites.

For more information on Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings™, please visit our Ratings Page on Martindale.com and our Frequently Asked Questions